Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Economic Activity Index YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Germany GfK Consumer Confidence Index (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
India Industrial Production Index YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
India Manufacturing Output MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --















































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
Bitcoin continues to struggle as it attempts to reclaim the $90,000 level, with traders facing a market defined by hesitation rather than conviction. After yesterday’s bearish breakdown below $90K, price action has slipped back into indecisive territory, raising fresh questions about whether this pullback is a temporary shakeout or the start of a deeper corrective phase.
According to top analyst Axel Adler, a macro indicator called Trend Pulse helps explain why momentum has faded. Adler notes that since January 19, the market has remained in Bear Mode, with the Bull phase absent for 83 consecutive days. Two separate charts reinforce this shift, showing that both short-term momentum and quarterly performance have turned negative at the same time.
Trend Pulse recently shifted from Neutral to Bear, driven by a double-negative setup: the 14-day return has flipped red, and the SMA30 versus SMA200 trend signal is also negative. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s quarterly return sits at -19%, confirming macro weakness, but without the kind of extreme that often signals a definitive bottom.
Bitcoin Remains Stuck In Bear Mode As Macro Signals Stay Negative
Adler notes that Bitcoin’s last Bull Mode signal was printed on November 2, 2025, when BTC traded near $110,000—roughly 83 days ago. Since then, the market has failed to regain structural strength. Even the Neutral stretch between December 30 and January 18 proved too short and too weak to restore the long-term trend, leaving Bitcoin vulnerable once selling pressure returned.
Adler explains that the first trigger for improvement is the 14-day return moving back above 0, which would shift the regime from Bear to Neutral. However, a full transition back into Bull Mode requires a second condition: SMA30 breaking above SMA200. Given the current divergence between the two averages, that crossover would likely demand 3–4 weeks of sustained upside rather than a short-lived bounce.
The Bitcoin Price Performance chart adds macro context by tracking quarterly return (90D) as a sentiment proxy. Historically, readings above +75% align with euphoria, while values below 0% signal pessimism, and drops below -30% reflect capitulation.
Bitcoin’s quarterly return sits near -19%, negative but far from deep bear-market extremes. Yet the 7-day change (-6.8%) suggests downside momentum is accelerating after the $90K breakdown.
Together, Trend Pulse and quarterly returns point to moderate pessimism without final capitulation, leaving the market at a decision point.
BTC Moving Averages Cap Recovery
Bitcoin is trading near $89,000 after failing to hold above the $90,000 psychological level, reinforcing the market’s current indecision. The chart shows BTC printing a lower-high structure since the early November peak, followed by a sharp selloff that reset price into a wide consolidation range. After bottoming in late November, Bitcoin rebounded but struggled to build sustained momentum, repeatedly stalling on push attempts toward the mid-$90K zone.
From a trend perspective, BTC remains pressured beneath its key moving averages. Price is trading below the green long-term average and the blue mid-term average, both of which are now sloping downward, signaling that broader momentum continues to lean bearish.
The most recent rejection occurred as BTC briefly pushed into the $95K–$97K area, only to roll over and break back down toward the range lows. Meanwhile, the red long-term average remains well above price near the low-$100Ks, highlighting how far BTC would need to recover to reestablish a stronger macro uptrend.
Volume has picked up on selloffs relative to bounces, suggesting that downside moves are still being met with more urgency. For bulls, reclaiming $90K and then holding above $92K–$94K is key. Otherwise, the chart keeps risk open for a deeper pullback toward the mid-$80K region.
Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
US Democratic Senators working on crypto market structure legislation filed several amendments on Friday, including measures to address conflicts of interest with US officials profiting from the crypto industry.
The ethics-focused amendments were filed ahead of the Senate Agriculture Committee’s markup for the crypto market structure legislation this Tuesday, which seeks to give greater clarity on federal rules for digital assets, define agency oversight, and bring regulatory certainty to investors and market participants.
One of the most notable amendments was Senator Michael Bennet’s purported inclusion of the Digital Asset Ethics Act into the crypto market structure legislation to prevent US officials from profiting from the crypto industry.
US Senator Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats have been raising concerns about President Donald Trump’s alleged conflicts of interest with the crypto industry, including his involvement in the World Liberty Financial crypto platform, which has increased his net worth by hundreds of millions of dollars.
CFTC should fill vacant seats before bill takes effect
Another amendment from Democrat Senator Amy Klobuchar seeks to delay the bill’s implementation until the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has a full set of commissioners.
The CFTC is currently led solely by Chair Michael Selig, who was sworn in on Dec. 22. There is no concrete timeline for when the remaining four commissioner seats are expected to be filled.
Senators Roger Marshall, Dick Durbin, and Peter Welch also made amendments to include the Credit Card Competition Act, which seeks to prohibit “credit card networks and certain card-issuing financial institutions from requiring network exclusivity on credit cards.”
The Senate markup for Tuesday comes after it was postponed on Jan. 15 due to disputes over stablecoin rewards restrictions and other decentralized finance provisions, which led major industry player Coinbase to withdraw support.
Snowstorm could postpone Senate markup again
There are fears that Tuesday’s markup will be pushed back again, with an incoming snowstorm predicted to strike Washington DC over the weekend.
Bitcoin’s push to $97,600 last week drew a burst of bullish options activity, but Glassnode argues the derivatives tape looked more like short-dated positioning than broad-based conviction. In a Jan. 23 thread, the on-chain analytics firm pointed to a split between front-end call demand and longer-dated risk pricing that stayed anchored in downside protection.
“Let’s deep dive into options market behavior during last week’s move to 97.6K, and how options metrics help gauge conviction behind the move,” Glassnode wrote. The core takeaway: upside flow showed up, but it didn’t meaningfully change how the market priced risk further out the curve.
What Bitcoin Traders Can Learn From Last Week’s Rally
Glassnode first focused on near-term skew. Around mid-January, BTC rose roughly 8% over a few days, and the 1-week 25-delta skew moved sharply toward neutral from “deep put territory.” That kind of front-end shift can look like a market flipping bullish—until you check whether the same repricing is happening in longer expiries.
“Careful though,” Glassnode warned. “Near-dated call demand is often misread as directional conviction.” The thread paired that point with flow data: the options volume put/call ratio dropped from 1 to 0.4, signaling a surge in call activity. But, as Glassnode framed it, the question is not whether calls were bought, but how short-dated that demand actually was.
The longer-dated picture was notably less enthusiastic. Glassnode said the 1-month 25-delta skew “only moved from 7% to 4% at the low,” staying in put asymmetry even as the 1-week skew fell from 8% to 1%. On the 3-month 25-delta skew, the shift was even smaller (less than 1.5%) and it “stayed firmly in put territory,” continuing to price asymmetric downside.
For Glassnode, that divergence matters because it separates “flow” from “risk pricing.” Upside participation can be real, but if the market does not reprice skew across maturities, it suggests traders are not extending that optimism into a higher-conviction, longer-horizon view.
The volatility tape reinforced the same message. “Layering in ATM implied volatility, we see vol being sold as price moved higher,” Glassnode wrote. “Gamma sellers monetized the rally. This is not the volatility behavior typically associated with sustained breakouts.”
That combination: front-end call demand alongside vol supply can align with tactical positioning rather than a regime change. It can also leave spot moves more vulnerable if follow-through buying does not materialize once short-dated structures roll off.
Glassnode closed with a checklist for what a cleaner breakout would look like: “An ideal breakout setup combines spot pressing key levels, skew pointing higher with conviction across maturities, and volatility being bid. Last week’s move didn’t meet those conditions.”
For traders watching whether BTC can revisit $97,600, the thread’s implication is straightforward: monitor whether longer-dated skew begins to lift out of put territory and whether implied volatility starts to get bid, not sold, as spot tests key levels again.
At press time, BTC traded at $89,297.
Litecoin is once again at a critical crossroads, with its long-term structure remaining intact after years of successful defenses. However, the margin for error is thin. As price hovers near key levels, $63 has emerged as the line bulls must protect. A break below it could shift momentum sharply, while holding above keeps the broader bullish structure alive and sets the stage for the next decisive move.
Structure Gives Way, Expansion Phase Begins
Columbus’s latest LTC update highlights that the multi-year compression that previously capped price action has finally resolved, resulting in a clean break of the long-term chart setup. This structural change confirms a shift from a neutral state to a clearly bullish one.
The current price action is described as a pause before expansion rather than the conclusion of the rally. In this phase, Litecoin is holding steady above old resistance levels, allowing the market to load for the next leg of the move, turning previous barriers into new support. Litecoin’s projected path forward is based on the typical behavior of expansion cycles following structural breaks.
The strategy follows a clear three-step progression: the initial breakout, followed by the current phase of acceptance. Once the market fully accepts these new price levels, the “real move” begins, representing a phase where the most significant gains are expected to materialize.
The 9-Year Trendline That Still Controls Litecoin
Matthew Dixon highlighted the immense historical significance of the Litecoin long-term trend line. This line has acted as an unbreakable floor for nine years, with the price never closing below it. While the market has dipped under this line multiple times in the past, every attempt to break down has ultimately failed, maintaining a remarkably consistent structural defense.
Currently, the market environment is putting this nearly decade-long support to the test once again. Dixon emphasizes that we cannot rely on intra-month volatility to determine the outcome. Instead, the definitive signal rests solely on the monthly candle close. This closing price will serve as a macro-economic pivot point that dictates the primary direction for the coming months.
A successful hold above the trend line would be a powerful bullish confirmation, suggesting the long-term uptrend remains intact despite external pressures. Conversely, a confirmed close below this line would shift the narrative to bearish, marking a historic breakdown of a nine-year support system.
Specific technical triggers are also in play, particularly the $63 level. Dixon warns that falling below $63 would be devastating, as it would effectively nullify the hidden bullish divergence currently supporting the price. Given these risks, Dixon recommends exercising patience until the monthly close or ensuring strict stop losses are in place for any active trades.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has knocked back US Senator Elizabeth Warren’s bid to pause the review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter, a move she sought until US President Donald Trump divests his stake in the crypto platform.
The OCC’s Jonathan Gould confirmed on Friday that WLF’s application will be evaluated under existing regulatory standards while emphasizing that no political or personal financial ties will impact the procedural review of the bank charter.
“The OCC intends to act consistent with this duty rather than your demand,” he said in response to Warren’s Jan. 14 letter. “The OCC charter application process should be, and under my leadership will be, an apolitical and nonpartisan process.”
Gould added that WLF’s application would be subject to a “rigorous review,” like any application it receives.
Warren’s criticisms were based on the President and his sons Eric, Donald Trump Jr, and Barron being listed as World Liberty founders, and the platform bringing in billions of dollars in paper wealth for the family.
WLF submitted the application on Jan. 7 to expand its crypto operations, including enabling it to issue, custody and convert its USD1 (USD1) stablecoin in-house, rather than rely on third-party providers such as BitGo.
Related: BitGo’s IPO pop turns volatile as shares slip below offer price
USD1 is already widely used for cross-border payments, settlement, and treasury operations and has become the sixth-largest stablecoin with a market capitalization of $4.2 billion since launching in March 2025.
Crypto industry has struggled to secure banking charters
National trust banking charters have been hard to secure for crypto companies in the past.
However, a breakthrough came in December when the OCC awarded five conditional approvals to Circle, Ripple, Fidelity Digital Assets, BitGo, and Paxos, signaling the currency regulator’s willingness to expand crypto services into TradFi.
The following article is adapted from The Block’s newsletter, The Daily, which comes out on weekday afternoons.
Happy Friday! Regulatory momentum is building: the Senate Agriculture Committee introduced amendments to its crypto bill, Kansas advanced a bitcoin reserve proposal, and Binance applied for a MiCA license via Greece.IPO activity is heating up. BitGo listed on the NYSE with backing from YZi Labs. Ledger and CertiK are exploring IPOs, Grayscale filed for a BNB ETF, and Dogecoin landed another ETF. Revolut dropped its U.S. merger plans to pursue a de novo bank charter. UBS is eyeing crypto trading for private clients.
Onchain signals are shifting. CryptoQuant says bitcoin holders are realizing net losses — a pattern last seen during the 2021–22 cycle. CZ is back online, reflecting on prison, Trump, and a potential bitcoin supercycle.
Meanwhile, Farcaster says it’s staying online and returning $180 million to VCs. Coinbase expects a constructive Q1 after last year’s reset. P.S. Don't forget to check out The Funding, a biweekly rundown of crypto VC trends. It's a great read — and just like The Daily, it's free to subscribe!
Binance applies for EU-wide crypto license via Greece under MiCA
Binance has applied for a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license in Greece, aiming to secure a unified regulatory approval that would allow it to operate across all 27 European Union member states.
What’s next for US crypto legislation as Senate Ag Committee releases bill text
Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman released the text of the crypto market structure bill on Wednesday. Boozman acknowledged that “fundamental policy issues” remain unresolved.
CryptoQuant says bitcoin holders are realizing net losses for the first time since October 2023
Bitcoin holders are now realizing net losses after over a year of realized gains, marking the first instance since October 2023, according to CryptoQuant. This marks a “regime shift” from profit-taking to loss realization, the firm said.
Dogecoin gets another ETF but Wall Street's memecoin appetite remains muted
21shares has launched the 21shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) on Nasdaq. The firm noted that it is the only ETF provider endorsed by the Dogecoin Foundation.
Farcaster to return $180M to investors, says protocol will continue under Neynar
Merkle Manufactory, the company behind decentralized social protocol Farcaster, plans to return the full $180 million it raised from investors, according to co-founder Dan Romero.
In the next week
Never miss a beat with The Block's daily digest of the most influential events happening across the digital asset ecosystem.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Ahead of a hearing next week to debate and vote on a sweeping cryptocurrency market structure bill in the Senate Agriculture Committee, members filed several changes to the legislation, including language addressing President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest.
On Friday, some amendments were filed ahead of a markup happening in the Senate Agriculture Committee on Tuesday. Among those is one from Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., to add the "Digital Asset Ethics Act" to the bill. That amendment would ban "covered individuals" like the president, vice president, and lawmakers from making certain financial transactions involving digital assets.
The amendment seemingly seeks to address concerns among many Democrats with Trump and his family's crypto interests. Bloomberg estimated that Trump has raked in about $1.4 billion from his crypto ventures, including from DeFi and stablecoin project World Liberty Financial. The Trump family also holds a 20% stake in the mining firm American Bitcoin.
Other amendments were also filed on Friday about preventing fake transactions at "digital asset kiosks" and another from Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., that would delay a future crypto bill's effectiveness until at least four commissioners at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been appointed.
That issue has been a point of contention for some lawmakers since there is just one commissioner at the CFTC currently, its chair Michael Selig, of the maximum five commissioners. No more than three commissioners can be of the same political party.
The Senate Agriculture Committee, led by Republican Chair Sen. John Boozman, released its bill text this past week, but noted that differences remained on "fundamental policy issues."
"Although it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t reach an agreement, I am grateful for the collaboration that has made this legislation better," Boozman said on Wednesday.
Democratic support is essential to pass a crypto structure bill in the Senate. Sixty votes are required for a bill to pass, requiring unanimous support from Republicans and seven Democrats to be on board. The Senate Agriculture Committee, which has jurisdiction over the CFTC, is viewed as being able to work together compared to the Senate Banking Committee, which faced its own woes last week.
Plans to hold a markup in the Senate Banking Committee fell through last week after Coinbase withdrew its support, citing concerns over the treatment of tokenized equities, DeFi, roles for the Securities and Exchange Commission and CFTC, and a looming issue — how to treat stablecoin rewards. The Senate Banking Committee's bill had over 70 amendments at play.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up