India Imposes Anti-Dumping Tariffs on Strategic Imports from China, Japan, and the EU

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

Summary:

India has introduced five-year anti-dumping duties on select imports from China, Japan, Switzerland, and the European Union to shield domestic industries from the adverse impact of low-cost goods....

New Tariffs Target Key Sectors Amid Rising Trade Pressures

In a significant policy shift to defend its strategic industries, India’s Ministry of Finance has officially imposed anti-dumping duties on a range of imported products, including vitamin A Palmitate and insoluble sulphur. The decision, grounded in recommendations by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), follows investigations confirming that these imports have inflicted substantial harm on domestic producers.

The move marks a proactive response to growing concerns about unfair pricing practices, especially from China and other key trade partners, and comes as part of India's broader strategy to reinforce economic self-reliance and insulate local industries from volatile global supply chains.

Details of the Tariff Measures

The imposed duties include a rate of up to $20.87 per kilogram on vitamin A Palmitate imported from China, the EU, and Switzerland. This compound plays a critical role in the pharmaceutical, nutritional supplement, and animal feed sectors. In parallel, insoluble sulphur—a vital component in tire manufacturing and industrial rubber production—faces the same tariff level when sourced from China and Japan.

These tariffs are set to remain in effect for a period of five years, providing a buffer for domestic firms to recalibrate their production capabilities and enhance competitiveness. The Indian government emphasized that the primary goal is to restore fair market conditions and prevent local manufacturers from being driven out of key markets due to dumping practices.

Aligning with Global Trade Realignment and Strategic Resilience

Analysts interpret this move as aligned with a wider global pattern of recalibrating trade policies amid supply chain disruptions and geopolitical fragmentation. Similar to measures seen in the United States and the EU, India's decision reflects growing resistance to overdependence on imported raw materials—particularly those perceived as underpriced or subsidized by exporting countries.

This trade posture also reinforces Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s "Aatmanirbhar Bharat" (Self-Reliant India) initiative, which aims to nurture domestic manufacturing and reduce vulnerability to global economic shocks. By targeting inputs crucial to health, agriculture, and manufacturing sectors, India is prioritizing resilience in industries considered vital to long-term national growth and strategic autonomy.

Expected Impacts on Domestic Industry and Global Trade Relations

The introduction of anti-dumping tariffs is expected to give Indian manufacturers a much-needed reprieve, especially in sectors where price competition from foreign imports has stifled local capacity expansion. The protective buffer could incentivize investments in modernization, innovation, and scale-up—ultimately improving productivity and economic contribution.

However, while these measures may benefit local firms, they could also add to trade tensions, particularly with China and the EU, which are likely to scrutinize the legality and scope of India’s tariff decisions under WTO frameworks. How these countries respond could influence future bilateral trade relations and affect negotiations in ongoing trade agreements.

India’s imposition of targeted anti-dumping tariffs illustrates a delicate balancing act between shielding domestic interests and maintaining open trade dynamics. While the measures address immediate concerns of market distortion and industrial strain, their long-term success will hinge on how effectively domestic firms leverage the protection to build sustainable competitive advantage. As global supply chains continue to fragment, India’s focus on strategic trade defense signals a deepening commitment to industrial sovereignty and economic resilience.

Source: The Economic Times

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Official Default Signals Escalating Economic Pressures

Ukraine has formally defaulted on $2.6 billion in GDP-linked bonds—financial instruments structured during the 2015 debt restructuring program that promised payments if GDP growth exceeded 3% annually. The missed payment, due on June 2, 2025, marks a critical financial inflection point for the country. It lays bare the immense fiscal strain caused by the prolonged conflict with Russia, even as Kyiv tries to rebuild its economic credibility and resilience.

While this default might have appeared abrupt to the investment community, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance defended the move as part of a broader long-term debt sustainability strategy. According to an official statement, the government’s priority is not to service performance-linked debt at the cost of reconstruction efforts. The focus, they insist, must be placed on stabilizing the economy and ensuring that public resources are channeled toward war recovery and structural rebuilding.

GDP-Linked Instruments: Growth or Liability?

The default revolves around a unique form of debt: GDP-linked warrants issued in 2015. These instruments were designed to provide additional payments to bondholders if Ukraine’s economy outperformed baseline forecasts. Ironically, despite the devastation of war, Ukraine's GDP rebounded by 5.3% in 2023, technically triggering the obligation. However, Finance Minister Sergii Marchenko criticized this metric as misleading, pointing out that the increase merely reflects a fragile recovery from a 30% contraction the year prior. He argued that the terms were crafted for peacetime conditions and should no longer apply under the current wartime context.

Marchenko’s remarks underscore the tension between economic data and on-the-ground realities. What appears as a recovery in statistical terms can, in wartime conditions, still represent severe human and fiscal hardship. The default, therefore, is framed as a rational choice rather than a breach of responsibility.

Creditor Talks Collapse Amid Strategic Reprioritization

Despite extensive negotiations, Ukraine has not reached a new agreement with the international bondholders holding these GDP warrants. Investors expressed disappointment over Kyiv’s decision but remained open to renewed discussions. This deadlock reveals the structural complexities of reconciling short-term national survival with long-term financial commitments. The issue goes beyond contractual disputes—it reflects a deeper dilemma faced by wartime economies navigating between sovereign agency and creditor confidence.

The International Monetary Fund has issued stark warnings regarding the default’s potential to disrupt Ukraine’s financial stability. The IMF’s current $15.5 billion stabilization package, as well as a separate $20 billion agreement with sovereign bondholders, could face heightened risk. These mechanisms are critical to maintaining basic state functions during wartime, including infrastructure upkeep and defense spending. Any erosion in creditor trust could tighten Ukraine’s access to concessional lending and erode the multilayered support system sustaining its wartime economy.

The IMF’s caution is not just technical—it signals the broader systemic risks of unresolved sovereign disputes. In Ukraine’s case, the default may not result in immediate capital flight, but it could undermine investor expectations of post-war repayment reliability.

External Dependence and Future Rebuilding Capacity

Ukraine’s default takes place at a time when its economy is highly dependent on external grants and soft loans. This dependence is not new but is now more pronounced, given the destruction of productive capacity and the need for large-scale reconstruction. While the war has created sympathy and unprecedented international support, continued financial credibility is essential for Ukraine’s long-term recovery.

By opting not to honor the GDP-linked payment, Ukraine has sent a signal that recovery imperatives override previous financial commitments, especially those perceived as outdated or misaligned with current realities. However, such decisions inevitably raise questions about the country’s ability to engage international markets when reconstruction accelerates.

A Strategic Default with Long-Term Consequences

Ukraine’s decision to default on $2.6 billion of GDP-linked bonds is emblematic of the tough trade-offs that war economies must navigate. While Kyiv insists that prioritizing domestic recovery is imperative, the implications for investor confidence and multilateral aid are significant. The challenge ahead lies in re-establishing a balance between national sovereignty in fiscal management and maintaining constructive relations with global creditors.

This default could shape the future framework for how wartime economies restructure debt—especially when recovery is coupled with conditional debt instruments. For Ukraine, the path forward will require not only diplomatic finesse but also carefully managed transparency to restore the financial trust necessary for its post-war economic revival.

Source: Bne

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Revised Figures Suggest Less Severe Downturn

Japan's Cabinet Office on Monday revised its preliminary estimate of first-quarter GDP, showing the economy contracted at a slower annualized rate of 0.2% rather than the previously reported 0.7%. This change stems mainly from modest gains in private consumption and inventory accumulation, hinting at underlying resilience in the domestic sector. On a quarter-on-quarter basis, the economy now appears flat in real terms, instead of the 0.2% contraction initially reported.

While the revision slightly eases immediate concerns, it does little to alter the broader narrative of a fragile economy entering a period of heightened uncertainty. The revised data precedes the implementation of new US tariff measures on Japanese exports, particularly in the automotive sector, which casts a long shadow over the coming quarters.

Consumption Offers a Glimmer, But Business Investment Slips

Private consumption—accounting for more than half of GDP—was revised upward to a 0.1% increase, from an initial reading of zero growth. Though small, the improvement reflects a cautious recovery in household spending. However, capital expenditure figures were revised downward to a 1.1% gain from the earlier estimate of 1.4%, missing economists’ expectation of 1.3%. This discrepancy suggests that businesses are beginning to pull back slightly amid mounting external pressures.

Additionally, an upward revision in private inventories contributed to reducing the overall contraction, indicating firms may be stockpiling in anticipation of potential supply chain disruptions or cost pressures linked to trade policy shifts.

External Demand Continues to Detract from Growth

Despite domestic demand contributing positively to growth (adding 0.8 percentage point), external demand continued to exert a drag, subtracting 0.8 percentage point from overall GDP—unchanged from the preliminary estimate. This persistent imbalance highlights Japan’s vulnerability to trade-related shocks, particularly from the US, which remains its largest export market.

With a 24% tariff on Japanese goods looming in July unless exemptions are granted, and a separate 25% levy targeting the auto industry under discussion, Japanese exporters face a turbulent road ahead. The automotive sector, a cornerstone of Japan’s industrial output and employment, is at the center of negotiations.

Tariff Fears and Monetary Policy Implications

Analysts and policymakers are growing increasingly concerned that renewed trade tensions will further complicate Japan’s fragile growth environment. Kazutaka Maeda from Meiji Yasuda Research Institute noted that the scale of the automotive industry would make it politically difficult for the US to offer significant concessions, thereby extending the negotiation timeline and associated uncertainty.

For the Bank of Japan, this presents a policy dilemma. Although the central bank is scheduled to meet early next week, Monday’s revision is unlikely to materially influence its monetary stance. According to Nomura’s Uichiro Nozaki, the BOJ remains more concerned about the outcome of trade talks and their subsequent impact on exports and inflation expectations.

The central bank has cautiously sought to normalize monetary policy, but geopolitical risks—particularly those tied to tariffs—continue to derail momentum and suppress the likelihood of policy tightening in the near term.

While the smaller-than-expected GDP contraction provides marginal relief, it does not meaningfully alter the trajectory of Japan’s economy. The combination of weak external demand, modest domestic recovery, and impending tariff threats underscores a fragile macroeconomic environment. Until clarity emerges from the US-Japan trade negotiations, policymakers and investors are likely to remain defensive, keeping the Bank of Japan on a cautious path and delaying any substantive shift in policy direction.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Trade Optimism Balances Supply Concerns

Oil markets began the week on stable footing, with Brent crude futures holding at $66.47 per barrel and US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude inching up to $64.59. This steadiness reflects a fragile optimism, driven largely by expectations surrounding US-China trade talks taking place in London. Investors appear to be banking on the possibility of a thaw in economic tensions between the two largest economies, which could in turn stimulate global energy demand.

The talks mark the first high-level meeting under the newly established US-China economic and trade consultation mechanism. With the geopolitical climate tense following China’s export restrictions on rare earths, the rare direct engagement between leaders last week has sparked cautious hopes for progress. The anticipation of any trade easing has already lifted oil prices to their first weekly gain in three weeks.

US Jobs Data and Rate Expectations Bolster Sentiment

Adding to market support was last Friday’s US employment report, which showed unemployment remaining steady in May. The data tempered concerns about economic slowdown and increased the likelihood of a Federal Reserve rate cut later this year. Lower interest rates typically support oil prices by weakening the US dollar and reducing borrowing costs, potentially stimulating energy consumption. Thus, the combination of strong labor data and potential monetary easing helped oil sustain last week's upward momentum.

Another factor keeping markets afloat is the forthcoming Chinese inflation data, which is expected to offer insight into the country’s domestic demand health. As the world’s largest crude importer, China’s consumption patterns significantly influence oil prices. Should the data signal stable or improving demand, it could further reinforce the positive sentiment already building around the trade discussions.

However, it is worth noting that this optimism exists within a narrow band of volatility, as China's broader economic landscape remains fragile. A weak inflation print could reignite fears of deflationary pressure and muted industrial output, tempering the current demand-side optimism.

OPEC+ Output Decisions Add Downside Pressure

Offsetting the positive signals is the latest production outlook from OPEC+. On May 31, the group announced a sizable supply increase set for July. HSBC analysts now forecast that further hikes are likely in August and September, warning of downside risks to their Brent crude forecast of $65 per barrel for the fourth quarter of 2025.

According to Capital Economics, this shift marks a structural change in OPEC+’s supply strategy, suggesting the group is likely to continue raising output at an accelerated pace. If global demand growth does not keep pace with this increased supply, the resulting surplus could place renewed pressure on prices in the coming months.

Oil prices are currently buoyed by geopolitical optimism and supportive macroeconomic data, but the path forward remains uncertain. While the potential for a US-China trade breakthrough offers hope for stronger demand, the increasing supply from OPEC+ could cap further price appreciation. The oil market appears to be entering a period of fragile equilibrium, with near-term movement likely to be dictated by the outcome of the London trade talks and upcoming economic data from key consuming economies.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Forex

Markets Pause After Dollar Surge, Awaiting Trade Signals

On Monday, the US dollar remained stable against major global currencies, cooling off from Friday’s rally sparked by a stronger-than-expected jobs report. The renewed optimism about labor market strength was tempered by growing market caution ahead of US-China trade talks scheduled to take place in London. These negotiations are seen as crucial for setting the tone in both financial markets and the broader economic relationship between the two largest economies.

The US delegation, featuring Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, is expected to meet with China’s Vice Premier He Lifeng. While investors remain hopeful, market strategists warn that only a meaningful breakthrough—not merely an agreement to continue discussions—will have a significant impact on market sentiment.

Short-Term Gains Fade as Broader Headwinds Persist

Despite Friday’s encouraging employment report, which offered some relief after a week of lackluster economic indicators, the dollar index remains down more than 8.6% year-to-date. On Monday, the index was largely flat at 99.169. The 10-year US Treasury yield also held steady after Friday’s more than 10 basis-point surge, suggesting a pause in risk recalibration as markets await further policy direction.

The employment surprise helped slash the dollar’s weekly losses in half, but persistent structural concerns—ranging from global trade disruptions to tariff policies—continue to weigh on broader confidence in the greenback’s safe-haven appeal.

Mixed Performance in Currency Markets

While the dollar index showed little movement, individual currencies reflected divergent economic conditions. The Japanese yen gained 0.10%, trading at 144.750 per dollar, following data showing Japan’s GDP contraction in Q1 was less severe than anticipated. Meanwhile, the euro and Swiss franc remained flat at $1.1399 and 0.8221 respectively. The British pound traded at $1.3535, showing little reaction in early Asia trading hours.

In the Pacific, the Australian dollar inched up 0.1% to $0.65 amid thin volumes due to a public holiday. New Zealand’s dollar traded at $0.6020, maintaining stability in the absence of local data catalysts.

Policy Expectations Center on Tariff-Linked Inflation Data

Markets are now shifting focus to the upcoming US inflation report for May, expected to provide the first clear signal of how newly implemented tariffs—particularly former President Trump's 10% universal tariff on non-USMCA imports—are feeding into price pressures. According to analysts from ANZ Bank, May data will offer an initial glimpse into the inflationary effects of these trade policies, though policymakers will likely wait for several months of consistent data before making any interest rate adjustments.

Although the Federal Reserve has entered its pre-meeting blackout period, its recent guidance suggests a measured stance. Futures markets show that investors expect the Fed’s first rate cut to occur in October, with a 25 basis point reduction seen as the most probable move. This cautious approach is supported by signs of continued resilience in the US economy, reducing the urgency for immediate easing.

Yuan Traders Eye Upcoming Chinese Economic Data

China’s offshore yuan hovered at 7.187 per dollar, with traders bracing for upcoming domestic inflation and trade data releases. These indicators will be closely watched to assess how deeply the Chinese economy is being affected by both internal deflationary trends and external trade friction. Any further weakness in Chinese data could amplify pressure on Beijing’s fiscal and monetary authorities to respond with stimulus measures.

The dollar’s steadiness reflects a broader market posture of uncertainty ahead of multiple critical events. While strong US labor data has temporarily lifted sentiment, the absence of clear resolution in US-China trade relations and the lagging effects of new tariffs keep markets on edge. For now, the financial community appears to be in a holding pattern—awaiting not just news from London’s trade negotiations, but also inflation data that could redefine the Federal Reserve’s policy trajectory in the months ahead.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Dark Current

Commodity

Economic

Oil prices held on to last week's gains early on Monday as investors waited for U.S.-China trade talks to be held in London later in the day.

Brent crude futures were flat at $66.47 a barrel at 0008 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was trading up 1 cent at $64.59.

The prospect of a U.S.-China trade deal supported prices as three of Donald Trump's top aides were set to meet with counterparts in London on Monday for the first meeting of the U.S.-China economic and trade consultation mechanism.

The announcement on Saturday followed a rare Thursday call between the two countries' top leaders, with both under pressure to dial down tensions as China's export controls on rare earths disrupt global supply chains. Oil prices posted their first weekly gain in three weeks on the news.

A U.S. jobs report showing unemployment held steady in May appeared to increase the odds of a Federal Reserve interest rate cut, further supporting last week's gains. Inflation data from China on Monday morning will give a reading of domestic demand in the world's largest crude importer.

The economic data and the prospect of a trade deal that could support economic growth and increase demand for oil outweighed worries about increased OPEC+ supply after the group announced another big output hike for July on May 31.

HSBC expects OPEC+ to accelerate supply hikes in August and September, which are likely to raise downside risks to the bank's $65 per barrel Brent forecast from the fourth quarter of 2025, according to a research note on Friday.

Capital Economics researchers said they believe this "new faster pace of (OPEC+) production rises is here to stay".

Source: Yahoo Finance

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Diana Wallace

The Bank of Japan should make clear it is not monetising government debt by ensuring that fiscal considerations do not take precedence over its goal of achieving price stability, Deputy Governor Shinichi Uchida said on Saturday.

Central banks can theoretically print unlimited amounts of money and completely finance government debt, which poses delicate questions around their huge government bond purchases conducted to revive their economies, Uchida said.

Central banks see "monetising," or directly financing government deficits, as taboo, as doing so risks letting inflation get out of control and potentially eroding their independence.

Such unconventional monetary easing steps taken since the 2008 financial crisis present a challenge for central banks across the globe, he said in a speech.

The BOJ's monetary easing, for its part, was aimed at achieving its 2% inflation target, and not at funding government debt, Uchida said.

"In considering what constitutes monetary financing or not, the important question is whether monetary policy is compromised by fiscal considerations," Uchida said.

In deploying and rolling back monetary easing, the BOJ must focus on achieving its economic and price mandate. "The result must be that the Bank does not deviate from such policy conduct out of fiscal considerations," he said.

"In its future conduct of monetary policy, the Bank should make it clear that it is not engaging in monetary financing."

The remarks come against the backdrop of growing pressure from opposition and ruling parties on Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to increase budget spending ahead of an upper house election due next month.

Some analysts have blamed concerns over Japan's worsening finances for pushing up super-long bond yields to record highs last month, and complicating the BOJ's efforts to taper its huge bond purchases.

Under a radical monetary easing programme deployed in 2013, the BOJ increased purchases of government bonds and adopted a policy of capping long-term interest rates around zero.

While the BOJ ended the policy last year, its short-term policy rate is still at 0.5%. The central bank plans to lay out in June a new bond tapering plan for fiscal 2026 and beyond as part of its effort to normalise monetary policy.