EU Tightens Carbon Border Tax to Block Evasion

Economic

Summary:

Starting in 2026, the EU will impose a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on high-emission imports, with plans to assign fixed emission values by country or company to prevent data manipulation, particularly from China....

Carbon Border Tax Rollout in 2026

The European Union confirmed that its carbon border tax, formally known as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), will take effect in early 2026. The tax will target imports in six heavy-emitting sectors cement, steel, aluminum, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen in order to align foreign producers with Europe’s own costly emissions trading system (EU ETS).

The goal is to protect European industries that already pay for their carbon emissions, while discouraging carbon leakage the relocation of polluting production to jurisdictions with looser climate rules.

Concerns Over Loopholes and China’s Role

Officials in Brussels worry that exporters, particularly in China, could game the system by diverting their “greenest” output to Europe while continuing to sell high-carbon goods elsewhere. Such a strategy would allow them to avoid paying CBAM duties without meaningfully lowering total emissions.

To counter this, the European Commission (EC) is preparing to propose new enforcement measures by the end of 2025. One key idea under discussion is to assign fixed emission factors at the country or company level, rather than calculating emissions on a shipment-by-shipment basis.

This would make the CBAM more difficult to evade but could penalize foreign firms that genuinely produce lower-carbon products, since they would be taxed at the same average rate as peers in their home country.

Push from European Industry

European industrial groups strongly support tougher safeguards. The European Aluminium Association has urged Brussels to apply a standardized carbon intensity to all aluminum imports from a given country, warning that without such measures the CBAM could become toothless.

While this approach would simplify enforcement and reduce opportunities for fraud, it may trigger resistance from non-EU exporters who want recognition for cleaner production processes.

Future Expansion of CBAM

The Commission is also considering broadening CBAM coverage to downstream products in the six targeted sectors, further tightening the system’s reach. This reflects growing EU determination to ensure climate policy cannot be undermined through trade loopholes.

As one senior EU official put it: “We want to make sure nobody slips through by sending us ‘green’ products while continuing to sell ‘grey’ ones at home.”

The EU’s plan to fix emissions values signals a shift toward practicality in implementing CBAM. However, it raises tensions between ease of enforcement and fairness for cleaner exporters. How Brussels balances these competing pressures will be pivotal in determining whether the CBAM can withstand global trade challenges while maintaining credibility as a climate policy tool.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Sustained Downtrend in Global Rates

According to Drewry Shipping Consultants’ World Container Index (WCI), average freight rates across eight key global routes fell by 1% in the week ending September 4, to $2,104 per 40-foot container (FEU). This marks a 40% drop from mid-June levels, underscoring the sharp correction in shipping markets.

While trans-Pacific spot rates ticked higher last week Shanghai–Los Angeles rising 8% to $2,522/FEU and Shanghai–New York up 12% to $3,677/FEU these gains were offset by steep declines on Asia–Europe lanes, with Shanghai–Rotterdam sliding 10% to $2,385/FEU. Drewry forecasts further weakness on Europe-bound trade due to persistent vessel oversupply.

Capacity Glut Meets Demand Uncertainty

The imbalance between capacity and demand is the central driver of falling rates. A surge in new vessel deliveries ordered years ago during the Red Sea disruption and pandemic-related bottlenecks is now colliding with slowing trade growth. At the same time, many U.S. retailers and manufacturers front-loaded orders earlier this year to hedge against tariff risks, leaving warehouses full and curbing fresh demand.

As a result, U.S. West Coast spot rates have collapsed 68% from their June peak, hitting just $1,802/FEU on September 1, the lowest since December 2023. Xeneta data shows this reflects reduced seasonal orders and cautious inventory management ahead of the autumn shopping season.

Tariff Policy Adds Volatility

Trade policy under the Trump administration continues to create uncertainty. A federal appeals court recently ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority in imposing broad tariffs, yet left them in effect until mid-October pending Supreme Court review. This legal limbo, combined with the White House’s threat of higher port fees for Chinese vessels, has left importers wary of committing to large contracts.

Michael Aldwell of Kuehne + Nagel emphasized that U.S. importers are finding planning “extremely difficult” under current conditions. Many are deliberately reducing inventories, either due to economic uncertainty or because earlier shipments have already filled storage capacity.

Short-Term Outlook: More Pressure Ahead

Despite stable global demand and port congestion in Europe, excess shipping capacity is set to push rates lower through year-end. Drewry projects further declines in spot rates unless carriers aggressively withdraw capacity. Meanwhile, the National Retail Federation forecasts U.S. imports will fall 19–21% year-on-year through the rest of 2025, highlighting structural weakness in demand.

The ongoing slide in sea freight costs eases pressure on Asian exporters battered by tariffs and inflation. Yet, the very factors driving cheaper shipping overcapacity, uncertain trade policies, and softer consumer demand signal fragility in global supply chains. Unless carriers adjust capacity or trade disputes stabilize, the downtrend may persist, with shipping costs testing new lows into 2026.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Political Fragility Amid Fiscal Austerity

The French government stands on shaky ground as it struggles to push through austerity measures aimed at curbing public debt. Prime Minister François Bayrou is unlikely to survive a parliamentary confidence vote on September 8, lacking the majority needed to enforce spending cuts. If his government collapses, France could face either snap elections, as demanded by the far-right RN party, or another fragile minority administration under President Emmanuel Macron.

This political uncertainty complicates economic policymaking, as austerity has proven both politically toxic and socially divisive. Every attempt to tighten spending sparks resistance from both left- and right-wing parties, reflecting a deep societal pushback against reforms.

Debt Burden and Fiscal Pressures

France’s public debt has soared to €3.35 trillion ($3.9 trillion), around 113% of GDP, with projections suggesting it could climb to 125% by 2030. That places France in a league with Greece and Italy traditionally the eurozone’s most indebted economies.

The country is also running the largest budget deficit in the EU, between 5.4% and 5.8% of GDP this year, far above the bloc’s 3% stability threshold. To comply with EU rules, significant fiscal tightening would be required. Yet given the political climate, implementing deep cuts is highly improbable.

Financial markets are already signaling concern. Investors now demand nearly 3.5% yields on French government bonds, compared with just 2.7% on German Bunds. This widening spread reflects higher risk premiums, a warning sign that debt sustainability doubts are creeping in.

Risks to the Eurozone

Analysts warn that instability in France could undermine confidence in the entire eurozone. As Friedrich Heinemann of ZEW Mannheim put it, “We should be worried. If a country as large as France faces both rising debt and political turmoil, the stability of the euro itself could come under strain.”

France’s troubles coincide with a period when the EU is already engaged in trade disputes with the United States, including Paris’s push to raise taxes on American tech giants. The overlap of domestic fiscal instability and external economic tensions makes this an especially precarious time for the bloc.

France’s combination of high debt, persistent deficits, and political fragility is casting a long shadow over Europe’s financial future. While austerity is seen as necessary to restore fiscal discipline, its political unpopularity raises the risk of paralysis. If markets lose confidence in France, the eurozone could face renewed turbulence reminiscent of earlier debt crises, only this time centered in one of its largest and most systemically important economies.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Signs of Technical Stagnation

At the Eastern Economic Forum, Sberbank CEO German Gref described the Russian economy as entering “technical stagnation,” noting that growth was nearly zero in July and August. He attributed the slowdown primarily to restrictive monetary policy, with interest rates at 18% after previously topping 20%. Although Sberbank forecasts rates could ease to 14% by year-end, Gref argued only levels near or below 12% would meaningfully support recovery. This reflects a causal relationship: tight monetary conditions, meant to fight inflation, are simultaneously suppressing business expansion and household demand, prolonging economic stagnation.

According to the Ministry of Finance, Russia’s budget deficit reached 4.88 trillion rubles ($61.1 billion) between January and July, already surpassing full-year projections. The imbalance is linked to several factors: weaker export revenues due to lower global oil prices, a stronger ruble, and physical damage to energy infrastructure from Ukrainian drone strikes. Oil and gas revenues in August dropped 36% month-on-month, extending a four-month decline. The correlation between falling energy exports and the widening deficit illustrates the vulnerability of Russia’s fiscal base to both external price shocks and wartime disruptions.

Slower Growth Outlook

The Ministry of Economic Development has acknowledged that the economy is cooling faster than anticipated. Revised forecasts suggest GDP may expand by only 1.2% in 2025, down from April’s 2.5% estimate. This downward adjustment reflects structural constraints: high borrowing costs, shrinking energy revenues, and disrupted fuel output. Around 15–20% of Russia’s fuel production is currently offline, forcing the government to extend export bans into September to secure domestic supply. Here, the causality is clear: constrained production capacity directly limits export earnings, which in turn undermines growth.

Analysts describe Russia’s predicament as a convergence of high interest rates, surging fiscal deficits, and collapsing energy revenues. Sanctions and persistent infrastructure vulnerabilities add further strain. If oil prices continue to weaken, the budget gap could deepen, raising the risk of prolonged recession. While some experts argue the Kremlin may tolerate low growth in the short term, the combination of domestic and external shocks places increasing pressure on policymakers to balance inflation control with stimulus.

Russia’s economic outlook for 2025 has darkened sharply. The interplay of restrictive monetary policy, falling energy revenues, and structural fiscal imbalances has pushed the economy into technical stagnation. Without decisive policy adjustments, the risk of a deeper and longer-lasting downturn looms large. The challenge for Moscow lies in finding a sustainable balance between defending financial stability and reigniting growth in an environment of rising external and internal pressures.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Cryptocurrency

From Speculation to Strategy

Donald Trump’s family has shifted from the showmanship of NFT collections and meme tokens like $TRUMP to a more institutionalized approach in digital assets. The launch of American Bitcoin on Nasdaq and the expansion of World Liberty Financial mark a deliberate repositioning toward legitimacy. Eric Trump’s televised remarks describing American Bitcoin’s listing as a milestone reinforce the family’s attempt to portray itself as a serious player in the sector.

This transition illustrates a causal link: earlier ventures gained publicity but lacked credibility, prompting a strategic pivot toward structures that investors recognize as more sustainable, such as mining firms and stablecoins.

The Rise of World Liberty Financial

World Liberty Financial, co-founded by Donald Trump and his sons, has become the cornerstone of this new strategy. The company issued USD1, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, while recently unlocking governance tokens. Although these tokens formally grant voting rights, the Trump family controls nearly 25% of supply, effectively retaining veto power over corporate decisions.

The estimated $5 billion value of their holdings makes this tokenized stake one of the most significant assets in the Trump portfolio, surpassing traditional businesses such as golf resorts and hotels. The correlation between token release and valuation surge underscores how financial engineering in crypto markets can rapidly inflate paper wealth.

Integration With Broader Trump Ventures

The family’s crypto expansion aligns with broader Trump-linked enterprises. Trump Media Group has established a crypto-focused arm, CRO Strategy, with plans to list on Nasdaq. This mirrors American Bitcoin’s path, bypassing traditional IPO hurdles. Together, these listings signal an effort to anchor Trump-related digital assets within regulated capital markets, lending them credibility that earlier NFT projects lacked.

Here, the causality lies in regulatory arbitrage: by choosing Nasdaq rather than unregulated exchanges, the family enhances investor confidence while still consolidating control internally.

Balancing Legitimacy and Controversy

While the Trump family presents its ventures as legitimate businesses, critics point to potential conflicts of interest given Donald Trump’s presidential position. White House officials, however, dismiss such claims as unfounded. The family continues to leverage political branding while insulating riskier products such as $TRUMP tokens and NFTs under the umbrella of more conventional-looking businesses.

This duality highlights a structural correlation: political influence fuels investor interest, while corporate formalization shields projects from reputational risk.

The Trump family’s crypto activities have evolved from spectacle to strategy. With American Bitcoin on Nasdaq, a stablecoin circulating under World Liberty Financial, and further ventures in the pipeline, the empire has reached a stage where legitimacy is woven into its narrative. Yet the intertwining of politics, personal wealth, and financial innovation ensures ongoing scrutiny. The success of this empire will depend not only on market dynamics but also on whether investors and regulators accept its new image as a credible force in global digital finance.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

US Tariffs Trigger Rethink in Laos’ Export Strategy

At the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, Lao Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone stated that Laos may redirect coffee exports from the United States to Russia after Washington imposed a 40% tariff last month. The move is part of President Trump’s broader tariff strategy aimed at reducing what he calls structural trade imbalances.

The causal relationship is straightforward: higher tariffs raise costs for US buyers, reducing demand for Lao coffee, which in turn incentivizes Laos to seek alternative markets such as Russia where no such barriers exist.

Russia Emerges as a Natural Alternative

Laos already exports coffee to Russia, but Prime Minister Siphandone noted that volumes could now increase significantly. He emphasized that if tariffs make Lao coffee prohibitively expensive in the US, the logical response would be to expand sales to markets willing to absorb greater supply.

This adjustment also reflects Moscow’s growing importance as a trade partner for countries facing Western restrictions. Strengthening coffee exports could deepen Laos–Russia economic ties at a time when both countries are looking for non-Western trade partners.

Global Coffee Trade Under Pressure

The US tariff policy has disrupted not only Laos but also major exporters Brazil and Vietnam, which now face tariffs of 50% and 20% respectively. Brazil, the world’s top producer, accounts for 37% of global supply, while Vietnam contributes 17%. These measures, coupled with weather-related disruptions, have tightened global supply and driven up prices in recent months, according to the International Coffee Organization.

The correlation here is clear: restrictive tariffs reduce the efficiency of traditional supply chains, redirecting trade flows and contributing to upward price pressure in global markets.

Implications for the US Market

The US remains the largest coffee-consuming nation, with two-thirds of Americans drinking coffee daily, according to the National Coffee Association. Despite strong lobbying from US roasters and retailers to exempt coffee from tariffs, their efforts have failed so far. The mismatch between high consumer demand and constrained imports risks further price hikes for American coffee drinkers.

Laos’ potential pivot toward Russia illustrates how US tariffs are reshaping global commodity flows. While Washington aims to correct trade imbalances, the effect is to divert exports toward alternative buyers, consolidating Russia’s role in non-Western trade networks. At the same time, American consumers may end up paying more for their daily coffee, showing how tariff policy can reverberate from global supply chains down to household consumption.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

A Landmark Investment Framework

On September 3, the US and Japan signed a memorandum of understanding that grants President Trump final authority to determine how a $550 billion Japanese investment will be deployed across American projects. Tokyo has just 45 days to disburse funds to initiatives designated by the White House. Failure to comply would trigger a reinstatement of higher tariffs.

The unusual terms highlight the extent of concessions US trade partners are willing to make under Trump’s tariff regime. Japan, facing a 25% export tariff to the US, secured a reduction to 15% under the deal, but only by committing unprecedented capital tied to Washington’s discretion.

Revenue Sharing and Tariff Relief

The agreement stipulates that profits from the investments will be split evenly until Japan’s principal contribution is repaid, after which the US will retain as much as 90% of ongoing returns. This framework marks a sharp divergence from earlier Japanese interpretations, which assumed profit-sharing proportional to financial contributions.

Alongside the broader package, US tariffs on Japanese automobiles and auto parts will fall from 27.5% to 15%. The executive order also lowers import duties on pharmaceuticals and raw materials for drug manufacturing to zero, while signaling future exemptions for Japanese steel, aluminum, and copper used in aerospace production.

The causal relationship is direct: tariff concessions were granted in exchange for binding capital inflows, effectively monetizing trade access into long-term investment control.

Political and Economic Ramifications

Trump has made such arrangements a hallmark of his second term. In August, Nvidia and AMD agreed to remit 15% of their Chinese revenue to the US government in exchange for export licenses. Earlier this year, Washington acquired a “golden share” in US Steel following Nippon Steel’s $15 billion takeover. These moves collectively redefine trade policy into a hybrid of tariff pressure and capital capture.

For Japan, the arrangement may prove beneficial in the medium term, depending on procurement allocations. Analysts, including Takeshi Yamaguchi of Morgan Stanley, note that if Japanese suppliers are prioritized for project sourcing, the initiative could indirectly bolster Japanese exports while preserving US market access.

Strategic Dimensions Beyond Trade

The agreement also reflects geopolitical alignment. By placing investment under US presidential authority, Japan signals a willingness to tie economic strategy more closely to Washington’s security and industrial priorities. This correlation between alliance politics and trade outcomes underscores how Trump’s “America First” agenda fuses foreign policy with domestic economic objectives.

Japan’s $550 billion commitment represents both an extraordinary concession and a calculated hedge against tariff escalation. By centralizing control in the Oval Office, the deal cements Trump’s leverage over foreign capital flows, while raising questions about sovereignty, fairness, and long-term economic balance. For Tokyo, the choice was pragmatic: accept tighter US control in return for tariff relief and market stability. For Washington, it is a bold step toward recasting trade policy into a mechanism of direct fiscal extraction and industrial strategy.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites