U.S. Auto Market Slams on the Brakes as Inventory Surges to $150 Billion

Economic

Summary:

Despite strong claims about economic recovery, the U.S. auto sector is under pressure with over 3 million unsold vehicles worth roughly $150 billion sitting in dealer lots, signaling demand saturation, strategic missteps...

Record Inventory Reflects Post-Supply Chain Misalignment

The American automotive market, once defined by scarcity during the 2020–2023 semiconductor crisis, is now witnessing the opposite: a historic glut. As of late 2025, there are approximately 3.15 million unsold new vehicles stored across 13,000 dealerships in the United States an average of 260 unsold units per dealer. With an average sticker price of $48,978 per vehicle, this translates into over $12 million in inventory per location, not counting the additional financial burdens of insurance, maintenance, depreciation, and property taxes.

This inventory surplus valued at around $150 billion is the highest since 2024 and starkly contrasts with the post-pandemic rhetoric of booming economic recovery. While President Donald Trump continues to tout economic greatness, the auto industry’s internal indicators suggest growing strain, inefficiencies, and an impending correction.

Extended Days in Inventory: A Sign of Demand-Production Mismatch

The current average inventory turnover rate is 85 days, significantly above the pre-pandemic industry benchmark of 60 days. Brands like Stellantis are feeling the sharpest impact. Its Ram truck line has over 50,000 unsold units, with vehicles sitting on lots for an average of 128 days twice the industry average locking up more than $2 billion in value.

Luxury brands are in even worse shape. Jaguar’s inventory dwell time exceeds 150 days, while Lincoln hovers around 146 days. Such prolonged turnover times reflect both weak consumer demand and oversupply, a classic mismatch that typically precedes aggressive discounting cycles.

Strategic Overproduction: A Costly Oversight

Automakers’ decision to scale up production aggressively in 2024, after supply chains normalized, appears increasingly misaligned with real consumer demand. The move, while intended to regain lost ground after years of production bottlenecks, failed to account for shifting macroeconomic realities, higher interest rates, and evolving consumer preferences.

This outcome demonstrates a clear cause-and-effect relationship: the overestimation of post-COVID demand recovery directly led to surplus production, swelling inventories, and the current pricing pressure that is now squeezing both dealership profitability and manufacturer margins.

Toyota’s “Just-In-Time” Model Shields It From the Worst

Japanese automakers, particularly Toyota and its luxury brand Lexus, have weathered the storm more effectively. Their inventory cycles range from 31 to 36 days roughly one-fourth of Stellantis’s burden. This resilience is credited to Toyota’s lean manufacturing system and Kanban-based logistics, which emphasize production strictly aligned with real-time demand.

Toyota’s ability to avoid excess inventory isn’t merely operational; it reflects a philosophical difference in how production is forecasted and managed. Unlike the scale-oriented U.S. model, Toyota’s discipline in maintaining supply-chain efficiency has insulated it from the financial stress now facing competitors.

Dealers and Manufacturers Turn to Heavy Discounting

To offload stagnant inventory, automakers have reintroduced aggressive incentive programs. End-of-year discounts at Stellantis brands such as Ram and Jeep now exceed $5,000 per vehicle double the 2023 average. This trend marks a reversal from the post-pandemic era of low incentives and inflated prices, and underscores how quickly the balance of power is shifting back to consumers.

Such promotions signal a willingness to trade profit for volume. The strategy is clear: protect sales momentum and dealer relationships, even if it means compressing margins.

Buyers Regain Leverage in a Saturated Market

In this oversupplied environment, consumers now enjoy significant bargaining power. With ample vehicle options, reduced wait times, and fierce dealer competition, car buyers are in a favorable position to negotiate not only on price but also on financing, warranty packages, and trade-in terms. For shoppers, this is the most buyer-friendly U.S. auto market in nearly a decade.

The U.S. auto industry is entering a critical adjustment phase. With unsold inventory piling up to $150 billion, automakers face mounting storage costs, declining margins, and strategic rethinking. While consumers stand to benefit from price cuts and greater choice, the industry itself must confront the consequences of overproduction and sluggish demand. Unless supply aligns more realistically with evolving market behavior, further disruptions, restructuring, and price volatility may follow.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Combatting the “Super-Cheap” Invasion

On December 12, EU finance ministers unanimously agreed to introduce a €3 import tax per parcel on low-value goods entering the bloc, effective from July 1, 2026. This measure directly targets the explosive growth of ultra-cheap merchandise shipped to European consumers via cross-border e-commerce platforms such as Shein, Temu, and AliExpress. It follows the EU’s earlier decision to eliminate the longstanding import duty exemption for packages under €150, which had previously allowed many low-cost goods to enter the 27-member bloc untaxed.

This policy shift reflects a growing concern that the loophole has distorted the single market by enabling offshore retailers to undercut domestic businesses on both price and compliance. French Finance Minister Roland Lescure, whose country handled nearly 800 million such parcels in the past year, called the measure “a major victory” for the EU’s economic sovereignty, stressing its importance for consumer protection and fair competition.

Massive Parcel Volumes Prompt Urgent Action

In 2023, an estimated 4.6 billion small packages equating to over 145 parcels per second were shipped into the EU, with 91% originating from China. The volume is projected to increase in the coming years. The overwhelming scale of this trade and the opaque enforcement of product safety and taxation standards by foreign sellers have fueled political momentum for reform.

The newly approved €3 levy will serve as a temporary mechanism while the EU finalizes a more comprehensive and permanent taxation framework for low-value imports. In parallel, the European Commission has floated an additional €2 processing fee proposal, which is still under negotiation among member states and may be implemented by the end of 2026.

Economic and Competitive Implications

The import tax aims to restore a level playing field for European retailers who argue they are disadvantaged by platforms exploiting the current customs framework. Many of these online sellers are perceived to bypass strict EU regulations on safety, labeling, and environmental standards, giving them a cost advantage over EU-based competitors.

This policy introduces a direct causal lever: by standardizing taxation across all incoming parcels, regardless of value, the EU aims to neutralize pricing distortions caused by previous exemptions. It also sends a signal that digital trade must comply with the same fiscal and regulatory responsibilities as physical retail.

Geopolitical and Policy Dimensions

While the tax is framed in economic terms, its underlying motivations are also geopolitical. With the majority of parcels originating from China, this move is part of the EU’s broader strategy to assert regulatory control and reduce vulnerability to external trade dependencies. It aligns with wider efforts across Western economies to scrutinize Chinese e-commerce giants, enforce product compliance, and curb import-driven imbalances.

By framing the issue as one of fairness and sovereignty, EU policymakers are also seeking to manage domestic political pressures from small and medium-sized enterprises and labor constituencies impacted by price competition from foreign digital platforms.

Towards a Holistic Taxation Regime

The €3 per parcel tax is only a transitional step. EU institutions are actively developing a permanent digital customs and taxation regime aimed at addressing structural issues in cross-border e-commerce. The final framework is expected to integrate digital declaration systems, enhanced product traceability, and uniform VAT enforcement across all member states.

This reflects a broader regulatory pivot toward digital economy governance, where transparency, traceability, and tax neutrality are critical. The challenge will be balancing these enforcement objectives with the EU’s digital trade commitments under WTO frameworks and bilateral agreements.

The EU’s decision to implement a €3 import tax on low-value parcels marks a significant shift in trade policy, targeting a flood of low-cost goods that have disrupted local markets. By closing loopholes and asserting regulatory control, the bloc aims to defend its economic sovereignty and protect domestic businesses. As the global e-commerce landscape continues to evolve, this move may signal a broader realignment of digital trade governance across advanced economies.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Sub-Saharan Africa Emerges as the Next Growth Engine

According to the State of African Energy 2026 report by the African Energy Chamber, demand for natural gas in Africa is expected to rise by 60% by 2050. Although North Africa currently dominates with two-thirds of the continent’s production led by Algeria, Egypt, and Libya its share is projected to decline below 40% by 2035. In contrast, sub-Saharan Africa, which holds over 70% of the continent’s undeveloped reserves, is poised to lead future growth.

Countries such as Nigeria, Mozambique, Tanzania, Senegal, Mauritania, and Angola are accelerating development. Nigeria, having declared the “Decade of Gas” in 2021, leads commercial gas production in the region. New export projects, including Coral Sul (Mozambique), Greater Tortue (Senegal-Mauritania), and Congo LNG, have already expanded the continent’s export portfolio since 2022.

Export Strategy and Domestic Value Creation

Africa exported 34.7 million tonnes of LNG in 2024, with sub-Saharan countries contributing 26.9 million tonnes 60% to Asia and 25% to Europe. The report projects that sub-Saharan LNG supply could quadruple by 2050, especially with Tanzania entering the export market. The region’s proximity to both Atlantic and Indian Ocean markets positions it well to capitalize on spot price volatility and supply disruptions globally.

Crucially, many LNG export projects include Domestic Market Obligations (DMOs), requiring a portion of output to be allocated to local markets. This model allows rising exports to also boost domestic supply. Senegal, for instance, is targeting 3 GW of gas-powered electricity by 2050, leveraging DMO-supplied gas from its offshore LNG projects.

Domestically, natural gas is expected to support transportation, industrialization, and electricity generation. While only a few sub-Saharan countries currently have significant gas-fired power capacities, figures are steadily increasing. Nigeria leads with 12.6 GW, followed by Ghana (2.9 GW) and Mozambique (1.1 GW), while others like Tanzania, Senegal, and Côte d’Ivoire are also developing small-scale gas power facilities. Floating gas-fired plants are being deployed to meet coastal energy needs efficiently.

Economic Benefits and the Push for Industrial Diversification

The dual benefits of rising gas exports and increased domestic utilization could significantly transform sub-Saharan economies. Countries like Nigeria and Angola are using gas to reduce reliance on imported chemicals, fertilizers, and refined petroleum products. Angola’s new gas master plan aims to replace such imports with local production, while Nigeria’s National Gas Expansion Programme (NGEP) promotes compressed natural gas (CNG) for vehicles, launched in 2022.

Gas is also seen as a driver of industrial job creation. With growing interest in using gas for petrochemicals, metallurgy, and fertilizer production, the sector’s potential to stimulate employment and economic diversification is substantial. The emerging model emphasizes a “double dividend” boosting national revenue through exports while expanding energy access and industrial capacity at home.

Barriers to Realizing Africa’s Gas Potential

Despite abundant resources over 400 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas Africa remains underdeveloped in terms of gas production. Most discoveries have not yet entered commercial production. Major reserves in the Rovuma Basin (Mozambique/Tanzania) and the Niger Delta (Nigeria) remain largely untapped, placing Africa second globally after Russia in undeveloped gas assets.

The 2026 Outlook report identifies four core challenges:

Upstream Economics: Over half of current sub-Saharan production comes from associated gas, which is cheaper to extract. However, non-associated (dry) gas, though independent of oil prices and extraction cycles, requires competitive pricing (in $/MMBtu) to attract investment.

Market Access and Demand Certainty: To ensure steady offtake and price visibility, countries need long-term contracts with reliable buyers, transparent pricing models, and government-backed demand incentives to encourage both producers and consumers.

Infrastructure and Midstream Gaps: Many potential producers lack the pipeline, liquefaction, and distribution systems necessary to move gas efficiently from source to market. Without midstream integration, upstream production stalls.

Country Risk and Regulatory Stability: Attracting investment requires stable fiscal terms, fair taxation, and a regulatory framework that balances national revenue goals with investor returns. Political risk remains a key concern. Clear and reasonable DMO frameworks and localization requirements are critical for long-term viability.

Failure to address these interconnected factors has previously led international oil companies to abandon even high-potential gas discoveries.

Strategic Advantage in a Global LNG Glut

Interestingly, the global LNG market is currently in a phase of oversupply, which some African producers see as an opportunity rather than a threat. The African Energy Chamber views gas as a "transition fuel" cleaner than coal or oil, ideal for power generation and industrial heat applications, and increasingly affordable as global prices decline.

This positioning allows sub-Saharan producers to scale up flexible gas projects suited to floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), modular power plants, and domestic industrial hubs. The “infrastructure-demand paradox” where infrastructure lags behind potential demand can be solved with clear pricing, long-term contracts, and coordinated national policy.

Africa’s gas sector is at a critical turning point. With rising demand, vast reserves, and favorable export geography, especially in sub-Saharan countries, natural gas offers a rare chance to boost exports and strengthen domestic economies simultaneously. However, to unlock this potential, African governments must coordinate upstream incentives, midstream infrastructure, and downstream market access within a politically stable and investor-friendly environment. If successful, the continent could become a global energy player and power its own development trajectory for decades to come.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Diplomatic Recalibration During a Time of Rising Gold Prices

As global gold prices climb to historic highs, Italy has managed to defuse a potentially destabilizing conflict with the European Central Bank (ECB) over a controversial clause in its draft budget. The dispute centered on the ownership and management of Italy’s gold reserves the third largest in the world. The resolution, reached through behind-the-scenes negotiations, reassures markets about the independence of the Bank of Italy and maintains stability in the broader eurozone monetary architecture.

The controversy began with a clause supported by members of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s right-wing coalition, which described Italy’s national gold reserves as "belonging to the Italian people." Although symbolically nationalistic, this phrasing provoked sharp concerns within the ECB. The institution warned that such language risked undermining the principle of central bank independence a foundational element of the European Union’s financial governance structure.

The ECB’s stance stems from a strict legal framework prohibiting national central banks from being influenced or directed by member governments. This independence is crucial to preventing fiscal authorities from exerting pressure on monetary institutions, especially in contexts such as public financing or asset management.

Resolution through High-Level Diplomacy

The disagreement was addressed directly by Italy’s Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti and ECB President Christine Lagarde during a Eurogroup meeting in Brussels. Their dialogue led to a consensus on revised language for the draft budget that preserves the core principle of Bank of Italy's operational autonomy. Giorgetti emphasized that there were no intentions to shift the gold reserves off the central bank’s balance sheet or to indirectly circumvent EU rules banning direct monetary financing of governments.

In a letter sent to Lagarde ahead of the meeting, Giorgetti reaffirmed Italy’s commitment to EU treaties and clarified that the modified clause merely reaffirms the Bank of Italy’s responsibility to safeguard and manage the gold on behalf of the nation without implying a change in ownership structure or oversight.

Understanding the Scale and Significance of Italy’s Gold Reserves

Italy’s central bank currently holds approximately 2,452 metric tons of gold, positioning it as the third-largest gold holder globally after the United States and Germany. At prevailing prices of around 4,300 USD per ounce, these reserves are valued at over 300 billion USD, equating to nearly 13% of Italy’s GDP.

This substantial reserve base represents not only a store of national wealth but also a pillar of financial credibility. It offers strategic value, especially in turbulent economic environments where gold often functions as a safe-haven asset. As such, any suggestion of political interference in its management could have introduced volatility to Italian financial markets and raised red flags among international investors and EU partners.

Causal and Correlative Interpretations

The timing of this institutional friction is not coincidental but causally linked to the dramatic rise in gold prices. The increased public and political interest in the reserves amplified scrutiny over how they are referenced in official legislation. On the other hand, the correlation between gold price escalation and fears about central bank independence highlights how sensitive financial markets are to symbolic political narratives, even when they do not propose material policy changes.

The Italian government’s willingness to swiftly revise the contested clause indicates a deliberate effort to avoid unnecessary confrontation with the ECB at a time when the eurozone is still navigating significant macroeconomic uncertainty. Fiscal fragility, inflationary pressures, and political fragmentation within the bloc have made institutional stability more crucial than ever.

By reaffirming its adherence to EU governance norms and central bank independence, Rome has helped avoid a legal and political rift that could have had broader implications. This episode serves as a reminder of the delicate balance member states must maintain between national legislative autonomy and supranational regulatory coherence.

Italy’s handling of the gold clause dispute with the ECB reflects a pragmatic course correction at a sensitive financial juncture. While domestic political rhetoric sought to affirm sovereignty, the final outcome respects institutional boundaries critical to EU cohesion. As gold continues to soar, this episode underscores how even symbolic legislative language can carry significant weight in the intricate dance between national identity, central bank independence, and economic stability.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Conflicting Narratives After Claimed Ceasefire

Tensions between Cambodia and Thailand remain high as both governments accuse each other of ongoing military aggression along the border. These developments directly contradict a recent statement by U.S. President Donald Trump, who said the two Southeast Asian countries had agreed to stop hostilities and return to the terms of a peace agreement signed in Malaysia in late October.

Official statements released by Phnom Penh and Bangkok indicate that clashes have not only continued but intensified in several areas, raising doubts about the effectiveness and enforcement of any ceasefire understanding.

Cambodia Accuses Thailand of Air Strikes

On the morning of December 13, Cambodia’s Ministry of National Defense accused Thai forces of launching new attacks using F-16 fighter jets. According to the Cambodian side, airstrikes targeted locations in Pursat, Preah Vihear, Banteay Meanchey, and Oddar Meanchey provinces. Cambodian authorities described these actions as violations of sovereignty and security.

At the same time, the ministry rejected reports circulating in Thai media that Cambodia was preparing to deploy multiple rocket launch systems from Kampong Thom province to strike Thai targets. Cambodian officials labeled these claims inaccurate and called on Thailand to stop spreading what they described as false information.

The humanitarian impact has continued to worsen. Cambodia’s Ministry of Interior reported that by the afternoon of December 12, more than 300,000 civilians had been forced to evacuate from border areas due to ongoing fighting. This sharp rise in displacement reflects the direct link between sustained military activity and growing civilian hardship.

Thailand Reports Continued Attacks and Military Losses

Thailand has offered a sharply different account of events. Rear Admiral Surasant Kongsiri, spokesperson for the Thai Ministry of Defense, stated that Cambodian forces continued to launch heavy attacks along the border, particularly in Sa Kaeo province. Thai authorities confirmed that their military remained in an active defensive posture.

The Royal Thai Navy reported that it destroyed a Cambodian command center on the morning of December 12 as part of its operational response. Thailand’s Internal Security Operations Command also confirmed that one Thai soldier was killed by an explosive device during clashes at Hill 677 in Ubon Ratchathani province. This incident brought the total number of Thai military fatalities to ten since hostilities escalated.

These losses illustrate how continued engagements on the ground translate directly into rising military casualties, reinforcing the fragility of the security situation.

Disputed Casualty Figures and Escalating Claims

The Thai military estimates that approximately 165 Cambodian soldiers have been killed since the conflict intensified. However, Phnom Penh has not confirmed this figure, highlighting a significant gap between the two sides’ assessments of the battlefield situation. This discrepancy points to a broader information divide that complicates diplomatic efforts and fuels mutual distrust.

The persistence of fighting, combined with conflicting official statements, raises questions about the credibility of external mediation efforts and the durability of recent peace commitments. While international actors may view the Malaysia agreement as a framework for de-escalation, developments on the ground suggest that political agreements have not yet translated into reduced military engagement.

The situation also underscores a broader pattern in which unresolved border disputes, when combined with heightened military readiness and information warfare, increase the risk of prolonged instability. Without effective monitoring and mutual verification mechanisms, announcements of ceasefires remain vulnerable to rapid breakdown.

The renewed exchange of accusations between Cambodia and Thailand highlights a deteriorating security environment along their shared border. Continued reports of air strikes, ground clashes, military casualties, and mass civilian displacement show that the conflict remains active despite claims of diplomatic progress. Unless both sides align political commitments with tangible restraint on the ground, the risk of further escalation and humanitarian strain is likely to remain high.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Exports Drive a Reversal in China’s Growth Trajectory

On December 10, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) announced a slight yet symbolically important revision to its 2025 growth projection for China, raising it from 4.7% to 4.8%. This decision came on the back of stronger-than-expected trade data and the sustained deployment of fiscal stimulus. Notably, China’s trade surplus for the period January to November 2025 surpassed the $1 trillion mark for the first time, underscoring the strength of the country’s external sector despite geopolitical and trade tensions.

November’s export performance played a decisive role in the ADB’s revision. Customs data revealed that exports surged 5.9% year-over-year in November, completely reversing a 1.1% decline in October and exceeding the 3.8% gain forecast in a Reuters poll. This resurgence brought China’s monthly trade surplus to $111.68 billion the highest since June and well above October’s $90.07 billion and the market estimate of $100.2 billion.

Geographic Diversification Softens the Blow of U.S. Tariffs

Despite nearly a 30% year-on-year decline in shipments to the United States, Chinese manufacturers adapted swiftly, redirecting goods to alternative destinations. Exports to Europe rose by 14.8%, to Australia by 35.8%, and to Southeast Asia by 8.2%. This export realignment reflects a direct causal relationship: China’s diversification strategy has effectively counterbalanced losses from the U.S. market, a response to persistent tariffs imposed by the administration of President Donald Trump.

Economist Zichun Huang of Capital Economics remarked that even though the U.S.-China tariff truce did not yield immediate gains in American-bound shipments during October, aggregate export momentum returned. This observation underscores the resilience of China’s supply chain network and its ability to respond flexibly to shifting global demand dynamics.

Stimulus and Global AI Investment Add Further Tailwinds

Alongside trade, China continues to lean on familiar levers public spending and industrial policy to stimulate domestic economic activity. Fiscal stimulus remains a key pillar of the current recovery strategy, and global investment trends in artificial intelligence have offered an unexpected boost by enhancing external demand for China’s tech-related exports.

Macquarie Group analysts, led by Larry Hu, pointed out that external demand could outperform expectations, thanks to a combination of faster global growth and China’s unmatched manufacturing capacity. The analysts dubbed exports “the biggest surprise” of 2025 and forecast average export growth of around 1% for 2026. Their analysis highlights a correlation between global AI-related investment booms and China’s export revival, suggesting a feedback loop that could support medium-term growth.

Structural Limitations Still Loom Despite Short-Term Gains

Although export recovery and fiscal support are stabilizing near-term growth, doubts remain about their long-term sustainability. The traditional dual-engine strategy export expansion and infrastructure investment is increasingly seen as delivering diminishing returns. This creates uncertainty around China’s ability to maintain growth without more profound structural reforms, especially in domestic consumption and the private sector.

Moreover, while the export data marks a welcome surprise, the marginal increase in the ADB’s 2025 forecast from 4.7% to 4.8% indicates continued caution about the pace and breadth of recovery. The ADB’s projection for 2026 remains unchanged at 4.3%, reflecting concerns about cyclical momentum tapering off and external demand plateauing.

Wider Regional Strength Reinforces Positive Momentum

ADB’s latest Asian Development Outlook also reflects optimism beyond China. Developing economies in the Asia-Pacific region are now expected to grow by 5.1% in 2025, up from the previous forecast of 4.8% in September. According to Chief Economist Albert Park, this revision is underpinned by solid macroeconomic fundamentals across Asia, particularly strong export performance and stable policy environments. This regional context provides additional support to China's recovery by reinforcing demand along supply chains and sustaining trade linkages.

China’s better-than-expected export performance in late 2025 has reinvigorated growth forecasts and helped restore some investor confidence. The shift in trade partners, combined with fiscal stimulus and global AI demand, forms a triad of support for the economy as it seeks to rebound from earlier sluggishness. While these developments have driven a modest upgrade in China’s outlook, structural inefficiencies and global uncertainties continue to cloud the medium-term trajectory. The resilience of China’s manufacturing and trade network remains its greatest strength, but diversification of growth drivers beyond state-led stimulus and external demand will be essential for sustained long-term prosperity.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Largest Stimulus Since 2022 to Counter Mounting Economic Headwinds

On December 11, Japan’s Lower House passed a supplementary budget amounting to ¥18.3 trillion for the current fiscal year ending March 2026. This is the most substantial mid-year fiscal package since 2022, designed to reinvigorate the Japanese economy amid declining household spending, rising bankruptcy cases, and weakening exports. The upper house is expected to pass the bill in the following week, thanks in part to backing from opposition parties such as the Democratic Party for the People.

Over 60% of the package will be financed through the issuance of ¥11.7 trillion in new government bonds. The government’s intent is to soften the cost-of-living blow to consumers, stimulate investment in key sectors, and accelerate defense spending to reach 2% of GDP earlier than scheduled.

Targeted Relief for Households and Strategic Sectors

The fiscal plan outlines subsidies for electricity and gas during the first quarter of 2026 and cash handouts for families with children. These interventions reflect a clear causal strategy: immediate relief measures are expected to sustain short-term consumption and mitigate social dissatisfaction, which is particularly acute as real household spending continues to fall.

Furthermore, the budget promotes long-term industrial resilience through investment in semiconductor manufacturing and shipbuilding sectors seen as strategically vital for Japan’s industrial renewal and security.

Defense Spending Frontloaded to Meet Ambitious Goals

Notably, the package also includes allocations to advance Japan’s defense posture. The government plans to achieve its 2% of GDP defense spending target by the end of this year, two years ahead of schedule. This reflects not only heightened geopolitical concerns but also the use of fiscal stimulus to meet broader national security objectives.

Despite the planned fiscal injection, structural vulnerabilities persist. Data from Tokyo Shoko Research revealed that corporate bankruptcies between January and November 2025 totaled 9,372 cases, putting Japan on track to exceed 10,000 cases annually for the second consecutive year. Although the number of bankruptcies in November dropped 7.5% year-on-year, this improvement was driven mainly by a decline in high-debt defaults, not by a broad recovery in business conditions.

The service sector remained the most affected, with 250 bankruptcies in November alone. These failures are largely attributed to surging costs and labor shortages, demonstrating a direct causal relationship between inflation and SME financial fragility.

Household Spending and Inflationary Pressures

In October 2025, real household spending dropped by 3% year-on-year the first such decline in six months. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, average household expenditure fell to ¥306,872 ($2,000), as spending on cars and food plummeted due to rising prices. The inflationary environment is thus exerting a suppressive effect on domestic demand, with private consumption, which constitutes over half of GDP, rising just 0.1% in Q3, down from 0.4% in Q2.

Simultaneously, a report by Teikoku DataBank showed that over 20,600 food and beverage products increased in price during 2025, surpassing the 20,000-item threshold for the first time in two years. This represents a 64.6% surge over 2024, driven by rising raw material and logistics costs. The inability of firms to absorb these increases internally has led to widespread price hikes, exacerbating consumer restraint.

Exports and Housing Investment Weigh on Q3 Output

The Japanese economy contracted by 1.8% year-on-year in Q3 2025, marking the first decline in six quarters. The drop was less severe than the Reuters consensus forecast of -2.5% but still reflects significant underlying weaknesses. On a quarterly basis, GDP fell 0.4%, driven primarily by declining exports particularly from automakers due to higher U.S. tariffs. Automakers absorbed most of the added tax burden by lowering export prices, yet demand still faltered.

Additionally, housing investment slowed due to stricter energy-efficiency regulations implemented in April. These constraints on residential construction exerted further downward pressure on output, reinforcing the idea that regulatory changes can act as a brake on short-term economic momentum.

Expectations for a Modest Rebound in Q4

Despite the challenges, private-sector analysts remain cautiously optimistic. A survey conducted by the Japan Center for Economic Research among 37 economists projected a 0.6% GDP expansion in Q4 2025. This anticipated recovery hinges on the timely execution of the supplementary budget, stabilization in global trade dynamics, and a moderation in consumer inflation.

Japan’s ¥18.3 trillion stimulus plan reflects both urgency and ambition. As inflation erodes purchasing power and corporate bankruptcies remain high, the government is seeking to reboot growth through fiscal expansion, targeted subsidies, and industrial investment. While the Q3 contraction was less severe than feared, persistent structural issues such as weak consumption, inflation, and trade friction continue to weigh heavily. The effectiveness of this "economic doping" will depend on execution speed and policy coherence in the months ahead. If the stimulus succeeds in stabilizing demand and mitigating inflationary fatigue, Japan may yet regain its growth trajectory by the close of fiscal 2025.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites