Retail Collapse in Urban China Signals End of an Era as Shopping Malls Shut Down in Droves

Economic

Summary:

China is entering its most severe retail purge in decades as traditional shopping malls close en masse. A combination of weak consumer spending, e-commerce dominance, overbuilt commercial infrastructure...

Malls Shuttered Across China as Retail Bubble Bursts

A sweeping wave of closures is sweeping through Chinese cities, marking the most brutal shakeout of the retail sector in decades. As consumers tighten their wallets and e-commerce platforms grow more dominant, many shopping centers that once symbolized urban prosperity have now become empty shells.

In Shanghai, long-standing malls such as Pacific Department Store in Xuhui (30 years in operation) and Meilong Isetan (27 years) have shut down after enduring prolonged losses. The same trend is unfolding in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. Notably, Parkson at Fuxingmen in Beijing an iconic name for over three decades was forced to close, even at the cost of multi-million-yuan contract violations. Newer, youth-targeted retail complexes like Yingzhan have also collapsed under financial strain, exiting prime locations and appearing on default lists.

Not Just E-Commerce: A Collapse of Consumer Confidence

While the rise of online shopping is a convenient narrative, analysts argue that it only partly explains the retail crash. The more profound driver lies in the sharp deterioration of urban middle-class purchasing power. Years of real estate deflation have eroded household wealth. Economic uncertainty has made discretionary spending a luxury. Visiting a shopping mall is no longer a lifestyle choice it’s increasingly viewed as an unnecessary expense.

This shift marks a causal collapse of a once-reliable economic engine. Retail centers were built on the assumption of an expanding, consumption-driven urban class. That class is now in retreat, financially cautious and reluctant to engage in non-essential shopping.

Record Low Rents Reflect Deep-Rooted Structural Weakness

Even in traditionally prime districts such as Shanghai’s Qipu Road Wholesale Market, rent prices have plunged from ¥70,000/month to just ¥500 with no takers. Some landlords are offering rent-free leases in exchange for basic management fees, underscoring the sheer desperation to attract tenants.

According to NetEase, 30 of China’s 35 first- and second-tier cities reported declines in retail rent prices during the first half of 2025, with 8 cities facing declines exceeding 10%. Guangzhou recorded the steepest fall over 15%.

This deflationary trend is not merely cyclical but structural. It reflects oversupply from overzealous real estate-linked retail development, exacerbated by a shrinking consumer base and weakened investor confidence.

The Legacy of the Land Rush: Overbuilt and Underused

The collapse of China’s mall economy is rooted in decisions made during the boom years of real estate expansion. Local governments, driven by land revenue and tax incentives, mandated commercial facilities such as malls be attached to land development projects. This approach created a glut of shopping centers disconnected from actual market demand.

With newer malls siphoning traffic from older ones, a cycle of displacement ensued each new development draining the viability of the last. In many cases, malls have devolved into food courts, with fashion and lifestyle retail disappearing altogether.

By the end of 2024, China had nearly 7,000 shopping malls over 30,000 m² more than six times the number in the U.S., a country with just a quarter of China’s population but far higher per capita GDP. The comparison exposes the sheer imbalance between supply and sustainable demand.

The Coming Reset: More Closures Expected

Observers warn that the current wave of mall closures is likely just the beginning. Years of unregulated expansion, driven by short-term profit motives and real estate speculation, have now collided with economic contraction and a lack of consumer resilience.

Retail investors and mall operators are struggling to adapt as capital inflows slow, consumption contracts, and digital platforms dominate. With no new viable profit model in sight and household wealth under pressure, China’s shopping mall landscape is facing an unprecedented purge a deep and painful reset of an outdated urban commercial model.

Unless new retail formats emerge that can reconcile digital integration, localized consumption patterns, and sustainable rental economics, China’s traditional malls may not just be closing they may be becoming obsolete.

Source: NetEase

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Negotiated Reciprocity: Southeast Asia Responds to U.S. Trade Demands

During U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent diplomatic tour of Asia, his administration announced multiple bilateral and framework trade agreements with Southeast Asian nations, reflecting a calculated exchange of tariff relief for American export access. While the deals remain non-binding at this stage, they signify a strategic shift by countries like Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam to align more closely with U.S. trade standards and economic priorities.

According to the White House, finalized agreements with Malaysia and Cambodia and preliminary frameworks with Thailand and Vietnam demonstrate growing regional willingness to accept U.S. technical regulations, ease market entry, and purchase high-value American products including Boeing aircraft and agricultural goods in exchange for targeted tariff exemptions.

Tariff Concessions in Exchange for Market Access

Malaysia and Cambodia have committed to reducing import duties on U.S. goods, particularly in the automotive, agricultural, and industrial sectors. This is accompanied by regulatory alignment with U.S. safety and technical standards especially in food and vehicle manufacturing thereby removing some longstanding non-tariff barriers.

In return, the U.S. will exempt selected Malaysian and Cambodian products from a 19% reciprocal tariff rate, part of the broader retaliatory regime applied to multiple trade partners. The exemptions also include products not produced in the U.S., offering both countries an economic incentive to negotiate without undermining U.S. domestic industry.

This arrangement reveals a transactional causality: tariff reduction is not driven by shared ideology but by calculated reciprocity. The U.S. gains increased export competitiveness and standard recognition; the Southeast Asian countries gain partial access to the American market under reduced protectionist scrutiny.

Strategic Procurement: Aircraft, Minerals, and Supply Chain Controls

Beyond tariff dynamics, procurement commitments form another cornerstone of these deals. Malaysia, for example, has pledged to invest $70 billion in the U.S. over the next decade, in part through the acquisition of Boeing aircraft. Cambodia and Thailand are also set to increase imports of American planes and agricultural commodities.

In addition, all four countries have agreed to facilitate U.S. access to strategic minerals essential for electronics and defense and to restrict activities that support indirect dumping into the American market by third-party nations, particularly China. These clauses extend the agreements beyond trade and into industrial policy and geopolitical positioning, aligning regional resources with U.S. economic security concerns.

Thailand, in particular, signed a side commitment focused on expanding its exports of strategic minerals to the U.S., suggesting a growing recognition that raw material diplomacy is an increasingly central component of bilateral trade strategy.

Framework Agreements with Vietnam and Thailand: Toward Deeper Engagement

The U.S. has also outlined framework agreements with Vietnam and Thailand that pave the way for comprehensive future trade deals. These frameworks include commitments to reduce tariffs on U.S. goods, lower barriers for U.S. firms, and adopt American technical standards across sectors including automobiles and machinery.

Vietnam and Thailand have both agreed to expand imports of U.S. agricultural products and aircraft, in line with similar commitments made by Malaysia and Cambodia. Although specific products to be exempted from current U.S. tariffs (20% for Vietnam, 19% for Cambodia) have not been publicly listed, the frameworks suggest that further tariff relief is conditional upon ongoing compliance and economic cooperation.

These frameworks reflect a correlational shift: the closer the regulatory and procurement alignment with U.S. preferences, the more likely it is that exemptions and favorable trade treatment will follow.

A Stepwise Approach Toward Strategic Economic Realignment

While the agreements announced during Trump’s Asia visit lack legal enforceability for now, they represent a significant political signal. For Southeast Asian nations, the offers of tariff relief, regulatory recognition, and increased U.S. market access provide strong motivation to accommodate Washington’s trade demands. For the U.S., these deals support broader goals of curbing Chinese economic influence in the region and securing critical inputs and export markets.

The evolving commitments mark a gradual but strategic realignment, wherein Southeast Asia positions itself as a cooperative partner in a contested global trade environment. As future negotiations formalize these frameworks, the region may find itself more deeply integrated into an American-led economic orbit trading partial sovereignty in regulatory space for economic security and access.

Source: WSJ

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

A Joint Declaration Anchoring Strategic Economic Collaboration

On October 26, 2025, on the sidelines of the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Vietnam and the United States issued a formal Joint Declaration announcing progress on a forthcoming Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade Agreement. This declaration, unveiled during a bilateral meeting between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chính, outlines the foundational principles and current status of negotiations aimed at institutionalizing a deeper and more equal economic relationship between the two countries.

The move reflects a strategic alignment consistent with the elevation of the Vietnam–U.S. relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. The declaration acknowledges the proactive efforts of both governments and business sectors in fostering a sustainable, stable, and mutually beneficial economic relationship.

Key Components of the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Framework

According to the declaration, both Vietnam and the U.S. have agreed to cooperate constructively on several core issues that remain significant barriers to trade integration. This includes resolving non-tariff barriers, standardizing commitments in digital trade, services, and investment, and jointly addressing intellectual property concerns and sustainable development goals.

Another critical element is the mutual intention to enhance the resilience of supply chains. This reflects a causal response to global disruptions in logistics and manufacturing, particularly in light of heightened geopolitical risks and pandemic aftershocks. By building shared mechanisms for supply chain security, both sides aim to reduce vulnerabilities and increase bilateral trade capacity.

These provisions show a progression from transactional trade arrangements to more systemic coordination, with the agreement structured to reflect mutual benefit, economic sovereignty, and respect for political institutions.

Progress in Negotiation and Tariff Adjustments

Since late April 2025, multiple rounds of negotiations have taken place at both technical and ministerial levels. Vietnam’s delegation, led by Minister of Industry and Trade Nguyễn Hồng Diên, has met both virtually and in person with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. These sustained diplomatic efforts culminated in a significant breakthrough on August 1, when President Trump signed an executive order reducing the reciprocal tariff rate for Vietnamese exports to the U.S. from 46% to 20%.

This substantial cut reflects a recognition of Vietnam’s efforts to engage in good faith trade reform and signals a recalibration of U.S. tariff policy toward Vietnam within the broader Indo-Pacific trade strategy. It also suggests a correlative link between diplomatic engagement and tariff moderation, underscoring the role of negotiation continuity in achieving economic concessions.

Bilateral Trade Growth Underpins the Partnership

Recent trade data from Vietnam’s General Department of Customs demonstrates a sharp upward trend in bilateral commerce. As of the end of September 2025, total two-way trade volume reached approximately $126.4 billion, up 27.3% year-on-year. Vietnamese exports to the U.S. surged to $112.8 billion, a 27.7% increase, accounting for 32.3% of total export turnover. Imports from the U.S. also rose 23.6% to $13.6 billion.

These figures illustrate a strong and growing interdependence between the two economies. The disproportionate surplus on Vietnam’s side continues to be a sensitive issue, yet the context of broader strategic cooperation appears to be reshaping the U.S. approach from punitive to pragmatic.

Toward a Balanced, Forward-Looking Trade Partnership

The Vietnam–U.S. Joint Declaration on the Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade Agreement reflects a turning point in the economic relations between the two nations. While concrete agreement terms are still under negotiation, the political and economic signals point toward a comprehensive realignment that balances market access with developmental asymmetries.

The framework prioritizes constructive dialogue over unilateral action and embeds trade reform within a broader agenda that includes digital transformation, environmental sustainability, and economic sovereignty. If successfully concluded, the agreement may serve not only as a bilateral model but also as a strategic counterweight in a region marked by shifting alliances and growing competition between major powers.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Messaging Through Trade: China’s Counter to U.S. Tariff Policies

China’s latest move to deepen trade integration with Southeast Asia through the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area 3.0 (ACFTA 3.0) marks more than just an economic agreement, it is a strategic political message. By finalizing the third revision of the long-standing trade pact during the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur, Chinese Premier Li Qiang positioned China as an advocate for multilateral economic cooperation, implicitly contrasting it with the unilateral trade policies pursued by the United States under President Donald Trump.

Li's statement that "unity is strength" and his criticism of "confrontation, coercion, and bullying" directly challenged the narrative of economic nationalism and tariffs that have characterized recent U.S. trade policy. The emphasis on mutual reliance and coordinated action signals China's intention to lead a parallel trade system that seeks deeper ties with the Global South particularly in Asia while marginalizing U.S. influence in the region.

Scope and Impact of ACFTA 3.0

The expanded agreement, which now includes commitments on digital trade, the green economy, and support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), reflects an effort to modernize the framework for regional commerce. Covering a market of over 2 billion people, the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area has already seen two-way trade grow from $235.5 billion in 2010 to nearly $1 trillion in 2024.

With the new upgrade, the pact seeks to remove non-tariff barriers, improve transparency, and broaden access to trade benefits for smaller market participants many of which form the economic backbone of ASEAN nations. While this reflects a correlational effort to deepen regional economic ties, the underlying causal intent is geopolitical: China is using its trade liberalization with ASEAN as a direct counter to U.S. tariffs and bilateral pressure.

ASEAN’s Balancing Act: Between Washington and Beijing

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, as ASEAN chair, underscored the bloc’s neutral posture, stating that the group welcomed both the United States and China. “The day before we were with President Donald Trump... and today we are back with China,” he said, emphasizing ASEAN’s centrality and pragmatic diplomacy.

This reflects ASEAN’s dual-track engagement strategy: while its members welcome Chinese investment and trade facilitation, many also remain tied to U.S. security networks or rely on American markets. However, Trump's imposition of broad tariffs, including on Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia even while signing side deals has prompted discomfort across the bloc.

This complex dynamic reveals a correlational tension: ASEAN’s desire for balance is being tested by the growing divergence in the economic strategies of Washington and Beijing. China's push for integration through ACFTA 3.0 contrasts with the U.S. approach of selective deals and tariff enforcement.

Unresolved U.S.-China Tensions Linger Despite Cooling Rhetoric

While officials from both the U.S. and China have hinted at progress toward a broader trade deal, including a planned summit between Trump and Xi in South Korea, the core structural issues in their economic relationship remain unresolved. This backdrop adds urgency to China’s trade overtures in Southeast Asia. By accelerating its multilateral commitments, China is attempting to mitigate external risks from its U.S. disputes while embedding itself more firmly in regional economic architecture.

Premier Li Qiang's speech emphasized China’s shared cultural and geographical ties with ASEAN, describing members as “good neighbors and good brothers.” The cultural framing of trade diplomacy strengthens the soft power narrative, reinforcing regional perceptions of China as a predictable and cooperative partner.

A Tactical Alliance, Not Just a Trade Deal

The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area 3.0 is not merely a revision of an economic agreement it is a calculated assertion of regional leadership. China is actively positioning itself as a defender of open trade and mutual development at a time when the U.S. is perceived to be retreating into protectionist policy.

While the agreement delivers tangible economic benefits lower tariffs, expanded market access, and support for SMEs its strategic significance lies in the narrative it supports: that China, not the U.S., is championing the future of global trade in Asia.

Yet this vision is not without challenges. ASEAN’s diverse political and economic alignments, the ongoing friction between Beijing and Washington, and the fragility of global demand all introduce uncertainties. Still, ACFTA 3.0 marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing reconfiguration of regional trade power, and China’s role in it is growing increasingly assertive.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

China–U.S. Trade War

Economic

A Trade Truce Anchored in Optics, Not Overhaul

After months of diplomatic wrangling and tariff threats, the United States and China appear poised to announce a formal trade truce at the upcoming summit in South Korea. President Donald Trump, expressing optimism aboard Air Force One, indicated that an agreement was near, bolstered by announcements over the weekend involving resumed Chinese soybean purchases and U.S. concessions on tariffs tied to rare-earth imports.

However, while these headline-friendly deals have calmed financial markets evidenced by the MSCI global stock index nearing record highs the substance of the deal remains narrow. Analysts and former diplomats alike have cautioned that the summit may yield symbolic wins while postponing harder, systemic issues that continue to shape the competitive U.S.–China relationship.

Markets Cheer, But Structural Tensions Persist

Financial markets have responded with enthusiasm, interpreting even incremental trade easing as a de-risking event for global equities. Yet the celebratory tone conceals the fact that most foundational economic and security disputes remain unresolved. From U.S. curbs on advanced chips to China’s retaliatory control over rare-earth exports, the underlying standoff reflects two fundamentally divergent models: one of open-market liberalism versus one of state-led industrial planning.

Daniel Kritenbrink, a former senior U.S. diplomat, emphasized that while both governments appear focused on avoiding short-term escalation, “none of the fundamentals in this relationship have changed.” This reflects a causally incomplete resolution, where the truce alleviates surface-level friction without addressing its underlying drivers.

Low-Hanging Fruit First: The Cost of Incrementalism

Trade analyst Sun Chenghao from Tsinghua University noted that by resolving easier disputes first such as soybean trade and fentanyl-linked tariffs negotiators may have made future rounds more difficult. Core disagreements on state subsidies, technological autonomy, and national security remain untouched. The result is a patchwork of micro-deals that skirt the deeper ideological and strategic divide.

Beijing’s recent policy roadmap reaffirmed its prioritization of manufacturing dominance and tech self-reliance until at least 2030, effectively rejecting U.S. calls for structural economic rebalancing. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s push for more Chinese consumer-driven growth was met with a countervailing focus on domestic industrial consolidation.

In this context, the probability of a “grand bargain” diminishes. Instead, a future shaped by sector-by-sector dialogue and narrowly scoped agreements appears far more likely buying time but not resolution.

Rare Earths and Tech: Leverage, Not Concession

Central to recent tensions has been China’s dominance in the rare-earth supply chain a strategic asset that Beijing has wielded to counter U.S. export controls on advanced semiconductors. Although Trump’s deal includes a temporary suspension of China’s new restrictions on rare-earth magnet exports, experts like Dexter Roberts warn that this pause is transactional, not transformative. “China’s never going to give up its leverage on rare earths. That would be sheer stupidity,” Roberts stated bluntly.

Meanwhile, U.S. restrictions on advanced chip technology remain firmly in place, as Bessent has made clear that rollback is not currently on the table. With both sides preserving their economic leverage while engaging in limited tactical compromises, the result is a fragile détente underpinned by unresolved strategic distrust.

Pharmaceuticals and Optics: Fentanyl Relief as a Concession

One area where progress may be more than symbolic is fentanyl. The U.S. administration has hinted at reducing the 20% tariff imposed to press Beijing on chemical exports linked to the deadly drug. This could offer partial relief to Chinese exporters and a political win for Trump, whose administration has linked drug enforcement to broader trade talks.

Still, even here the measures are reactive, not reformative. The reduction of fentanyl tariffs while significant in the context of humanitarian diplomacy does not change the structural grievances dominating U.S.–China trade relations, such as subsidies, digital surveillance, or forced technology transfer.

A Strategic Chessboard: Trump’s Broader Regional Moves

Parallel to the China negotiations, Trump’s trade pacts with Malaysia, Thailand, and Cambodia focused on rare earths and anti-dumping pledges underscore a broader effort to build regional coalitions that isolate Beijing’s influence. These side deals reflect a tactical balancing act designed to strengthen U.S. leverage while deepening economic ties with key Indo-Pacific allies.

The meeting between Trump and Xi, now confirmed to take place in Busan, South Korea, carries symbolic weight but limited strategic depth. While future leader visits such as Trump’s proposed trip to Beijing and Xi’s possible appearance at Mar-a-Lago signal a willingness to maintain communication channels, they do not imply convergence of economic systems.

Stability at the Surface, Stalemate at the Core

The U.S.–China trade deal expected at the Trump-Xi summit is best understood as a ceasefire, not a treaty. It delivers tactical clarity on a few immediate concerns soy, rare earths, fentanyl while leaving the structural architecture of the economic conflict entirely intact. Washington continues to demand openness and reform; Beijing continues to double down on self-sufficiency and industrial dominance.

By focusing on narrow deliverables and postponing deeper issues, both governments have bought time and market calm. But absent a genuine reconciliation of strategic visions, the likelihood of renewed tensions in future negotiation cycles remains high. Investors may enjoy the current rally, but policymakers must brace for the unresolved the real trade war has simply moved to a more silent phase.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Beyond Oil: A Strategic Economic Reorientation

Saudi Arabia, long known for its oil-fueled economic engine, is undergoing a profound transformation aimed at redefining its identity as a global economic power. At the core of this shift is a decisive move to decouple economic growth and fiscal health from crude exports, while investing in next-generation technologies such as artificial intelligence and expanding sectors like tourism and sports.

According to Investment Minister Khalid Al Falih, 50.6% of the Saudi economy is now “completely decoupled” from oil—a figure that continues to grow. Just a few years ago, nearly all of the kingdom’s revenue stemmed from oil. Today, 40% of government revenue is derived from sectors unrelated to hydrocarbons. This transition marks a causal break from decades of oil dependency, enabled by deliberate policy intervention, strategic reinvestment of oil windfalls, and accelerated non-oil sector development.

AI as a Pillar of Future Growth

One of the kingdom’s most ambitious moves lies in its adoption and promotion of artificial intelligence. Saudi Arabia aims to become a global leader in AI development and infrastructure, with plans to build data centers “at a scale and cost not achieved anywhere else,” according to Al Falih. The economic rationale is clear: PwC estimates that AI could add more than $135 billion to the Saudi economy by 2030.

Jonathan Ross, CEO of AI chip firm Groq, pointed out that Saudi Arabia’s surplus energy supply offers a comparative advantage in hosting AI infrastructure. This reflects a direct causal alignment between energy abundance and computational scalability—a synergy that few nations can replicate. In effect, the country is repurposing its legacy strength in energy to anchor a new digital frontier.

Large language models, AI applications, and cloud infrastructure represent areas of priority investment. The policy direction implies that rather than gradually pivoting away from oil, Saudi Arabia intends to leapfrog into frontier industries by deploying its sovereign wealth at scale.

Tourism’s Expanding Role in GDP Contribution

Tourism represents another rapidly growing sector with significant contributions to economic diversification. In 2024, the industry’s share of GDP rose to 5%, up from 3% in 2019, according to Tourism Minister Ahmed Al-Khateeb. By 2030, tourism is projected to contribute at least 10%, with a long-term goal of 20%.

New infrastructure resorts, airports, airlines and the opening up of cultural and historical destinations are driving this shift. The increase in international visitor numbers and diversification of source markets reflect both a strategic policy choice and shifting global perceptions of the kingdom. Unlike AI, whose benefits are longer-term and capital-intensive, tourism offers more immediate employment and revenue-generation potential, serving as a stabilizing counterweight to volatile oil receipts.

The Sovereign Wealth Engine Behind Diversification

The Public Investment Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s sovereign wealth fund, has grown sixfold since its inception and now approaches $1 trillion in capital deployment. PIF has been instrumental in supporting Saudi Arabia’s diversification drive by acquiring stakes in global tech firms, video game publishers, and sports franchises.

Notable investments include the acquisition of shares in Electronic Arts, the formation of the SoftBank Vision Fund, and the purchase of Premier League club Newcastle United. These moves are not just financial, they are symbolic extensions of Saudi Arabia’s strategic desire to project influence and relevance far beyond oil markets.

The PIF’s investment portfolio reflects a calculated effort to embed Saudi Arabia into global value chains across emerging industries. The strategy represents a shift from being a passive recipient of oil wealth to an active global allocator of capital in areas with long-term geopolitical and economic significance.

Macroeconomic Resilience Despite Falling Oil Revenue

Even as Brent crude prices have declined by 13.4% in 2025, leading to a 24% year-on-year fall in Saudi oil revenue for the first half of the year, the government has not scaled back public spending. In fact, total revenue reached 565.21 billion Saudi riyals ($150.73 billion) in H1 2025, with oil contributing just 53.4% down sharply from 67.97% in 2019.

This resilience underlines the fiscal space created by past oil surpluses and highlights a deliberate effort to shield the national budget from commodity price shocks. The ability to continue funding infrastructure, education, AI initiatives, and tourism projects despite weakening oil prices speaks to an increasingly diversified and stabilized fiscal architecture.

From Oil Giant to Innovation Nation

Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification is no longer theoretical it is actively reshaping the kingdom’s macroeconomic profile. With over half of the economy now operating independently of oil, and with bold investments in AI, tourism, and global brands, Saudi Arabia is building an economic model designed for resilience, relevance, and reinvention.

The kingdom’s strategy suggests a causal ambition: to transform finite oil wealth into sustainable technological and cultural capital. Whether measured by AI breakthroughs, tourist arrivals, or sovereign investments, Saudi Arabia is positioning itself not just for a post-oil future but as a defining player in the global economic order of the coming decades.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

Global Markets Surge on Trade Deal Optimism

The financial world is holding its breath, not because a U.S.–China trade agreement has been finalized, but because its mere possibility has sent equity markets soaring across continents. U.S. President Donald Trump indicated aboard Air Force One that a deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping is imminent, lifting investor sentiment and pushing the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average to fresh record highs on Monday. Asian and European equities mirrored the excitement, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 and South Korea’s Kospi also closing at all-time highs.

This dramatic response underscores a deeply rooted causal relationship between geopolitical diplomacy and investor confidence. Even absent a signed document, the suggestion of progress has recalibrated market expectations particularly in technology, where trade tensions have clouded earnings guidance and expansion strategies.

Technology Giants Poised for Resurgence

Nowhere is the potential impact of a trade truce more visible than in the tech sector. Companies like Nvidia, which excluded shipments to China in its Q4 forecast due to ongoing export restrictions, are poised to regain significant commercial ground if trade barriers are lifted or clarified. CFRA’s Sam Stovall noted that many forecasts had been made “without the benefit of China,” suggesting that a policy reversal could lead to a wave of revised earnings guidance and renewed investor buying.

This reflects both a causal and correlative dynamic: reduced geopolitical friction could directly enable revenue recovery, while also improving market psychology that has been increasingly shaped by fear of fragmentation in global supply chains.

Symbolic Agriculture Moves and the Broader Economic Metaphor

Beyond the digital world, the trade conflict has impacted real-world commodities. Reports suggest that China may ease its informal boycott of U.S. soybeans, a move that is small in economic value but large in political symbolism. For Scott Bessent, current U.S. Treasury Secretary and self-described soybean farmer, the shift is both personal and emblematic. The metaphor extends beyond agriculture everyone in the global economy, from workers to executives, has been “farming” uncertainty, sowing caution and waiting for a harvest of policy stability.

A trade deal, even if partial, could signal that the prolonged economic standoff is nearing resolution, allowing businesses and investors to begin planning long-term strategies rather than reacting to near-daily volatility.

Contrasting Headlines Highlight Fragility Beneath the Rally

However, not all signals are uniformly positive. Amazon is reportedly preparing for the largest layoff in its history, with up to 30,000 employees affected. Meanwhile, Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk may depart if shareholders fail to approve his $1 trillion pay package. These developments reflect internal corporate tensions that persist regardless of trade news, serving as a reminder that not all gains in the market are supported by equally stable fundamentals.

Yet despite such headlines, the Russell 2000 Index a benchmark for small-cap U.S. stocks also hit a new high, suggesting that investor appetite is broadening beyond the megacap tech names that have led the rally. Still, analysts caution that when the Federal Reserve eventually cuts interest rates, returns on cash instruments like money market funds will decline, prompting a strategic shift of funds into riskier assets.

Gold Shines Bright Amid Rising Geopolitical Risks

In a separate trend reflecting residual anxiety, gold has regained favor as a safe haven asset. With geopolitical tensions flaring in the Middle East particularly U.S. warnings over Tehran the precious metal is once again attracting inflows. In India, gold purchases reached up to $11 billion during the Diwali festival alone, a spike driven more by investment appeal than traditional jewelry demand. The shift highlights how, even amid bullish equity markets, risk hedging remains a priority for many.

Gold’s performance up 55% year-to-date despite a mid-October slide mirrors broader market dynamics where optimism over trade coexists with fear over global conflict, inflation, and monetary policy uncertainty.

The Waiting Game for Resolution

Markets are acting as though the U.S.–China trade war is on the cusp of resolution but history has shown that diplomatic optimism does not always translate into enduring outcomes. While President Trump’s statements suggest a deal is imminent, the actual terms, timelines, and enforcement mechanisms remain unclear.

Nevertheless, in a world weary of tariffs, uncertainty, and fragmented trade flows, the hope of a deal is powerful enough to shift capital, lift indexes, and realign corporate expectations. From soybean fields in the Midwest to server farms in Silicon Valley, the global economy is ready to sow again if only the political climate allows the seeds of optimism to take root.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Retail Collapse in Urban China Signals End of an Era as Shopping Malls Shut Down in Droves

Malls Shuttered Across China as Retail Bubble Bursts

Not Just E-Commerce: A Collapse of Consumer Confidence

Record Low Rents Reflect Deep-Rooted Structural Weakness

The Legacy of the Land Rush: Overbuilt and Underused

The Coming Reset: More Closures Expected

Source: NetEase

Southeast Asian Nations Move Closer to U.S. Trade Alignment Through Tariff Concessions and Strategic Procurement Deals

Negotiated Reciprocity: Southeast Asia Responds to U.S. Trade Demands

Tariff Concessions in Exchange for Market Access

Strategic Procurement: Aircraft, Minerals, and Supply Chain Controls

Framework Agreements with Vietnam and Thailand: Toward Deeper Engagement

A Stepwise Approach Toward Strategic Economic Realignment

Source: WSJ

Vietnam and U.S. Advance Reciprocal Trade Agreement, Marking a New Phase in Strategic Economic Alignment

A Joint Declaration Anchoring Strategic Economic Collaboration

Key Components of the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Framework

Progress in Negotiation and Tariff Adjustments

Bilateral Trade Growth Underpins the Partnership

Toward a Balanced, Forward-Looking Trade Partnership

China Positions Itself as Champion of Open Trade Amid ASEAN Pact Expansion and U.S. Protectionist Pressures

Strategic Messaging Through Trade: China’s Counter to U.S. Tariff Policies

Scope and Impact of ACFTA 3.0

ASEAN’s Balancing Act: Between Washington and Beijing

Unresolved U.S.-China Tensions Linger Despite Cooling Rhetoric

A Tactical Alliance, Not Just a Trade Deal

Source: Bloomberg

Truce Without Transformation: U.S.–China Trade Deal Calms Markets but Sidesteps Core Conflicts

A Trade Truce Anchored in Optics, Not Overhaul

Markets Cheer, But Structural Tensions Persist

Low-Hanging Fruit First: The Cost of Incrementalism

Rare Earths and Tech: Leverage, Not Concession

Pharmaceuticals and Optics: Fentanyl Relief as a Concession

A Strategic Chessboard: Trump’s Broader Regional Moves

Stability at the Surface, Stalemate at the Core

Source: Reuters

Saudi Arabia’s Post-Oil Ambition: Investing in AI, Tourism, and Global Influence to Redefine Its Economic Future

Beyond Oil: A Strategic Economic Reorientation

AI as a Pillar of Future Growth

Tourism’s Expanding Role in GDP Contribution

The Sovereign Wealth Engine Behind Diversification

Macroeconomic Resilience Despite Falling Oil Revenue

From Oil Giant to Innovation Nation

Source: CNBC

The Harvest of Hope: Markets Rally on U.S.–China Trade Deal Optimism Amid Global Uncertainty

Global Markets Surge on Trade Deal Optimism

Technology Giants Poised for Resurgence

Symbolic Agriculture Moves and the Broader Economic Metaphor

Contrasting Headlines Highlight Fragility Beneath the Rally

Gold Shines Bright Amid Rising Geopolitical Risks

The Waiting Game for Resolution

Source: CNBC

Risk Disclosure