Australia Presses US for Clarity Amid Trump’s Threat of 200% Drug Tariffs

Economic

Summary:

Australia is urgently seeking clarification from the US after President Trump proposed a 200% tariff on pharmaceutical imports, raising alarm over the potential impact on Australia’s drug exports and its national healthcare protections...

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Industry on Alert Amid US Trade Threat

The Australian government has moved swiftly to request more information following U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement of a potential 200% tariff on imported pharmaceuticals. Treasurer Jim Chalmers emphasized on Wednesday that Australia is particularly vulnerable to such measures due to its pharmaceutical industry’s heavy reliance on the U.S. market. In 2024, pharmaceutical exports to the U.S. totaled A$2.1 billion, accounting for 38% of Australia’s total pharma exports.

This sector-specific exposure stands in sharp contrast to Australia’s copper trade with the U.S., which makes up less than 1% of its overall copper exports. Trump’s simultaneous plan to impose a 50% tariff on copper imports may garner symbolic attention, but it is the pharmaceutical tariff threat that has provoked immediate concern in Canberra.

PBS at the Center of a Brewing Trade Dispute

The crux of the tension lies in Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), a public program that caps prices on nearly 1,000 essential medicines. While hailed domestically as a pillar of equitable healthcare, the PBS has increasingly come under scrutiny from U.S. trade lobbyists who argue it disadvantages American pharmaceutical exporters. According to recent reporting by The Guardian, several powerful Washington lobbying groups are calling on the White House to penalize Australia for what they see as regulatory barriers and domestic manufacturing incentives that restrict foreign competition.

The trade tension appears to stem not only from economic calculations but also from conflicting policy philosophies: the U.S. model prioritizes open market pricing, while Australia’s approach centers on healthcare affordability through price regulation. The tariff threat thus reflects not just retaliation for market access disputes but also a broader ideological clash over pharmaceutical governance.

Trump’s Tactical Delay Offers Limited Assurance

President Trump indicated that pharmaceutical companies may be given up to one year to shift production to the U.S. before the full 200% tariff is enforced. While this temporary reprieve might allow some firms to adjust, it does little to reduce the broader uncertainty for exporters like Australia. The correlation between political rhetoric and actual policy implementation remains unclear, leaving trade partners to navigate a fluid and potentially volatile landscape.

Treasurer Chalmers has made it clear that Australia will not compromise on its PBS framework, signaling a firm political stance. "Our Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is not something we’re willing to trade away or do deals on,” he said, underscoring Canberra’s unwillingness to accept U.S. pressure on healthcare policy.

Market and Policy Implications of a Prolonged Dispute

If enacted, the proposed tariffs could significantly disrupt pharmaceutical trade between the two countries. Australian exporters may face diminished competitiveness in the U.S. market, potentially leading to revenue losses and reduced scale in a sector already under cost pressure. Moreover, the uncertainty could discourage long-term investment in cross-border pharmaceutical supply chains.

Beyond bilateral trade, the episode raises concerns about the politicization of healthcare trade and the limits of trade policy as a tool for resolving regulatory disagreements. The causal relationship between perceived unfair pricing systems and punitive tariffs introduces a precedent that could reverberate in future trade negotiations with other nations.

Healthcare Policy Meets Trade Power Politics

Australia’s rapid response to Trump’s drug tariff threat underscores the high stakes involved when national healthcare policy intersects with geopolitical trade strategy. As Canberra insists on protecting the PBS, the confrontation may evolve into a broader test of how far governments are willing to go to defend domestic policy values in the face of economic retaliation.

While the full implications of the 200% tariff remain uncertain, one thing is clear: Australia is not treating the threat as symbolic. Its economic and political leaders are preparing for the possibility of a sustained standoff, one that pits healthcare sovereignty against the expanding reach of tariff diplomacy.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Market Fatigue Sets In as Tariff Drama Repeats

Global financial markets, once volatile in response to U.S. trade policy shifts, are now displaying a more muted tone. Carol Fong, Chief Executive Officer of CGS International Securities Group, highlighted at the Reuters Next Asia summit in Singapore that the repeated nature of President Trump’s tariff threats has dulled market sensitivity. Despite Trump setting a new August 1 deadline for sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs across nearly all major trading partners, market reactions over the past two days have been relatively subdued.

This shift in investor behavior suggests that markets are beginning to price in political unpredictability as a baseline condition. The causal link between tariff announcements and financial volatility appears to be weakening, giving way to a more correlation-based dynamic where broader macroeconomic fundamentals increasingly dictate market movement, rather than day-to-day political proclamations.

Tariff Policy No Longer a Shock Event

The lack of immediate reaction when the previous tariff deadline passed without incident is illustrative. Investors seem to anticipate that many of these deadlines are strategic negotiation tools rather than definitive policy shifts. While Trump reaffirmed his commitment to enforcing a 50% tariff on copper imports and hinted at broader measures, traders appear to be factoring in the likelihood of delays, exemptions, or partial enforcement dampening volatility.

This evolving investor psychology underscores how financial markets adapt over time to recurring policy shocks. The element of surprise, once potent in tariff announcements, has largely faded, turning what were once market-moving headlines into background noise.

Tariffs and Fiscal Revenue: Economic Impact Beyond Price Reaction

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent offered another layer to the discussion, revealing that the U.S. has already collected $100 billion in tariff revenue this year, with projections of $300 billion by year-end. While these figures underscore the scale of current trade policies, they also indicate that tariffs are serving a dual function: not only as tools of foreign policy leverage but also as fiscal instruments contributing directly to government revenue.

However, this fiscal inflow may come at the cost of longer-term economic distortions. Higher input costs for U.S. manufacturers especially in copper-intensive sectors such as construction, consumer electronics, and defense could hinder competitiveness and strain supply chains. Although the market has not sharply reacted in the short term, the cumulative effects of sustained tariffs are likely to influence industrial activity, earnings expectations, and pricing dynamics over time.

Complacency or Strategic Adaptation?

The apparent desensitization of markets to Trump’s tariff maneuvers reflects a deeper shift in investor mindset. While this may signal a form of complacency, it more accurately represents a strategic adaptation to political noise in favor of focusing on structural data and policy outcomes.

Yet this does not mean tariffs have lost their economic relevance. As enforcement deepens or broadens particularly if no exemptions are granted by the August 1 deadline markets may still respond, especially if tangible supply disruptions or inflationary pressures emerge. For now, however, the immediate impact of tariff headlines is waning, with investor attention increasingly turning to long-term fundamentals and earnings resilience in a trade-fragmented world.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Forex

Dollar Gains Momentum Amid Rising Trade Pressures

The dollar edged higher to 146.85 yen on Wednesday, marking its third straight day of gains and reaching levels not seen in over two weeks. The latest upward push was triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement of 25% tariffs on Japan and several other trading partners, with promises of further trade-related measures targeting at least seven countries. Although Trump left the door open for extensions pending new trade proposals, the overall tone added to market volatility and reinforced bullish sentiment toward the greenback.

The rise in the USD/JPY exchange rate appears causally linked to a combination of elevated U.S. Treasury yields and weakening confidence in Japan’s economic outlook. Concerns over stalled trade negotiations between the U.S. and Japan particularly around agricultural protections like Japan’s rice market have added pressure on the yen. In parallel, Japanese government bond yields have climbed in recent days, reflecting growing fiscal concerns ahead of the upper house elections scheduled for July 20.

Rising Yields Support Dollar Rally

U.S. yields have climbed for five consecutive sessions, further widening the interest rate differential between U.S. and Japanese government bonds. This yield gap remains a key driver of the dollar’s appreciation against the yen, as it increases the appeal of dollar-denominated assets. On Tuesday, these developments coincided with a broader rise in the dollar index, which settled at 97.582 after a two-day advance.

Japanese yields also ticked higher, but the market interpreted this as a fiscal risk reaction rather than a signal of economic strength. The Bank of Japan, while maintaining a loose monetary stance, is now closely watching domestic inflation, especially after recent increases in rice prices. Board member Junko Koeda noted the potential for second-round inflation effects, adding a layer of uncertainty to Japan’s economic policy outlook.

Tariff Tensions Expand to Global Currency Markets

While the dollar’s strength has been most pronounced against the yen, ripple effects are visible across the broader currency market. The euro held relatively steady at $1.1720, while the British pound slipped 0.1% to $1.35795. Commodity-linked currencies showed weakness, with the Australian dollar declining to $0.6526 and the New Zealand dollar easing to $0.5993 both partially retracing gains made earlier in the week.

The market’s reaction suggests a correlation between escalating U.S. trade policy and increased demand for the dollar as a safe haven. Although no immediate causal relationship exists between tariffs and the dollar’s fundamental value, the uncertainty created by unpredictable trade policies drives investors toward the U.S. currency, particularly when accompanied by rising U.S. interest rates.

Political and Diplomatic Signals Remain Mixed

Adding to the geopolitical complexity, Trump’s administration continues to adjust its diplomatic posture. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will skip the upcoming G20 finance ministers meeting in South Africa a move interpreted as a diplomatic signal but will attend the World Expo 2025 in Osaka, Japan. This selective engagement illustrates how the administration is recalibrating its focus toward strategic economic relationships, even as tensions mount.

Meanwhile, the European Union appears to have avoided the brunt of new U.S. tariffs, with sources suggesting that Brussels may secure exemptions from the baseline 10% rate. If confirmed, this development would reinforce a differentiated approach in U.S. trade strategy, further influencing investor sentiment across currency pairs.

The dollar’s recent appreciation reflects both technical and fundamental drivers. On one side, rising yields and trade anxiety support a stronger greenback; on the other, the yen’s weakness is magnified by Japan’s fiscal concerns and fragile trade position. With Trump promising additional tariff announcements and ongoing uncertainty in global trade talks, investors appear poised to maintain their defensive dollar positions in the short term. However, further clarity or unexpected policy shifts could quickly alter the current trajectory.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Commodity

Economic

Price Movement Reflects Tariff Caution Despite Demand Support

Oil markets eased on Wednesday after a brief surge to two-week highs, as investors cautiously monitored new developments in U.S. trade policy. Brent crude slipped by 20 cents to $69.95 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell by 21 cents to $68.12. These modest declines came after an earlier rally driven by strong U.S. travel data, which had buoyed expectations for summer fuel consumption.

However, U.S. President Donald Trump’s mixed signals on tariffs introduced fresh uncertainty. By postponing a key trade deadline to August 1 while simultaneously announcing new tariffs on copper, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals Trump injected confusion into the outlook for global trade, fueling concerns about broader economic weakness and potential demand destruction for oil.

The interplay between these political signals and price movements suggests a close correlation rather than a direct causal relationship. Still, given oil’s sensitivity to macroeconomic demand shifts, the ambiguity around U.S. trade actions has tempered the market’s bullish momentum.

Strong U.S. Travel Offsets Some Demand Concerns

Offsetting the bearish trade narrative, travel demand around the July 4th holiday weekend in the United States proved robust. According to AAA, a record 72.2 million Americans were projected to travel more than 50 miles, reflecting continued consumer strength in domestic transportation sectors. This short-term demand surge offered a cushion to oil prices, even as macro headwinds loomed.

The relationship between holiday travel and near-term oil consumption is direct and seasonal. Although the boost is temporary, it provides critical short-term support at a time when long-term demand expectations remain clouded by policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk.

Shifting Supply Landscape Between U.S. and OPEC+

On the supply side, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) revised down its U.S. oil production forecast for 2025 to 13.37 million barrels per day, slightly below the previous estimate of 13.42 million bpd. The EIA attributed this revision to reduced drilling activity prompted by weaker price signals, suggesting that American producers are adjusting cautiously to current market conditions.

This downward revision reflects a causal relationship between market price levels and capital allocation among U.S. shale producers. When prices remain soft or volatile, investment slows, impacting output timelines.

Conversely, OPEC+ is continuing its supply expansion, having already approved a 548,000 bpd production hike for August and planning further increases in September. Most of this incremental supply, however, has thus far come from Saudi Arabia, as actual output remains below headline targets. The United Arab Emirates’ rise to a larger production quota is also expected to contribute to the bloc’s September growth.

The divergence in production trends between the U.S. and OPEC+ could create a structural imbalance in global supply over time, though the pace of OPEC+ ramp-up remains inconsistent, limiting immediate downside risk to prices.

Geopolitical Risks Offer Underlying Price Support

While macroeconomic and trade-related concerns dominate the oil narrative, geopolitical tensions are quietly underpinning the market. A deadly attack off the coast of Yemen involving the bulk carrier Eternity C marked the second maritime incident in a single day. The region, long known for volatile shipping conditions, has reemerged as a source of instability, reminding traders of the ongoing threat to global energy transport routes.

Such developments tend to act as a psychological floor for oil prices, with traders pricing in premiums for supply disruptions even if actual flows remain unaffected. The correlation between geopolitical risks and oil prices often reflects market sentiment rather than immediate changes in supply-demand fundamentals.

Markets Navigate a Narrow Path Between Optimism and Uncertainty

Oil’s recent price movement illustrates the complex tug-of-war between short-term bullish factors like holiday-driven demand and persistent macroeconomic uncertainty surrounding trade policy and production dynamics. While travel trends and a slight decline in U.S. output offer temporary support, the ambiguous impact of new U.S. tariffs and OPEC+’s evolving supply strategy continue to cloud the longer-term outlook.

For now, the oil market appears to be balancing cautiously, awaiting clarity on policy and production before committing to a clear directional trend. Investors will likely remain reactive to political developments and economic indicators in the coming weeks.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Hassett’s Name Gains Momentum Amid Trump’s Renewed Fed Criticism

Kevin Hassett, a senior White House economic adviser, has emerged as a prominent candidate to succeed Jerome Powell as chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve, according to a Wall Street Journal report citing individuals familiar with the matter. Hassett reportedly held at least two private discussions with President Donald Trump in June 2025 regarding the potential appointment. This development comes as Trump intensifies his criticism of the current Fed leadership for resisting deeper rate cuts in the face of economic headwinds.

Trump’s dissatisfaction with Powell’s monetary stance particularly the Federal Reserve’s caution toward reducing interest rates has been a recurring theme in recent months. The president has frequently argued that more aggressive rate cuts are necessary to stimulate growth and counterbalance global economic uncertainty. The emergence of Hassett as a frontrunner appears to reflect Trump’s interest in appointing a more dovish Fed leader aligned with his pro-growth agenda.

Shortlist Reflects Broader Strategic Considerations

While Hassett is gaining traction, he is not the only name reportedly under consideration. The shortlist includes Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor known for his more hawkish monetary views; Christopher Waller, a current Fed governor with strong central bank credentials; and Scott Bessent, the current Treasury Secretary and a close economic adviser to Trump. Each of these figures represents a different ideological orientation and potential direction for future monetary policy.

Among the contenders, Hassett stands out for his close advisory relationship with Trump and his background in economic modeling and tax policy. His public advocacy for more accommodative policy may resonate with Trump’s criticism of Powell’s stance, although his lack of central banking experience could draw scrutiny from markets and economists.

Implications for Fed Independence and Market Expectations

The prospect of a new Fed chair being selected amid heightened political pressure raises questions about the future independence of the central bank. Should Hassett or another Trump-aligned figure be appointed, markets may begin to reassess expectations for interest rate policy in 2026 and beyond. The potential shift toward a more politically influenced Fed could affect bond yields, inflation forecasts, and investor confidence in the central bank’s commitment to price stability.

This possibility does not suggest a direct causal link between Trump’s preferences and immediate monetary changes, but it highlights a strong correlation between political priorities and the likely orientation of future Fed leadership.

As Trump signals a move to replace Jerome Powell, the emergence of Kevin Hassett as a serious contender introduces a new layer of uncertainty in U.S. monetary policy. With several high-profile figures reportedly in contention, the eventual choice will signal the administration’s broader economic direction either toward institutional continuity or a more unorthodox, growth-driven policy regime. For now, markets will watch closely for official confirmation and any accompanying shifts in Fed communication or rate path expectations.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Deepening Producer Deflation Signals Growing Economic Strain

In June 2025, China recorded its most severe factory-gate deflation since July 2023, with the Producer Price Index (PPI) falling 3.6% year-over-year. This decline exceeded both the 3.3% drop recorded in May and market expectations of a 3.2% fall. The widening deflation underscores mounting pressures in the industrial sector as China contends with subdued domestic demand and rising geopolitical uncertainty linked to global trade friction, particularly with the United States.

The downturn in producer prices reveals the extent to which Chinese manufacturers are struggling to sustain pricing power in an environment where demand recovery remains fragile. The deflationary trend, if prolonged, risks further compressing profit margins in key industrial sectors and could suppress investment, delaying broader economic recovery.

Trade Environment and Export Industry Under Pressure

According to Dong Lijuan, a statistician from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the unstable global trade environment has dampened export expectations among Chinese enterprises. This suggests a potential causal relationship between US-led tariff policies and the decline in factory-gate prices, particularly in export-oriented sectors. The uncertainty surrounding international trade policy, notably the aggressive tariff stance under US President Donald Trump, has not only constrained external demand but also disrupted market confidence and future production planning.

As a result, many businesses have resorted to price reductions in order to maintain market share. This is evident in the intensifying price competition across various sectors, including the automobile industry, where authorities have recently called for restraint to prevent further erosion of margins caused by aggressive discounting.

Consumer Prices Show Fragile Recovery

On the consumer side, prices showed modest signs of stabilization, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) edging up 0.1% in June after five months of contraction. This minor increase slightly exceeded market expectations and reversed a 0.1% decline in May. However, the monthly CPI still dipped 0.1%, mirroring weak household spending and the lingering effects of a prolonged property market slump.

Dong Lijuan attributed the slight CPI rebound to rising prices in industrial consumer goods. Despite this, broader consumer sentiment remains weak, as reflected in the continued need for large e-commerce firms like Alibaba and JD.com to offer significant subsidies to stimulate demand, particularly in the fast delivery segment. These strategies reflect not cyclical strength, but an ongoing battle for market share amid tepid consumption.

Core Inflation Reflects Tentative Momentum

Core inflation, which excludes the volatile categories of food and fuel, rose to 0.7% in June the highest in 14 months. This data point suggests that some underlying price momentum is returning, especially in non-essential goods. However, the increase appears more correlational than causative in terms of signaling robust demand, as it coincides with rising input costs and targeted price adjustments rather than a broad-based consumer resurgence.

The combination of deepening producer deflation and only marginal consumer price recovery increases pressure on Chinese policymakers to introduce additional support measures. While the central government has maintained a cautious approach to large-scale stimulus, continued price weakness in both upstream and downstream sectors may prompt fiscal and monetary intervention aimed at stabilizing demand and preventing a deflationary spiral.

The structural nature of the current challenges ranging from trade headwinds to domestic overcapacity and weak real estate markets suggests that isolated measures may be insufficient. Coordinated policy actions that address both supply-side inefficiencies and demand-side weaknesses will likely be required to restore momentum and rebuild pricing power.

China’s economic path forward hinges on managing the fine line between short-term stabilization and long-term reform. The sharp decline in producer prices illustrates a deteriorating industrial landscape, while the tepid recovery in consumer prices underscores the fragility of household demand. In this context, the inflation data serve as a critical signal: absent more proactive policy responses, China risks slipping into a deeper deflationary cycle that could stall growth and undermine confidence in its economic transition.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Monetary Easing Paused as Central Bank Reassesses Recovery Conditions

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) has decided to pause its monetary easing cycle, keeping the Official Cash Rate (OCR) at 3.25% in its latest decision. After a total of 225 basis points in rate cuts since August 2024, this marks the first hold since the current cutting cycle began. The central bank acknowledged that while inflation has fallen to 2.5%, geopolitical risks particularly trade tensions and tariffs require a more cautious stance before further loosening is implemented.

RBNZ policymakers made it clear that further rate cuts remain on the table, contingent upon continued easing of medium-term inflation pressures. According to the monetary policy statement, if these disinflationary trends persist, the central bank expects to lower the OCR further in line with projections from its May meeting.

Despite headline inflation moderating within the 1–3% target band, the uncertainty surrounding tariff impacts and the resilience of domestic demand introduces significant ambiguity. The bank emphasized that it will rely on incoming data to judge the speed of the recovery, the stickiness of inflation, and the full effect of global trade disruptions.

The causal relationship between global trade tensions and domestic inflation expectations is still unfolding. While New Zealand is not directly imposing new tariffs, the secondary effects such as reduced export demand or increased import costs could complicate the central bank’s disinflation objective.

Historical Tightening Cycle and Its Aftermath

New Zealand was among the first economies to roll back pandemic-era stimulus, having lifted interest rates by 525 basis points between late 2021 and 2023. The swift and aggressive tightening succeeded in halting runaway inflation but also dragged the economy into recession in 2024. Since then, a fragile recovery has begun to take shape, aided by lower interest rates and elevated commodity export prices.

However, that recovery remains uneven. While the tradable sector benefits from firm export prices, the non-tradable side of the economy especially household consumption and business investment still shows signs of strain. Global headwinds, including weaker international growth and tighter fiscal conditions, further weigh on momentum.

The central bank explicitly linked global developments with domestic growth prospects, stating that uncertainty in international policy environments and rising tariffs will likely act as a brake on global output, thereby slowing New Zealand’s recovery and reducing inflationary risks.

Forward Guidance and Market Expectations

Markets largely anticipated the RBNZ’s decision to hold, as 19 of 27 economists surveyed by Reuters had forecast this outcome. However, the tone of the accompanying statement suggests that the easing cycle is not over, only temporarily paused.

RBNZ forecasts inflation to remain near the upper bound of its target range throughout the second and third quarters of 2025. This projection, if met, would support the case for one or more additional rate cuts later in the year, provided global trade conditions do not deteriorate further.

The decision to maintain the current OCR reflects not only economic caution but also a strategic balance: preserving the option to ease policy while maintaining credibility in inflation targeting. The relationship between weakening global demand and reduced inflation pressure is central to this balancing act. However, any reacceleration in price levels due to tariffs or supply constraints could challenge the bank’s current trajectory.

RBNZ Walks a Fine Line Between Easing and Vigilance

The RBNZ’s decision to pause rate cuts signals a strategic recalibration rather than a change in direction. While inflation has cooled and the domestic economy is showing signs of stabilization, global uncertainty particularly concerning trade and fiscal environments remains a powerful variable shaping monetary policy.

With inflation nearing the top of its target band and growth still sluggish, the central bank appears committed to a flexible, data-driven approach. The months ahead will test whether external risks intensify or recede and whether the path to recovery is strong enough to justify further monetary accommodation.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Australia Presses US for Clarity Amid Trump’s Threat of 200% Drug Tariffs

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Industry on Alert Amid US Trade Threat

PBS at the Center of a Brewing Trade Dispute

Trump’s Tactical Delay Offers Limited Assurance

Market and Policy Implications of a Prolonged Dispute

Healthcare Policy Meets Trade Power Politics

Source: Bloomberg

Markets Grow Immune to Trump’s Tariff Rhetoric Amid Rising Trade Uncertainty

Market Fatigue Sets In as Tariff Drama Repeats

Tariff Policy No Longer a Shock Event

Tariffs and Fiscal Revenue: Economic Impact Beyond Price Reaction

Complacency or Strategic Adaptation?

Source: Reuters

Dollar Strengthens Against Yen as Trump Escalates Trade War Rhetoric

Dollar Gains Momentum Amid Rising Trade Pressures

Rising Yields Support Dollar Rally

Tariff Tensions Expand to Global Currency Markets

Political and Diplomatic Signals Remain Mixed

Source: Reuters

Oil Prices Retreat from Two-Week Highs as Tariff Uncertainty and Supply Forecasts Weigh on Market

Price Movement Reflects Tariff Caution Despite Demand Support

Strong U.S. Travel Offsets Some Demand Concerns

Shifting Supply Landscape Between U.S. and OPEC+

Geopolitical Risks Offer Underlying Price Support

Markets Navigate a Narrow Path Between Optimism and Uncertainty

Source: Reuters

Kevin Hassett Emerges as Leading Candidate for Fed Chair Under Trump’s Consideration

Hassett’s Name Gains Momentum Amid Trump’s Renewed Fed Criticism

Shortlist Reflects Broader Strategic Considerations

Implications for Fed Independence and Market Expectations

Source: Reuters

China’s Factory-Gate Prices Fall Sharply as Demand Weakens and Trade Tensions Escalate

Deepening Producer Deflation Signals Growing Economic Strain

Trade Environment and Export Industry Under Pressure

Consumer Prices Show Fragile Recovery

Core Inflation Reflects Tentative Momentum

Source: Reuters

RBNZ Holds Cash Rate Steady at 3.25% Amid Fragile Recovery and Global Trade Risks

Monetary Easing Paused as Central Bank Reassesses Recovery Conditions

Historical Tightening Cycle and Its Aftermath

Forward Guidance and Market Expectations

RBNZ Walks a Fine Line Between Easing and Vigilance

Source: Reuters

Risk Disclosure