Trump’s Nuclear Fuel Revival: Repurposing Cold War Plutonium Sparks Safety Debate

Economic

Summary:

Donald Trump’s administration is drafting a plan to convert 20 tons of Cold War-era weapons-grade plutonium into reactor fuel to meet surging U.S. energy demand...

Repurposing Plutonium: From Warheads to Reactors

The Trump administration is preparing to revive a controversial nuclear fuel strategy by repurposing approximately 20 tons of weapons-grade plutonium originally pledged for disposal under a 2000 arms control treaty with Russia into reactor fuel. This initiative, disclosed by Reuters and under evaluation by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), marks a shift in nuclear material strategy to support domestic energy needs.

The plan would draw on material from the 34-ton plutonium stockpile the United States previously committed to destroy. These warhead remnants, stored under tight security at sites like Savannah River (South Carolina), Pantex (Texas), and Los Alamos (New Mexico), are now being reconsidered not as waste, but as a potential fuel source for next-generation reactors.

Energy Demands Driven by AI and Digital Infrastructure

This nuclear pivot is framed by rising national electricity consumption, which has increased for the first time in two decades. The growth is largely attributed to the energy-intensive demands of expanding data centers driven by artificial intelligence development and digital infrastructure.

Trump’s executive order issued in May 2025 called for advanced nuclear fuel technologies, including plutonium conversion, to enhance America’s energy security and technological leadership. The DOE confirmed it is exploring multiple strategies, including plutonium fuel options, to strengthen the domestic nuclear supply chain.

This effort comes in parallel with declining enthusiasm for plutonium disposal. The original Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) program, launched under the 2000 US–Russia agreement, sought to transform weapons-grade plutonium into fuel suitable for commercial nuclear power. However, the MOX project was canceled in 2018 after costs ballooned to over $50 billion. Since then, the default strategy has been to mix plutonium with inert material and dispose of it underground at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico a method that DOE estimates will still cost $20 billion.

A Controversial Reprise of a Failed Program

While proponents frame the new plan as an innovative solution to both nuclear waste and energy security, nuclear experts remain skeptical. Edwin Lyman, a physicist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, strongly criticized the initiative, stating that trying to repackage weapons plutonium as fuel is akin to reliving the failed MOX project with no guarantee of success.

He emphasized that plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years and poses persistent security and environmental risks. From his perspective, the safest and most cost-effective approach remains dilution and disposal methods already in place prior to Trump’s executive order. Lyman warns that transforming plutonium into commercial reactor fuel could increase proliferation risks, complicate reactor operations, and add to waste-handling burdens.

Strategic Motives Versus Safety Trade-Offs

At its core, the plan reveals a tension between strategic ambition and operational feasibility. On one hand, repurposing plutonium could reduce reliance on imported uranium, stimulate domestic reactor innovation, and address long-term waste management backlogs. On the other hand, this direction may reintroduce the same cost, safety, and technical challenges that derailed the MOX strategy.

There is no confirmed timeline yet for implementation, and the DOE plans to seek proposals from private industry in the coming days. As the draft framework circulates, officials have stated that final details are still subject to modification based on technical consultation and public feedback.

A Costly Gamble With Uncertain Returns

The Trump administration’s plutonium reuse strategy presents a bold, yet contentious approach to revitalizing the U.S. nuclear sector. While it addresses rising electricity demand and attempts to close the loop on plutonium disposal, the plan also resurrects unresolved issues surrounding cost overruns, engineering complexity, and national security.

If the project proceeds, it may redefine America’s nuclear materials strategy. But for now, it stands as a policy experiment caught between geopolitical ambition and deeply entrenched concerns about nuclear safety, proliferation, and fiscal prudence.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Short-Term Lift From Front-Loading Activity

The second quarter of 2025 brought unexpectedly positive GDP figures for several major ASEAN economies, largely due to accelerated exports to the US ahead of impending tariff changes. Thailand’s GDP rose by 2.8% year-on-year in Q2, slightly lower than Q1’s 3.2% but above analysts’ forecast of 2.5%. This expansion was driven by a 12.2% jump in exports comprising around 60% of Thailand’s GDP as firms rushed shipments before the 19% US import tariff came into effect.

Similarly, Malaysia maintained its Q1 momentum with a stable 4.4% GDP growth rate in Q2, supported by resilient domestic consumption and a steady labor market. Meanwhile, the Philippines posted a higher-than-expected GDP increase of 5.5% in Q2, marginally outpacing Q1’s 5.4%, boosted by a rebound in agriculture and solid household spending.

These robust performances, however, were heavily front-loaded. Much of the export growth was the result of American importers stockpiling goods to avoid tariff hikes a pattern that does not reflect underlying demand strength and cannot be sustained into the latter part of the year.

Erosion of Growth Momentum Expected in H2 2025

Despite the Q2 surge, projections for full-year growth have been revised downward across the board, reflecting both internal fragilities and external trade uncertainty. The Thai NESDC now anticipates annual GDP growth of just 1.8% to 2.3%, citing signs of cooling in key sectors like tourism. With international arrivals projected to drop from 35 million to 33 million this year, and government fiscal support amounting to $116.6 billion, Thailand’s policy focus has shifted toward cushioning the economy. The Bank of Thailand has also slashed interest rates to 1.5%, the lowest in two years.

Malaysia, too, has been forced to recalibrate. The Central Bank revised its 2025 growth target from 4.5–5.5% down to 4.0–4.8%, responding to weakening export performance particularly in electronics and semiconductors and broader global trade uncertainties. In a rare move, Malaysia also opted to cut interest rates, marking its first such action in five years, to bolster domestic demand.

In the Philippines, despite a strong Q2 print, the government lowered its full-year growth forecast to 5.5–6.5%, well below the initial 6–8% range. The revision reflects caution over potential trade shocks and a dimming global outlook. Monetary policymakers have hinted at further easing if inflation continues to decline, signaling a readiness to stimulate demand should external conditions deteriorate further.

Structural Trends and Correlated Risks

The short-lived export surge in Q2, primarily caused by front-loading activities ahead of the US tariff implementation, represents a temporary uplift rather than a structural improvement. Analysts widely view this as a correlational phenomenon, where US importers’ behavior triggered by policy uncertainty temporarily elevated ASEAN economies’ output. However, it lacks the causal foundation required for sustained growth.

The region now faces a convergence of correlated external risks: a weakening global demand environment, tighter financial conditions in advanced economies, and volatility in commodity and currency markets. These conditions could constrain exports, private investment, and consumer spending across ASEAN in the coming quarters.

Forecasts Point to Average Growth at Best

According to Focus Economics, ASEAN GDP growth in 2025 is likely to revert to a decadal average, with signs of stagnation across consumption, investment, and exports. While the Q2 results offered a temporary boost, the absence of structural demand improvements and the increasing unpredictability of the global trading environment may limit recovery potential.

In conclusion, although Q2 showed promise, the growth observed was more the result of tactical shifts in global supply chain behavior than a reflection of real, underlying economic strength. Without stronger global demand or new drivers of domestic productivity and investment, ASEAN economies may be approaching a more tepid phase of their post-pandemic recovery.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tightening the Net: Washington Escalates Iran Oil Sanctions

In a major policy development, the United States Treasury and State Departments have issued a new wave of sanctions aimed at dismantling Iran’s clandestine oil export network. The latest measures include blacklisting a prominent Greek shipping executive, Antonios Margaritis, along with his extensive maritime business network, several vessels, and a chain of operations linked to Iranian oil flows. Margaritis, described as a veteran in the shipping industry, was accused of leveraging decades of sector experience to facilitate the illegal movement of Iranian crude.

The scope of this enforcement action, however, stretches far beyond the Mediterranean. For the fourth time this year, US sanctions now extend deep into mainland China, underscoring Beijing’s entrenched role as the lifeline of Iran’s oil economy. Two strategic oil infrastructure entities in China were specifically designated by the US State Department: Dongjiakou Port in Shandong Province and Yangshan Shengang International Oil Storage and Transportation Company in Zhejiang Province. These facilities are believed to have enabled the offloading and processing of millions of barrels of Iranian crude through previously sanctioned tankers.

Sanctions Strategy and Its Underlying Objectives

These actions form part of a broader “maximum pressure” framework intended to curtail Iran’s access to international financial resources and disrupt its ability to fund weapons programs, including its nuclear development. By targeting both the logistical facilitators (such as port operators) and the transport intermediaries (like Margaritis and his ships), the United States aims to neutralize the supply chain mechanisms that allow Iranian crude to reach global markets despite longstanding restrictions.

The choice to target Chinese operators reflects not only their central role in the physical receipt of Iranian oil but also a strategic calculus. Given China’s massive energy consumption needs and its robust bilateral trade relations with Tehran, Beijing remains Tehran’s most important customer. Current estimates suggest that up to 90% of Iran’s total crude exports are now directed to China a striking figure that signals not just economic reliance but political defiance in the face of American pressure.

Persistent Oil Flows Despite Pressure

Despite repeated rounds of sanctions, China’s appetite for Iranian crude has remained resilient. Independent Chinese refiners, often referred to as “teapots,” have played a key role in processing these imports. These small, flexible plants are adept at circumventing supply chain bottlenecks and have become a favored destination for sanctioned oil flows. Prior sanctions earlier this year also targeted some of these refiners, yet the volume of trade between China and Iran has not meaningfully declined.

The nature of this relationship suggests more than a casual correlation. China’s dependence on stable and discounted energy sources, coupled with Iran’s geopolitical isolation, creates a mutually reinforcing partnership. While the sanctions create legal and financial friction, they have yet to sever the underlying supply-demand dynamic that links the two nations. This interplay is not merely correlated it is structured around deeply aligned interests in trade resilience, strategic defiance, and energy security.

Implications and Outlook

Analysts believe the US’s latest moves are designed not only to penalize specific entities but also to signal a broader deterrent to other actors in the oil trade supply chain. However, the ultimate effectiveness of such sanctions remains uncertain. Given the scope of China’s energy needs and its ability to shield domestic firms from Western legal frameworks, Beijing is unlikely to alter its strategic alignment with Tehran.

In conclusion, this latest escalation in US sanctions policy illustrates a cause-and-effect sequence rooted in geopolitical rivalry. As Iran remains dependent on Chinese demand, and China remains willing to challenge US sanctions to secure energy flows, the confrontation over oil is likely to intensify. For Washington, cutting off Iran’s revenue will require more than designations it may demand a reshaping of global enforcement architecture. Meanwhile, Iran and China appear poised to continue their oil trade, defying pressure through quiet coordination and logistical ingenuity.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Cautious Stance Amid Unresolved Inflation Dynamics

Alberto Musalem, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, publicly stated on August 22 that he would not support a decision to cut interest rates at the upcoming September 16–17 FOMC meeting without first reviewing more economic data. He emphasized that inflation remains closer to 3% than the Fed’s 2% target and may persist at elevated levels for longer than initially anticipated. This elevated inflation trajectory represents a more tangible and immediate risk than the yet-to-materialize threat of labor market weakness.

While labor market deterioration remains a hypothetical concern, Musalem noted that the current policy framework is appropriately calibrated for a still-robust job market and inflation levels that exceed the Fed’s target. However, he did not rule out adjustments should labor conditions deteriorate more rapidly than expected. His decision will be finalized only 2–3 days before the meeting, following updates on inflation forecasts, unemployment rates, and other macroeconomic indicators.

Contrasting Signals Between Powell and Musalem

Musalem’s reserved outlook comes in contrast to earlier comments made by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at the same policy research conference. Powell had opened the door to a possible September rate cut, suggesting that inflation caused by tariff effects may be transitory, and that risks to the labor market were increasing. Powell emphasized that a shift in the risk balance could compel the Fed to alter its policy stance.

However, Musalem pushed back, stressing that any forward-looking policy decision must consider whether the inflation risk already materialized and persistent outweighs labor risks, which are not yet evident in the data. His repeated use of cautious qualifiers such as "may" and "not my baseline scenario" suggests a correlation between recent tariff-driven inflation and future monetary policy shifts, but not necessarily a direct causal path to rate cuts.

Key Data Points to Watch Before September Decision

The upcoming labor report for August and the Fed’s updated macroeconomic projections will be instrumental in shaping the policy decision. These data releases will help determine whether the inflationary pressures are rooted in structural factors such as prolonged supply disruptions or sticky wage growth or if they reflect short-term volatility from recent tariff changes. Musalem also acknowledged reduced uncertainty in the fiscal, trade, and immigration policy landscape, suggesting that clearer macro policy conditions now permit a more grounded analysis of inflation’s drivers.

His comments imply a conditional framework in which policy will only pivot if hard data confirms either a slowdown in employment or further resilience in inflation, reinforcing the Fed’s data-dependence. He underscored this by stating that for him, the focus is not confined to September alone, but extends to how trends evolve in the longer term.

Market Implications and Investor Takeaways

Wall Street’s optimism for imminent rate cuts may have been premature, given Musalem’s reluctance to endorse easing without substantial new evidence. The Fed appears divided, with some officials like Powell more attuned to forward-looking risks and others like Musalem anchored to the present inflation metrics. This divergence highlights the importance of interpreting Fed commentary in context and recognizing whether statements signal correlation with current economic indicators or an actual causal commitment to action.

Investors should brace for volatility in the coming weeks, as policy remains in flux. Unless incoming data shows clear labor market weakness or a sharp inflation retreat, the Fed’s stance may remain restrictive well beyond September.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Logistics as a strategic growth engine

At the 6th Regional Logistics Forum held in Hue on August 22, experts and policymakers emphasized that logistics will play a decisive role in boosting the competitiveness of North Central and Central Coastal Vietnam. Positioned at the crossroads of the North-South axis and the East-West Economic Corridor, the region has the natural advantage of deep-sea ports, expanding airports, and a developing rail network. These factors collectively create the potential for Central Vietnam to evolve into a national and regional logistics hub.

The linkage here is causal: the expansion of logistics infrastructure directly lowers transportation costs, enhances trade connectivity, and improves the efficiency of supply chains. In turn, this facilitates regional economic growth, particularly in marine economy and cross-border trade.

Regional development vision and economic ambitions

According to the regional planning framework for 2021–2030 with a vision to 2050, Central Vietnam aims to become a fast-growing and sustainable region, spearheading the country’s marine economy. By 2030, the region’s per capita income is projected to reach the upper-middle level, and by 2050 logistics alone is expected to contribute more than 6% of Vietnam’s total logistics revenue.

This reflects a correlation between logistics expansion and overall regional competitiveness. While logistics alone may not cause broad-based growth, its efficiency correlates strongly with the ability of industries such as fisheries, manufacturing, and trade to scale up exports and integrate deeper into global supply chains.

Infrastructure challenges and investment needs

Despite its vast potential, logistics infrastructure in Central Vietnam remains fragmented. The lack of seamless connections among seaports, railways, highways, and airports has resulted in transportation costs that remain higher than regional averages. Modern multimodal logistics centers are scarce, limiting the ability to optimize flows of goods.

Moreover, institutional bottlenecks persist. Special policy mechanisms to attract large-scale infrastructure investment are still limited, while small and medium-sized logistics enterprises often lack resources to adopt advanced technologies, making them less competitive. Human resource development also lags behind demand, with insufficient training and retention of high-quality logistics professionals.

Policy responses and future pathways

Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade Nguyen Sinh Nhat Tan outlined seven solutions to unlock the region’s logistics potential. These include maximizing geographical advantages, accelerating infrastructure investment, reforming administrative procedures, and deepening international cooperation. The correlation between these reforms and regional integration is significant: better infrastructure and simplified procedures make the region more attractive for trade and investment, while international partnerships broaden access to global markets.

Central Vietnam’s ambition to become more than a domestic transit point underscores a strategic shift. If logistical bottlenecks are resolved and supportive policies implemented, the region could rise as a “strategic link” in both regional and global supply chains. This transformation would not only enhance Vietnam’s economic resilience but also strengthen its positioning in the increasingly competitive Indo-Pacific trade landscape.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Energy security as a foundation for semiconductor development

Vietnam’s government has identified reliable and affordable electricity supply as a strategic prerequisite for building a competitive semiconductor ecosystem. According to the conclusion of the National Steering Committee on Semiconductor Industry Development’s second meeting, the Ministry of Industry and Trade must propose a specific electricity pricing framework for semiconductor and electronics manufacturing plants and report to the Prime Minister in the third quarter of 2025.

The causal link is clear: semiconductor manufacturing requires a stable, high-quality power supply due to the sector’s energy-intensive and precision-driven production processes. Without competitive energy pricing, investment attraction and global supply chain integration would face structural obstacles.

Alignment with long-term semiconductor strategy

The proposed pricing mechanism is part of the broader Vietnam Semiconductor Industry Development Strategy to 2030, Vision 2050. This strategy not only emphasizes infrastructure readiness but also prioritizes clean energy use to align with sustainability commitments. The Ministry of Industry and Trade is simultaneously reviewing Decree 57/2025 on direct power purchase agreements for renewable energy and Decree 58/2025 on new energy development, aiming to integrate renewable sources directly into semiconductor supply chains.

While the Ministry of Industry and Trade handles energy pricing and supply security, the Ministry of Finance has been directed to continue designing incentives to attract foreign semiconductor investment, focusing on advanced and high-value technologies. The Ministry of Science and Technology will coordinate with other agencies to monitor policy implementation and develop supporting mechanisms, while the Ministry of Home Affairs is tasked with creating a framework to recruit and retain semiconductor talent, including financial support for students and researchers in science and technology.

Implications for global supply chains

The development of a semiconductor-specific electricity pricing scheme reflects Vietnam’s determination to position itself as a reliable node in the global chip supply chain. By ensuring competitive energy costs and prioritizing renewable power, Vietnam aims to reduce dependency on external supply chains while appealing to international investors seeking stable and sustainable production bases.

Vietnam’s decision to design a preferential electricity pricing mechanism for the semiconductor industry highlights the country’s strategic shift from being a low-cost electronics assembler to a critical participant in global high-tech supply chains. If implemented effectively, this could not only lower operational risks for chipmakers but also enhance Vietnam’s competitiveness against regional rivals such as Malaysia, Taiwan, and South Korea.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

A rare Chinese private sector move into Venezuela

China Concord Resources Corp, a privately owned Chinese company, has emerged as a new player in Venezuela’s struggling oil sector. After years of sanctions that deterred major international investors, CCRC signed a 20-year production-sharing agreement in May 2024 to operate two abandoned oilfields, Lago Cinco and Lagunillas Lago, in the Maracaibo Basin. The contract grants the firm direct operational control in exchange for sharing a portion of the output with state oil company PDVSA.

This marks one of the few large-scale private Chinese ventures in Venezuela since state-owned CNPC scaled back operations following U.S. sanctions in 2019. The causal link is straightforward: U.S. restrictions limited the entry of oil majors, leaving a vacuum that smaller, more flexible firms like CCRC can exploit.

Ambitious production targets

Currently, the two oilfields produce only about 12,000 barrels per day, reflecting years of underinvestment. CCRC has already deployed 60 Chinese engineers and rigs since September 2024 to restart 100 wells, with plans to rehabilitate 500 in total. The company aims to lift output to 60,000 barrels per day by late 2026, with light crude earmarked for domestic refining and heavy crude exported to China. This goal illustrates a causal relationship: investment in capital and technology directly revives dormant fields, enhancing Venezuela’s overall capacity beyond its current 1 million barrels per day.

Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves, over 300 billion barrels, yet its industry remains crippled by sanctions. While Washington has selectively eased restrictions, granting Chevron licenses to resume limited operations, these exemptions come with strict conditions that prevent revenues from flowing to the Maduro government. By contrast, CCRC’s deal ensures Caracas receives direct benefits from new production, strengthening Sino-Venezuelan ties.

The correlation between sanctions and market entry is striking: whereas U.S. firms like Chevron operate under political constraints, Chinese private capital moves in with fewer restrictions, securing long-term stakes. This creates a parallel energy corridor where Venezuela’s heavy crude is increasingly tied to Chinese demand, diminishing U.S. leverage.

Implications for global oil politics

For Venezuela, the investment signals diversification beyond limited Western partnerships, reinforcing Caracas’s strategic pivot to Asia. For China, it secures stable access to energy resources at a time of growing rivalry with the U.S., while also enhancing BRICS’ influence in global energy flows. For Washington, the development raises competitive challenges, as its sanctions may be backfiring by enabling alternative players to secure privileged positions.

China’s billion-dollar gamble in Venezuela is more than an oil deal it reflects a recalibration of global energy alliances. By stepping into spaces vacated by Western majors, Chinese firms are not just reviving dormant capacity but also reshaping the balance of power in one of the world’s most strategic oil markets.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites