China Poised to Triple AI Chip Output in 2026 Amid Rising Tech Independence Drive

Economic

Summary:

Chinese tech giants including Huawei and SMIC plan to triple domestic AI chip production by next year through aggressive factory expansion...

China’s AI Chip Ambitions Accelerate

According to the Financial Times, China is gearing up for a massive production surge in artificial intelligence (AI) semiconductors, with major players such as Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) at the forefront. This expansion is expected to more than triple the country’s output of AI chips by 2026.

The strategic move comes as U.S.-China tech tensions escalate, pushing Chinese firms to build domestic capabilities to match or replace Western suppliers. AI chips essential for powering large language models, facial recognition systems, and autonomous technologies have become a central battleground in this effort.

Huawei’s Factory Push and Strategic Role

Huawei, which currently leads China’s AI hardware innovation, is supporting the launch of three new AI-focused semiconductor facilities. The first is set to begin operations by the end of this year, with the other two following in 2026. If all three reach full capacity, their combined output is expected to surpass SMIC’s current AI chip production, a significant benchmark given SMIC is China’s largest semiconductor foundry.

Although Huawei claims it won’t directly own or operate the chip fabs, it remains a key driver in shaping their design and operational focus. Its latest AI chips reportedly meet performance criteria laid out by DeepSeek, a fast-growing AI startup in China specializing in large-scale models, showcasing the alignment between hardware development and software deployment in China’s AI ecosystem.

SMIC to Double Capacity for 7nm Chips

In parallel, SMIC plans to double its production capacity next year for 7-nanometer chips, the most advanced nodes currently mass-produced in China. Huawei is SMIC’s largest customer in this segment, underscoring a growing alliance between China’s top fabless and foundry firms.

Industry executives suggest that once these new facilities come online, domestic production constraints will no longer be a bottleneck, paving the way for rapid AI model deployment and system integration.

Reducing Dependency on Nvidia and AMD

China’s production ramp-up also comes amid growing uncertainty around Nvidia’s H20 AI chip, a U.S.-sanctioned variant intended for the Chinese market. Local firms are now working on homegrown alternatives to compete with the H20 and similar models from AMD, aiming to eliminate a strategic vulnerability in the supply chain.

By boosting domestic chip supply, China seeks to provide greater stability for its AI developers, particularly as U.S. export restrictions continue to tighten. The goal is not merely to fill the gap left by foreign suppliers but to eventually surpass them in efficiency and specialization, particularly for AI applications tailored to Chinese platforms and needs.

China’s aggressive investment in AI chip manufacturing marks a critical phase in its long-term strategy to achieve technological sovereignty. If successful, this expansion could transform China from a major chip importer into a globally competitive chip producer, especially in the AI domain. The impact will be felt not just in the domestic tech scene but also across global supply chains and the broader AI arms race.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Energy Diplomacy Amid Political Tensions

In the complex geopolitics of the Middle East, political agreements are notoriously fragile and slow-moving. However, recent developments in natural gas trade are reshaping the region’s dynamics. Israel’s gas exports to Egypt and Jordan are playing a pivotal role not only in supporting regional energy security but also in advancing Israel’s long-term diplomatic normalization agenda.

Gas deals have helped preserve fragile peace agreements, especially with Egypt and Jordan, while reinforcing Israel's image as a reliable energy partner. Amid the Gaza conflict and the humanitarian crisis facing Palestinians, these energy ties have notably endured, suggesting the growing weight of economic interests over purely political considerations.

The Leviathan Field and the Egypt Deal

NewMed Energy, which holds a 45.34% stake in the Leviathan gas field the largest in the Eastern Mediterranean recently signed a $35 billion deal to supply Egypt with 130 billion cubic meters of gas over 15 years. This gas will be delivered via pipelines, offering substantial cost savings compared to Egypt’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports, which currently cost $12–13/mn Btu versus Israel’s lower pipeline rate (estimated at ~$7.50/mn Btu).

This deal also relieves pressure on Egypt’s domestic gas supply, which has been strained due to falling output from the Zohr gas field (which provides 35–40% of Egypt’s production). As a result, Egypt was forced to cut industrial activity in early 2025 and turn to foreign suppliers like Shell and TotalEnergies for LNG.

Regional Energy Interdependence

Israel’s gas exports are emerging as a vital link in a regional energy web. Jordan, for instance, has imported Israeli gas since 2020 and continues to depend on it amid fluctuating regional supplies. Egypt, facing a projected 22.5% drop in domestic gas production by 2028 and a 39% surge in electricity demand, increasingly leans on Israeli supplies to close the gap.

This growing energy interdependence not only positions Israel as a regional energy anchor but also creates economic incentives for sustained cooperation, even among adversarial nations.

Gulf Interest and Investment Potential

Energy ambitions are further supported by the involvement of Gulf sovereign wealth funds and national oil companies. The Shell-Kufpec joint venture in Egypt’s Mina West field and the interest from Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) in acquiring NewMed Energy signal Gulf interest in deeper integration with Israel’s energy infrastructure.

Although the ADNOC-BP–NewMed deal stalled in 2024, the possibility of privatizing NewMed could reaccelerate efforts to tie Israeli gas assets more closely with Gulf economies and logistics networks, transforming Israel into a strategic node in a broader energy corridor.

Toward Normalization Through Energy

The strategic logic is clear: if Israel can ensure affordable and stable energy supplies to key regional players like Egypt and Jordan, it strengthens its case as a reliable economic partner. This could open doors to broader infrastructure cooperation and diplomatic normalization, including renewed interest from Gulf states.

For Israel, this energy-based diplomacy is not only about export revenue it’s a path toward regional acceptance and long-term integration into a Middle East previously resistant to open cooperation. The more Israel proves indispensable to regional energy needs, the more leverage it gains to reshape alliances and recast its role in the region.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Europe Takes a Bold Step Toward Using Russian Assets for Ukraine's Recovery

In a major escalation of economic pressure on Russia, the European Commission is formulating a plan to transfer €200 billion worth of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. These assets, held in European financial institutions since the outbreak of the war in 2022, are now being eyed as a crucial funding source to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn infrastructure.

A member of the working group confirmed that this proposal would redirect frozen Russian funds primarily central bank reserves toward Ukraine's reconstruction, with the plan being developed to comply with international law and to minimize legal and financial risks for EU institutions.

Legal and Political Hurdles Ahead

Although the proposal is gaining traction within the European Commission, it still requires unanimous approval from EU member states, and countries like Hungary have already expressed skepticism about the legality and feasibility of the move.

The Commission is currently drafting a comprehensive legal and technical framework to facilitate the transfer while attempting to avoid setting a precedent that could weaken investor confidence in European financial systems.

Strategic Messaging and Risks of Escalation

Supporters of the plan argue that if Russia refuses to pay war reparations, this mechanism may be the only practical path to accountability. However, Moscow has strongly condemned the initiative, branding it “theft of sovereign assets.” The Kremlin has threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing Western-owned assets still present on Russian soil though this option has lost weight as many Western firms have already exited Russia.

This plan, if implemented, would mark an unprecedented use of frozen sovereign assets in modern geopolitics. While previous instances have seen targeted sanctions or freezes, an outright confiscation and redirection of state-held funds would raise serious legal and ethical questions on the international stage.

For Ukraine, however, the potential €200 billion infusion could provide a lifeline, helping to restore infrastructure, housing, healthcare, and industry especially as direct international aid flows become harder to sustain over time.

The EU’s move to transfer frozen Russian funds to Ukraine could shift the balance in the post-war reconstruction effort but also risks intensifying global disputes over the sanctity of state assets. If successful, it might inspire future precedents for handling aggressor states, but the risk of economic retaliation and legal backlash remains high.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

India Prioritizes Cheap Russian Oil Over US Pressure

In a bold response to escalating trade tensions, India is set to increase its crude oil imports from Russia by 150,000–300,000 barrels per day in September compared to August. This decision comes just days after the United States, under President Donald Trump, imposed a second round of tariffs, raising duties on Indian imports to 50%, as a way to pressure New Delhi into distancing itself from Moscow.

Despite growing pressure, Indian officials remain firm. Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar stated that India and Russia aim to boost bilateral trade to USD 100 billion in the next five years. He emphasized that Russia remains a strategic partner, especially in ensuring India’s energy security and economic development. This firm stance shows India’s unwillingness to let geopolitical pressure override its national interests.

A Mutually Beneficial Relationship Amid Global Shifts

Following disruptions in Russia’s refining capacity with at least 10 refineries shut down, reducing domestic refining output by 17% Moscow is being pushed to export more crude oil. India, which already accounts for over one-third of Russia’s oil exports, has become a key outlet, with major refiners like Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy (partially Russian-owned) continuing to ramp up purchases.

Most of this oil is delivered via Russian-owned tankers, and the deep discounts offered have helped India reduce its import bill while keeping domestic energy prices under control crucial for a rapidly growing economy.

Short-Term Impact: US Sanctions May Backfire

Although Washington’s goal is to isolate Russia economically, the sanctions might be strengthening alternative energy alliances, especially among BRICS countries. Rather than isolating Russia, these efforts are pushing nations like India and China closer to Moscow, allowing for new trade patterns that bypass Western financial systems and political influence.

India’s move signals a broader trend among emerging economies to pursue strategic autonomy in the face of global fragmentation. While continuing to maintain relations with the US and the West, New Delhi is clearly asserting its independence in matters of energy and trade.

This development could serve as a model for other developing nations navigating similar geopolitical pressure choosing stable growth and energy affordability over alignment with any single global power bloc.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Mexico Moves to Curb Chinese Imports in Strategic Trade Realignment

Mexico’s upcoming 2026 budget proposal is expected to include a significant policy shift: new import tariffs on goods originating from China, notably in sectors such as automobiles, textiles, and plastics. Citing a Bloomberg report on August 28, the move reflects Mexico’s effort to rebalance its trade relationship with China, shield domestic industries from underpriced competition, and position itself more favorably in the evolving geopolitical trade dynamic shaped by U.S. pressure.

This tariff proposal aligns with longstanding demands from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has pushed Mexico to mirror America’s aggressive trade posture toward China. It also comes ahead of next year’s planned review of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), underscoring how the issue of supply chain sovereignty and trade parity has become a precondition for deeper economic integration.

Domestic Industry Protection and Trade Balancing Objectives

Officials in Mexico’s finance ministry suggest that the primary objective is to protect national industries and reduce reliance on cheap Asian inputs, especially from China. These proposed tariffs are not limited to China alone; early indications suggest they may extend to other Asian economies, hinting at a broader strategy of reshoring production and encouraging regional manufacturing ecosystems.

The tariff expansion would mark a sharp pivot from Mexico’s historically open trade orientation and signal a causal response to competitive erosion in its domestic manufacturing base. The targeted sectors automotive, textiles, and plastics have faced increasing pressure from low-cost Chinese imports, affecting local employment and industrial capacity.

North American Supply Chain Realignment Underway

Beyond domestic politics, this policy move has clear implications for the North American supply chain framework. As Mexico integrates further into U.S.-led initiatives to decouple from Chinese manufacturing, the tariffs could encourage nearshoring of key production lines, enhance compliance with USMCA origin rules, and support broader U.S. goals of reducing Chinese participation in sensitive sectors such as electric vehicles and advanced manufacturing.

However, such a transition also risks supply disruption and input inflation, especially for Mexican businesses that rely on Chinese intermediate goods. The downstream effects may include price increases in consumer goods, delays in assembly lines, and elevated production costs particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises.

Political Timing and Legislative Outlook

The draft budget, spearheaded by President Claudia Sheinbaum’s administration, is set to be submitted to Mexico’s Congress on September 8. As the policy represents a blend of trade and political strategy, its success will depend on domestic legislative support and bilateral coordination with the U.S. administration, especially amid ongoing discussions about regional security and anti-narcotics cooperation.

If enacted, these tariffs will be a litmus test for Mexico’s willingness to recalibrate its international trade stance and align more explicitly with U.S. strategic interests. It also represents a broader trend of economic nationalism, where middle-power economies like Mexico must navigate the fine line between open-market pragmatism and protectionist realignment under geopolitical pressure.

Mexico’s proposed tariff hikes on Chinese imports mark a significant pivot in its trade and industrial policy, driven by a need to protect domestic producers, align with U.S. trade priorities, and regain control over supply chain dynamics. While the move may fortify its manufacturing base and strengthen ties with Washington, it also introduces new risks ranging from supply chain bottlenecks to retaliatory actions by affected Asian trading partners. As the 2026 budget moves through Congress, the world will be watching how Mexico manages this balancing act in an increasingly fragmented global trade landscape.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Global Debt Risks No Longer Abstract, IMF Warns

In a pivotal interview with Bloomberg on August 28, IMF Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath warned that global public debt has reached dangerously high levels, posing systemic risks across both advanced and emerging markets. Her remarks signaled a shift from traditional assumptions that markets can "absorb" sovereign debt without destabilizing effects. Today, Gopinath stressed, that assumption no longer holds even for developed economies like the U.S., U.K., and France.

This causal concern arises from the tightening global financial environment, characterized by persistently high interest rates, post-pandemic fiscal expansion, and mounting geopolitical fragmentation. While no major financial crisis has erupted yet, Gopinath cautioned that “absence of crisis does not imply absence of risk.”

Bond Market Fragility: A Structural Warning Sign

Bond markets long considered a barometer of macro-financial health are beginning to crack under the pressure of fiscal imbalances and investor anxiety. In France, 30-year bond yields surged to a 14-year high on fears that the government may fail to meet its deficit-reduction pledges. Similarly, U.K. 30-year gilt yields are hovering near their highest point since 1998, intensifying fiscal stress for the administration of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

The U.S. is no exception. Its 30-year Treasury yields have climbed well above their multi-year average, directly increasing the cost of government borrowing and raising the long-term fiscal burden. These developments underscore Gopinath’s warning that global bond markets are in an "increasingly fragile" state, made more precarious by inflated equity valuations and policy uncertainty.

Political Interference Threatens Fed’s Operational Independence

Gopinath also addressed a politically sensitive issue: the independence of the U.S. Federal Reserve. Her comments followed recent moves by President Donald Trump to dismiss Fed Governor Lisa Cook a move many view as an effort to influence interest rate policy ahead of the 2026 election cycle.

Though markets remained relatively calm, Gopinath interpreted this not as a sign of stability but as a potential underpricing of political risk. While the Fed’s “operational independence” in setting interest rates remains intact for now, she cautioned against complacency. The specter of executive interference could erode investor trust and amplify volatility if political moves are seen as compromising central bank credibility.

Timing of the Warning Highlights Broader Systemic Concerns

Gopinath’s statements come at a critical moment: global economic growth is decelerating, borrowing costs are rising, and political pressures both domestic and international are intensifying. Her warnings cut across technical analysis and emphasize a broader, systemic vulnerability: that the interconnected debt and bond market architecture is under strain from both fiscal mismanagement and weakening institutional autonomy.

Her final remarks as IMF’s No. 2 official carry additional weight, as she prepares to return to academia at Harvard. During her tenure, Gopinath has been a leading voice on global financial governance, pandemic recovery, and macroeconomic coordination and her departure coincides with a turning point in the post-COVID monetary policy era.

Gita Gopinath’s exit from the IMF leaves behind a sobering set of warnings. The confluence of historic public debt levels, fragile sovereign bond markets, and rising political intervention in monetary institutions presents a potentially volatile mix. While current market behavior appears orderly, the foundations are under stress. With global financial stability increasingly reliant on trust in independent institutions and responsible fiscal policy, any misstep could shift the system from fragile equilibrium to crisis. Investors and policymakers alike should take heed the risk landscape is darker than it appears on the surface.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tokyo Summit Marks Deepening of Japan–India Strategic Cooperation

During a high-profile summit in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled a 10-year roadmap aimed at significantly expanding economic and technological ties between their two nations. The centerpiece of the announcement was Japan’s commitment to invest 10 trillion yen approximately $68 billion into India’s key sectors through private capital by 2035.

This initiative, as outlined by Prime Minister Ishiba, targets strategic industries such as high technology, digital transformation, and rare earth minerals. His remarks underscored the causal relationship between India’s market potential and Japan’s pursuit of sustainable regional growth amid a volatile global landscape.

A Milestone in Japan’s Confidence in India

Prime Minister Ishiba also revealed that Japan had already met its previous goal of investing 5 trillion yen between 2022 and 2026 two years ahead of schedule demonstrating growing confidence in India’s economic trajectory. This early completion is both symbolic and strategic, reflecting Tokyo’s deepening alignment with New Delhi as a counterweight to regional disruptions.

From India’s perspective, Modi emphasized that the partnership had entered a “new chapter,” anchored in pillars of investment, innovation, economic security, green technology, healthcare, and regional exchanges. The bilateral framework now includes eight key domains that extend beyond trade to institutional cooperation and people-to-people ties.

Workforce Mobility and Supply Chain Integration

One of the most notable aspects of the partnership is a large-scale workforce exchange plan. Over the next five years, the two countries will facilitate the movement of 500,000 individuals including 50,000 skilled Indian workers to contribute to Japan’s labor market and local communities. This exchange not only supports Japan’s demographic needs but also showcases a mutually reinforcing model of combining Japanese capital with Indian talent.

To facilitate investment, Prime Minister Modi pledged further administrative and regulatory reforms to help Japanese firms expand their supply chains in India. He also encouraged investors to leverage what he termed the "synergy of Japanese technology and Indian human capital" a narrative that reaffirms India’s pitch as a strategic manufacturing and innovation hub.

Japan–India Economic Security Initiative and Technological Frontiers

The summit also marked the official launch of the Japan–India Economic Security Initiative, aimed at enhancing supply chain resilience in critical sectors such as semiconductors, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and emerging technologies. This is a causal response to growing geopolitical risks and reflects a shared goal of reducing dependency on external actors, particularly in sensitive industries.

Both leaders emphasized high-tech cooperation as a top priority. Collaborative projects are expected to focus on artificial intelligence (AI) and next-generation mobility systems including smart ports, advanced aviation, and maritime technologies. These areas align closely with both nations’ industrial policy agendas and long-term development strategies.

Space Collaboration: Chandrayaan-5 and Beyond

In the aerospace domain, ISRO (India) and JAXA (Japan) have agreed to collaborate on the upcoming Chandrayaan-5 lunar mission, with a specific aim of exploring the Moon’s South Pole. The mission, scheduled for 2027–2028, highlights the maturation of space diplomacy between the two nations and could pave the way for more ambitious joint missions in deep space exploration and satellite technologies.

The 2025 Tokyo summit between Japan and India marks a pivotal step in the evolution of a multi-dimensional strategic partnership. With a historic investment commitment, expanded industrial and technological cooperation, and an ambitious framework for workforce and space collaboration, both nations are positioning themselves as co-architects of a new, resilient Indo-Pacific economic order. As global supply chains fragment and geopolitical alignments shift, this bilateral alignment stands out as a model of pragmatic and forward-looking cooperation.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites