China Deploys Humanoid Robots to Transform Border Operations with Vietnam

Economic

Summary:

China is launching a $37 million pilot project to deploy humanoid robots at border checkpoints with Vietnam, marking a major step in AI-powered logistics, security, and visitor management....

Border Transformation Begins with Robot Deployment in Guangxi

A new chapter in China–Vietnam border operations is unfolding as UBTech Robotics, a leading Chinese robotics manufacturer, announces a landmark $37 million contract to deploy humanoid robots at border checkpoints in the coastal city of Fangchenggang, Guangxi adjacent to Vietnam. These advanced robots will handle diverse tasks, from guiding tourists and managing pedestrian flows to patrolling and facilitating logistics operations.

This initiative signals Beijing’s growing emphasis on integrating artificial intelligence and robotics into public infrastructure, with the China–Vietnam border becoming a frontline for demonstrating the potential of AI-enabled humanoid machines.

UBTech's Walker S2 Robots Lead the Transformation

Central to the project is the Walker S2, an industrial-grade humanoid robot introduced in July 2025 and marketed as the world’s first humanoid robot with a self-replacement battery feature. This innovation allows for extended autonomous operation, which is critical for applications in customs and logistics, where operational continuity is essential.

The robot fleet will begin deployment in December 2025, not only at border checkpoints but also in industrial zones, where they will conduct inspections in steel, copper, and aluminum factories. This expansion underscores a causal strategy: deploying versatile robots reduces repetitive labor and enhances operational efficiency in both state and private sectors.

UBTech reports that it has received total orders worth RMB 1.1 billion (USD 155.4 million) for the Walker series. The company aims to deliver 500 units by year-end and expand production tenfold in 2026, with a long-term goal of 10,000 units by 2027. The company is also focused on reducing manufacturing costs to scale access and deployment.

Robot Integration Reflects National AI Strategy

This pilot project is part of a broader national campaign to commercialize and normalize the use of AI-powered robotics across China. UBTech's contract fits into this context, representing a growing trend of government agencies at local and provincial levels adopting robots to handle routine and labor-intensive tasks.

For instance, in July 2025, Zhejiang’s immigration department introduced humanoid and quadruped robots some developed by Unitree Robotics to assist in routine operations at entry-exit checkpoints. Meanwhile, Hangzhou’s Xiaoshan International Airport has integrated similar machines for passenger services.

Even in high-profile diplomatic contexts, robots have made appearances. At the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit in Tianjin, multi-lingual robots developed by Beijing-based iBen Intelligence were used for visitor assistance. Shenzhen Customs also integrated DeepSeek's large language model into their AI-driven cargo verification robot earlier this year.

These deployments are not isolated; rather, they form a nationwide trend reflecting a strong correlation between government policy and commercial robotic expansion.

China’s Robotics Governance Structure Is Taking Shape

Further institutional support comes from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, which recently announced the formation of the National Humanoid Robot Committee. The committee is led by Chief Engineer Xie Shaofeng and includes prominent industry figures such as Unitree’s Wang Xingxing, AgiBot’s Peng Zhihui, and UBTech’s CTO Xiong Youjun. The presence of top technologists in regulatory structures suggests a causal mechanism: aligning industry innovation with policy support accelerates commercialization.

The implementation of humanoid robots at one of China’s most strategically important borders has both technological and geopolitical implications. The move enhances surveillance, streamlines logistics, and projects China’s technological leadership in the region. It also sets a precedent for other border modernization efforts, particularly in zones critical to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

From an economic perspective, these robots reduce reliance on human labor in border operations and manufacturing inspections. From a political standpoint, they reinforce Beijing’s commitment to building a “new quality productive force,” a term often used in state rhetoric to describe innovation-led growth.

A Futuristic Border Takes Shape

The deployment of humanoid robots along the China–Vietnam border illustrates how robotics is shifting from research labs to real-world public infrastructure. With AI-driven machines soon managing everything from customs checks to industrial oversight, China is not just testing the future it is building it.

As UBTech and other firms race to scale production and reduce costs, and with strong regulatory backing in place, this border project is more than a technological milestone it is a symbol of China’s ambition to lead the world in intelligent robotics integration across every aspect of governance and commerce.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Belgium Pushes Back Against EU Proposal on Russian Assets

Belgium has emerged as the most vocal opponent within the European Union to a plan that would lend Ukraine funds backed by nearly EUR 140 billion in frozen Russian central bank assets. Prime Minister Bart De Wever expressed his formal objections in a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, characterizing the initiative as a "fundamental mistake" that risks long-term diplomatic and financial fallout.

De Wever’s argument rests heavily on established international legal norms. He noted that throughout history, frozen wartime assets have only been allocated after a conflict ends, typically through post-war treaties and in the form of reparations paid by the losing side. Using such assets mid-conflict sets a dangerous precedent that could, he warns, hinder future peace negotiations by reducing incentives for compromise.

This logic draws on a cause-effect framework: prematurely reallocating frozen funds may harden negotiating positions and complicate the prospects for a diplomatic resolution, especially in a scenario where Russia and Ukraine are both being nudged toward mutual concessions.

Peace Negotiations and Strategic Timing

The timing of Belgium’s objection is also notable. It comes amid renewed US-led efforts to push forward a peace initiative between Kyiv and Moscow. While neither party has officially endorsed the plan, both have made cautiously positive gestures. The proposed terms involve significant concessions from Ukraine, including military withdrawals and recognition of Russian control over Donbass and Crimea, in exchange for a cessation of hostilities.

Within this sensitive diplomatic environment, Belgium argues that the EU’s asset-lending plan could derail talks by appearing to pre-judge the outcome of the war or by giving one side economic advantages outside of negotiated settlements.

Euroclear’s Neutrality and Systemic Risk

Another major concern for Belgium lies in the global ramifications of compromising Euroclear, the Brussels-based financial institution that holds most of the frozen Russian assets. With nearly USD 300 billion of Russian assets immobilized worldwide, Euroclear alone manages the majority. Any unilateral move to repurpose these assets especially for lending rather than as part of a post-conflict reparations process could undermine the institution’s perceived neutrality and credibility.

This scenario introduces systemic risk. If countries like China, India, and others fear that their sovereign reserves might one day be subject to similar actions, they may begin withdrawing funds from Euroclear or avoiding it altogether. Belgium rightly fears that such erosion of trust could trigger a liquidity crisis or a broader financial exodus, threatening its national financial stability and international standing.

Geopolitical and Legal Implications Beyond Russia

While the immediate target of the EU plan is Russia, Belgium’s refusal also reflects broader concerns about international financial governance. The decision to weaponize sovereign assets during an active conflict may alienate global South countries and emerging markets, who increasingly view the West’s control of global financial infrastructure as a potential risk.

Thus, the opposition is not merely a defense of Russia’s assets but a calculated effort to protect long-term credibility and neutrality in global capital markets. The causal relationship here is clear: eroding legal predictability and institutional neutrality could result in capital flight, weakening Brussels as a financial hub.

Belgium’s Stand as a Warning Sign

Belgium’s rejection of the EU’s asset-lending proposal is more than a bureaucratic obstacle it reflects deep-rooted concerns about legality, diplomacy, and financial stability. As peace talks gain momentum and financial institutions face growing scrutiny, the EU must tread carefully in balancing its support for Ukraine with the need to uphold legal and economic norms that sustain global trust.

Unless a consensus is reached that respects both humanitarian goals and international legal boundaries, the decision to repurpose frozen assets could leave lasting damage on Europe’s credibility in the financial world.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Europe’s Whitefish Shortage Opens a Strategic Door for Vietnam

The European Union is experiencing a growing supply crisis in the whitefish market, particularly for traditionally dominant species such as cod and haddock. This shortage, caused by a combination of natural constraints, geopolitical tensions, and sanctions on Russian imports, has led to price surges and market instability. Amid this disruption, Vietnam's pangasius also known as tra fish has become a strategic substitute, not only due to its affordability and processing versatility but also because Vietnam is the only country to have developed an industrialized pangasius export sector.

Cod, the staple of Europe’s whitefish consumption, is now in short supply due to dramatically reduced catch volumes in the Barents and Norwegian Seas. While some producers have attempted to bridge the gap with farmed cod, production capacity remains insufficient to meet demand. In parallel, EU sanctions on Russia have disrupted established whitefish import flows, creating a perfect storm of scarcity.

This structural gap has elevated the importance of alternative whitefish proteins. The demand-side pressure is not merely cyclical it reflects a shift in the underlying supply architecture of the EU seafood market. As a result, the conditions have generated a cause-effect dynamic: with cod in decline, demand is redirected toward viable substitutes like pangasius.

Vietnam’s Tra Fish Gains Ground Despite Short-Term Fluctuations

Vietnam’s pangasius exports to the EU reached USD 149 million in the first 10 months of 2025, marking a modest 3% year-on-year increase. However, monthly figures reveal volatility. October 2025 exports totaled USD 15 million, an 11% decrease compared to October 2024. This month-on-month contraction is indicative of economic caution among EU importers amid uncertainty, not a reversal of broader trends.

The divergence among member states further illustrates this point. The Netherlands, a traditional leader in EU imports, showed slight stagnation with a 2% drop. Germany weakened more significantly, down 32%. In contrast, Spain’s imports surged 75% in October, and Belgium posted a 1% rise for the month and a 19% increase year-to-date. These figures suggest a geographic shift in demand within the EU, with Southern and Western Europe presenting new growth frontiers.

Vietnam’s Competitive Edge: Price, Scale, and Processing Capability

Vietnam's unique position stems from its industrial-scale pangasius industry, capable of providing consistent, cost-effective supply that meets diverse processing requirements. Pangasius aligns well with EU importers’ need for flexible, affordable alternatives in an increasingly constrained market. This is not a correlation but a causal advantage: the scale and standardization of Vietnam’s pangasius supply chain directly meet the structural needs created by whitefish shortfalls.

Furthermore, Vietnamese producers are increasingly aligning with EU sustainability requirements. Certification schemes such as ASC have helped raise product credibility, enhancing market acceptance. This alignment between regulatory expectations and supply readiness further entrenches Vietnam’s role as a reliable partner.

Consumer Trends Shift Toward Value-Added Convenience

Another dynamic favoring Vietnam is the changing consumer landscape in Europe. There is growing preference for ready-to-cook, value-added seafood products. Vietnamese exporters have responded with processed lines such as breaded pangasius, pre-cooked fillets, and high-grade cut portions. These offerings not only cater to evolving retail needs but also improve profit margins for exporters.

This shift creates a virtuous cycle: increased consumer demand for convenience encourages greater adoption of pangasius, which in turn reinforces its presence in EU distribution networks.

Strategic Moment for Expansion

Vietnam’s nearly USD 150 million in EU pangasius exports in 2025 is not merely a numerical achievement it reflects a strategic positioning in a reshaping global seafood market. With traditional whitefish supply chains under stress, Vietnam’s combination of industrial capability, competitive pricing, and increasing alignment with sustainability and consumer trends positions it uniquely to fill the vacuum.

While short-term fluctuations remain, the long-term trajectory favors Vietnamese pangasius as a stable, scalable solution for Europe’s whitefish needs. The challenge now lies in capitalizing on this momentum diversifying products, deepening market presence in Spain, Belgium, and France, and continuing to lead in sustainable aquaculture practices.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Indonesia Resists US Efforts to Limit China Ties Through Trade Clause

Trade negotiations between the United States and Indonesia have encountered a significant stumbling block, as Jakarta reportedly opposes the inclusion of a so-called “poison pill” clause designed to restrict its economic engagement with China. The clause, modeled after provisions in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), would allow Washington to impose punitive measures if Indonesia were to pursue trade agreements with China deemed unfavorable by the US.

Indonesia’s refusal reflects a strong desire to maintain strategic autonomy and an independent foreign policy. As one of Southeast Asia’s largest economies, Indonesia depends heavily on foreign investment and international trade, with both the US and China being pivotal partners. The proposed restriction is seen by Jakarta as a threat to this balancing act, potentially reducing the country’s economic flexibility and undermining its non-aligned foreign policy tradition.

This opposition indicates a causal relationship: restrictive clauses aimed at curbing China’s influence could directly impede Indonesia’s ability to maneuver diplomatically and economically. Jakarta’s response demonstrates that economic coercion even indirect can backfire when it threatens national policy independence.

Geopolitical Competition Shapes Trade Dynamics

This dispute underscores the intensifying geopolitical rivalry between the US and China, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, where both powers are competing for influence. The proposed clause is part of Washington’s broader strategy to constrain Beijing’s rise by discouraging partner nations from entering into deeper economic cooperation with China.

However, analysts suggest that Indonesia remains especially cautious of any commitments that might harm its substantial trade relationship with China. As China is not only Indonesia’s largest trading partner but also a major investor in infrastructure projects across the archipelago, any limitation would likely result in long-term economic and diplomatic consequences.

Contradictory Trade Terms Raise Fairness Concerns

While the US is pushing for restrictive conditions, the terms outlined in the draft bilateral agreement appear asymmetrical. Under the current framework revealed in July 2025, Indonesia agreed to eliminate 99% of tariffs on US goods and pledged significant purchases including USD 15 billion in oil and gas, USD 4.5 billion in cultural products, and USD 3.2 billion in aircraft. Meanwhile, all Indonesian exports to the US would be subject to a 19% tariff.

This imbalance could be viewed not just as a trade-off but as a potential leverage mechanism to steer Indonesia’s future trade decisions. The causal logic here suggests that trade benefits are being offered as conditional incentives, tied to political alignment rather than purely economic interests.

Tensions Cast Shadow Over Broader Indo-Pacific Strategy

The outcome of these talks could set a precedent for how the US approaches trade negotiations in the region, particularly with countries seeking to remain neutral amid great power competition. How Washington and Jakarta reconcile their differences over the poison pill clause will likely influence the broader structure of Indo-Pacific economic alliances and determine the durability of US-Indonesian economic cooperation.

Indonesia’s resistance may also inspire other regional players to reevaluate the long-term strategic costs of trade agreements that infringe upon their sovereignty. In this light, the clause’s rejection is not merely a bilateral dispute, but part of a larger pattern of pushback against binary alignments in a multipolar global economy.

As the Indo-Pacific becomes a focal point of US-China rivalry, Indonesia is asserting its right to diversify partnerships without external constraint. While the US seeks to embed strategic considerations into economic agreements, Indonesia’s resistance illustrates that emerging economies are not willing to trade autonomy for access. The challenge ahead lies in finding a balance where economic cooperation does not come at the expense of geopolitical neutrality something Indonesia is determined to defend.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Plant Nears Restart After More Than a Decade

Japan is preparing to resume operations at the world’s largest nuclear power facility, the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, signaling a significant step in the country's gradual return to nuclear energy. The restart of units 6 and 7, managed by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), is scheduled for January 2026, contingent upon approval from Niigata’s local council, which is expected to vote during its December 2 session.

Before the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011, nuclear energy contributed around 30% of Japan’s electricity supply. However, following the radiation leak, the government mandated a nationwide suspension of all nuclear reactors for safety reviews. Since 2015, only 14 of the country's 33 reactors have resumed operations, with 11 more under review. The cautious pace illustrates a reactive shift in energy governance driven by safety and public trust concerns, a clear causal response to a major technological disaster.

The recent endorsement by Niigata Governor Hideyo Hanazumi marks a political turning point. His decision to allow TEPCO to restart two reactors reflects changing attitudes at the provincial leadership level and a potential recalibration of Japan’s energy mix to reduce fossil fuel dependence. However, ultimate implementation still hinges on local legislative approval, underscoring the importance of decentralized political support in Japan’s energy policy.

TEPCO’s Revival Plan and Safety Compliance

TEPCO, which operated the ill-fated Fukushima plant, has been pushing for the restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa for years. In October, the company announced that it had completed safety checks and fuel loading for reactor 6, with key operational criteria deemed compliant. This suggests a cause-effect link between improved safety systems and growing institutional confidence in resuming operations.

Nevertheless, TEPCO’s reputation remains controversial. Community skepticism continues to shadow the company’s plans, partly due to its recent proposal to make financial contributions to local economic development in exchange for project support. Critics argue that such offers resemble financial coercion, undermining the legitimacy of public consent and fueling concerns about transparency.

Public Opinion Remains Deeply Divided

Despite official momentum, local sentiment remains fractured. Anti-nuclear groups and some residents have voiced opposition to the restart, citing unresolved fears over nuclear safety and transparency in TEPCO’s conduct. Public surveys reveal that resistance persists, though exact figures were not disclosed. This indicates a correlation between past nuclear trauma and persistent distrust toward industry stakeholders, particularly when those stakeholders also control crisis-era plants.

If approved, the restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa’s reactors will mark a major development in Japan’s post-Fukushima energy realignment. The move carries significant economic and strategic implications, including the potential to stabilize energy supply and reduce import reliance. However, it also exposes deep-seated public anxieties and governance dilemmas. The balancing act between safety assurances, energy independence, and community consent will determine whether Japan can achieve a sustainable return to nuclear power, or whether societal resistance will stall further progress.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Strong Market Signals Point to Historic Gold Rally in 2026

Major financial institutions are increasingly confident that gold prices will reach unprecedented levels in 2026, as key structural drivers remain firmly in place. These include the ongoing trend of net gold purchases by central banks and a widely anticipated continuation of interest rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve, both of which reinforce investor demand for the non-yielding metal.

Deutsche Bank has sharply revised its 2026 gold price forecast upward to an average of USD 4,450 per ounce, from a previous estimate of USD 4,000. The projected trading range is set between USD 3,950 and USD 4,950. According to Michael Hsueh, the bank’s strategist, recent technical indicators suggest that the correction phase has concluded, while stable investment flows and a persistent supply-demand imbalance highlighted by consistent third-quarter central bank buying continue to support price growth. This reflects a causal relationship between structural gold accumulation and bullish price momentum.

Historical Surge Underpinned by Macroeconomic Factors

This optimistic outlook follows a year in which gold experienced a historically significant surge, briefly topping USD 4,380 per ounce before undergoing a short-term correction. The early 2025 rally was fueled by investor flight to safety amid geopolitical instability and persistent doubts over the long-term strength of the US dollar. These conditions have created a strong psychological foundation for continued inflows into gold markets, where both institutional and retail investors seek security against systemic volatility.

Goldman Sachs analyst Daan Struyven echoed Deutsche Bank’s optimism, projecting a nearly 20% increase in gold prices to approximately USD 4,900 by the end of 2026. Struyven attributes this growth to the same factors seen in 2025, particularly the structural shift in central bank behavior following the 2022 freezing of Russian assets. This event fundamentally altered reserve strategies, prompting a diversification away from US dollar holdings. In addition, the Fed’s dovish policy trajectory lowers the opportunity cost of holding non-yield-bearing assets like gold, reinforcing investor interest. The analysis here indicates a causal mechanism: declining interest rates reduce holding costs, thus increasing gold’s attractiveness.

Bank of America, meanwhile, has provided one of the most aggressive forecasts, suggesting gold could touch USD 5,000 per ounce. Michael Widmer, Head of Metals Research, contextualized the recent price pullback as a normal feature of historical upcycles. He noted that past gold bull markets since the 1970s have commonly included temporary corrections of around 10%, followed by substantial recoveries a pattern consistent with current price dynamics.

China’s Central Bank Maintains Strategic Accumulation

The People's Bank of China has emerged as a significant player in this global trend. October marked the twelfth consecutive month of gold purchases, adding another 30,000 ounces and lifting total reserves to 74.09 million ounces, valued at approximately USD 297.2 billion. This sustained accumulation provides a strong foundation of structural demand that underpins global price levels. The implication here is not merely correlation but a direct influence: China’s steady purchases provide floor support and add upward pressure in times of market uncertainty.

Since resuming its rate-cutting cycle in September following two previous 25-basis-point reductions earlier in the year the Fed has strengthened market conviction that interest rates will continue to decline into 2026. CME Group’s FedWatch tool shows over 80% market consensus for further cuts at the next policy meeting. This anticipated monetary easing contributes to the positive sentiment surrounding gold, as lower rates tend to weaken the dollar and encourage shifts into hard assets.

In sum, the confluence of central bank accumulation, geopolitical uncertainty, investor demand, and a dovish US monetary policy creates ideal conditions for gold’s sustained rally into 2026. The causal relationships between structural demand, lower interest rates, and price momentum suggest that gold’s next chapter will be shaped not just by short-term speculation, but by enduring shifts in how global institutions manage reserves and hedge against macroeconomic risk. The consensus across Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America highlights a rare alignment in market outlooks, signaling that the USD 5,000 threshold may no longer be speculative it could be imminent.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

E-Commerce Tax Loophole Puts UK Retailers at a Disadvantage

For years, UK retailers have faced a growing threat from ultra-cheap e-commerce platforms such as Shein, Temu, and AliExpress, which ship goods directly from Chinese manufacturers to British consumers. These parcels have been able to bypass customs duties thanks to a loophole that exempts packages valued under £135 (approximately USD 179). As a result, international sellers gained a significant price advantage over local brick-and-mortar stores that must pay import taxes.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently announced in Parliament that the government will end this competitive imbalance by applying customs duties to all imported parcels, regardless of value. The reform aims to level the playing field between local and foreign sellers. However, the full implementation is not scheduled until March 2029, with consultations running through March 2026. This sluggish approach has drawn sharp criticism from domestic retailers and trade bodies.

Retail Industry's Strong Opposition to the Delay

The British Retail Consortium’s director general, Helen Dickinson, stressed the urgency of the matter, noting that nearly 1.6 million parcels are currently exploiting the loophole daily double the volume from the previous year. She warned that further delays will deepen losses for domestic retailers, many of whom are already under pressure. Her argument highlights a cause-effect relationship: the continued influx of duty-free parcels directly contributes to declining competitiveness and financial strain among UK retailers.

In contrast, other major economies have acted more swiftly. The United States, which is the largest market for Shein and Temu, ended its tax exemption on imports under USD 800 starting in May 2024 for goods from China and Hong Kong, later extending it globally. This rapid policy shift initially disrupted logistics, evidenced by over one million packages being delayed at JFK airport due to short notice.

Similarly, the European Union accelerated its own plans to eliminate the VAT exemption for goods under €150, moving the deadline forward from 2028 to 2026. South Africa and Brazil have already imposed VAT and a 20% import tax respectively on low-value international purchases. The UK's deferred timeline risks isolating it from these aligned international trade standards, as emphasized by retailers like Sainsbury’s and Boohoo, who argue the delay invites continued fiscal losses and undermines regulatory fairness.

Implications for Market Dynamics and Consumer Behavior

According to customs tax expert Andrew Thurston, removing the duty-free threshold will raise the cost of direct international shipping, narrowing the price difference between imported goods and domestic offerings. This shift could gradually nudge consumers back toward local stores, assuming prices become more competitive and product availability remains strong. The implication here is a correlation: while higher tariffs won’t guarantee behavioral change, they are expected to reduce the appeal of cheap imports, especially if combined with other pro-retail initiatives.

In summary, while the UK government’s intent to reform e-commerce tariffs aligns with global regulatory movements, its protracted timeline risks continued damage to domestic retail and long-term loss of tax revenue. The causal link between delayed reform and market distortion is evident in the mounting daily volume of untaxed parcels and shrinking sales for domestic retailers. Unless action is expedited, the UK may find itself out of step with global trade enforcement trends, to the detriment of its retail sector.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites