Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



Indonesia Deposit Facility Rate (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia Lending Facility Rate (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa Core CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
IEA Oil Market Report
U.K. CBI Industrial Prices Expectations (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa Retail Sales YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Industrial Trends - Orders (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Retail Sales MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. MBA Mortgage Application Activity Index WoWA:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Industrial Product Price Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
Canada Industrial Product Price Index MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoYA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Construction Spending MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Refined Oil StocksA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Gasoline StocksA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Cushing Crude Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Crude Oil StocksA:--
F: --
P: --
South Korea GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Korea GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Imports YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Exports YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Goods Trade Balance (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Trade Balance (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
Australia Employment (Dec)A:--
F: --
Australia Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Australia Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Australia Full-time Employment (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Capacity Utilization (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Late Liquidity Window Rate (LON) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Overnight Lending Rate (O/N) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey 1-Week Repo Rate--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Distributive Trades (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Retail Sales Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures Final QoQ (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Canada New Housing Price Index MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real GDP Annualized QoQ Final (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index Final QoQ (AR) (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Income MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks Change--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Kansas Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Kansas Fed Manufacturing Production Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Stocks Change--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Demand Projected by Production--
F: --
P: --















































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
Solo mining Bitcoin in 2025 is technically possible but extremely difficult. Learn about success rates, costs, profitability vs pool mining, and if it's worth trying.

Solo Mining Bitcoin has become an increasingly rare practice as industrial mining pools dominate the network in 2025. Yet some miners still chase the independence and full-reward potential of mining alone. This guide explains how solo mining works today, how difficult it has become, and whether individuals can still profit from it.
Solo bitcoin mining means attempting to mine Bitcoin blocks independently, without joining a mining pool. When you mine solo, you compete directly against the entire global network of miners to solve complex cryptographic puzzles. If you successfully find a block, you receive the full block reward—currently 6.25 BTC plus transaction fees—but you bear all the computational costs and risks alone.
The process of mining bitcoins solo follows Bitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism. Your mining hardware repeatedly hashes block header data, searching for a hash value that meets the network's difficulty target. This is essentially a computational lottery where more hashing power increases your chances but guarantees nothing.
Here's what happens during solo bitcoin mining:
Unlike pool mining where rewards are distributed based on contributed work, solo mining operates on an all-or-nothing basis. You might mine for months or years without finding a single block, or you could theoretically find one on your first day—though the latter scenario is astronomically unlikely with typical hardware.
Understanding the fundamental differences between solo and pool mining is essential before committing resources to either approach.
| Aspect | Solo Mining | Pool Mining |
|---|---|---|
| Reward Distribution | 100% of block reward (6.25 BTC + fees) if successful | Proportional share based on contributed hashrate |
| Payment Frequency | Extremely rare, unpredictable (possibly never) | Regular payouts (daily to weekly) |
| Income Stability | Zero income for extended periods, then massive payout | Consistent, predictable returns |
| Pool Fees | None | 1-3% of earnings |
| Technical Requirements | Run full Bitcoin node, advanced setup | Simple connection to pool servers |
| Variance Risk | Extremely high—lottery-like odds | Low—smoothed returns across many miners |
| Minimum Hashrate | Realistically 100+ TH/s for any reasonable chance | Any amount accepted (even single ASIC) |
The economic reality is stark: pool mining provides predictable income that covers electricity costs and generates steady profit, while solo mining bitcoin resembles buying lottery tickets with your electricity bill. Most rational miners choose pools because consistent returns allow for business planning, equipment maintenance, and risk management.
The difficulty of solo mining bitcoin has reached unprecedented levels in 2025. To understand just how challenging it has become, we need to examine the current network conditions and calculate your realistic probability of success.
Bitcoin's mining difficulty adjusts every 2,016 blocks (approximately every two weeks) to maintain a consistent 10-minute block time. As of 2025, the network difficulty has increased dramatically compared to Bitcoin's early years, making solo mining exponentially harder than it was even a few years ago.
Key network statistics that impact solo mining difficulty:
This difficulty level means that even a state-of-the-art ASIC miner running at 100 terahashes per second (TH/s) represents only 0.000017% of the total network hashrate. You're competing against massive mining farms with thousands of machines operating in regions with cheap electricity.
Mathematics reveals the harsh reality of bitcoin solo mining success. Your probability of finding a block depends entirely on your hashrate relative to the total network hashrate.
Here's the probability calculation for different hardware scenarios:
| Your Hashrate | % of Network | Expected Time to Find 1 Block | Probability per Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 TH/s (1 high-end ASIC) | 0.000017% | ~11.4 years | 0.024% |
| 500 TH/s (5 ASICs) | 0.000083% | ~2.3 years | 0.12% |
| 1 PH/s (10 ASICs) | 0.00017% | ~14 months | 0.24% |
| 10 PH/s (100 ASICs) | 0.0017% | ~42 days | 2.4% |
| 100 PH/s (1000 ASICs) | 0.017% | ~4.2 days | 24% |
These are expected averages based on probability. The actual time could be much shorter or significantly longer due to the random nature of mining. You might find a block on your first day (probability near zero) or mine for triple the expected time without success—both scenarios have occurred in practice.
For perspective, if you run a single high-end ASIC costing $3,000-$5,000 with electricity expenses around $150-$300 monthly, you could spend $20,000+ on electricity over the expected 11.4 years before finding your first block. Even if successful, the block reward might not cover your accumulated costs, especially considering hardware depreciation and potential Bitcoin price fluctuations.
Despite astronomical odds, solo bitcoin mining pool victories do occasionally occur—but context matters enormously when evaluating these rare successes.
Notable recent success cases include:
The failure stories are far more common but rarely discussed:
Even success stories often reveal that pool mining would have been more profitable when considering risk-adjusted returns. The psychological appeal of potentially winning a full block reward clouds the mathematical reality that consistent pool returns typically generate superior outcomes over time.
Successfully mining bitcoins solo demands significant hardware investment and infrastructure planning. Unlike pool mining where even modest equipment can generate some returns, solo mining requires substantial computational power to have any realistic chance of finding a block within a reasonable timeframe.
Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) miners are the only viable hardware for solo bitcoin mining in 2025. Graphics cards (GPUs) and CPUs became obsolete for Bitcoin mining years ago due to efficiency limitations. Modern ASIC miners are purpose-built for the SHA-256 algorithm that Bitcoin uses, delivering hashrates that general-purpose hardware cannot match.
Current top-tier ASIC miners for solo mining consideration:
| Model | Hashrate | Power Consumption | Efficiency | Approximate Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antminer S21 | 200 TH/s | 3,500W | 17.5 J/TH | $5,000-$7,000 |
| Whatsminer M60 | 172 TH/s | 3,344W | 19.4 J/TH | $4,500-$6,500 |
| Antminer S19 XP | 140 TH/s | 3,010W | 21.5 J/TH | $3,500-$5,000 |
| AvalonMiner 1466 | 150 TH/s | 3,500W | 23.3 J/TH | $4,000-$5,500 |
For solo mining to be remotely feasible, you realistically need at least 500 TH/s to 1 PH/s of total hashrate. This translates to investing in 3-5 high-end ASIC miners, with an initial hardware outlay of $15,000 to $35,000. Even at this investment level, your expected time to find a block remains between 1-3 years under current network conditions.
Critical factors when selecting ASIC hardware:
Some miners explore solar powered bitcoin mining to offset electricity costs, though this requires additional investment in solar panels, inverters, and battery storage systems. A typical ASIC drawing 3,500 watts continuously needs approximately 12-15 kilowatts of solar panel capacity (accounting for efficiency losses and nighttime operations), adding $10,000-$20,000 to your initial investment per miner.
Electricity represents the ongoing operational expense that determines whether solo bitcoin mining remains financially viable. Unlike the one-time hardware purchase, electricity costs accumulate continuously and often exceed hardware investment over extended mining periods.
Understanding your electricity costs:
| Hardware Setup | Total Power Draw | Monthly kWh | Cost at $0.10/kWh | Cost at $0.15/kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ASIC (200 TH/s) | 3,500W | 2,520 kWh | $252 | $378 |
| 3 ASICs (600 TH/s) | 10,500W | 7,560 kWh | $756 | $1,134 |
| 5 ASICs (1 PH/s) | 17,500W | 12,600 kWh | $1,260 | $1,890 |
| 10 ASICs (2 PH/s) | 35,000W | 25,200 kWh | $2,520 | $3,780 |
Beyond electricity, infrastructure requirements add substantial costs:
Solar bitcoin mining can reduce operational costs, but requires substantial upfront investment and depends heavily on geographic location. Areas with optimal sun exposure (Southwest United States, parts of Australia, Middle East) provide better ROI for solar installations. However, battery storage systems necessary for 24/7 mining operations significantly increase costs—a battery bank capable of running 5 ASICs overnight might cost $15,000-$30,000 alone.
Insurance and maintenance represent ongoing expenses often overlooked by new miners. ASIC miners require regular cleaning, fan replacements, and occasional repairs. Budget approximately 5-10% of hardware value annually for maintenance and unexpected component failures.
Return on investment calculations for solo bitcoin mining reveal why most rational actors choose pool mining instead. While the potential for a massive one-time payout exists, the mathematical expected value typically favors consistent pool returns when accounting for risk, time value of money, and operational complexities.
A comprehensive cost analysis exposes the financial reality of solo mining attempts. Let's examine a realistic scenario with specific numbers to illustrate the economic challenge.
Example scenario: 1 PH/s solo mining operation (5 high-end ASICs)
| Cost Category | Initial Investment | Monthly Recurring | Annual Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASIC Hardware (5 miners) | $30,000 | — | — |
| Infrastructure Setup | $5,000 | — | — |
| Electricity (at $0.12/kWh) | — | $1,512 | $18,144 |
| Internet & Maintenance | — | $150 | $1,800 |
| Hardware Depreciation | — | — | $7,500 |
| Total First Year | $35,000 | $1,662 | $62,444 |
Expected outcome analysis:
This appears attractive on paper, but several critical risk factors undermine this optimistic scenario:
The probability distribution matters enormously. You have roughly a 30% chance of finding zero blocks in 20 months, a scenario where you lose your entire $70,000+ investment. Conversely, you have about a 5% chance of finding a block within 2 months, generating exceptional returns. This risk profile resembles venture capital investing or gambling rather than traditional business operations.
Comparing identical hardware operating in solo versus pool mining modes reveals the fundamental economic trade-off between variance and expected value.
Using the same 1 PH/s setup over 14 months:
| Metric | Solo Mining | Pool Mining |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Blocks Found | 1 block (average) | N/A (proportional shares) |
| Expected Revenue | $381,000-$393,000 | $385,000 |
| Pool Fees | $0 | $7,700 (2%) |
| Net Mining Revenue | $381,000-$393,000 | $377,300 |
| Operating Costs | $58,317 | $58,317 |
| Net Profit | $322,683-$334,683 | $318,983 |
| Revenue Certainty | High variance (might be $0) | 99%+ certainty |
| Cash Flow | Zero for months, then lump sum | Daily/weekly payouts |
The expected value difference is minimal—solo mining potentially saves 2% in pool fees, translating to roughly $3,700-$15,700 more profit over 14 months. However, this marginal advantage disappears when considering:
The solo bitcoin mining pool concept has emerged as a middle-ground option, where miners contribute hashrate to a pool that attempts solo mining on behalf of participants. If the pool finds a block, rewards distribute proportionally among contributors. This reduces individual variance while maintaining some solo mining characteristics, though it doesn't eliminate the fundamental probability challenges of competing against the entire network.
Bitcoin's notorious price volatility introduces another layer of complexity to solo mining ROI calculations. Unlike pool mining where you can sell rewards regularly to lock in prices, solo mining forces you to bet on Bitcoin's value at an unknowable future date when you might find a block.
Price scenario analysis for 1 PH/s operation finding a block after 14 months:
| BTC Price Scenario | Block Reward Value | Total Costs | Net Profit/Loss | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000 (bull case) | $635,000 | $58,317 | +$576,683 | 989% |
| $80,000 (optimistic) | $508,000 | $58,317 | +$449,683 | 771% |
| $60,000 (moderate) | $381,000 | $58,317 | +$322,683 | 553% |
| $40,000 (pessimistic) | $254,000 | $58,317 | +$195,683 | 336% |
| $25,000 (bear market) | $158,750 | $58,317 | +$100,433 | 172% |
Even in pessimistic price scenarios, finding a block generates positive returns—but this analysis assumes you successfully find a block. The compounding risk involves both probability (might never find a block) and price uncertainty (block might be worth less than expected).
Additional price-related considerations:
The optimal strategy for most miners involves pool mining to generate steady income while Bitcoin price remains uncertain, then potentially switching to solo mining only if accumulating significant hashrate (10+ PH/s) that makes probability of success reasonable within specific timeframes. Attempting solo mining with modest hashrate essentially converts your mining operation into a speculative bet on both probability and future Bitcoin valuation—a dual-risk proposition that sophisticated investors typically avoid.
Setting up a solo mining operation requires technical knowledge beyond simply connecting hardware to a pool. You'll need to run your own Bitcoin node, configure mining software, and maintain reliable infrastructure. This section walks through the essential steps for anyone determined to attempt mining bitcoins solo despite the challenging odds.
The foundation of any solo mining operation is a fully synchronized Bitcoin Core node. Unlike pool mining where the pool operator manages blockchain data, solo miners must maintain their own complete copy of the Bitcoin blockchain and validate all transactions independently.
Step-by-step Bitcoin Core installation:
Mining software configuration comes next. Several options exist for solo bitcoin mining, each with different features and compatibility:
| Software | Best For | Key Features | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| CGMiner | Advanced users | Highly customizable, supports multiple hardware types | High |
| BFGMiner | ASIC miners | Dynamic clocking, monitoring, remote interface | High |
| Braiins OS+ | Antminer hardware | Firmware replacement with optimization features | Medium |
| Solo CK Pool | Beginners wanting solo experience | Simplified solo mining without running full node | Low |
For true solo mining, CGMiner or BFGMiner connected to your local Bitcoin Core node provides complete control. Configure your mining software with these essential parameters:
Alternative approach for those wanting to avoid full node complexity: solo bitcoin mining pool services like Solo CK Pool allow you to attempt solo mining by connecting your hardware to their infrastructure. You maintain the solo mining reward structure (keeping 100% of any block found minus a small fee), but delegate the technical burden of running a node. This reduces setup complexity but introduces minor centralization and trust requirements.
Once your software infrastructure is ready, connecting ASIC hardware involves both physical setup and network configuration. Modern ASICs include built-in web interfaces that simplify configuration compared to earlier generations of mining hardware.
Physical connection process:
Network configuration through ASIC web interface:
Verification steps to confirm successful connection:
Common troubleshooting issues include incorrect RPC credentials, firewall blocking connections between miner and node, or insufficient PSU power delivery causing hashboard failures. Most ASIC manufacturers provide detailed logs through the web interface that help diagnose connectivity problems.
Continuous monitoring separates successful mining operations from costly failures. Hardware issues, network disruptions, or configuration problems can silently drain electricity for days while generating zero useful work. Implementing robust monitoring systems provides early warning of problems and maximizes your already-slim chances of bitcoin solo mining success.
Essential metrics to monitor continuously:
Monitoring tools and platforms:
| Tool | Type | Key Features | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awesome Miner | Software suite | Multi-device monitoring, alerts, remote management | Free (limited) / $200+ (pro) |
| Hive OS | Operating system | Comprehensive dashboard, mobile app, auto-tuning | Free (3 devices) / $3/device/month |
| MinerStat | Web platform | Cloud monitoring, profit switching, alerts | $2-4/device/month |
| Built-in ASIC interface | Hardware native | Basic stats, logs, configuration | Free (included) |
Setting up effective alert systems prevents costly extended downtime:
For operations using solar powered bitcoin mining, additional monitoring becomes essential. Track solar panel output, battery charge levels, and grid consumption to optimize your energy mix. Solar monitoring systems should alert you when battery reserves drop below thresholds needed to maintain 24/7 operation, allowing you to temporarily reduce mining intensity or switch to grid power during extended cloudy periods.
Regular maintenance schedules complement automated monitoring. Monthly tasks should include physically inspecting your ASICs for dust accumulation, verifying all fans spin freely, checking cable connections remain secure, and reviewing performance trends to identify gradual degradation before catastrophic failure occurs. Quarterly deep cleaning with compressed air prevents dust buildup that reduces cooling efficiency and shortens hardware lifespan.
Documentation practices help optimize long-term operations. Maintain logs of hashrate performance, downtime incidents, maintenance activities, and electricity costs. This data proves invaluable for calculating actual ROI, identifying patterns in hardware behavior, and making informed decisions about when to upgrade equipment or abandon unprofitable operations.
Yes, solo mining Bitcoin is still possible in 2025, but success chances are extremely low due to the high network difficulty and dominance of industrial-scale miners.
With a single high-end ASIC miner, it could take over 10 years on average to find one block. Even large setups may wait months or years without success.
Most solo miners earn nothing unless they find a full block. When successful, rewards can exceed $300,000 depending on Bitcoin’s price and fees.
Yes, solo mining is legitimate and aligns with Bitcoin’s decentralized design. However, the odds of consistent profitability are very small for most individuals.
Solo Mining Bitcoin in 2025 remains technically possible but highly challenging. It requires significant investment, constant power supply, and a willingness to take long-term risks for uncertain rewards. While it appeals to those who value independence and decentralization, most miners find pool mining a far more practical and profitable approach.
European carmakers are inching closer to a recovery next year after a series of profit warnings in 2025, with cost cuts and turnaround plans prompting analysts to raise earnings estimates.
The Stoxx Europe 600 auto index is set for a sharp earnings-per-share rebound in 2026 and 2027, Bloomberg Intelligence data shows. This year is "likely to be the trough" for the sector's earnings, according to BI strategist Laurent Douillet, as new electric vehicle subsidies, cost measures and strategy overhauls brighten the outlook.
Automakers' bottom lines have been hit on multiple fronts in 2025 as they battled both internal setbacks and external troubles, including US tariffs, subdued demand in China, aggressive competition from Chinese carmakers and a slowdown in the electric vehicle market.
Luxury automaker Porsche AG slashed its guidance four times this year as it decided to scale back its EV ambitions, Jeep-owner Stellantis NV took billions in one-time charges as it adjusted product ranges and redirected production in the US, and Renault SA recognized an €9.5 billion ($10.9 billion) loss due to an accounting change for its stake in Nissan Motor Co.
More recently, the shortage of critical components from chipmaker Nexperia BV — caught in a political standoff between the Netherlands and China — presented an additional challenge. Only last week, Volkswagen AG warned the delivery of its financial targets hinges on the continued supply of semiconductors, saying it only had enough chips to keep its German manufacturing plants running for a week.
"Overall car production can only move at the pace of the slowest components," Citigroup analyst Ross MacDonald said. The Nexperia issue could cause further disruption to car production in the fourth quarter, he added.
These challenges have kept the sector underperforming the broader European index.
Challenges remain for the sector, with signs of continued weakness in the key US and Chinese markets and fundamentals still "fragile," according to BI's Douillet.
Still, the tide may be turning as the automakers look forward to €3 billion of new EV subsidies in Germany through 2029, while efforts to reduce costs and reshape model lineups should start paying off in 2026.
Porsche — contending with subdued demand in China, supply chain bottlenecks and cooling demand for EVs — signaled that the worst may be over at its latest results as it aims to reset its luxury credentials.
"Whilst Porsche has taken a long time to deal with the China sales loss and battery electric vehicle strategic re-alignment, we believe much of this is now done," according to Citigroup analyst Harald Hendrikse, who expects significant earnings improvement in 2026.
Parent company Volkswagen, which took a €2.7 billion goodwill impairment charge related to Porsche's strategic shift, reported solid cash flow and margins for the third quarter, boosting investor confidence in a recovery. The automaker said this week that the easing of US-China trade tensions was a "positive signal" for the potential resumption of Nexperia chip shipments.
"This print, despite its nuances, provides compelling evidence of the business' underlying strength," Deutsche Bank analyst Tim Rokossa said, adding that new models and cost savings should support this "much-needed" cash generation.
Mercedes-Benz Group AG kept its outlook and launched a €2 billion buyback as it turned to cost cuts to protect profitability, while Stellantis' sales are showing signs of improvement in North America as the company refocuses on making SUVs for its main US market.
The optimism has been fueled by a recovery in European car sales, which rose for a third straight month in September. Combined with tariffs concerns fading further into the background and turnaround efforts starting to feed through into earnings bodes well for 2026.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that US forces stationed in South Korea remain primarily focused on deterring North Korea but acknowledged Washington retains "flexibility for regional contingencies," signaling potential roles beyond the Korean Peninsula amid rising tensions with China.
Hegseth made the remarks when asked whether US troops could be used in a conflict over Taiwan or in the South China Sea.
"There's no doubt flexibility for regional contingencies is something we would take a look at," he told reporters alongside Korean Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back.
Hegseth's comments come as Washington deepens coordination with allies across the Indo-Pacific to deter China. While he emphasized that the Korean Peninsula remains the alliance's center of gravity, US officials have said the military's role there should evolve beyond solely deterring North Korea.
Hegseth also praised Seoul's plans to boost military spending, including investments in missile defense and space capabilities, and said both sides will expand cooperation between defense labs to advance military technology.
"These investments would accelerate the ROK's ability to lead its conventional deterrence, and defense against North Korea," he said, using the acronym for Republic of Korea.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung recently told Bloomberg News that South Korea plans to raise defense spending to 3.5% of gross domestic product from 2.3%, part of efforts to build independent national defense capabilities.
Hegseth is in Seoul for the annual Security Consultative Meeting — the final stop on an Asia tour that included Malaysia and Vietnam, and followed President Donald Trump's first regional trip of his second term. The talks came days after Trump finalized a trade deal with South Korea and approved Seoul's request to build a nuclear-powered submarine at a US shipyard.
Hegseth said the Pentagon would work with other agencies to carry out the pledge, calling it proof that "the president wants allies to be strong." A day earlier, Hegseth and Ahn visited the Demilitarized Zone dividing the Korean Peninsula, marking the first joint visit by the two defense chiefs since 2017.
"Our forces remain ready to support President Trump's efforts to bring lasting peace through strength," Hegseth wrote on X after the visit. The DMZ is where Trump last met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in 2019, and the president said during his latest trip that he remains open to meeting Kim again.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up