Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Economic Activity Index YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Current Account (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Chicago Fed National Activity Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed New Orders Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --












































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
The Ethereum Foundation has formed a dedicated Post-Quantum (PQ) team to accelerate the network's preparations for quantum computing threats, with senior researcher Justin Drake calling it a "top strategic priority" in an X post on Friday.
The new team will be led by Thomas Coratger, a cryptographic engineer at the foundation, with support from Emile, a cryptographer closely associated with the foundation's leanVM project. Drake described leanVM, a minimalist zero-knowledge proof virtual machine optimized for quantum-resistant hash-based signatures, as the "cornerstone" of Ethereum's post-quantum strategy.
"After years of quiet R&D, EF management has officially declared PQ security a top strategic priority," Drake wrote. "It's now 2026, timelines are accelerating. Time to go full PQ."
The foundation is putting significant funding behind the effort, announcing a $1 million Poseidon Prize to strengthen a hash function central to Ethereum's zero-knowledge proof systems, adding to the $1 million Proximity Prize targeting broader post-quantum cryptographic research announced last year.
On the engineering side, multi-client post-quantum consensus development networks are already running, with Lighthouse and Grandine having implemented PQ devnets and Prysm expected to follow. Biweekly developer sessions on post-quantum transactions will begin next month, led by researcher Antonio Sanso. Drake also outlined community initiatives including a three-day workshop in October and a session ahead of EthCC in March.
The announcement comes amid intensifying industry focus on quantum preparedness. On Wednesday, Coinbase formed an independent advisory board to evaluate quantum risks to blockchain networks, with Drake among its members alongside Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh and University of Texas professor Scott Aaronson.
The move also follows Buterin's January 12 outline of the "walkaway test", a framework for assessing whether Ethereum could remain secure if core developers stepped away. Buterin listed quantum resistance as non-negotiable and has previously estimated a 20% probability that quantum computers capable of breaking current cryptography could emerge before 2030.
Last week, Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood removed a 10% bitcoin allocation from his model portfolio, citing quantum computing as an "existential" risk. Unlike Bitcoin, which would likely require a contentious hard fork consensus for quantum-resistant upgrades, Ethereum's account abstraction roadmap provides a clearer migration pathway.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
The biggest obstacle to Bitcoin being used as a payment method is tax policy, not scaling technology that reduces settlement times and transaction costs, according to Pierre Rochard, a board member for Bitcoin treasury company Strive.
“Here’s a metaphor: the best athlete can win against the worst athlete 100% of the time, if the best athlete plays. It drops to 0% if he doesn’t play and lets the weak athlete win,” Rochard said about BTC’s current lack of use as a method of payment.
In December 2025, the Bitcoin Policy Institute, a non-profit policy advocacy organization, sounded the alarm on the lack of a de minimis tax exemption for small Bitcoin transactions.
The lack of a de minimis tax exemption means that every time BTC is transferred to another party for payment, it is subject to taxes, hindering its use as a medium of exchange.
US lawmakers are considering limiting the de minimis tax exemption to overcollateralized dollar-pegged stablecoins, which are tokenized US dollars, backed 1:1 by fiat cash deposits or short-term government securities, which sparked backlash from Bitcoiners.
Related: Netherlands risks capital flight with unrealized gains tax on stocks, crypto
The Bitcoin community reacts to the lack of de minimis exemptions for BTC
In July 2025, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, an ally of the crypto industry, introduced a bill proposing a de minimis tax exemption on digital asset transactions of $300 or less.
The bill placed a $5,000 annual limit on exemptions and also included provisions to exempt cryptocurrencies used for charitable donations.
Lummis’ bill proposed deferring income from staking crypto to secure proof-of-stake blockchain networks or income earned from mining proof-of-work cryptocurrencies until those assets were sold.
Jack Dorsey, the founder of payments company Square, which integrated Bitcoin payments into its point-of-sale systems in October, called for a tax exemption on small BTC transactions.
“We want BTC to be everyday money ASAP,” Dorsey said. Meanwhile, others like Bitcoin advocate and co-founder of the Truth for the Commoner (TFTC) media outlet, Marty Bent, said the proposed tax exemption for stablecoins is “nonsensical.”
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
XRP has spent most of the past few months trading with lower highs since July 2025, frustrating traders and compressing price action into an increasingly tight range.
However, a technical breakdown shared by crypto analyst ChartNerd argued that what looks like stagnation may actually be the final preparation phase before a historic move. The price structure suggests something far bigger that sends XRP on its most aggressive rally in eight years, but the implications only become clear when the full setup is examined.
A 400-Day Rectangular Reaccumulation Still Holding Structure
According to technical analysis done by ChartNerd, XRP’s price action has been locked inside a rectangular reaccumulation zone for about 400 days, and this has led to the formation of what looks like a rectangular bull flag on a macro timeframe. The technical chart shows a strong impulsive move from July 2024 to December 2024 acting as the flagpole, right when XRP peaked at the $3.4 price zone back then.
This impulsive flagpole has been followed by a long period of sideways trading where XRP’s price has repeatedly respected a clearly defined support around $1.8 and resistance boundaries around $3.6. This type of structure is associated with reaccumulation within the support and resistance zones, especially when it is playing out after a sharp expansion move and holding for this length of time.
Each dip into reaccumulation support has been absorbed, preventing any sustained breakdown and keeping the broader pattern intact. ChartNerd noted that the rectangular flag will be valid as long as this support level is defended, and this will activate the expansion journey.
XRP Price Chart. Source: @ChartNerdTA on X
Macro Breakout Projection Puts XRP Price Target At $23
According to ChartNerd, bearish participants are increasingly pressured by the fact that this fractal is still holding despite repeated attempts to invalidate it. The longer XRP’s price action is trapped inside the rectangle without breaking down, the more likely it becomes that the eventual resolution favors the dominant trend that preceded the consolidation. In this case, that trend was bullish, which strengthens the case for an upside breakout once resistance is cleared.
If the rectangular bull flag resolves to the upside as projected, the chart outlines a breakout trajectory that would carry XRP into double-digit territory, with a long-term target region near $23. This price target projection is derived from the height of the flagpole extended from the top of the reaccumulation range.
ChartNerd labelled this possible move as one of the most aggressive rallies XRP could see in seven to eight years. At the time of writing, XRP is trading around $1.92, meaning a move toward the $23 region would represent a gain of over 1,000% from current levels, which is a type of percentage expansion XRP has played out well in the past.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
U.S. spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds posted their worst week since February 2025, with $1.33 billion in net outflows across a shortened four-day trading week, according to SoSoValue data.
The outflows mark a sharp reversal from the prior week, when the same funds attracted $1.42 billion in net inflows. Markets were closed Monday for the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday, leaving only four trading sessions.
Wednesday delivered the heaviest blow, with $709 million exiting bitcoin ETFs in a single session, followed by $483 million in outflows on Tuesday, per SoSoValue. The bleeding slowed toward the end of the week, with Thursday and Friday seeing $32 million and $104 million in redemptions, respectively.
The week's outflows represent the largest weekly redemptions since late February 2025, when bitcoin ETFs shed $2.61 billion during a volatile stretch that saw bitcoin fall from its then-all-time high above $109,000 to below $80,000. That period, which analysts dubbed the "February Freeze," included a record single-day outflow of $1.14 billion on Feb. 25.
BlackRock's IBIT, the largest spot bitcoin ETF by assets, recorded outflows on each of the four trading days last week, according to SoSoValue data. IBIT saw its heaviest redemptions on Tuesday and Wednesday, contributing significantly to the overall weekly decline. The fund holds approximately $69.75 billion in net assets and represents roughly 3.9% of bitcoin's total supply.
Despite the recent outflows, cumulative net inflows into U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs since their January 2024 launch remain at $56.5 billion, with total net assets standing at approximately $115.9 billion.
Ethereum ETFs follow suit
Spot Ethereum ETFs mirrored their bitcoin counterparts, posting $611 million in net outflows for the week. Wednesday was also the worst session for ether products, with $298 million in redemptions, followed by $230 million on Tuesday, per SoSoValue.
The week's ether ETF outflows represent a significant reversal from the prior week, which saw $479 million in net inflows driven by strong performances from BlackRock's ETHA and Grayscale funds.
Total Ethereum ETF net assets now stand at approximately $17.7 billion, with cumulative net inflows of $12.3 billion since the products launched in July 2024.
Solana and XRP ETFs buck the trend
While bitcoin and ether funds bled capital, spot Solana ETFs continued their positive momentum, attracting $9.6 million in net inflows over the four trading days, per SoSoValue. The products have now seen inflows for multiple consecutive weeks, with Bitwise's BSOL maintaining its position as the category leader by assets under management.
Spot XRP ETFs had a more mixed week, posting a net outflow of $40.6 million. Tuesday saw $53 million leave the funds, though the products recovered modest inflows of $7 million to $3 million on the remaining days. The outflows follow XRP ETFs' first daily net outflow since their mid-November debut, which occurred during the first week of January.
"Crypto has been weaker relative to other asset classes, with investors feeling more comfortable taking positions in stocks than in crypto," Min Jung, Research Associate at Presto Research, previously told The Block. "That dynamic appears to be continuing, and is reflected in both price action and ETF flows."
The ETF outflows come as on-chain data signals a broader shift in market dynamics. Bitcoin holders have begun realizing net losses for the first time since October 2023, according to a CryptoQuant report published Thursday. The firm said the market has transitioned from a "profit-taking" phase to a "loss-realization" phase over the past 30 days, with cumulative realized losses totaling approximately 69,000 BTC since Dec. 23. CryptoQuant noted the current on-chain structure resembles patterns observed during the 2021-2022 bull-to-bear transition.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Chainlink remains on standby as daily candles continue to show indecision, keeping traders on edge. The next significant move for LINK largely depends on Bitcoin’s momentum, with bulls and bears waiting for a clear signal before committing. Until then, the market is in a holding pattern, building tension for the breakout or breakdown.
Traders Await Clear Direction For Chainlink
According to an update from CryptoWzrd, the daily candles for both Chainlink and LINKBTC continue to print indecisive price action, reflecting a lack of strong conviction from either side of the market. Despite recent movements, neither buyers nor sellers have been able to establish a clear directional edge, keeping the broader outlook neutral for now.
To gain a reliable directional bias and unlock higher-probability trade opportunities, healthier and more decisive daily candles are required, as price could continue to chop within its current range. Bitcoin is expected to remain the primary driver of the next significant move. In particular, LINKBTC needs to print another bullish daily candle in the coming week to maintain any constructive momentum.
Failure to do so could shift the balance back in favor of the bears and increase downside pressure. A continuation of weakness would likely result in a break of the daily lower-high trendline, followed by a loss of the critical $12 support level.
On the bullish side, if Bitcoin provides the necessary support, LINK could attempt a recovery rally toward the $16 resistance zone. Until a clearer higher-timeframe structure emerges, the trading focus remains tactical. Attention will be placed on the lower-timeframe charts, particularly over the weekend, to capitalize on quick, short-term opportunities while avoiding unnecessary exposure to indecisive daily conditions.
Intraday Chart Shows Tight Range, Market Lacks Clear Direction
The analyst concluded that the intraday chart remains choppy, with price action tightly compressed within a narrow range. Such conditions point to persistent market indecision, in which neither bulls nor bears have shown sufficient conviction to drive a sustained move in either direction. As a result, trade setups lack clarity and carry elevated risk.
From a tactical perspective, a retest of the $13 resistance level, followed by clear signs of rejection or fading momentum, could open the door to a short opportunity. However, if price holds above $13 with strong acceptance, that would place the market in more constructive territory and tilt the bias back in favor of the bulls.
Until one of these scenarios plays out decisively, the analyst emphasized the importance of waiting. A more mature and well-defined chart structure is needed before engaging in the next trade, ensuring better confirmation, cleaner entries, and improved risk-to-reward conditions.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up