Trump Threatens Up to 70% Tariffs on Foreign Goods Starting August 1

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

Summary:

U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to impose steep tariffs up to 70% on imports from multiple countries starting August 1, intensifying trade pressure just weeks before key negotiations are set to conclude....

Trump Warns of Sweeping New Tariffs as Trade Pressure Mounts

On July 4, President Donald Trump stated that the U.S. will begin notifying 10 to 12 countries per day over the next five days regarding newly proposed import tariffs, with rates ranging from 10% to as high as 70%. These tariffs, he confirmed, will largely take effect starting August 1, 2025.

Speaking at Andrews Air Force Base, Trump revealed that the administration has finalized the documentation detailing the tariffs and the amounts foreign governments will need to pay in order to continue trading with the U.S. He emphasized that while some flexibility might be shown toward countries currently in talks, the vast majority of the tariffs will begin without delay.

Targeted Partners and Negotiation Tactics

Although Trump did not specify which nations will be included in this tariff wave, he singled out the European Union and Japan as countries that have taken stances unfavorable to U.S. interests in recent trade talks. Earlier this week, he threatened a 35% tariff on Japanese goods an announcement seen by some analysts as a negotiating tactic rather than a firm commitment.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have both acknowledged that deadlines could shift slightly depending on negotiation progress, especially for countries like India. However, Trump’s latest comments indicate that the administration is growing less willing to offer timeline flexibility.

A Sharp Escalation from April Announcements

This new tariff plan marks a significant escalation from April 2025, when Trump introduced retaliatory tariffs then capped around 50% on many U.S. trading partners. The latest announcement pushes those boundaries even further, with maximum rates now reaching 70%, surpassing even those proposed on “Liberation Day,” a symbolic moment for Trump’s trade agenda.

Trump stated that while not all agreements can be finalized at once given the large number of countries involved the U.S. will begin issuing official tariff letters soon. “We’re talking with many nations,” he said, “and we’ll simply tell them how much they need to pay to do business in the United States. That process will move very quickly.”

Global Trade Outlook and Implications

So far, the U.S. has finalized a trade framework with the UK, China, and Vietnam, though specific terms have yet to be published. The impending tariff wave could dramatically alter global trade flows, especially if major economies respond with retaliatory measures or halt negotiations altogether.

Trump’s strategy is aimed at pressuring countries into faster and more favorable trade deals. However, it also introduces significant uncertainty for international exporters, multinational corporations, and domestic businesses reliant on global supply chains.

As the world watches the lead-up to August 1, the administration’s aggressive push signals that trade tensions are unlikely to subside anytime soon especially under a policy environment that rewards quick compliance and penalizes delay.

Source: CNN

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

U.S. Loosens EDA Software Restrictions in Trade Accord with China

In a marked shift from previous clampdowns, the Trump administration has lifted licensing requirements on exports of electronic design automation (EDA) software to China. This software is essential for semiconductor chip design and is primarily developed by U.S. giants such as Synopsys and Cadence, as well as Germany's Siemens EDA. These firms can now resume business with Chinese clients without prior government approval a significant development given that China accounts for 16% of Synopsys’ and 12% of Cadence’s annual revenue.

This easing comes only weeks after new restrictions were imposed, underlining the rapidly shifting nature of U.S. trade policy. Though the U.S. Department of Commerce has yet to issue a detailed explanation, companies have already begun restoring service operations in the Chinese market.

Strategic Trade Deal in London Sets the Stage

The change is part of a broader framework agreement signed in London, aimed at easing trade tensions and stabilizing global technology supply chains. Besides EDA, the deal includes U.S. relaxations on ethane and jet engine exports, while China pledges to accelerate rare earth mineral approvals a vital component of U.S. civilian and defense technology.

Analysts interpret this as a pivot in U.S. policy, shifting from rigid enforcement to using export controls as a negotiation tool. Instead of completely blocking access, the U.S. is applying calculated flexibility to maintain influence while advancing other trade objectives.

China Gains Ground, but with Caution

For China, the reopening of the EDA software supply is a significant win. Companies like Huawei, which had been severely limited by the prior restrictions, may regain some momentum in chip development, particularly for AI and smartphone processors.

However, U.S. experts caution that this access could be temporary and strategic. “Even brief supply disruptions have likely reinforced Beijing’s determination to build independent design tools,” said one analyst at Singapore’s International Institute for Strategic Studies.

There’s growing concern that American leniency today may inadvertently encourage Chinese innovation tomorrow. As such, this decision though economically beneficial in the short term may accelerate China's efforts toward self-sufficiency in semiconductor design.

Tactical Concession, Not Policy Reversal

Bloomberg reports that the U.S. views EDA software as a "lower-value bargaining chip" compared to high-performance AI chips, like those from Nvidia, which remain under strict control due to their potential military applications.

Therefore, reopening EDA access is not a policy retreat, but a tactical adjustment offering short-term benefits in exchange for progress in broader trade negotiations.

Still, the abrupt shift from restriction to relaxation within two weeks has left global businesses scrambling for clarity. The lack of transparent, stable policy guidance poses risks for both U.S. exporters and international supply chains.

The EDA software agreement reflects a recalibration of the U.S.-China tech rivalry not a resolution. While it opens temporary space for American companies to regain market share and for China to resume development, the underlying competition in AI, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure remains intense. As both nations continue to weaponize technology policy for strategic advantage, global businesses must remain agile amid ongoing uncertainty.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

India Retaliates at WTO Over U.S. Auto Tariffs, Raising Stakes in Bilateral Trade Talks

On July 4, India submitted a formal proposal to the World Trade Organization (WTO), seeking approval to impose retaliatory tariffs on automobiles and certain auto parts imported from the United States. This development comes as both countries approach a critical deadline for concluding a temporary trade agreement.

According to the WTO’s statement, India announced its intent to suspend trade concessions granted to the U.S. by levying higher duties on American-origin goods. The move is in response to the 25% tariff the U.S. imposed starting May 3 on passenger vehicles, light trucks, and auto components under the guise of national security protections.

India argues that the U.S. actions qualify as "safeguard measures" under WTO rules but were implemented without proper notification or consultation. As a result, India is invoking its rights under Article 8.2 of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards, allowing it to withdraw equivalent concessions estimated at $723.75 million annually to counter losses from disrupted auto exports, valued at nearly $2.9 billion per year.

Trade Tensions Escalate Amid Fragile Negotiations

India’s move follows a similar notification last month regarding tariffs the U.S. imposed on steel, aluminum, and derivative products. In both cases, India maintains that Washington is misusing Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to disguise protectionist policies as national security concerns.

These developments add urgency to the ongoing negotiations between the two nations, as the 90-day grace period suspending U.S. country-specific tariff plans will expire on July 9. Both sides are under pressure to finalize phase one of a comprehensive Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) announced by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump in February.

Impact on Supply Chains and Strategic Relations

The escalating tariff threats risk further disrupting supply chains, particularly in the automotive sector, where U.S. manufacturers rely on parts sourced from Indian suppliers. At the same time, India’s cost-competitive auto industry faces uncertainty in accessing one of its key export markets.

While both governments aim to restore stable trade relations, India’s WTO proposal underscores growing frustration with what it sees as unilateralism from Washington. If retaliatory measures are implemented, it could trigger a new wave of tit-for-tat actions at a time when global trade is already facing headwinds from protectionism and geopolitical uncertainty.

India's WTO action is a calculated warning shot, signaling its readiness to push back against U.S. trade tactics. Although legal under international trade rules, it complicates efforts to secure a mutually beneficial agreement. Whether diplomacy can prevail before the July 9 deadline remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: both sides are under mounting pressure to strike a deal or risk reigniting a broader trade conflict.

Source: Times of India

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Global Expansion Positions China at the Heart of Asia’s Supply Chain Future

China is no longer just the "world’s factory." Through a combination of state-driven policy support, aggressive financing, and rapid technological adoption, Chinese enterprises are shaping the next evolution of Asia’s supply chain ecosystem. As they expand globally especially in key sectors like electric vehicles, AI, and renewable energy these companies are creating ripple effects that both disrupt and invite collaboration across the region.

Most Chinese firms entering international markets have already endured harsh domestic competition, emerging leaner and stronger. Backed by tax incentives, state-supported funding, and preferential regulatory treatment, they have evolved into formidable global players particularly in fast-growing industries like e-commerce and green technology.

AI as the Next Frontier: From Competitive Edge to Regional Transformation

Artificial intelligence is set to redefine supply chain and production structures across Asia. According to EY’s Asia-Pacific Managing Partner, Yew-Poh Mak, the Chinese model shows how AI investments can lead to decentralized supply chains, enhance cost efficiency, boost labor productivity, and enable personalized mass production.

In a recent EY survey, nearly 60% of industrial leaders view AI as a revolutionary force beyond 2030. While China leads this wave through national AI strategies and significant funding, the rest of Asia can catch up by focusing on education, skill retraining, and technology adoption.

Mak argues that with the right strategies, smaller economies can seize opportunities within the newly forming supply webs catalyzed by Chinese innovation.

Credit Expansion and Government Support Fuel China’s Entrepreneurial Engine

A significant reason behind China’s rapid innovation lies in its inclusive and robust financing ecosystem. In just a few years, inclusive loans to small and micro businesses ballooned from ¥15.1 trillion in 2020 to ¥32.9 trillion in 2024. Even entrepreneurs who failed previously are now receiving new opportunities via low-interest loans, government venture capital, and eased regulations.

These mechanisms aren’t merely reactive but form the backbone of China's strategy to dominate future industries by nurturing a generation of resilient, tech-savvy founders. Tax breaks, government grants, and early-stage funding focus heavily on strategic sectors like AI and clean energy.

EVs and Solar: Proof of China’s End-to-End Competitive Model

China’s dominance in electric vehicles and solar panels illustrates its vertically integrated industrial advantage. In EVs, the government’s early 2010s subsidy strategy led to a boom, followed by a natural consolidation: from 500 EV makers in 2019 to around 100 today. Now, companies like BYD control over a third of domestic market share and are world leaders in production.

Similarly, in solar energy, China controls more than 80% of global solar panel production. Its grip on upstream supply chains, from polysilicon to key module components, reinforces its global leverage in renewable energy.

Implications for Asia: Challenge or Blueprint?

China’s rise in supply chain control is not just a geopolitical maneuver but also a practical business model. Countries in Asia can choose to compete or cooperate by integrating into China's expanding ecosystems. With the right investments in AI, talent development, and adaptive regulation, emerging economies can innovate within niche sectors while learning from China’s integrated strategy.

In short, China is actively defining the future structure of Asia’s supply chains not through domination, but by setting standards, accelerating innovation, and creating interconnected opportunities that others can adapt and build upon.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Surprising Upswing in Household Spending Breaks Three-Year Record

Japan’s latest economic data revealed a notable 4.7% year-on-year increase in household spending for May 2025, surpassing market expectations and marking the strongest growth since August 2022. The average household expenditure reached over 316,000 yen (approximately $2,100 USD), outperforming economists’ forecast of just 1.2%.

Alongside this surge, household income also edged up by 0.4% compared to the same month last year. These figures offer a rare bright spot in an economy grappling with persistent inflation and mixed consumer sentiment.

Temporary Demand Factors Drive Short-Term Gains

Harumi Taguchi, Chief Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, noted that the increase was partly due to temporary boosts from automobile purchases and domestic travel. While these sectors helped inflate the May data, it remains uncertain whether they reflect a broader recovery in household consumption.

The implication here is not necessarily a causal shift in consumer behavior, but rather a correlation with one-off spending patterns, possibly linked to seasonal or promotional events. The Bank of Japan (BoJ), which closely monitors household spending as a key indicator for monetary policy adjustments, is expected to interpret the results with caution.

Wage Growth Still Trails Inflation, Pressuring Real Income

Despite the rise in nominal wages, real wages adjusted for inflation have declined for four consecutive months through April. This persistent gap indicates that household purchasing power remains under strain, even as headline spending appears to be rising.

With inflation consistently exceeding the BoJ’s 2% target, the erosion of real income continues to weigh on long-term consumption trends. Thus, the current spike in spending may not signal broader economic resilience, but rather a momentary adjustment amid underlying financial pressure.

Political Reactions Ahead of Upper House Election

In the lead-up to Japan’s July 20 Upper House election, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has proposed a new round of cash handouts to help households manage rising prices. Opposition parties, meanwhile, have called for a consumption tax cut as a more structural solution to easing the public's financial burden.

This highlights a broader policy tension: whether short-term fiscal injections can sustain consumer confidence or if deeper tax reforms are needed to address stagnant wage growth and inflation fatigue.

Global Trade and Tariff Pressures Add to Uncertainty

Trade tensions, particularly with the United States, are adding complexity to Japan’s economic landscape. Despite steep tariffs, Japanese automakers have largely refrained from raising prices in U.S. markets, choosing instead to absorb costs hurting profitability in an already fragile margin environment.

These external pressures, combined with inflation and political uncertainty, present layered risks to Japan’s domestic recovery, suggesting that the May household spending spike may be more of an anomaly than a trend.

Japan’s sharp rise in household spending for May is an encouraging headline, but the underlying dynamics reveal a more cautious picture. Driven by temporary consumption in autos and travel, and occurring amid stagnant real wages and inflation concerns, the data reflect both hope and fragility. With a national election approaching and economic sentiment finely balanced, policymakers face increasing pressure to respond decisively to ensure this spending momentum translates into sustained recovery.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

Mounting Inventories and Crumbling Exports in America’s Ginseng Heartland

In the rural town of Marathon, Wisconsin—the epicenter of America’s ginseng cultivation—warehouse floors are stacked with crates of unsold roots. Will Hsu, owner of Hsu's Ginseng Enterprises, has seen 68,000 kilograms of ginseng sit idle, even as a smaller shipment made its way to China. This surplus is unprecedented for summer months, when stocks would typically be cleared out after the Lunar New Year.

Wisconsin accounts for 98% of U.S. ginseng output, and October's harvests can reach 680,000 kilograms annually. However, after Beijing imposed a 125% tariff on American ginseng in response to Washington’s 145% levy on Chinese goods, exports effectively stalled beginning in April 2025.

With China and Hong Kong previously absorbing 83% of U.S. ginseng exports—valued at $32.5 million last year—the consequences of the trade freeze are dire. A decade ago, that figure stood closer to 90%, but now, the industry's grip on its largest market is slipping rapidly.

Tariff Deadlock, Inflation, and Unfair Pricing Pressures

American ginseng, prized in East Asia for its medicinal benefits, is particularly popular in China, where older roots command premium prices. However, the current diplomatic standoff has triggered a series of consequences beyond trade volume.

Farmers report being pressured by Chinese buyers to lower prices further, effectively absorbing part of the tariff burden. Meanwhile, domestic inflation has driven up production costs for labor, fertilizer, and equipment—exacerbated by Trump-era tariffs on Chinese agricultural machinery and parts.

This presents a causal chain: tariffs increase equipment costs and reduce demand, while price pressure from foreign buyers cuts margins. Farmers are caught in a profitability trap, many forced to dip into savings or take on debt just to keep their operations running.

Ginseng Industry Faces Structural and Generational Fragility

Joe Heil, who runs one of America’s largest ginseng farms, exemplifies the industry’s pain. He had once supported the notion that U.S. tariffs could foster fairer trade. But now, after years of losses from the trade war, pandemic disruptions, and rising input costs, he finds himself relying on loans to survive.

The labor-intensive nature of ginseng farming—with a three- to four-year lead time between planting and harvest—adds to the challenge. With low margins and long investment cycles, younger generations are turning away from the profession, fearing unstable income and high risk.

The problem isn’t only economic but structural: the long lifecycle of ginseng farming leaves producers highly vulnerable to short-term policy shifts and demand shocks.

Internal Competition and External Threats Cloud Future Recovery

Even if trade resumes, American ginseng is increasingly facing competition—from both Canada and China's own domestic producers. These rivals are filling the void left by the U.S., forcing American farmers to explore newer markets in Korea and Japan, though those remain niche compared to China’s scale.

Domestically, producers hope that if China reclassifies American ginseng as a functional food (rather than a herbal drug), it may ease import restrictions and reignite consumer demand. Yet, with China’s own economy slowing and consumers spending more cautiously, hopes for a fast recovery remain muted.

The phrase repeated by growers—“our survival depends on the weather and China”—captures both the environmental and geopolitical fragility of the industry.

American ginseng farmers are trapped in a multi-layered crisis: export bottlenecks, pricing pressure, rising costs, and a shrinking labor force. With inventories piling up and cash flow thinning, even veteran farmers are questioning how long they can hold on. The downturn is not just a story of trade tariffs—it’s a broader narrative of how global interdependence, policy decisions, and shifting demand can reshape the destiny of an entire agricultural sector. Unless trade conditions ease or domestic consumption surges, America’s ginseng industry faces an uncertain and narrowing future.

Source: Nikkei Asia

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Cryptocurrency

Historic Step Toward U.S. Crypto Regulation

On June 24, 2025, the U.S. Senate passed the Genius Act 2025 by a 68–30 vote, moving the country closer to enacting its first formal law on digital assets—specifically targeting stablecoins, or cryptocurrencies pegged to the U.S. dollar. The bill still requires approval by the House of Representatives before becoming law.

If ratified, the Genius Act would introduce clear regulatory frameworks for stablecoin issuance, operation, and supervision. It prohibits issuers from using the reserve funds backing these coins for lending or collateral purposes—except under special conditions. This clause addresses long-standing concerns among central banks, such as those represented by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), about stablecoins destabilizing the financial system.

Stablecoin Utility with Strong Oversight

Stablecoins under the Act must be fully backed, one-to-one, by high-liquidity assets like cash, bank deposits, U.S. Treasury bills maturing within 93 days, or short-term repurchase agreements collateralized by government securities. Issuers generate revenue from transaction fees, while users benefit from faster, cheaper, 24/7 cross-border payments compared to traditional banking systems.

However, the Genius Act demands that all wallet addresses, transaction identities, and fund flows be disclosed to government agencies, ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-terrorism financing laws. This introduces a central paradox: although stablecoins inherit the speed and decentralization of blockchain technology, their anonymity features are curtailed under this legislation.

This direct causal control mechanism links user transparency with national financial stability objectives, bringing crypto under tighter regulatory watch.

Institutional and Licensing Frameworks for Issuers

The Act specifies which entities can issue stablecoins:

Financial institutions insured by the federal government (e.g., banks, credit unions) may create subsidiaries to issue stablecoins. These must apply for approval via the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Non-financial companies wishing to issue stablecoins must apply directly to the OCC. Smaller issuers with asset bases below $19 billion can register at either the federal or state level, but those above $50 billion require federal-level approval.

Regardless of scale or route, all issuers are subject to continuous financial and compliance assessments. This reflects the law’s attempt to classify stablecoin issuers as quasi-financial institutions under the purview of central banking regulation.

Market Integrity and Consumer Protection Remain Limited

Despite greater transparency, consumer protection is still limited. Stablecoins lack FDIC-style insurance, and losses are only recoverable up to the value of the reserve fund. If issuers mismanage these reserves or act recklessly, users risk losing their funds entirely. The BIS has repeatedly warned of this vulnerability, citing unstable revenue models and the absence of a central settlement function as systemic risks.

Although the Genius Act introduces checks against fraud and enhances oversight, it does not fundamentally change the fact that stablecoin users remain exposed to counterparty risk. This underlines the Act's role as a transitional framework—offering structure without fully replicating the safety net of traditional bank deposits.

Global Reactions and BIS’s Call for Caution

The BIS’s 2025 annual report, cited by the Wall Street Journal, maintains a skeptical view of stablecoins. The institution argues that these crypto-assets:

- Are ill-suited as core monetary instruments

- Lack adequate supervision, making them vulnerable to misuse

- Fail to offer final settlement guarantees like central banks

- Present conflicts between price stability and profit-driven models

- Threaten monetary sovereignty and may trigger capital flight in developing economies

BIS concludes that stablecoins should play only a supplementary role and urges strict controls to contain systemic risk.

The Genius Act 2025 represents a landmark in U.S. crypto legislation—one that embraces the utility of blockchain-based payments while enforcing stringent compliance and oversight. By clearly defining who can issue stablecoins and how they must be backed and monitored, the law seeks to bring crypto into alignment with the institutional demands of the broader financial system.

Yet this progress also comes with unresolved tensions: the technology’s decentralization is curbed, privacy is sacrificed, and consumer protection remains incomplete. As stablecoins continue to gain popularity, the Genius Act may offer a much-needed template, but whether it ensures long-term trust and resilience remains to be seen—especially amid rising scrutiny from global financial watchdogs.

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites