China Quietly Rolls Out Tariff Exemption List For U.S. Goods As Trade War Softens Behind The Scenes

China–U.S. Trade War

Summary:

China is discreetly informing companies about a new 'whitelist' of U.S.-made goods exempt from its 125% retaliatory tariffs, signaling a tactical easing of trade tensions while maintaining a firm public stance amid ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington....

Behind-The-Scenes Diplomacy: China’s Tariff Exemption Strategy Emerges

Amid intensifying trade friction with the United States, China has begun quietly notifying select companies of a confidential list of U.S.-made goods that will be exempt from its 125% retaliatory tariffs. This strategic, under-the-radar move—confirmed by multiple industry sources—illustrates how Beijing is pursuing a two-track approach: maintaining a tough public posture while creating channels for practical relief in critical sectors such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and energy.

This previously undisclosed “whitelist” represents a significant concession in practice, if not in rhetoric. Although authorities have not published the list or confirmed its existence publicly, companies are being contacted individually, often through local government bodies like Shanghai’s Pudong administration, and encouraged to verify whether their imports qualify for tariff waivers.

Discretion Reflects Political Calculus, Economic Necessity

The silent rollout of the exemption list reveals a delicate balancing act. China is signaling to domestic audiences and international observers that it remains firm in its retaliatory stance against Washington’s 145% import tariffs, yet it is simultaneously acknowledging the economic damage of prolonged trade disruptions and seeking to mitigate it.

By keeping the list confidential and initiating one-on-one communication with firms, China avoids the optics of capitulation while securing the economic benefits of supply chain continuity. This duality allows Beijing to support critical industries that remain dependent on U.S. technologies—especially in sectors like medicine and microchips—without undermining its public commitment to “fighting to the end.”

Growing List Reflects Expanding Concessions

The exemption list appears to be expanding beyond earlier categories like pharmaceuticals and aircraft engines. Ethane imports from the U.S.—essential for industrial processing and unavailable elsewhere at similar scale—have recently been exempted. Energy firms had actively lobbied for this exception, reinforcing that exemptions are being granted based on strategic supply necessity and industry pressure.

Some companies, according to sources, have also been asked to proactively reach out to government contacts to lobby for product-specific exemptions. This further underscores the ad hoc, case-by-case nature of the process—designed to keep political messaging intact while providing operational relief.

Authorities Gauge Tariff Fallout Across Industries

Parallel to granting exemptions, Chinese officials are actively surveying businesses to assess the cumulative impact of the U.S.-China trade war. Local governments in cities like Xiamen and eastern manufacturing hubs have distributed surveys to textile and semiconductor firms, asking for detailed feedback on affected trade flows, revenue impacts, and supply chain risks.

In some instances, foreign business associations have also been invited to share detailed scenarios of disruption. These information-gathering efforts suggest that Beijing is preparing a broader recalibration of trade policy, possibly contingent on the direction of future negotiations with Washington.

Signals Of De-escalation Amid Public Tension

While China’s Ministry of Commerce has not commented publicly, these internal adjustments reflect a quiet but meaningful shift. U.S. President Trump hinted on Tuesday that a deal with China may be close, stating, “It’s going to be a fair deal,” suggesting some backchannel negotiations are progressing.

This evolving situation shows correlation—not necessarily direct causation—between behind-the-scenes exemptions in Beijing and softer public messaging from Washington. The tentative synchronization points to a tactical pause in escalation, even as both sides continue to flex publicly.

Managing The Optics Of De-escalation

China’s ‘whitelist’ approach offers a window into how global trade diplomacy is increasingly shaped by informal, flexible mechanisms rather than headline-grabbing announcements. By quietly exempting essential U.S. goods from punitive tariffs, Beijing is protecting its industrial needs while keeping the broader geopolitical narrative intact.

If sustained, this strategy could form the basis of a more comprehensive softening in trade tensions. However, its success depends on mutual willingness to prioritize economic pragmatism over nationalist posturing.

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tariff Front-Loading Likely Drags U.S. Economy Into Near-Stall In Q1 2025

The U.S. economy appears to have stalled—or possibly contracted—in the first quarter of 2025, weighed down by businesses aggressively stockpiling goods in anticipation of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff hikes. According to early forecasts ahead of the Commerce Department’s GDP report, growth likely slowed to an annualized rate of just 0.3%, with some projections, such as Goldman Sachs', suggesting a 0.8% contraction. The primary culprit: a ballooning trade deficit driven by a record surge in goods imports.

While the Trump administration aimed to pressure trading partners and reconfigure global supply chains, the near-term effect of abrupt policy shifts has been economic disruption. The 145% tariff on Chinese goods—compounded by erratic policy signals and retaliatory trade tensions—has triggered widespread economic distortion.

Record Trade Deficit Alters GDP Composition

A significant component of the GDP hit comes from the March trade data showing the goods trade deficit reaching an all-time high. Economists estimate this alone shaved up to 1.9 percentage points off GDP. The sharp import surge, largely preemptive and non-recurring, represents a front-loading of activity, not genuine expansion.

Despite some technical nuance—such as large-scale gold imports inflating the numbers—analysts agree that the direction of the economy is being shaped by trade uncertainty. The Atlanta Fed's model estimates GDP contracted at a 1.5% pace when factoring in the trade imbalance, while the New York Fed projects a more optimistic 2.6% gain, underscoring the high volatility and data distortion.

Consumer Confidence, Spending And Labor Trends Turn Soft

Consumer sentiment has plunged to near five-year lows, as households respond to higher prices, confusing policy messages, and fears of stagnation. Airlines and retailers are pulling back forecasts, citing a collapse in discretionary spending. Moody’s Analytics and others noted that front-loaded purchases temporarily boosted consumption, but this masks real weakness: with inflation rising and the labor market cooling, savings rates are up and future spending appears set to decline.

The PCE price index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, is expected to show core inflation rising at a 3.3% annualized rate—up from 2.6% in Q4 2024. This inflationary pressure, combined with slow or negative growth, places the economy at risk of stagflation.

Inventories And Domestic Output Distortions

Despite the spike in imports, inventory accumulation remained modest, further complicating GDP calculations. Some economists caution that these imbalances distort true economic output, particularly when large capital goods or commodities (like non-monetary gold) skew trade figures.

To isolate core domestic demand, analysts often look to “final sales to private domestic purchasers”—a metric excluding trade, inventories, and government spending. But even this measure is now distorted, as tariff-driven pre-purchasing has artificially inflated private consumption.

Market And Policy Implications: Fed Under Pressure

With Q1 data reflecting both higher inflation and weaker growth, the Federal Reserve faces a complex policy dilemma. Markets now expect rate cuts later this year, but rising prices tied to tariffs could delay action. Treasury yields have dropped as investors price in slower growth, and confidence in long-term U.S. economic management is eroding.

Trump’s recent executive action to soften auto tariffs—by granting offset credits through 2027—has done little to restore clarity. The broader 145% tariff regime on Chinese imports remains in effect, creating ongoing price pressures for businesses and consumers alike.

Overall, the first-quarter economic performance offers a stark reflection of the cost of policy unpredictability. Stockpiling has distorted economic indicators, consumer confidence has fallen, and inflation is creeping upward. While tariffs are intended to shift supply chains and rebalance trade, the short-term result is an economy teetering on the edge of contraction, with measurement anomalies masking deeper fragilities.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

China–U.S. Trade War

Economic

Private Sector Empowerment Becomes Strategic Pillar Amid Trade War Uncertainty

On April 30, 2025, China approved a sweeping new law aimed at reinforcing the private sector, signaling Beijing’s recognition that long-term economic resilience depends on domestic dynamism rather than external demand. The “Law on Promoting the Private Economy,” containing 78 articles, will take effect on May 20 and is being described as both a legal framework and a morale booster for private businesses increasingly strained by prolonged regulatory ambiguity and trade disruptions.

The law was finalized after three rounds of deliberation by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. It lays out policy commitments to improve market competition, enhance access to finance, encourage technological innovation, and protect the economic rights of private entities. This move comes as China seeks to counterbalance weakening export activity and combat investor skepticism following years of inconsistent policy signals.

A Timely Legislative Push During Economic Vulnerability

The new law arrives as China’s economy faces mounting headwinds from a multi-front trade confrontation with the U.S., which has imposed a 145% tariff rate on Chinese goods—combining a 125% retaliatory layer with a pre-existing 20%. In response, Beijing enacted its own 125% tariffs on American imports and halted Boeing orders while restricting strategic exports.

However, both sides have recently signaled a willingness to moderate. China is reportedly considering suspending tariffs on certain U.S. goods such as medical equipment and industrial chemicals like ethane, echoing a reciprocal U.S. move to exempt electronics from the 145% levy. This tentative easing illustrates how trade war escalation is now driving broader domestic reform in Beijing’s economic playbook.

Legal Reform Anchored In Economic Reality

The law’s drafting began in 2024, spearheaded by China’s National Development and Reform Commission. A draft was released for public comment in October, incorporating key feedback from private entrepreneurs—particularly around issues like arbitrary penalties and law enforcement bias, long viewed as major deterrents to private sector investment.

New additions to the final version directly address the private sector’s longstanding grievances, including unequal market access and the sense that state-owned enterprises enjoy preferential regulatory treatment. By pledging fairer enforcement and curbing opportunistic fines for revenue generation, the law aims to revive private sector confidence and stabilize the business climate.

Private Sector's Pivotal Economic Role Acknowledged

According to China’s National Bureau of Statistics, the private economy contributes over 60% of national GDP, 70% of innovation output, and 80% of urban employment. Yet despite this significance, years of overregulation and policy ambiguity have discouraged private investment and fueled a perception that the state favors public sector dominance.

Although private investment declined in recent years, a modest rebound of 0.4% in Q1 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 may indicate early signs of recovery. Still, structural challenges remain, and Beijing appears intent on using legal instruments to offer clarity, stability, and long-term reassurance.

Political Signaling Through High-Level Engagement

President Xi Jinping’s decision to convene a landmark meeting with the country’s top private entrepreneurs in February—the first such session since 2018—was seen as a high-profile gesture to reset relations with the private sector. That meeting likely served as a precursor to the legislative push, underlining the central government’s shift toward enabling private enterprise as a strategic buffer against external economic shocks.

The legislative effort also appears designed to shift expectations. Rather than short-term fiscal stimulus, Beijing is betting on structural reforms and regulatory clarity to unlock domestic productivity. The move reflects a causal approach: as external uncertainty rises, internal stabilization through legal safeguards becomes more urgent.

Balancing Trade Policy With Domestic Reforms

While the new law is not a direct response to tariffs, its timing and tone suggest that China is preparing for a protracted decoupling with the U.S. by fostering self-reliance and improving internal efficiency. The recent back-and-forth on tariff suspensions shows a parallel dynamic: efforts to reduce external friction are being matched by domestic reforms to ensure that future growth can be sustained without overdependence on vulnerable trade relationships.

As the trade war with the U.S. continues to strain traditional growth engines like exports and infrastructure, the private sector is being positioned as a key source of endogenous innovation and employment. For this strategy to succeed, consistent legal protections and access to capital will be essential.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Global Markets Lose Momentum Amid Tariff-Induced Economic Anxiety

Markets opened the day on a shaky footing, as the weight of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policy continued to ripple across global financial and commodity markets. Despite initial hopes for easing tensions after the administration announced partial relief on auto tariffs, sentiment soured due to worsening macroeconomic signals and a lack of clarity on trade negotiations.

Brent crude dropped 0.28% to $64.07 per barrel, and U.S. WTI crude fell 0.35% to $60.21, extending sharp losses from the previous session. U.S. stock futures also lost traction, with Nasdaq and S&P 500 futures falling 0.6% and 0.4% respectively. Meanwhile, Treasury yields declined to multi-week lows as investors shifted expectations toward deeper rate cuts from the Federal Reserve by year-end.

Market Sentiment Deteriorates Despite Policy Hints

While Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick claimed to have secured a foreign trade deal—awaiting approval from the partner country—the lack of specifics failed to inspire confidence. Traders remain skeptical of meaningful progress amid what many view as a chaotic and politically motivated trade agenda.

Investor uncertainty was compounded by fresh economic data showing a record U.S. goods trade deficit and the sharpest drop in consumer confidence since the early pandemic period. As signs of economic fragility mount, analysts are increasingly pricing in a scenario of prolonged stagnation. Julius Baer’s chief economist, David Kohl, estimated a 50% chance of recessionary conditions emerging in the coming months, attributing the risk directly to erratic and restrictive trade policy.

Corporate Strategy Under Pressure From Policy Instability

Multinational corporations are now openly struggling with the implications of unpredictable tariffs. UPS announced a sweeping plan to cut 20,000 jobs, while General Motors pulled its earnings forecast and delayed its investor call. Many firms are refraining from long-term planning, citing poor visibility and the risk of contracting demand.

M&G Investments’ CIO Fabiana Fedeli described the current landscape as one where businesses are increasingly unwilling to sign contracts or invest in future growth, describing the situation as “a very slippery slope.” The result is a widespread freeze on capital spending that could deepen the economic slowdown.

Oil And Commodities Reflect Demand Fears

The energy market mirrored these concerns. Crude oil’s back-to-back losses reflected not only the drag from weak economic indicators but also from reduced corporate fuel consumption forecasts. The demand outlook has darkened as fears of a synchronized global slowdown—led by the U.S. and China—overshadow any near-term supply constraints.

Spot gold held steady at $3,316.11 an ounce, indicating modest safe-haven demand amid growing economic uncertainty and market volatility.

Bond Markets Signal Fed Will Be Forced To Act

With market confidence waning, traders increased bets on rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. The futures market now prices in 97 basis points of cuts by December, up from 80 basis points last week. This pivot drove the two-year U.S. Treasury yield to a three-week low of 3.64%, while the 10-year yield dropped to 4.158%, its lowest since early April.

Even with inflation risks stemming from tariffs, the growing drag on GDP and consumer sentiment has pushed expectations toward more aggressive monetary easing—especially if economic data continues to deteriorate.

China Data Adds To Gloomy Global Outlook

Adding another layer to the bearish global sentiment, China reported a contraction in factory activity for April, reversing two months of modest recovery. Societe Generale revised its 2025–2026 GDP growth forecasts for China down to 4%, expecting further stimulus equal to 2.5% of GDP and warning of prolonged deflationary pressure.

The Chinese stock market responded tepidly, with the CSI300 edging up 0.12% and the Hang Seng Index dipping 0.08%, mirroring a global market that is neither in freefall nor in recovery—stuck instead in a state of tense stagnation.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tariff Stockpiling Triggers Historic Surge In Trade Deficit

The United States recorded its largest-ever monthly goods trade deficit in March 2025, reaching $162.0 billion, as importers raced to bring in merchandise ahead of new tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. According to the Census Bureau, goods imports soared to a record $342.7 billion, led by a 27.5% surge in consumer goods. This tariff-induced stockpiling strategy signals a short-term spike in activity but presents a long-term drag on the economy by skewing trade balances and distorting inventory cycles.

Economists sharply revised down their GDP estimates for the first quarter, with Goldman Sachs projecting a 0.8% contraction and JPMorgan anticipating a 1.75% decline, compared to 2.4% growth in Q4 2024. The overwhelming presence of front-loaded imports underscores a direct link between tariff policy shifts and output volatility, as the import surge subtracts from GDP calculations and offsets any positive inventory accumulation effects.

Consumer Confidence Plummets As Tariff Anxiety Mounts

The economic repercussions of Trump’s erratic tariff strategy are reverberating beyond trade statistics. Consumer confidence dropped 7.9 points to 86.0 in April—the lowest reading since May 2020—according to the Conference Board. The report noted that tariffs have risen to the forefront of consumer concerns, with mentions reaching an all-time high in survey responses.

The data reflect a synchronized decline across age, income, and political lines, indicating that tariff uncertainty is undermining confidence in future economic stability. This psychological strain is expected to reduce discretionary spending, a crucial driver of U.S. growth, and exacerbate the slowdown already triggered by weak net exports.

Labor Market Signals Stability, But With Cracks Emerging

Despite growing economic pessimism, the labor market has yet to show widespread distress. Job openings fell to 7.192 million in March—the lowest level since last September—but layoffs remained near nine-month lows. Businesses appear reluctant to release workers, mindful of past hiring challenges during and after the pandemic. The labor market tightness, however, appears increasingly fragile and susceptible to external shocks.

The ratio of job openings to unemployed workers dipped slightly, signaling that although hiring intentions are cooling, job security remains intact—for now. But economists warn that if the economic outlook continues to deteriorate under the weight of trade-related disruptions, employment may begin to adjust more sharply.

GDP Outlook Sours Amid Supply Chain Stress And Inventory Distortions

The worsening trade imbalance has prompted analysts to lower GDP expectations not only due to the direct subtraction from imports, but also because of the limited offset from inventory accumulation. While wholesale inventories rose 0.5%, mostly due to tariff-driven stockpiling, retail inventories fell 0.1%, dragged down by motor vehicle dealerships. The uneven inventory picture suggests that much of the import surge is not translating into consumer-facing economic activity.

Goods exports, on the other hand, rose only modestly by $2.2 billion to $180.8 billion, driven by automotive vehicles and food shipments. Capital and consumer goods exports declined, revealing early signs of retaliation or suppressed foreign demand in response to the U.S.’s aggressive trade posture. A weaker dollar, often supportive of exports, is unlikely to deliver significant relief if other countries respond with countermeasures.

Policy Implications And Fed Dilemma

The Federal Reserve now faces a complex challenge. On one hand, tariff-induced price hikes and potential supply bottlenecks are contributing to inflation pressures, limiting the Fed’s ability to cut interest rates in the short term. On the other hand, deteriorating GDP growth and declining consumer sentiment are fueling expectations that the central bank will eventually be forced to lower rates significantly later in the year.

As ING’s James Knightley noted, while the Fed may remain constrained in the near term, mounting economic damage from trade instability will inevitably increase the political.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Commodity

Energy Markets React Cautiously To Trade Policy Uncertainty

Crude oil prices declined slightly in early Asian trading on April 30, 2025, as escalating global trade tensions triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump’s unpredictable tariff policy stoked fears of weakening global economic growth and fuel demand. Brent crude futures fell by 17 cents to $64.08 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) dropped 12 cents to $60.30 per barrel. Both benchmarks marked their lowest settlements since April 10 in the prior session, indicating growing market anxiety.

The decline reflects a correlation between intensifying trade policy risks and lowered energy demand expectations. Although price drops were modest in magnitude, they signal investor sensitivity to broader economic indicators and policy instability.

Trade War Sentiment Clouds Energy Market Projections

The oil market is highly responsive to macroeconomic signals, particularly those tied to global trade volumes and industrial production. President Trump’s erratic approach to tariffs—especially those aimed at key trading partners—has injected volatility into energy market projections.

As tariffs threaten to disrupt supply chains, dampen industrial activity, and reduce cross-border consumer demand, the oil market interprets these signals as bearish. Analysts are increasingly factoring in the likelihood of slower economic growth translating into reduced consumption of crude and refined fuels, from manufacturing to transportation sectors.

Demand Outlook Softens Amid Supply Uncertainty

While supply-side dynamics such as OPEC+ output levels or U.S. inventory fluctuations continue to influence oil pricing, demand-side weakness is now taking center stage. The current environment highlights a scenario where demand deterioration, rather than supply constraints, is becoming the dominant force behind price movement.

Even slight downgrades to expected growth in oil-consuming economies—such as China, where PMI data shows slowing factory activity—can reinforce downside price pressure, particularly when combined with geopolitical instability and protectionist rhetoric.

Investor Sentiment And Technical Indicators

The subdued price reaction in this trading session also suggests that traders are awaiting further clarity on upcoming trade negotiations and macroeconomic data, including U.S. GDP results and updates on China’s export performance. Until there is more visibility on how these tensions will unfold, the market is likely to remain fragile, with any additional escalation posing immediate downside risk.

The return to price levels last seen on April 10 points to a weakening of technical support levels, opening the possibility of deeper retracements if negative sentiment persists.

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

China’s Manufacturing Momentum Slows Under Tariff Pressure

China’s manufacturing sector showed signs of renewed stress in April 2025, with the Caixin/S&P Global Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) falling to 50.4 from 51.2 in March. While this reading remains marginally above the neutral 50 mark separating expansion from contraction, it is the weakest since January and confirms that escalating U.S. tariffs are beginning to disrupt factory output and confidence across the country.

This decline comes as Beijing refrains from launching new stimulus measures, opting instead to observe the trajectory of the trade conflict. The data diverges from the official government PMI, which pointed to an even faster slowdown in activity, signaling that the toll from tariffs is broadening.

Export Demand Weakens Sharply Amid Trade War Escalation

The most immediate and pronounced impact has been on new export orders, which fell at their fastest pace since July 2023. The contraction suggests a strong correlation between the latest round of U.S. tariff increases and the weakening of China's external demand.

Total new orders continued to rise, but only marginally, and the growth rate slowed noticeably. Output itself increased, but momentum faded as manufacturers focused on fulfilling prior commitments rather than securing fresh demand. This indicates that while current operations remain active, future production is at risk due to shrinking pipelines.

Business Sentiment Deteriorates As Policy Responses Lag

The softening of business optimism was another worrying sign. April’s reading on confidence dropped to its third-lowest level since the sentiment index began in 2012. Firms are trimming inventories and bracing for a prolonged period of trade uncertainty, showing that the slowdown is no longer seen as temporary.

The delayed policy response from Beijing may be contributing to this pessimism. Despite prior pledges from the Politburo to support companies and workers affected by the tariffs, concrete measures remain limited. Economists from Caixin warned that authorities need to act sooner rather than later to cushion further downside risks.

Employment Declines Resume As Firms Cut Costs

In a significant reversal from the previous month’s gains, employment in the manufacturing sector declined in April. The survey cites resignations and cost-saving restructurings as key factors behind the job cuts. With foreign trade directly or indirectly supporting 180 million Chinese jobs, as noted by former Premier Li Keqiang, even small declines in export activity can have a large ripple effect on labor markets.

Corporate downsizing and efforts to preserve margins amid falling orders show a cause-effect pattern: as export demand drops due to tariffs, revenue shortfalls lead companies to scale back labor and other operational costs.

Supply Chain Strains And Shifts In Input Costs

Trade disruptions also caused a slight lengthening of supplier lead times, while subdued input demand led to intensified price competition among vendors. This environment pushed average input costs lower in April, contributing to further deflationary pressures within upstream segments.

Despite the cost relief, weak domestic demand poses a structural constraint. The government has encouraged exporters to pivot to the domestic market, but businesses cite severe headwinds including low consumer spending, delayed payments, and high return rates. These challenges limit the effectiveness of domestic reallocation as a substitute for lost export opportunities.

Risks To Recovery Mount Amid Geopolitical Tensions

The manufacturing slowdown underscores how deeply trade frictions are affecting China's post-pandemic recovery. The structural vulnerability of China’s export-dependent growth model is being exposed, and the ripple effects—from shrinking orders to layoffs—are building systemic pressure on both firms and households.

If left unaddressed, these stress points could dampen overall economic momentum in the second and third quarters of 2025. Without timely and targeted fiscal and monetary interventions, the gap between production capacity and demand—both foreign and domestic—may widen, threatening broader recovery prospects.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

China Quietly Rolls Out Tariff Exemption List For U.S. Goods As Trade War Softens Behind The Scenes

Behind-The-Scenes Diplomacy: China’s Tariff Exemption Strategy Emerges

Discretion Reflects Political Calculus, Economic Necessity

Growing List Reflects Expanding Concessions

Authorities Gauge Tariff Fallout Across Industries

Signals Of De-escalation Amid Public Tension

Managing The Optics Of De-escalation

Source: Reuters

Tariff-Driven Stockpiling Chokes U.S. Economic Growth In First Quarter As GDP Falters

Tariff Front-Loading Likely Drags U.S. Economy Into Near-Stall In Q1 2025

Record Trade Deficit Alters GDP Composition

Consumer Confidence, Spending And Labor Trends Turn Soft

Inventories And Domestic Output Distortions

Market And Policy Implications: Fed Under Pressure

Source: Reuters

China Enacts Landmark Law To Empower Private Sector Amid Escalating U.S. Trade Pressure

Private Sector Empowerment Becomes Strategic Pillar Amid Trade War Uncertainty

A Timely Legislative Push During Economic Vulnerability

Legal Reform Anchored In Economic Reality

Private Sector's Pivotal Economic Role Acknowledged

Political Signaling Through High-Level Engagement

Balancing Trade Policy With Domestic Reforms

Source: Bloomberg

Markets Shaken As Trump’s Tariff Turbulence Sparks Global Growth Fears And Corporate Retrenchment

Global Markets Lose Momentum Amid Tariff-Induced Economic Anxiety

Market Sentiment Deteriorates Despite Policy Hints

Corporate Strategy Under Pressure From Policy Instability

Oil And Commodities Reflect Demand Fears

Bond Markets Signal Fed Will Be Forced To Act

China Data Adds To Gloomy Global Outlook

Source: Reuters

Record U.S. Goods Trade Deficit Signals Deepening Economic Strain As Tariff Fears Drive Stockpiling

Tariff Stockpiling Triggers Historic Surge In Trade Deficit

Consumer Confidence Plummets As Tariff Anxiety Mounts

Labor Market Signals Stability, But With Cracks Emerging

GDP Outlook Sours Amid Supply Chain Stress And Inventory Distortions

Policy Implications And Fed Dilemma

Source: Reuters

Oil Prices Dip As Trade War Fears Undermine Global Demand Outlook

Energy Markets React Cautiously To Trade Policy Uncertainty

Trade War Sentiment Clouds Energy Market Projections

Demand Outlook Softens Amid Supply Uncertainty

Investor Sentiment And Technical Indicators

Source: Reuters

China’s Factory Growth Falters As U.S. Tariffs Trigger Export Collapse And Job Losses

China’s Manufacturing Momentum Slows Under Tariff Pressure

Export Demand Weakens Sharply Amid Trade War Escalation

Business Sentiment Deteriorates As Policy Responses Lag

Employment Declines Resume As Firms Cut Costs

Supply Chain Strains And Shifts In Input Costs

Risks To Recovery Mount Amid Geopolitical Tensions

Source: Reuters

Risk Disclosure