Colibri Resource Commences Drilling at EP Gold Project, Sonora, Mexico

The USDA opens the new week with a fresh flash sale of U.S. soybeans to China, with the agency reporting in a notice that 132,000 metric tons of soybeans were sold for delivery in the 2025/26 marketing year. The sale comes after a flash sale of 462,000 tons of soybeans was announced by the agency to China on Friday, and also after news reports that the USDA will be releasing a $12 billion farm aid package to help farmers impacted by China's lack of soybean purchasing in 2025. CBOT grains are higher pre-market, with soybeans up 0.1%, corn up 0.4%, and wheat up 0.5%. (kirk.maltais@wsj.com)

The Baltic Exchange’s dry bulk index, which tracks rates for vessels transporting dry commodities, eased for a third session on Monday, falling about 1.2% to a near one-week low of 2,694 points, pressured by all vessel segments.

The capesize index, which typically transports 150,000-ton cargoes such as iron ore and coal, was also down for a third day, decreasing by 1.4% to 5,013 points; and the panamax index, which usually carries 60,000-70,000 tons of coal or grain, fell by 1.3% to its lowest since November 5 at 1,813 points, marking the eighth consecutive session of decreases.

Among smaller vessels, the supramax index shed 6 points to 1,430 points.

By Theo Francis

Nvidia is No. 1 in the annual Management Top 250, in a year when the tech industry's overall dominance continued to slip in the ranking of America's best-run companies.

With innovation and financial strength driving shifts in the upper reaches of the ranking, five of the so-called Magnificent Seven tech firms landed in the very top spots: Nvidia took the lead from Apple, which replaced it at No. 2. Microsoft kept the third spot, and Alphabet returned to fourth, after slipping to eighth last year. Amazon.com — officially a retailer despite its heavy tech emphasis — ranks fifth, up from No. 19 last year.

The biggest and most successful tech companies have capitalized best on shifts in technology and hiring, while others in the industry have fallen in the rankings — leaving room for companies in other industries to rise — says Daniel Martin, chief data scientist for Claremont Graduate University's Drucker Institute, which compiled the ranking for The Wall Street Journal.

A tumultuous year

The Management Top 250 ranking uses the principles of management guru Peter Drucker to identify the most effectively managed businesses. This year, 668 companies were graded on customer satisfaction, innovation, social responsibility, employee engagement and development, and financial strength, using 34 indicators supplied by third-party data providers. The Drucker Institute created the statistical model behind the ranking.

The ranking reflects the year ended in June — a period of tumult and often countervailing forces that started before President Trump's second term and ended after his sweeping tariff policies began. Profits generally rose despite trade and economic uncertainty, and consumer spending largely held up amid persistent dissatisfaction with prices. But employees grew gloomier as a cooling labor market gave employers the upper hand.

There are some signs of stress in the ranking. A total of 66 companies in the Top 250 received red flags for scoring in the bottom 25% of the full 668 companies in at least one of the main ranking components — most commonly financial strength and employee engagement. Only utility holding company Sempra received two red flags, in financial strength and customer satisfaction.

Sempra said customer satisfaction for utilities can be affected by cost concerns, including those driven by state mandates, which make up more than a third of the average bill in California, one of its primary markets. It added that the measures underlying the financial-strength scoring don't reflect utility-company performance well, and that performance improved excluding such factors as unusual tax effects and currency fluctuation.

For the first time since The Wall Street Journal first published the ranking in 2017, no company qualified as an "all-star" — a designation for any company that scores in the top 15% of each of the ranking's five main components. Only Apple made the grade last year.

Tech slips

After the top five, tech companies became scarcer. Only three more tech firms made the top 20, for a total of eight in that group, counting Amazon.com — down from 11 last year. Two tech companies that were in the top 10 last year fell out of the top 20 this year: Intel dropped to No. 25 from fourth place last year, with declines in all five main categories of the ranking. Adobe fell to no. 28 from ninth, with big declines in scores for innovation and social responsibility.

Intel named Lip-Bu Tan as its new chief executive in March, and the executive has headed a turnaround effort that this fall ended the company's six-quarter streak of losses. The company has also benefited from infusions of capital announced by the U.S. government in August and Nvidia in September.

Among the non-tech companies rising sharply were heavy-equipment maker Caterpillar, which rose to 10th from No. 29 last year, and Honeywell, the industrial conglomerate, which shot up to No. 15 from No. 78.

The other non-tech companies in the top 10 are Mastercard at No. 6, Procter & Gamble at No. 7, International Business Machines at No. 8 and Johnson & Johnson at No. 9.

Just two of the Magnificent Seven failed to approach the top of the charts. Meta Platforms dropped to No. 66, from No. 46 last year, with a red flag for customer satisfaction. And Tesla fell off this year's list altogether, after ranking 199th a year ago. (Stock-market performance for the seven companies has been similarly spotty — only three had outperformed the broader stock market late into 2025, and just two had as of Dec. 5.

Trading places

At the very top of the ranking, the two most valuable companies in the world swapped places — barely. Their overall scores are within a few hundredths of a percentage point of each other.

Apple has long ranked in the top three, and was No. 1 last year. Nvidia reached no. 2 during a half-decade climb. Overall, scores for both companies slipped this year, but Apple's fell farther.

The biggest factor in Apple's stumble was a decline in its social-responsibility score, caused by "significant drops" in metrics related to the company's global supply chain, Drucker's Martin says. Underlying factors include labor conditions, concentration of production in higher-risk regions and availability of complete supplier audits.

It was enough to push Apple down to No. 190 in social responsibility; Nvidia is No. 31.

"It's not so much what it's doing internally as a company, as how its supply chain has changed," Martin says of Apple. Like many other companies, Apple was forced to revamp its supply chain in April after President Trump announced sweeping new tariffs on nearly every country in the world. The company routed more of its iPhones to India for final assembly, accelerating a trend already under way. Meanwhile, many of the materials used in modern electronics are mined in war-torn regions such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, where child and forced labor have been documented.

In a 2025 supply-chain progress report published on its website, Apple said it works to align its practices with United Nations sustainable-development goals. Earlier this year, Apple said it was nearly at a year-end goal to use only recycled rare earth elements in magnets and cobalt in batteries. The company also said it continues to strengthen industrywide supply-chain due diligence, and last year told suppliers to stop obtaining tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold from Congo and neighboring Rwanda.

Apple's highest component scores in the ranking are in financial strength, where it is second among the Top 250, and innovation, where it ranks third. Nvidia is No. 1 in both financial strength and employee engagement and development.

Nvidia's skyrocketing share price in recent years has contributed to its draw as an employer, along with a culture that often puts even junior employees on important projects.

New priorities

The decline in Apple's social-responsibility score reflected a broad trend. More than half the companies in the ranking saw declines in that score, while a similar number had declines in financial strength — and a third of the Top 250 saw declines in both categories.

The widespread decline in social-responsibility scores suggests a broad reordering of business priorities. "We're seeing companies adopt a much more short-term, financially focused mindset," Martin says. "The standard for what is considered a good [social-responsibility] investment is dropping, likely due to market pressures that are really incentivizing more fiscally conservative behavior from companies."

Meanwhile, scores for financial strength and employee engagement largely moved together, Martin says. In most cases, financial strength suffered at companies whose scores for employee engagement and development declined.

Cause and effect aren't always clear, but there are a couple of ways the metrics could be linked. Financially stressed companies may curtail efforts to keep employees happy. Or investing too little in employees may alienate workers enough that it increases turnover or dents productivity, ultimately hurting a company financially.

However, the top 25 companies show a different pattern. They generally fared well on financial strength even when their employee-engagement scores slipped.

One possible explanation: The best-performing companies are spending more heavily than others on innovation, and the advantage that gives them financially is more than enough to offset any negative impact from declining employee engagement.

Innovation pays

Innovation drove many of the gains at companies that rose in the ranking, followed by customer satisfaction and financial strength.

That includes three companies that leapt into the top 10 this year. Amazon climbed to No. 5 with improvements in innovation and financial strength, despite slipping employee engagement. IBM at No. 8 and Caterpillar at No. 10 both were propelled by improvements in innovation.

Amazon has been plowing billions of dollars into data centers and other capital investment, and this fall the company released a new custom chip for the AI market. At the same time, it is ramping up its use of robots and automation in warehouses to more than a million in service this summer, and Amazon Chief Executive Andy Jassy has said AI will lead the company to cut jobs. "It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce," Jassy told employees in June.

In a note to company employees in late October, Amazon executive Beth Galetti, who oversees human resources, said the company is already seeing results from yearlong efforts to operate more like a huge startup. The 14,000 job cuts announced this fall, she added, "are a continuation of this work to get even stronger by further reducing bureaucracy, removing layers, and shifting resources to ensure we're investing in our biggest bets and what matters most to our customers' current and future needs." Three companies jumped more than 120 places in the ranking. Virginia-based electric utility company AES rose to No. 76, from No. 212 last year, on a strong gain in innovation as well as increases in scores for social responsibility and customer satisfaction. In July last year, AES unveiled a robot designed to help crews install solar panels faster and more cheaply.

GE HealthCare Technologies, spun off from General Electric in early 2023, rose 125 spots to No. 122 on strength in employee engagement and social responsibility, as well as innovation, despite dropping sharply in financial strength and customer satisfaction. The company said it has launched more than 40 products this year and has mitigated more than half its 2025 tariff exposure. It has touted new multiyear arrangements with customers like one announced in January with California's Sutter Health encompassing AI-assisted imaging, outpatient cardiology and maternal care, and more.

Expedia Group, the online travel platform, gained 122 spots, to No. 125, on strong gains in financial strength and innovation, despite slipping significantly on customer satisfaction.

About 50 companies made this year's list after failing to make the cut a year ago — including Air Products & Chemicals, which landed at No. 35 with a strong showing for customer satisfaction. It last appeared in 2023 at No. 111.

Companies falling the most in the ranking often did so with substantial drops in customer-satisfaction scores. Among them: Allstate, which fell 105 places to No. 188, with an accompanying sharp drop in its rankings on customer service and innovation.

Starbucks fell to no. 187 from No. 86, losing ground in every category, in particular employee engagement. Amid a six-quarter stretch of same-store sales declines, CEO Brian Niccol is pushing a tightly scripted charm offensive to woo customers, as well as closing stores and cutting corporate jobs. Meanwhile, unionized baristas in some areas have staged walkouts.

Starbucks has said nearly all locations remain open and that its yearlong turnaround effort to revamp stores has led to customers visiting more and staying longer, and to better financial results. It has also called its jobs the best available in retail, with employee surveys showing growing majorities of employees calling the company a great place to work.

"The 'Back to Starbucks' plan is working, and our turnaround is taking hold," a spokeswoman said in a statement.

Theo Francis is a Wall Street Journal staff reporter based in Washington, D.C. Email him at theo.francis@wsj.com.

USDA released the following export highlights in its Export Sales report for week ended

November 6.

Source: USDA

                                 SUMMARY OF EXPORT TRANSACTIONS 
                       REPORTED UNDER THE DAILY SALES REPORTING SYSTEM 
                              FOR PERIOD ENDING NOVEMBER 6, 2025 
 
Highlights for week ending November 6, 2025 are excluded due to the lapse in federal funding. 
 
COMMODITY          DESTINATION        QUANITY (MT)          MARKETING YEAR 
CORN               UNKNOWN           126,000 MT 1/             2025/2026 
SOYBEANS           CHINA             232,000 MT 1/             2025/2026 
SOYBEANS           UNKNOWN           117,000 MT 1/             2025/2026 
 
1/ Export sales. 
Write to Linda Rice at csstat@dowjones.com 
 

Gold prices edge lower, with focus on the Federal Reserve's policy meeting later this week. Futures in New York fall 0.3% to $4,232.40 a troy ounce, while spot gold is down 0.2% to $4,198.69 an ounce. "The dot-plot projections will be key to watch and could drive the market's response," Aaron Hill from FP Markets says. A major shift is unlikely due to high levels of uncertainty after a prolonged U.S. government shutdown, with only one rate cut expected next year, according to the analyst. Meanwhile, the looming selection of a new Fed chair could reshape expectations for next year and heighten volatility around inflation and interest rates. (giulia.petroni@wsj.com)

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - December 8, 2025) - South Pacific Metals Corp. (FSE: 6J00) ("South Pacific Metals", "SPMC" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that it has closed its previously announced best-efforts private placement of units (the "Offering"), led by BMO Capital Markets, for gross proceeds of C$9,199,494. Each unit (a "Unit") consisted of one common share of the Company (a "Common Share") and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant") of the Company. Under the Offering, a total of 17,036,100 Units were issued at a price of C$0.54 per Unit. This includes proceeds from the full exercise of the 15% option granted to the Agents (as defined below) to purchase an additional 2,222,100 Units.

BMO Capital Markets acted as lead agent and sole bookrunner for a syndicate of agents including Paradigm Capital Inc. and Velocity Trade Capital Ltd. (the "Agents").

Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share at a price of C$0.90 per Common Share for a period of 24 months following the closing of the Offering.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering to expand exploration activities and for general corporate purposes. The Units issued under the Offering were issued pursuant to the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption under Part 5A of National Instrument 45-106 - Prospectus Exemptions and are not subject to resale restrictions pursuant to applicable Canadian securities laws or the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSXV") other than Units issued to certain officers and directors of the Company that are subject to a TSXV mandated hold period. The Offering remains subject to a number of customary conditions, including the final approval of the TSXV.

The Offering involved the issuance of 378,000 Units (for a subscription amount of $204,120) to related parties (as such term is defined under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions ("MI 61-101") and therefore constitutes a related party transaction under MI 61-101. This transaction is exempt from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 pursuant to sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101, as the fair market value of the securities to be distributed and the consideration to be received for the securities issued to related parties under the Offering does not exceed 25% of the Company's market capitalization.

The Offering was conducted pursuant to an agency agreement between the Company and the Agents dated December 8, 2025. Pursuant to the agency agreement, the Agents received a cash commission of $491,969.65 in connection with the Offering.

The securities have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act"), or any U.S. state securities laws and may not be offered or sold to, or for the account or benefit of, persons in the "United States" or "U.S. persons" (as such terms are defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) absent registration under the U.S. Securities Act and all applicable U.S. state securities laws or in compliance with an applicable exemption therefrom. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of any of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

ABOUT SOUTH PACIFIC METALS CORP.

South Pacific Metals Corp is an emerging gold-copper exploration company operating in the heart of Papua New Guinea's proven gold and copper production corridors. With an expansive 3,100 km² land package and four transformative gold-copper projects contiguous with major producers K92 Mining, PanAust and neighbouring Barrick/Zijin, new leadership and experienced in-country teams are prioritizing thoughtful and rigorous technical programs focused on boots-on-the-ground exploration to prioritize discovery across its portfolio projects: Anga, Osena, Kili Teke, and May River.

Immediately flanking K92 Mining's active drilling and gold producing operations to the northeast and southwest, SPMC's Anga and Osena Projects are located within the high-grade Kainantu Gold District - each having the potential to host similar-style lode-gold and porphyry copper-gold mineralization as that present within K92's tenements. Kili Teke is an advanced exploration project situated only 40 km from the world-class Porgera Gold Mine and hosts an existing Inferred Mineral Resource with multiple opportunities for expansion and further discovery. The May River Project is located adjacent to the world-renowned Frieda River copper-gold project, with historical drilling indicating potential for a significant, untapped gold-mineralized system. SPMC common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange  and Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE: 6J00).

For further information, please contact:

Michael Murphy, Executive Chair

or

Investor Relations

South Pacific Metals Corp.

Tel: +1-604-653-9464

Email: info@southpacificmetals.ca

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Information

Statements contained in this release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties affecting the business of SPMC. In making the forward-looking statements, SPMC has applied certain assumptions that are based on information available to the Company, including SPMC's strategic plan for the near and mid-term. There is no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements may involve various risks and uncertainties affecting the business of the Company. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because of the context of the statements, including such words as "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "plans", "may", "estimates", or words of a similar nature. Forward-looking statements or information in this news release relate to, among other things: the proposed use of proceeds of the Offering and other details regarding the Offering. These forward-looking statements and information reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant operational, business, economic, regulatory, or other unforeseen uncertainties and contingencies. These assumptions include, without limitation: the Company receiving all requisite approvals in connection with the Offering, including TSXV approval; success of the Company's projects; prices for metals remaining as estimated; currency exchange rates remaining as estimated; availability of funds for the Company's projects; capital, decommissioning and reclamation estimates; prices for energy inputs; labour, materials, supplies and services (including transportation); no labour-related disruptions; no unplanned delays or interruptions in scheduled construction and production; all necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals are received in a timely manner; and the ability to comply with environmental, health and safety laws. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. The Company cautions the reader that forward-looking statements and information involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information contained in this news release and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Such factors include, without limitation: fluctuations in gold prices, fluctuations in prices for energy inputs, labour, materials, supplies and services (including transportation), fluctuations in currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar), operational risks and hazards inherent with the business of mineral exploration, inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks and hazards, the Company's ability to obtain all necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals in a timely manner, changes in laws, regulations and government practices, including environmental, export and import laws and regulations, legal restrictions relating to mineral exploration, increased competition in the mining industry for equipment and qualified personnel, the availability of additional capital, title matters and the additional risks identified in the Company's filings with Canadian securities regulators under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described, or intended. Investors are cautioned against undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and, except as required under applicable securities legislation, the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances. Mineralization hosted on adjacent and/or nearby properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization hosted on the Company's property.

Not for distribution to U.S. news wire services or dissemination in the United States.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/277215