Vietnam Intensifies Preparations for Reciprocal Trade Talks with the United States

Economic

Summary:

The Ministry of Industry and Trade is coordinating with other ministries and business associations to develop negotiation strategies aimed at preserving and expanding bilateral trade with the United States...

Strategic Coordination for Trade Negotiations

As Vietnam prepares for critical discussions with the United States on reciprocal trade matters, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has consolidated evaluations and recommendations from key governmental ministries, industry associations, and major exporters. These insights are shaping the national strategy to present a cohesive and persuasive case during upcoming negotiations.

Contributors include the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Finance, Construction, Agriculture, Environment, and Science & Technology, alongside representatives from industries with significant export volumes to the US, such as textiles, footwear, electronics, metals, and cashews. This wide-ranging consultation reflects the government’s intent to represent diverse industrial interests while reinforcing Vietnam’s position as a reliable trade partner.

Bilateral Trade Position and Market Dynamics

Participants in the preparatory meetings shared a consensus that the United States remains one of Vietnam’s most strategic and valuable export markets. Conversely, Vietnam is currently the eighth-largest trading partner of the US. American consumers have become increasingly familiar with and appreciative of Vietnamese products, recognizing their balance of quality and affordability.

This dynamic highlights a favorable commercial environment, in which Vietnamese exports supplement rather than threaten US domestic industries. Since many Vietnamese goods do not directly compete with US-made alternatives, their presence in the market often enhances consumer choice rather than disrupts local production. This framing supports the argument that Vietnamese trade contributes to, rather than detracts from, US economic interests.

Commitment to Regulatory Alignment and Transparency

Vietnamese export products with high trade volumes—especially those bound for the US—have consistently met American regulatory and technical standards, including labeling, origin certification, and product quality. Vietnam’s negotiating stance is anchored in this compliance record, which it is prepared to substantiate with verifiable data and documentation.

In addition to technical compliance, Vietnamese authorities and businesses have expressed readiness to address any concerns raised by US importers. This proactive attitude underlines Vietnam’s commitment to maintaining transparency and resolving disputes constructively rather than reactively.

Engagement with Industry and Strategic Messaging

The Ministry of Industry and Trade has engaged in direct dialogues with industry associations to better understand operational challenges and align policy responses. Businesses have been encouraged to provide detailed data to reinforce Vietnam’s case, particularly on origin tracing and regulatory adherence.

Vietnam’s broader strategy includes encouraging exporters and associations to participate more actively in advocacy efforts. This includes engaging directly with US authorities, policymakers, and industry groups to articulate Vietnam’s position and promote equitable tariff policies. Such efforts are critical in building long-term goodwill and fostering bipartisan understanding in Washington regarding Vietnam’s role in global supply chains.

Furthermore, Vietnam seeks greater openness from the US side, particularly regarding access to high-tech American products. By advocating for a balanced two-way flow of trade, Vietnam positions itself as a cooperative partner seeking mutual economic development rather than one-sided concessions.

Toward Balanced and Sustainable Trade Relations

Vietnam’s approach to upcoming negotiations is defined by structured preparation, inter-ministerial cooperation, and a clear communication strategy aimed at both US institutions and consumers. Rather than viewing the discussions as transactional, Vietnam is framing the engagement as an opportunity to reinforce trust, diversify trade relationships, and ensure long-term economic integration.

As both countries continue to deepen their comprehensive strategic partnership, the outcomes of these talks may influence trade structures and regulatory frameworks in the years to come. Vietnam’s emphasis on data-driven policy arguments and inclusive stakeholder engagement reflects a shift toward more mature, resilient, and responsive trade diplomacy.

Source: VNS

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Urgent Warning from the Treasury

In a formal letter sent to House Speaker Mike Johnson on May 9, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cautioned that while the exact timing remains uncertain, the federal government is projected to hit its current debt ceiling in August 2025. The urgency stems from the anticipated Congressional recess beginning late July, which could delay timely action. Bessent urged lawmakers to act before mid-July to safeguard national creditworthiness and prevent potential financial disruptions.

This request echoes previous warnings issued during similar debt ceiling confrontations in recent years. The recurring nature of such warnings underscores structural inefficiencies in the legislative process when it comes to managing public debt policy.

Legislative Challenges and Republican Agenda

The debt ceiling debate is unfolding within a broader political context marked by partisan negotiations over a large-scale legislative package backed by Republican lawmakers. The proposed bill aims to align with former President Donald Trump’s policy agenda, which includes boosting funding for border security and defense while simultaneously implementing tax cuts and potentially reducing federal social programs such as Medicaid.

Republican leaders are striving to finalize and pass this package by July 4, but internal divisions and competing interests make this timeline highly ambitious. Although Secretary Bessent’s letter outlines a four-week buffer, any delays beyond mid-July could leave the Treasury with limited maneuverability, raising market concerns and weakening investor confidence.

A central feature of the package is a proposed debt ceiling increase ranging between USD 4 trillion and USD 5 trillion. This would accommodate the government's financing needs while avoiding frequent repeat negotiations. However, many Republican lawmakers, particularly those who have never voted in favor of a debt limit increase, are now willing to support the move to avoid direct negotiations with Democrats. This shift reflects a strategic compromise within the party to maintain narrative control over fiscal reform while ensuring the government avoids default.

Credibility Versus Deadlock

In a May 6 Congressional testimony, Bessent reaffirmed that the US government “will never default” and emphasized the necessity of lifting the borrowing cap. While this statement is meant to calm markets and signal administrative confidence, the political maneuvering required to secure legislative consensus may test that assurance. The relationship between legislative delay and financial market response is not deterministic but historically correlates with increased volatility and credit outlook adjustments from rating agencies.

The overlap between debt ceiling discussions and broader budgetary reforms complicates the process. Rather than being a standalone fiscal measure, the debt limit is now entangled in ideological bargaining, with each faction leveraging it as a tool to push their policy priorities. This dynamic introduces a layer of political risk that could influence short-term interest rates, Treasury bill yields, and global perceptions of US financial governance.

Looking Ahead: Political Timetable and Market Implications

Lawmakers are scheduled to leave Washington by the end of July, returning only after Labor Day (September 1). This creates a narrow legislative window in which a deal must be finalized, passed, and enacted. The compressed timeline, paired with the complexity of the proposed legislation, raises concerns about whether procedural steps can be completed in time.

Markets may begin pricing in the uncertainty as July approaches, especially if negotiations stall or if intra-party conflicts deepen. While the Treasury continues to assure that a default will be avoided, delays in action could erode the perceived stability of US fiscal management, with ripple effects potentially felt in global financial markets.

Source: CBS

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Rising Import Volume and Category Leaders

Vietnam’s import expenditure from the United States reached USD 1.56 billion in April alone, contributing to a cumulative four-month total of more than USD 5.66 billion. This figure not only represents an increase of over 25% compared to the same period in 2024 but also highlights significant growth across several commodity groups.

Among the most noteworthy import categories are computers, electronic products, and components, which generated USD 1.82 billion in trade, representing a remarkable year-on-year growth rate of 58%. These products accounted for more than 32% of Vietnam’s total imports from the US, indicating that high-tech goods are at the forefront of this bilateral trade expansion.

Automobile imports also showed a notable upward shift. Vietnam brought in 110 completely built-up units (CBUs) from the US in April alone, far surpassing the 43 units imported over the preceding three months combined. This sudden spike implies either pent-up demand or easing of logistical barriers, which may be temporary or part of a longer-term market adjustment.

Similarly, wheat imports surged to 163,029 tonnes during the first four months of 2025, valued at USD 45.3 million. In April alone, 108,962 tonnes were shipped from the US to Vietnam, suggesting a possible seasonal shift in sourcing strategies or increasing reliance on US agricultural products due to competitive pricing or geopolitical alignment.

Diplomatic Momentum and Trade Strategy

This steep rise in imports does not occur in isolation but rather coincides with increased diplomatic engagement between the two countries. On April 4, General Secretary Tô Lâm held a phone call with US President Donald J. Trump, expressing Vietnam’s readiness to engage in discussions aimed at lowering tariffs on imports from both countries to 0%. This political overture positions Vietnam not only as a consumer of US goods but also as a proactive negotiator in shaping the rules of mutual trade.

Moreover, the meeting between Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chính and the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission at the Government Headquarters further reinforces Vietnam’s intention to pursue balanced and sustainable trade. The Prime Minister explicitly linked tariff discussions with broader economic goals, including market diversification, supply chain resilience, and the cultivation of a self-reliant but globally integrated economy.

Interpreting Trade Data and Policy Synchronization

The correlation between trade volume growth and diplomatic developments suggests a strategic alignment rather than a mere coincidence. The fact that high-value categories such as electronics are leading the import surge implies a purposeful shift to meet domestic demand while simultaneously building goodwill with the US administration.

There is also a broader implication: the growth in imports may serve as a lever in Vietnam’s effort to strengthen its position in trade negotiations. By showcasing increased purchases of US goods, Vietnam potentially gains moral leverage to request reciprocal tariff reductions or favorable investment conditions from the US side. This interplay between economic behavior and diplomatic signaling underscores a calculated policy direction.

Outlook for Bilateral Economic Relations

Vietnam’s rising imports from the US appear to be both a reflection of immediate market needs and a strategic response to ongoing global realignments. As Vietnam navigates global supply chain shifts and positions itself amid rising US-China trade tensions, this data points to a longer-term ambition: to solidify a stable and advantageous economic partnership with the United States.

The evolving nature of tariff negotiations, coupled with Vietnam’s demonstrated readiness to restructure its economy for deeper integration, marks a pivotal moment in the Vietnam–US trade relationship. How both countries respond in terms of tariff policy and investment facilitation will shape the trajectory of this partnership in the years ahead.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Stakes Behind Trump’s Gulf Tour

Set to begin on May 13, Donald Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar could be the most geopolitically consequential Middle East engagement by a U.S. president in years. The trip is expected to yield announcements across several key domains: energy, artificial intelligence, trade, weapons sales, and diplomacy.

One symbolic yet provocative move reportedly under consideration is Trump referring to the “Persian Gulf” as the “Arabian Gulf,” aligning with the nomenclature favored by Arab states. While merely semantic to some, the shift would carry deep geopolitical undertones, particularly amid stalled U.S.-Iran nuclear talks and hardening regional blocs.

AI and Technology: A Silicon Valley–Gulf Convergence

Coinciding with Trump’s arrival in Riyadh is a high-profile U.S.–Arab investment forum featuring CEOs from BlackRock, Palantir, Qualcomm, Alphabet, and Citigroup. Washington’s recent relaxation of AI export controls—replacing Biden-era restrictions on sensitive chip technology with a “simplified” regulatory framework—is widely expected to boost Gulf ambitions to become global tech hubs.

UAE’s G42, previously scrutinized for its ties with China, has pivoted to align with U.S. standards, even drawing a $1.5 billion investment from Microsoft. This move signals a new era of U.S.–Gulf tech collaboration—centered not just on capital, but on access to frontier innovation.

Oil Diplomacy and Budgetary Constraints

Oil remains the cornerstone of U.S.–Gulf cooperation. Trump is expected to negotiate supply adjustments with OPEC members, notably Saudi Arabia, to keep global prices stable. While Riyadh currently maintains production levels, a sustained low-price environment could pressure the kingdom’s fiscal position and delay Vision 2030 megaprojects.

Meanwhile, Gulf nations have committed to substantial U.S. investments. Saudi Arabia's earlier pledge to channel $600 billion into U.S. industries under Trump’s term may resurface in discussions—though this time Riyadh is seeking reciprocal capital to finance its expansive domestic agenda.

Nuclear Energy and the Iran Equation

The UAE and Saudi Arabia are pushing for U.S. support on peaceful nuclear development. Trump’s administration appears willing to revisit earlier conditions—possibly dropping the normalization-with-Israel prerequisite tied to previous proposals. A civilian nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia could be among the headline announcements, reflecting shifting U.S. calculations.

Simultaneously, backchannel talks with Iran are reportedly underway. Both sides are keen to avoid military escalation, especially as the Gaza conflict dominates headlines.

Gaza, Ceasefires, and Contested Real Estate

On Gaza, Trump seeks a temporary ceasefire and a potential 21-day truce to enable hostage exchanges. His controversial suggestion that the U.S. could “administer” Gaza as strategic real estate has drawn outrage across the Arab world, though few concrete alternatives have emerged from Arab capitals.

Israel continues to expand military operations, with little clarity on post-war governance. Trump's proposals may spark new diplomatic initiatives—or exacerbate tensions depending on how Arab leaders respond.

Trump’s Gulf tour appears less about mending old frameworks and more about crafting new ones—from redefining maritime geography to reshaping technology alliances and nuclear norms. While critics warn of volatile symbolism and blurred ethics, others view this as a pragmatic recalibration of U.S. influence in a fragmented, multipolar Middle East.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Realignment Amid Shifting Global Trade Tensions

Indonesia announced it will gradually eliminate imports of refined petroleum products from Singapore—its largest fuel supplier—and source oil instead from the United States and Middle Eastern countries. This decision, confirmed by Energy Minister Bahlil Lahadalia on May 9, reflects Jakarta's dual motivations: securing more competitive prices and rebalancing trade relationships in light of intensifying geopolitical volatility.

Singapore, despite lacking domestic crude oil production, has long served as a regional refining hub. It currently supplies over 50% of Indonesia’s refined fuel imports, totaling approximately 290,000 barrels per day, largely consisting of gasoline and diesel. However, this dependency is set to end.

Political Calculus Behind Energy Diversification

Minister Lahadalia made it clear that the shift is not solely economic. “It’s not just about price,” he stated. “It’s also about geopolitical balance—we need to adjust our position with other global powers.” His remarks suggest Indonesia is strategically pivoting toward the U.S. in a bid to gain favor before entering potentially high-stakes trade negotiations, especially under the looming threat of punitive tariffs from the Trump administration.

The move follows a broader trend across the Global South, where nations are seeking to diversify trade partnerships to reduce reliance on traditional suppliers and preempt the fallout of escalating U.S. protectionism. Jakarta has already proposed increasing imports of U.S. crude oil and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), signaling clear intent to deepen energy ties with Washington.

Operational Shifts and Market Disruption Risks

Indonesia's state oil firm Pertamina is currently investing in new port infrastructure to accommodate larger crude carriers, facilitating direct imports from distant suppliers. According to Sentosa Shipbrokers, this transition could begin within the next six months and may significantly disrupt regional tanker traffic and trade flows, given Singapore's central role in maritime fuel logistics.

Sentosa’s analysts predict volatility in tanker chartering rates and regional supply chains if Singapore’s export volumes contract sharply. The restructuring of Indonesia’s import profile will also test the operational agility of refineries in the U.S. and Gulf states, which may see a short-term spike in demand.

Implications for Singapore and Regional Energy Flows

For Singapore, the decision signals a potential decline in its long-standing role as a fuel re-export hub in Southeast Asia. While the city-state's advanced refining infrastructure remains world-class, its vulnerability to geopolitical shifts and competitive sourcing strategies is becoming increasingly apparent.

Indonesia’s decision is emblematic of a broader recalibration happening across Asia-Pacific supply chains. From energy to agriculture, countries are no longer viewing proximity or historic trade patterns as sufficient, instead factoring in diplomatic alignment and trade security in a more fragmented global order.

By aligning its energy procurement strategy with broader geopolitical objectives, Indonesia is signaling its readiness to play a more sophisticated game in global trade diplomacy. As tariff threats loom, the country is leveraging its import portfolio not only to reduce vulnerability but to gain strategic leverage with Washington.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

U.S.–Vietnam Agricultural Trade: A Critical Economic Pillar

On May 9, the Vietnamese Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment co-hosted a high-level conference focused on fostering trade in agricultural, forestry, and aquatic products with the United States. This comes at a sensitive time, as the U.S. contemplates imposing retaliatory tariffs of up to 46% on certain imports, placing significant pressure on Vietnamese exports.

The United States remains Vietnam’s largest export market for agricultural, forestry, and aquatic products, with bilateral trade in these sectors reaching $13.8 billion in 2024—accounting for over 21% of the country’s total agri-export turnover. China followed closely at $13.6 billion. The strategic nature of this trade partnership underscores the urgency with which Vietnam is seeking collaborative solutions.

Balancing Immediate Needs with Long-Term Strategy

Minister of Agriculture and Environment Đỗ Đức Duy emphasized that the Vietnamese government has been proactive, engaging in consultations and negotiations with the U.S. to safeguard mutual interests. Meanwhile, Minister of Industry and Trade Nguyễn Hồng Diên stressed the dual benefits of increasing U.S. agricultural imports—not only to satisfy domestic demand and ease trade tensions in the short term but also to build a foundation for deeper, more technologically advanced, and sustainable bilateral cooperation.

The Minister urged the removal of trade barriers and the implementation of strong, practical policies—such as tax incentives, credit support, and logistics facilitation—to energize two-way trade and support the private sector.

Business Engagement and Policy Synergy

The conference further highlighted the role of industry stakeholders. Minister Diên called on Vietnamese businesses and industry associations to proactively engage with American partners, not only to secure new sourcing contracts but also to explore collaboration opportunities for building a green, high-value, and sustainable agricultural system in Vietnam.

Through enhanced production standards, circular agriculture models, and advanced processing technologies, Vietnam aims to align its agricultural sector more closely with global expectations—especially from high-standard markets like the U.S.

Administrative Simplification and Technical Barrier Reform

Vietnam is also accelerating efforts to dismantle technical trade barriers. The ministries committed to simplifying customs procedures and opening access for U.S. agricultural goods. The intention is to reduce transaction costs and enhance business confidence, ensuring that companies on both sides can maintain and expand operations under a more predictable and supportive policy framework.

The risk of escalating tariffs underscores a broader transformation in global trade dynamics, and Vietnam views its relationship with the United States as a stabilizing force. The government's commitment to policy reform, combined with industry readiness and cross-sectoral cooperation, signals that Vietnam is not only responding to immediate threats but also positioning itself as a reliable, forward-looking trading partner.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

China–U.S. Trade War

Economic

A Wake-Up Call for European Maritime Security

Chinese companies—namely COSCO, China Merchants, and Hong Kong-based Hutchison—currently hold stakes in over 30 port terminals across the European Union. While these investments were once viewed through a commercial lens, they are now being reinterpreted as strategic vulnerabilities in light of shifting global dynamics and geopolitical tensions.

On May 8, EU Transport Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas called for a comprehensive review of foreign ownership in European seaports, urging leaders to consider new regulations to bolster strategic infrastructure oversight. His remarks follow the publication of a new EU defense white paper proposing tighter restrictions on foreign ownership of transportation assets considered critical to security.

Though no country was explicitly named, the subtext was clear—concerns are mounting over China’s state-coordinated economic influence.

Strategic Penetration in Key Ports Across Europe

Chinese port investments extend from Belgium’s Antwerp-Bruges to Greece’s Piraeus, with holdings in Rotterdam, Valencia, and Gdynia. According to Belgian defense scholar Simon Van Hoeymissen, these are not isolated cases of capital investment but rather a deliberate strategy by Beijing to secure long-term maritime access.

Portuguese MEP Ana Miguel Pedro from the European People’s Party underscored the risks: “These are not market-driven actors. COSCO, for instance, follows directives from the Chinese Communist Party.” Her warning, shared increasingly by EU policymakers, is that deep Chinese involvement in seaport operations poses both economic and security threats.

Case in Point: Poland’s Gdynia Port

The port of Gdynia in Poland encapsulates the strategic dilemma. Operated in part by Hutchison for over 20 years, it lies adjacent to naval bases, shipyards, and NATO special forces hubs. The presence of a Chinese operator in such proximity to EU and NATO military logistics has triggered new layers of concern.

Poland has since classified Gdynia as critical infrastructure, requiring its operators to work closely with national security authorities. Hutchison had been in talks to sell its global port portfolio—worth $23 billion, including 14 European terminals—to a BlackRock-MSC consortium. However, the deal was halted in March following political pushback from Beijing.

EU's Growing Strategic Awareness

A recent report by Poland’s Center for Eastern Studies (OSW) linked China’s ambiguous support for Russia in the Ukraine conflict to increased fears over port security. The EU is now reconsidering not just future Chinese investments but also existing ownership structures.

Calls for regulatory reform are growing louder within the European Parliament. A draft resolution from the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group calls for stricter foreign investment screenings as part of the next legislative cycle. The overarching message: Europe can no longer afford fragmented responses while foreign actors pursue coordinated, long-term strategies.

Geopolitics Meets Infrastructure: A Critical Inflection Point

The shift in EU attitudes reflects a broader recognition that maritime infrastructure is no longer just about commerce—it’s about sovereignty and strategic leverage. As MEP Pedro warned, “If a vulnerability is exploited in one European port, the whole EU is at risk.”

With rising geopolitical uncertainty and global power rivalries intensifying, Europe is being urged to act not just reactively, but preemptively. The question now is whether the EU can reform fast enough to safeguard its critical infrastructure before those vulnerabilities become liabilities.

Source: Politico

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Vietnam Intensifies Preparations for Reciprocal Trade Talks with the United States

Strategic Coordination for Trade Negotiations

Bilateral Trade Position and Market Dynamics

Commitment to Regulatory Alignment and Transparency

Engagement with Industry and Strategic Messaging

Toward Balanced and Sustainable Trade Relations

Source: VNS

US Faces Debt Ceiling Deadline in August 2025 Amid Legislative Tensions

Urgent Warning from the Treasury

Legislative Challenges and Republican Agenda

Credibility Versus Deadlock

Looking Ahead: Political Timetable and Market Implications

Source: CBS

Vietnam’s Import Surge from the US Reflects Strategic Trade Intentions

Rising Import Volume and Category Leaders

Diplomatic Momentum and Trade Strategy

Interpreting Trade Data and Policy Synchronization

Outlook for Bilateral Economic Relations

Trump's Gulf Visit May Redraw Middle East Map: AI Chips, Oil, and a Renamed Sea?

Strategic Stakes Behind Trump’s Gulf Tour

AI and Technology: A Silicon Valley–Gulf Convergence

Oil Diplomacy and Budgetary Constraints

Nuclear Energy and the Iran Equation

Gaza, Ceasefires, and Contested Real Estate

Source: CNBC

Indonesia Cuts Oil Imports from Singapore to Zero in Strategic Pivot Toward U.S. Ahead of Tariff Talks

Strategic Realignment Amid Shifting Global Trade Tensions

Political Calculus Behind Energy Diversification

Operational Shifts and Market Disruption Risks

Implications for Singapore and Regional Energy Flows

Source: Reuters

Vietnam and the U.S. Seek to Strengthen Agricultural Trade Amid Tariff Pressures

U.S.–Vietnam Agricultural Trade: A Critical Economic Pillar

Balancing Immediate Needs with Long-Term Strategy

Business Engagement and Policy Synergy

Administrative Simplification and Technical Barrier Reform

China’s Expanding Footprint at Over 30 European Ports Triggers EU Security Scrutiny

A Wake-Up Call for European Maritime Security

Strategic Penetration in Key Ports Across Europe

Case in Point: Poland’s Gdynia Port

EU's Growing Strategic Awareness

Geopolitics Meets Infrastructure: A Critical Inflection Point

Source: Politico

Risk Disclosure