Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests


[CITIC Securities: Current US Financial Market Environment Does Not Favor Balance Sheet Reduction] CITIC Securities Points Out That Although Warsh Repeatedly Mentioned The Policy Direction Of Interest Rate Cuts And Balance Sheet Reduction In 2025, Considering That The Liquidity Pressure In The US Money Market Only Significantly Eased In January, The Current Reserve-to-GDP Ratio Is Still Around 10%, And The Fed's Assets Held As A Percentage Of GDP Are Around 20%, Approaching The Pre-pandemic Level Of 2018, Indicating Limited Overall Reserve Adequacy. If Warsh Becomes The Next Fed Chairman, And If He Quickly Initiates Balance Sheet Reduction After Taking Office, The US Money Market May Face Liquidity Pressure Again. Therefore, Overall, CITIC Securities Believes That The Current US Financial Market Environment Does Not Favor Balance Sheet Reduction
UN Secretary General Guterres: Dissolution Of New Start Could Not Come At A Worse Time, With Risk Of Nuclear Weapon Use At Highest In Decades

U.K. Composite PMI Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Total Reserve Assets (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Core CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Core HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone PPI MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
Euro Zone Core HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Italy HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Core CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone PPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. MBA Mortgage Application Activity Index WoWA:--
F: --
P: --
Brazil IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Brazil IHS Markit Services PMI (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ADP Employment (Jan)A:--
F: --
The U.S. Treasury Department released its quarterly refinancing statement.
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Price Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Inventories Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Oil Imports ChangesA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Heating Oil Stock ChangesA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Demand Projected by ProductionA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Gasoline Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Cushing, Oklahoma Crude Oil Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
Australia Trade Balance (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Australia Exports MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan 30-Year JGB Auction Yield--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia Annual GDP Growth--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia GDP YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Italy IHS Markit Construction PMI (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone IHS Markit Construction PMI (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Construction PMI (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Italy Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Markit/CIPS Construction PMI (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
France 10-Year OAT Auction Avg. Yield--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Retail Sales YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Retail Sales MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BOE MPC Vote Cut (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BOE MPC Vote Hike (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BOE MPC Vote Unchanged (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Benchmark Interest Rate--
F: --
P: --
MPC Rate Statement
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Bank of England Governor Bailey held a press conference on monetary policy.
Euro Zone ECB Marginal Lending Rate--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone ECB Deposit Rate--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone ECB Main Refinancing Rate--
F: --
P: --
ECB Monetary Policy Statement
U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
ECB Press Conference



























Aris Aris
ID: 9979627

















No matching data
View All

No data
By Megan Cheah
Citigroup's Hong Kong and Singapore branches and alternative asset partners Blackstone, Blue Owl and KKR are launching evergreen funds for the U.S. bank's high-net-worth clients seeking to diversify their portfolios.
The funds will offer access to private markets with more flexible subscription and liquidity terms than traditional closed-ended private markets solutions, subject to a minimum initial holding period, Citi said Thursday.
They will cover private-market asset classes including equity, credit, infrastructure and real estate, which are usually reserved for institutional investors, Citi said.
The funds aim to serve Citi's high-net-worth private banking clients in Asia and the Middle East, the bank added.
These clients are increasingly seeking resilient sources of returns beyond traditional public markets, said Vicky Kong, head of wealth, Asia North and Australia, at Citi. This collaboration with Blackstone, Blue Owl and KKR directly addresses that demand, she added.
Write to Megan Cheah at megan.cheah@wsj.com
Oracle Corp. (ORCL) is garnering retail attention after Blackstone Inc. (BX) reportedly mulls more financial commitment to its Michigan data center project.
According to a report from Bloomberg that cited people familiar with the matter, Blackstone is considering a debt investment to boost the project.
The world’s largest alternative asset manager has already been in talks with Oracle to provide equity capital for the project, as per the report. Bank of America Corp. (BAC) is at the forefront of the debt raise, targeting $14 billion for the project as an initial goal.
Shares of ORCL gained 0.12% at the time of writing.
Lender Concerns
Oracle’s shares have declined in recent months, while the cost of insuring its debt against default has jumped, according to the Bloomberg report. This has prompted some prospective investors to question whether the project’s original terms remain viable amid market volatility, the people reportedly told Bloomberg.
Oracle shares have declined nearly 30% in the past six months.
However, representatives for Oracle, Bank of America and Related Digital confirmed to Bloomberg that financing for the project has been progressing as planned.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Bank of America said the lender is leading the financing discussions for the project with other banks and investors, with progress towards closing on schedule.
Project In Michigan
In October 2025, Oracle, OpenAI, Related Digital, and DTE Energy announced a hyperscale data center in Saline Township, Michigan, to bolster AI infrastructure in the U.S.
The deal, part of the Stargate Project, outlined a 575-acre site south of Ann Arbor, with a 1.4-gigawatt campus, including three large data-center buildings and was slated to break ground in early 2026.
The Stargate Project is a U.S.-focused AI infrastructure venture with a planned commitment of $500 billion over four years for OpenAI, led by SoftBank and OpenAI with Oracle and MGX as partners.
However, the data center in Michigan has drawn widespread regulatory and public scrutiny over energy and environmental concerns, as well as local zoning overrides. In December, Oracle confirmed that long-term financing partner Blue Owl Capital Inc., which has financed some of its other AI infrastructure projects, would not be contributing equity to the Michigan data center.
How Did Stocktwits Users React?
On Stocktwits, retail sentiment around ORCL shares remained in the ‘extremely bullish’ territory over the past day amid ‘extremely high’ message volumes.
One bullish user said Blackstone, Softbank, and OpenAI are partners with very deep pockets. The user said ORCL shares would go over $200.
https://stocktwits.com/KnuckleSandwich/message/643167561
Shares of ORCL have gained nearly 7% in the past year.
Also Read: Seagate Shares Rallied 19% Today — How Much More Upside Does The Street See?
Press release Regulated information
Brussels, January 28, 2026, 17:45 CET
In line with Belgian transparency legislation (Law of May 2, 2007), Citigroup Inc. recently sent to Solvay the following transparency notifications indicating that they crossed the threshold of 3%.
Here is a summary of the notifications:
| Date on which the threshold is crossed | Voting rights after the transaction | Equivalent financial instruments after the transaction | Total |
| January 19, 2026 | 0.56% | 2.51 | 3.06% |
| January 22, 2026 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
The latest notification, dated January 27, 2026, contains the following information:
Transparency notifications and the full chain of controlled undertakings through which the holding is effectively held are available on the Investor Relations Section of Solvay's website.
Contacts
Investor relations
Geoffroy d’Oultremont: +32 478 88 32 96
Vincent Toussaint: +33 6 74 87 85 65
Charlotte Vandevenne: +32 471 68 01 66
Media relations
Peter Boelaert: +32 479 30 91 59
Laetitia Van Minnenbruggen: +32 484 65 30 47
About Solvay
Solvay, a pioneering chemical company with a legacy rooted in founder Ernest Solvay's pivotal innovations in the soda ash process, is dedicated to delivering essential solutions globally through its workforce of circa 9,000 employees. Since 1863, Solvay harnesses the power of chemistry to create innovative, sustainable solutions that answer the world’s most essential needs such as purifying the air we breathe and the water we drink, preserving our food supplies, protecting our health and well-being, creating eco-friendly clothing, making the tires of our cars more sustainable and cleaning and protecting our homes. Solvay’s unwavering commitment drives the transition to a carbon-neutral future by 2050, underscoring its dedication to sustainability and a fair and just transition. As a world-leading company with €4.7 billion in net sales in 2024, Solvay is listed on Euronext Brussels and Paris (SOLB). For more information about Solvay, please visit solvay.com or follow Solvay on Linkedin.
Ce communiqué de presse est également disponible en français.
Dit persbericht is ook in het Nederlands beschikbaar.
Attachments
By Candice Choi
A former Citigroup executive sued the bank Monday, alleging one of its top executives sexually harassed her and that its human resources department was "weaponized" against her in the aftermath.
The suit was filed in Manhattan federal court by Julia Carreon, who worked in Citi's wealth management division until 2024. It alleges Andy Sieg, Citi's head of wealth, publicly displayed sexually charged conduct toward her and failed to refute rumors that they were having an inappropriate relationship.
In a statement, a Citi spokesman said the lawsuit "has absolutely no merit and we will demonstrate that through the legal process."
Carreon in the lawsuit accuses Citi of fostering a decadeslong culture of sexual harassment that reduced her to being perceived as a sex object. Citi Chief Executive Jane Fraser is one of the finance world's few female CEOs.
Sieg was poached by Citi in 2023 to revive its wealth-management business and saw his remit expanded late last year. Carreon said in her lawsuit she was hired in 2021 to transform the wealth management unit's digital experience but was harassed when she succeeded at her job because she ruffled the feathers of male colleagues.
Carreon alleges in her lawsuit that she was sidelined for her initial two years of employment, but was encouraged after Sieg joined and she was named Citi's global head of platform and experiences.
Carreon alleges in the lawsuit that Sieg called and texted her multiple times a week including at night, insinuated in front of others that the two were intimate and had her sit near him in meetings, despite her not being his direct report. She alleges other employees falsely assumed that she was promoted for having an affair with Sieg, who she says didn't refute the suspicions.
The suit says Carreon became aware she was the subject of a human resources investigation in 2024 for two separate allegations — that she was a bully and that she had gotten ahead because of her special access to Sieg.
Regarding the latter allegation, Carreon said in the lawsuit that HR representatives appeared to pose questions as predetermined conclusions when they interviewed her.
In an interview Monday, she said it became clear to her that they "intended to bury me and this is just not something they do to men."
Write to Candice Choi at candice.choi@wsj.com
By Philip van Doorn
A combination of high and improving returns on equity and low or declining price/earnings ratios make the case for several major industry players
These are among the large U.S. banks that have shown a combination of high returns on tangible common equity and have low forward price/earnings ratios.
Bank earnings season isn't over, but it is not too early to point out that some of the big banks stand out with a combination of high or improving returns on equity and low or declining price/earnings valuations.
Let's begin by looking at how returns on tangible common equity and forward P/E ratios for the largest 15 U.S. banks by total assets have changed over the past year.
A bank's ROTCE is its return on equity, excluding preferred stock and intangibles such as goodwill, loan-servicing rights and deferred tax assets.
All of these banks have reported their fourth-quarter results except for American Express (AXP), for which we are showing ROTCE for the first three quarters of 2025 and total assets as of Sept. 30. American Express will announce its fourth-quarter earnings on Friday.
All ROTCE figures were calculated by FactSet, except for some that cannot be calculated by the data provider until full 2025 financial statements are presented within the banks' annual reports. Therefore, for Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Capital One (COF) and Charles Schwab (SCHW), we have used the banks' own reported ROTCE figures.
Bank of New York Mellon's return on equity has always been outstanding, and certainly underappreciated.Macrae Sykes, portfolio manager at Gabelli
To the right of the ROTCE columns are a comparison of current forward P/E ratios to those from a year ago. These are stock prices divided by consensus earnings-per-share estimates among analysts working for brokerage and research firms polled by FactSet.
You may need to scroll the table or flip your screen to landscape to see all of the data:
Bank 2025 ROTCE 2024 ROTCE Forward P/E Forward P/E one year ago Total assets ($bil)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 20.0% 22.1% 13.9 14.2 $4,425
Bank of America Corp. 14.1% 12.9% 11.8 12.4 $3,410
Citigroup Inc. 7.7% 6.9% 10.9 10.8 $2,657
Wells Fargo & Co. 14.8% 13.5% 12.3 13.0 $2,149
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 16.0% 13.5% 15.7 13.7 $1,810
Morgan Stanley 21.6% 18.5% 15.9 15.9 $1,420
U.S. Bancorp 19.4% 16.8% 11.0 11.1 $692
Capital One Financial Corp. 3.2% 10.1% 10.4 12.9 $662
PNC Financial Services Group Inc. 15.1% 15.3% 12.0 12.8 $574
Truist Financial Corp. 12.3% -1.1% 10.9 11.5 $548
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. 30.5% 23.6% 14.0 12.2 $472
Charles Schwab Corp. 38.0% 35.3% 17.3 19.3 $491
State Street Corp. 18.8% 18.7% 10.7 10.0 $366
American Express Co. 35.4% 39.9% 20.5 21.2 $298
Fifth Third Bancorp 17.3% 17.6% 14.1 11.9 $214
Source: FactSet
Here are some notes about the data, highlighting combinations of attractive or improving ROTCE along with low or declining P/E:
When asked about the trust banks (Bank of New York Mellon and State Street), Macrae Sykes, a portfolio manager at Gabelli, told MarketWatch that he had "always appreciated their businesses," which feature "pretty stable fees and straightforward operations."
Sykes holds both of those stocks as portfolio manager of the Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities exchange-traded fund GABF, which has a five-star rating (the highest) within Morningstar's U.S. Fund, Financial category. Among the 15 banks listed above, Sykes also holds American Express, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Morgan Stanley and Schwab within the GABF portfolio.
Under the leadership of Robin Vince, who became Bank of New York Mellon's chief executive in August 2022, "execution has been stronger," Sykes said. He added that market volatility has been a benefit for the various custody, trading and back-office work the institution does for corporate clients in the brokerage and asset-management industries.
"Bank of New York Mellon's return on equity has always been outstanding, and certainly underappreciated," he said. Sykes also pointed to this statement from Vince during the Jan. 13 call, which was confirmed per the FactSet transcript: "Over the last two years, the number of clients buying three or more of our services increased by more than 60%."
When discussing State Street, Sykes said the bank had reported eight straight quarters of improving operating leverage (fixed costs to variable costs) and that it had been making good progress reducing expenses, while service fees had "grown by double digits." He specifically pointed to the SPDR suite of exchange-traded funds managed by State Street as "a nice area of growth."
Amid the "wave of innovation for tokenization, digital assets, crypto and stablecoins," Sykes said, both Bank of New York Mellon and State Street had been "developing platforms quickly to service the new space."
When discussing the trust banks' valuations, he said that "historically, they have traded between 10 and 13 times earnings," and that Bank of New York Mellon "has certainly seen the multiple expand" to the current forward P/E of 14.
"We have had a pretty strong run-up in the markets and good operating leverage, so it can be more challenging going forward," he said.
But even if the valuations aren't particularly attractive now, banks are operating under an easing regulatory environment, and the trust banks have continued with what Sykes called "very healthy capital return" in the form of dividend increases and stock buybacks.
So with high ROTCE and buybacks to lower share counts and boost earnings per share, along with dividend increases, long-term investors may still be looking at excellent opportunities with the trust banks and others among the players with attractive ROTCE.
Let's end with a chart. This shows the weighted forward P/E of the Invesco KBW Bank ETF KBWB, which tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index BKX of 24 of the largest U.S. banks, relative to that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY, which tracks the S&P 500 SPX, since the end of 2011:
Large U.S. banks as a group are trading relatively low against the S&P 500 on a weighted forward P/E basis.
Over the past 15 years, the big U.S. banks as a group have traded on average at 67% the S&P 500's weighted forward P/E. Now they are slightly more discounted, at a 56% relative valuation.
Don't miss: This momentum fund has dodged U.S. stocks and trounced the competition
-Philip van Doorn
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
WASHINGTON (dpa-AFX) - Blackstone, Inc. (BX) and Arlington Industries, Inc. announced Monday that funds managed by Blackstone Energy Transition Partners have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Arlington, a leading designer and manufacturer of electrical products in the U.S. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
Founded in 1949, Arlington designs and manufactures a range of electrical products such as fittings, enclosures and other components.
The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026, subject to customary conditions.
Arlington represents the latest in a number of recent transactions Blackstone Energy Transition Partners has announced behind its high-conviction investment themes in electrification and the ongoing energy transition. This includes Alliance Technical Group, Maclean Power Systems, Wolf Summit Energy, Hill Top Energy Center, Shermco, Enverus, Lancium, Westwood, and others.
In Monday's pre-market trading, BX is trading on the NYSE at $149.77, up $0.68 or 0.46 percent.
Copyright(c) 2026 RTTNews.com. All Rights Reserved
Copyright RTT News/dpa-AFX
By Alex Kozul-Wright
Precious metals have shone through the gloom as market clouds gather amid global trade tensions. But investors joining the hunt for havens would do well to understand the fundamental trading differences between the leading lights of this flight to safety — gold and copper.
The two metals have been on a tear since the start of 2026, hitting fresh record highs in January. But they each respond to distinct financial cues, making their shared rally less coincidence than warning that the market is sending mixed signals about inflation, growth, and financial stability.
What Makes Gold Shine
Unlike copper, the physical demand and supply for gold aren't its key price drivers. Instead, investment demand — in the form of gold bars, coins, and ETFs — play a much bigger role.
According to the World Gold Council, investment accounted for 41% of final demand for the yellow metal in the third quarter of 2025. Jewelry came in second, at 28%.
And while gold does have several industrial applications (such as in circuit boards), they account for just 6% of final demand. The opposite is true for copper, for which industrial applications make up almost 100% of its end use.
Copper as a Bellwether
More than two thirds of copper's annual supply is used in construction — in plumbing and wiring — and manufacturing equipment-used in energy transmission cables, electric motors, and micro chips.
More recently, the buildout of artificial-intelligence data centers has amounted to 7% of global demand (or 1.7 million tons). Its widespread use in manufacturing has prompted some traders to view copper as a bellwether for global economic activity.
In reality, copper's price is best understood as a proxy for Chinese economic activity, given the country's longstanding industrial expansion. China remains by far the world's largest consumer of copper — at roughly 60% last year.
Diverging Fortunes?
The factors underpinning gold's historic performance look set to persist. Earlier this month, analysts at Citigroup recently estimated that gold could reach $5,000 an ounce within three months.
That watermark has come faster than many anticipated. Continuous gold futures were trading at $5,089 in early trading Monday, having already climbed 17.5% since the start of January.
For copper, underlying price drivers may be moving in the other direction. Goldman Sachs released a note in January stating it sees the LME copper price falling to $11,000 a ton by December 2026.
For now, copper futures are hovering at around $13,115 a ton.
Goldman noted that China's copper demand came in below expectations in the fourth quarter of 2025. In addition, high prices could also incentivize switching from copper to aluminum in the manufacture of various goods, including EV batteries.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on imports from several European countries unless the U.S. can acquire Greenland stoked worries that a resulting trade war could weigh on global growth — and consequently copper demand. Trump has since backtracked but fears remain.
Just remember, if you're in the market to diversify your portfolio into metals, make sure you know why you're buying — gold for resilience, copper for long-term growth. Whatever your motivation, the discipline to hold for the cycle ahead will be key as markets continue to be buffeted by geopolitical uncertainty.
Write to Alex Kozul-Wright at alexander.kozul-wright@barrons.com
This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up