• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6939.02
6939.02
6939.02
6964.08
6893.47
-29.99
-0.43%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48892.46
48892.46
48892.46
49047.68
48459.88
-179.09
-0.36%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23461.81
23461.81
23461.81
23662.25
23351.55
-223.30
-0.94%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
96.990
97.070
96.990
96.990
96.150
+1.020
+ 1.06%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18491
1.18514
1.18491
1.19743
1.18491
-0.01211
-1.01%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.36835
1.36880
1.36835
1.38142
1.36788
-0.01258
-0.91%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4894.49
4894.49
4894.49
5450.83
4682.14
-481.82
-8.96%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
65.427
65.456
65.427
65.832
63.409
+0.175
+ 0.27%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

U.S. House Speaker Boris Johnson: Trump May “readjust” His Immigration Policy

Share

[Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives: Confident Of Sufficient Votes To End Partial Government Shutdown By Tuesday] February 1st, According To Nbc News, U.S. House Speaker Johnson Said He Is Confident That There Will Be Enough Votes By At Least Tuesday To End The Partial Government Shutdown

Share

Iranian Official Tells Reuters: Media Reports Of Plans For Revolutionary Guards To Hold Military Exercise In Strait Of Hormuz Are Wrong

Share

Ukraine's Defence Minister Says Kyiv And Spacex Working On System To Ensure Only Authorized Starlink Terminals Work In Ukraine

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Europe Has Failed To Defeat Russia In Ukraine

Share

Nigerian Army Says It Killed A Boko Haram Commander And 10 Fighters

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: We Never Found The Two Nuclear Submarines Trump Spoke Of Deploying Closer To Russia

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come 'Soon' In Ukraine But Equally Important To Think Of How To Prevent New Conflicts

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Trump Is An Effective Leader Who Seeks Peace

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Behind The So Called 'Chaos' Of Trump, He Is An Effective And Original USA Leader

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come Soon In Ukraine War

Share

Ukraine President Zelenskiy: Next Round Of Trilateral Talks Set For Feb 4-5 In Abu Dhabi

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russia Gains Control Over Two Villages In Ukraine's Kharkiv And Donetsk Regions

Share

Trump Says India Will Buy Oil From Venezuela

Share

Istanbul Jan Consumer Price Index 4.56% Month-On-Month - Chamber Of Commerce

Share

Moody's: Interest Payments To Revenue Ratio Set To Worsen Next Year

Share

Moody's: Federal Government Fiscal Deficit Still Wider Than What It Was Prior To Covid

Share

Saudi Arabia's Stock Index Down 2.1% - Lseg

Share

Pakistan Balochistan Chief Minister Says 145 Militants Killed After Attacks Over 40 Hours

Share

Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei: If Americans Start A War This Time, It Will Be A Regional Conflict

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.K. M4 Money Supply (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Italy Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico GDP Prelim YoY (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Trade Balance (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP MoM (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Chicago PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Federal Government Budget Balance (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Non-manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Trade Balance Prelim (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Trade Balance (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Inflation Rate YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Core Inflation YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Commodity Price YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Germany Actual Retail Sales MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --
Italy Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Output Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Monetary Base YoY (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    3487443 flag
    In 1979, gold was above $200 USD, then by June it had quadrupled in value in just a few months. From above $200 USD, gold surged to over $850 USD. At that time, its value was relatively high, especially considering inflation was over 13 percent. Just a few months later, gold plummeted back to above $300 USD.
    3505272 flag
    Has anyone updated the system? That's why your reasoning is correct.
    3505186 flag
    The app is lagging so badly, I can't watch anything.
    3505186 flag
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    3507622 flag
    how to trade please guide me
    hong hong flag
    That USA showed a Roun right now
    hong hong flag
    United States they can show Iran right now
    3487443 flag
    3505186
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    [100]It's me, kid@Chế độ khách3505186
    hsjskbdb flag
    Similarities: Both are driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical factors, and expectations of currency devaluation. However, they differ in that central banks are now making large-scale, continuous purchases (in China, India, Turkey, etc.), which is not purely speculative . ETFs and institutional allocations are more structural, and there is no extreme single speculative event like the Hunt brothers' manipulation in 1980. Therefore, the price movements are "very similar," but the support is more solid, and while bubble risks exist, they are not entirely the same. Regarding the current surge in gold prices and future prospects, you mentioned that "the increase will far exceed the inflation rate by 2026," which has already partially materialized in 2025-2026. Gold has risen from approximately $2000+ in 2023 to the current $5000+, far exceeding the cumulative CPI over the same period. Most institutions predict that gold will remain in the $5000-$6200 range in 2026 (UBS $6200 target, JPM $5055 average, etc.), with some optimists seeing a possible $7000+. Has gold already transformed from a "safe-haven asset" into a "risk asset"? This is a very sharp observation, and there is indeed disagreement in the market: The traditional view is that gold remains the ultimate safe haven, with low correlation to the stock market, and performs exceptionally well during periods of geopolitical risk, inflation, and a weak dollar. Multiple reports (JPM, VanEck, BIS, etc.) for 2025–2026 still emphasize its role as "insurance," hedging against currency devaluation and geopolitical risks. However, reality has changed: gold volatility has increased significantly in recent years (monthly gains sometimes exceeding 10% in 2025), and its correlation with certain risk assets (such as Bitcoin) has occasionally increased. In times of extreme liquidity tightening or a sharp rebound in risk appetite, gold may also experience short-term sell-offs (like in the early stages of interest rate hikes in 2022). Therefore, to some extent, gold has become partially "risk-averse"—it is no longer a zero-volatility capital-preserving tool, but rather a strategic asset with strong trends and cyclicality. Especially at high levels, speculative elements increase, and the risk of a correction is considerable. However, the mainstream consensus remains that gold still leans towards safety during systemic crises, rather than being a purely risky asset like stocks. Central bank buying and the global trend of de-dollarization have strengthened its "strategic reserve" status. Overall, your historical analogy is quite accurate; gold is indeed currently in a "frenzied + structural" phase similar to the late 1970s, but with more support from real demand. Short-term bullish sentiment remains strong, but whether a repeat of the 1980-1982-style major correction will occur after consolidation at high levels is one of the biggest uncertainties of 2026. What is your view on the probability of a correction? Or which specific driving factor are you more focused on?
    hsjskbdb flag
    Envious of Trump, who can freely control gold prices.
    hsjskbdb flag
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    3507933 flag
    hsjskbdb
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    @hsjskbdbin
    Joyce flag
    have any of you review the lumonel.com that I have been posting my earnings on here
    "ThatfxSniper📈" recalled a message
    3487443 flag
    hsjskbdb
    Similarities: Both are driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical factors, and expectations of currency devaluation. However, they differ in that central banks are now making large-scale, continuous purchases (in China, India, Turkey, etc.), which is not purely speculative . ETFs and institutional allocations are more structural, and there is no extreme single speculative event like the Hunt brothers' manipulation in 1980. Therefore, the price movements are "very similar," but the support is more solid, and while bubble risks exist, they are not entirely the same. Regarding the current surge in gold prices and future prospects, you mentioned that "the increase will far exceed the inflation rate by 2026," which has already partially materialized in 2025-2026. Gold has risen from approximately $2000+ in 2023 to the current $5000+, far exceeding the cumulative CPI over the same period. Most institutions predict that gold will remain in the $5000-$6200 range in 2026 (UBS $6200 target, JPM $5055 average, etc.), with some optimists seeing a possible $7000+. Has gold already transformed from a "safe-haven asset" into a "risk asset"? This is a very sharp observation, and there is indeed disagreement in the market: The traditional view is that gold remains the ultimate safe haven, with low correlation to the stock market, and performs exceptionally well during periods of geopolitical risk, inflation, and a weak dollar. Multiple reports (JPM, VanEck, BIS, etc.) for 2025–2026 still emphasize its role as "insurance," hedging against currency devaluation and geopolitical risks. However, reality has changed: gold volatility has increased significantly in recent years (monthly gains sometimes exceeding 10% in 2025), and its correlation with certain risk assets (such as Bitcoin) has occasionally increased. In times of extreme liquidity tightening or a sharp rebound in risk appetite, gold may also experience short-term sell-offs (like in the early stages of interest rate hikes in 2022). Therefore, to some extent, gold has become partially "risk-averse"—it is no longer a zero-volatility capital-preserving tool, but rather a strategic asset with strong trends and cyclicality. Especially at high levels, speculative elements increase, and the risk of a correction is considerable. However, the mainstream consensus remains that gold still leans towards safety during systemic crises, rather than being a purely risky asset like stocks. Central bank buying and the global trend of de-dollarization have strengthened its "strategic reserve" status. Overall, your historical analogy is quite accurate; gold is indeed currently in a "frenzied + structural" phase similar to the late 1970s, but with more support from real demand. Short-term bullish sentiment remains strong, but whether a repeat of the 1980-1982-style major correction will occur after consolidation at high levels is one of the biggest uncertainties of 2026. What is your view on the probability of a correction? Or which specific driving factor are you more focused on?
    [100]1. The Fed chairman has warned that gold is rising too high and affirmed that gold will not affect the USD. 2. Russia and Ukraine may end the war in March. 3. Trump has appointed a rebel as Fed chairman, a person considered a proponent of a strong USD. 4. Gold has risen far beyond inflation. 5. The gold standard system will not return because the transfer of goods is too difficult to calculate and invest in, unlike the current USD monetary system which is easy to use and allows for profitable investment through channels such as cryptocurrencies, stocks, etc. Countries can trade more easily and can invest for profit. Everyone says that the US public debt exceeds $38 trillion, so countries can sell all their US bonds and buy gold. If the US public debt exceeds $40 trillion, countries will also accept it because in the next 50 years no currency will replace the USD except China, but currently they are not accepted due to exchange rate manipulation. There are still concerns that China's gold purchases have their own agendas. They also buy a large amount of oil and gas, with the intention of occupying Taiwan in the next few years or by 2030. In fact, many countries predicted that Trump might become president in 2025, so starting in late 2023, central banks began buying gold because Trump's policies are erratic and could affect the USD. They need to diversify their assets, not abandon them. Remember, the US has two parties: the Democratic Party and the US. Their policies are constantly changing. In the midterm elections in November, I think the Democrats will regain control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. At that time, they will fight against Trump. The Hunt brothers manipulated the silver market, not gold. In 1980, central banks also sold US bonds, just like today, because they lost confidence in the high inflation in the US, exceeding 13 percent due to the money pumped to support the military in Vietnam. The person who eradicated inflation and gold in 1980 was Fed Paula. VoLc Kern raised interest rates. Over 21 percent restored confidence in the USD, but in return, the US has been in recession for many years. Why is Trump now appointing someone who opposes his policies as chairman of the Fed?
    3487443 flag
    The signs of gold bull cycles and the end of the cycle are that gold usually rises very sharply in the last 3 years, but the similarity between 1980 and 2011 is that the final year saw a very strong increase. Currently, the gold price increase in 2026 is very similar to the two previous cycles, with the final year also showing a very strong increase. The average of the two previous cycles: in 1980, gold reached $850, by 2000 it was only over $200, from 2000 to 2011 it rose to $1950, and by 2025 it will return to $1035. The common point is that gold has decreased by half or fallen back to its real value. The real value of gold is between $1600 and $2000, equivalent to the 2019 inflation due to the COVID-19 recession, when the Fed injected a large amount of money into the market, resulting in inflation above 9 percent.
    just Brendon flag
    hello fastbul
    just Brendon flag
    alert for tonight move I have+1000 Pip's confirmed move analysis
    3505272 flag
    Hello Fasbull
    3508362 flag
    hello
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Bitcoin LTH Supply Rises Again Amid Bearish Market Dynamics

          NewsBTC
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          The Bitcoin market experienced a shockingly dramatic weekend, as opposed to the typical silent price action displayed in previous weekends. On Saturday, January 31st, the world’s leading cryptocurrency seemingly led other crypto assets south of the charts, with its price falling from $84,350 to as low as $75,000 in a single swoop. 

          As this unfolded, an inversely correlated shift also played out underneath the charts. A recent on-chain evaluation has pointed out that Bitcoin’s Long-term Holder behavior is changing, contrary to what its short-term holders are doing.

          Long-Term Holders Accumulate As Short-Term Supply Declines

          Pseudonymous on-chain analyst Darkfost recently took to CryptoQuant, via a Quicktake post, pointing out that Bitcoin’s long-term holders are racking up more BTC. The relevant indicator here is the LTH supply change (Coinbase fix).

          For context, this metric tracks the net change in the amount of Bitcoin held by long-term holders (typically coins unmoved for ~155 days). According to the analyst, approximately 186,000 (on a monthly average) have been added to the Long-term holders’ supply.

          Seeing as more coins are aging past 155 days, Darkfost implied that short-term holder supply is, in turn, witnessing steady contraction. Notably, the analyst pointed out this kind of transition (between long-term and short-term investors) last happened in April, as the Bitcoin price retraced. 

          As it is intuitively evident, a rising LTH supply is typically interpreted as growing conviction among Bitcoin’s long-term investors. By extension, this means that long-term holders are distributing less of their holdings and stowing away more. 

          In theory, this behavior is bullish news for the cryptocurrency. This is because, as LTHs absorb supply, the amount of available Bitcoin for sale reduces. Historically, it is also a bullish signal for the BTC price, as it has often appeared during the early stages of accumulation periods or late into correction stages.

          However, the broader market implications in the current context might not be so favorable. Darkfost highlighted that there is very weak demand available to cushion the falling BTC price. 

          At the same time, the Bitcoin market appears to be entering a bearish phase; hence, it is not far-fetched to see major capitulation events in the near-term. If this happens, the Bitcoin price would likely plummet, as weaker investors may sell off their holdings in fear or as victims of liquidation events.

          For a bullish outlook to be truly relevant, there has to be a clear recovery in demand, alongside continued long-term holder accumulation. 

          Bitcoin Price At A Glance 

          As of press time, the Bitcoin price stands at approximately $78,060, reflecting a 6.9% loss in the past day.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Bitcoin Price Hits 9-Month Low Amid $2.6 Billion Liquidation: What’s Next?

          Beincrypto
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          Bitcoin price fell below the $80,000 support level, hitting a nine-month low and wiping out $2.6 billion in trader positions.

          According to BeInCrypto data, the 6% slide sent the token to $77,082 before a minor rebound. This marked the first time prices have sat this low since April 2025.

          Bitcoin Sinks Below ‘Fair Value’ for First Time in Years

          The price action pushed Bitcoin below critical on-chain benchmarks for the first time in years.

          Glassnode data confirmed that Bitcoin fell below its True Market Mean—currently $80,500—for the first time in 30 months. The last breach occurred in late 2023, when the asset traded at just $29,000.

          Historically, a breach of this level signals a transition from a bull cycle to a mid-term bear market.

          As a result, BTC holders now face a grim reality as its Short-Term Holder Cost Basis has climbed to $95,400, while the Active Investor Mean stands at $87,300.

          With the spot price significantly below these averages, the market now faces a substantial overhang of unrealized losses.

          This technical breakdown triggered a violent deleveraging event across global derivatives exchanges.

          Data from CoinGlass show that the collapse led to the liquidation of roughly $2.58 billion in trader positions.

          Notably, the carnage hit one side of the market with extreme prejudice as “long” positions—bets on a price rebound—accounted for $2.42 billion of the total losses. This is the largest long liquidation event in the last three months.

          Ethereum traders bore the heaviest burden, incurring $1.15 billion in liquidations, while Bitcoin-related wipes totaled more than $772 million.

          This massive “long squeeze” shows that participants overleveraged their positions to defend the $80,000 floor, only to be crushed by accelerating downside momentum.

          CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju tied this substantial decline to an exhaustion in BTC’s buyer liquidity. He attributed this to a “flatlined” Realized Cap, which confirms that the fresh capital required to sustain a bull market has simply vanished.

          According to Ju, while early investors continue to take profits on holdings acquired during the 2025 surge, no new institutional “blood” exists to absorb the supply.

          “MSTR was a major driver of this rally. Unless Saylor significantly dumps his stack, we won’t see a -70% crash like previous cycles,” he added.

          Considering this, he posited that the market would be forced into a “wide-ranging sideways consolidation” until a new floor emerges.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          UAE firm bought 49% of Trump-linked crypto startup for $500M: WSJ

          Cointelegraph
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          A UAE-backed investment vehicle quietly agreed to buy nearly half of World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency startup linked to President Donald Trump, just days before he returned to the White House, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

          Aryam Investment 1, an Abu Dhabi entity backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, signed a deal in January 2025 to purchase a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million, the Journal said, citing documents and people familiar with the matter.

          Half of that amount was paid upfront, sending $187 million to Trump family-controlled entities, with additional tens of millions flowing to entities tied to co-founders, including relatives of US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, per the report.

          The agreement was reportedly signed by Eric Trump. The Journal reported that the deal had not been publicly disclosed, despite World Liberty later revealing that the Trump family’s stake had fallen sharply.

          Related: Sam Bankman-Fried turns up Trump support following Ellison’s release

          Tahnoon’s ambitions grow after Trump election

          Tahnoon, the brother of the United Arab Emirates president and the country’s national security adviser, has been central to Abu Dhabi’s push to become a global leader in artificial intelligence. Under the Biden administration, his efforts to secure advanced US-made AI chips were limited amid concerns that sensitive technology could reach China, particularly through companies such as G42.

          Following Trump’s election, those efforts gained momentum. Tahnoon met multiple times with Trump and senior US officials, and within months the administration committed to granting the UAE access to hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips annually.

          The Journal reported that executives from G42 helped manage Aryam Investment 1 and took board seats at World Liberty as part of the deal, making Aryam the startup’s largest outside shareholder. Weeks before the US-UAE chip framework was announced, another Tahnoon-led firm, MGX, used World Liberty’s stablecoin to complete a $2 billion investment into Binance.

          World Liberty and the White House have reportedly denied any wrongdoing. Spokespeople told the Journal that President Trump was not involved in the deal and that it did not provide any influence over US policy.

          Related: Trump picks crypto-friendly Kevin Warsh as new Fed chair

          World Liberty faces US probe calls

          Last year, Democratic senators called on US authorities to investigate alleged links between World Liberty Financial’s token sales and sanctioned foreign actors. In a Nov. letter to the Justice Department and Treasury, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed cited claims that WLFI governance tokens were bought by blockchain addresses tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, as well as Russian- and Iranian-linked entities.

          The controversy is heightened by WLFI’s ownership structure, which gives Trump family-linked entities control over the majority of token revenue. Lawmakers argue this creates a direct conflict of interest, as most proceeds from token sales flow to the president’s family.

          Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Swift Surge: New XRP Whale Amasses $206 Million In Minutes

          NewsBTC
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          A fresh whale on the XRP ledger moved a large chunk of tokens in a very short time, and traders are split on what it means.

          According to on-chain records, a newly activated address received two equal transfers that together totaled $120 million XRP.

          The transfers came through an intermediary wallet that shuffled the coins across multiple quick moves.

          Whale Activity And The Flow Of Funds

          Reports say the incoming batches were two transfers of $60 million XRP each. The intermediary took each batch and pushed them onward to a holding address within the hour.

          That receiving account now shows a balance of $185 million XRP after adding a leftover $35 million it already held. Exchange tags are absent. No known custodial label appears next to these addresses. That makes the trail harder to read.

          Why The Moves Could Be Routine

          Large holders move funds for many reasons. Custodians tidy up wallets. Exchanges consolidate holdings. Firms rotate funds locked in cold storage for operational reasons.

          Those are common explanations. Active traders watched the price around the same time. Reports note XRP had slid to the low $1.70 range, breaking below the $1.80 support and slipping about 10% since Jan. 29. Signals Traders Want To See

          If this were a quiet buy-the-dip, market signs would usually show up. Price stabilization or an uptick might follow. Spot volume could climb. Net outflows from exchange wallets might be visible.

          None of those clear, matching clues appeared right away. Instead, the funds sat put. That raises the chance this was internal reshuffling rather than aggressive accumulation.What The Intermediary Pattern Suggests

          Routing through a central wallet is common. Some teams prefer to funnel receipts into a single address for accounting or security checks before dispersing them.

          The pace of transfers can look dramatic on a block explorer. But drama does not equate to new money entering the market.

          Without evidence that the source funds came from outside exchanges, or that they were purchased on the open market, the move should be treated as ambiguous.

          Reports have disclosed similar on-chain activity in past months that later turned out to be either coordinated buying or routine housekeeping.

          Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Ripple Co-Founder Leads $40M Push to Counter California Wealth Tax

          CryptoNews
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen and venture capitalist Tim Draper have launched Grow California, a $40 million political initiative designed to elect moderate state legislators and push back against labor unions, with a proposed wealth tax serving as the primary catalyst for Silicon Valley’s latest political mobilization.

          According to , the effort, which began with $5 million checks from each founder in September, represents one of the most significant financial commitments from the tech and crypto sectors to reshape California politics.

          The ballot measure that triggered this response, backed by Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, would impose a one-time 5% tax on net worth exceeding $1 billion, including unrealized gains on assets not yet sold.

          “Whoever designed that wealth tax in the unions — wow,” Larsen said. “They woke up the sleeping giant like I have never seen.“Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen. | Source: BloombergTech Billionaires Challenge Union Influence With Business-Friendly Candidates

          Larsen, whose net worth is nearly $15 billion from Ripple holdings and crypto assets, said he expects to personally commit $30 million to the organization.

          “If it takes a couple of cycles, fine — that’s what we’re here for,” he told The New York Times when asked about potential November losses.

          The group plans to target about a dozen state legislative seats this year, focusing on public safety, homelessness, and budget discipline, according to Shaudi Fulp, the former Sacramento lobbyist leading daily operations.

          While Democrats control more than two-thirds of seats in both legislative chambers, Grow California will not engage in the 2026 gubernatorial race or expensive ballot proposition campaigns.

          Both founders come from the crypto industry, though they stress that the initiative does not represent the interests of the crypto sector specifically.

          Larsen acknowledged learning lessons from Fairshake, the crypto super PAC backed by Ripple that spent over $100 million shaping the current Congress.

          Draper, known for Bitcoin-themed accessories and his persistent campaign to split California into multiple states, did not respond to requests for comment.

          “The government unions do a great job,” Larsen said, adding with a laugh, “I have respect for the job that they’ve done. They show up, and they’re there consistently. But that’s going to clash with a lot of the things that are going to make California successful if there’s no counterforce.“

          🇺🇸 Crypto and tech leaders warn California’s proposed 5% billionaire tax on unrealized gains could trigger capital flight and an exodus of high-net-worth residents ahead of the 2026 ballot vote. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) California Crypto Politics Intensifies Amid Governor Race And Regulatory Expansion

          The wealth tax debate coincides with former Assembly member Ian Calderon’s entry into the 2026 gubernatorial race on a pro-Bitcoin platform.

          Calderon, 39, who served as Assembly Majority Leader from 2016 to 2020, declared his vision for California to become “the undisputed leader on Bitcoin” in his campaign announcement video.

          Meanwhile, Governor Gavin Newsom has intensified criticism of President Donald Trump’s crypto-related pardons, launching a state-backed website tracking what his office calls “criminal cronies.“

          The site prominently features Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, who received a full pardon in October after serving four months for Bank Secrecy Act violations, and Ross Ulbricht, whose life sentence for Silk Road operations was commuted.

          🚨 California Governor Newsom slams Trump’s crypto pardons, calling 's CZ and Silk Road’s Ross Ulbricht “criminal cronies” in a new state tracker highlighting controversial pardons. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews)

          Beyond political battles, California continues advancing digital asset infrastructure through the Digital Financial Assets Law, which takes effect in July 2025 and requires all crypto service providers to obtain state licenses.

          The Assembly also unanimously passed AB 1180 in June, creating a pilot program for state fee payments using digital assets that runs through 2031.Global Tax Frameworks Contrast California’s Uncertain Trajectory

          While California debates wealth taxation, other jurisdictions are implementing clearer crypto tax structures.

          Japan’s 2026 tax reform blueprint reduces crypto taxation from up to 55% to a flat 20% for specified digital assets handled by registered businesses, though the exact qualifying criteria remain undefined.

          Similarly, the European Union’s DAC8 tax transparency law took effect on January 1, requiring crypto exchanges and service providers to collect and report user information to national tax authorities, with data sharing between EU countries beginning July 1.

          “Tax authorities now have an automated dashboard tracking your digital assets,” wrote Bitcoin educator Heidi Chakos.

          🏛 DAC8 took effect on Jan. 1, giving the EU power to seize crypto linked to unpaid taxes, while negating privacy for individual holders. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews)

          However, just like California, South Korea faces mounting uncertainty over its repeatedly delayed crypto tax regime, now scheduled for January 2027 despite lacking essential infrastructure.

          Switzerland also postponed the automatic exchange of crypto account information with foreign tax authorities until at least 2027, though legal frameworks take effect in January 2026.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          $30M Stolen as Step Finance Treasury Wallets Compromised

          CryptoNews
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          Step Finance, a major Solana DeFi platform, multiple treasury and fee wallets were compromised by a sophisticated attacker during Asian Pacific trading hours, resulting in the theft of approximately 261,854 SOL tokens worth roughly $30 million.

          The breach sent shockwaves through the Solana ecosystem as blockchain security firm CertiK flagged that the stolen SOL “has been withdrawn after stake authorization had been transferred” to an unknown wallet address.

          The incident triggered immediate market panic, with the platform’s native STEP token plummeting over 90% within 24 hours.Source: CoinGecko

          While the team insists user funds remained unaffected, questions swirl over whether the breach represents a genuine security failure or a disguised exit scam, particularly given that the attacker appeared to have direct wallet access rather than exploiting smart contract vulnerabilities.

          Earlier today several of our treasury wallets were compromised by a sophisticated actor during APAC hours. This was an attack facilitated through a well known attack vector. Immediate remediation steps have been taken, and we are working closely with top security professionals.…— Step☀️ (@StepFinance_) Emergency Response and Damage Control

          Step Finance disclosed the security breach through a series of urgent social media posts, stating “several of our treasury and fee wallets were compromised by a sophisticated actor” and confirming the attack leveraged “a well known attack vector.“

          The platform immediately activated emergency protocols and reached out to cybersecurity firms for assistance.

          Solana media firm Solana Floor that on-chain data showed the stolen 261,854 SOL was “unstaked and moved during the incident,” suggesting the attacker had obtained authorization to control staking operations.

          The team emphasized it had “notified the relevant authorities” and implemented immediate remediation steps while working with top security professionals around the clock.

          We are contacting Cybersecurity firms to assist. Any firms who can assist feel free to slide into DMs— Step☀️ (@StepFinance_) Ripple Effects Across Linked Protocols

          The breach extended beyond Step Finance’s own operations, impacting connected platforms including Remora Markets.

          The protocol disclosed that as “majority LP, Step Finance experienced a hack of treasury wallets earlier today” with some affected assets including Remora rStocks.

          Remora users that despite the incident, “Remora assets remain held 1:1 in our brokerage account” while constructing a process for handling redemptions.

          The market’s swift verdict on Step Finance came through brutal price action, with the STEP token losing most of its value as traders fled amid uncertainty about the platform’s future viability and the legitimacy of the breach.

          Remora Markets majority LP, Step Finance experienced a hack of treasury wallets earlier today. Some of the assets involved in the incident are Remora rStocks. An investigation is currently underway. Remora assets remain held 1:1 in our brokerage account. A process for handling…— Remora Markets (@RemoraMarkets) January’s Relentless Wave of DeFi Exploits

          The Step Finance hack marks the latest in what security firms describe as a devastating month for cryptocurrency security.

          According to CertiK’s comprehensive January 2026 , “combining all the incidents in January, we’ve confirmed ~$370.3M lost to exploits” across multiple attack vectors.

          Major January incidents included Truebit’s $26.6 million smart contract exploit, SwapNet’s $13.3 million breach affecting Matcha Meta users, Saga’s $6.2 million exploit that forced the Layer-1 protocol to pause its SagaEVM chain, and through flash loan manipulation.

          CertiK’s analysis revealed that phishing incidents accounted for $311.3 million of January’s losses, while code vulnerability attacks totaled $51.5 million.

          🚨Combining all the incidents in January we’ve confirmed ~$370.3M lost to exploits.~$311.3M of the total is attributed to phishing with one victim losing ~$284M due to a social engineering scam.More details below 👇 — CertiK Alert (@CertiKAlert)

          Notably, the Step Finance breach continues a troubling pattern affecting Solana-based protocols.

          Swiss crypto platform SwissBorg lost $41.5 million worth of SOL tokens in September 2025 after hackers compromised partner API provider Kiln, while South Korea’s Upbit exchange suffered a $36 million Solana exploit in November 2025, exactly six years after its 2019 hack attributed to North Korean actors.

          Beyond individual protocol failures, January also witnessed the largest single crypto theft of 2026, when a victim lost over $282 million in Bitcoin and Litecoin through a hardware wallet social engineering scam, as blockchain investigator ZachXBT described it, surpassing the previous record of $243 million set in August 2024.

          The attacker “immediately began converting the stolen assets into Monero through multiple instant exchanges,” obscuring the trail across multiple blockchain networks.

          CertiK’s data shows that despite these massive losses, less than 2-5% has been recovered so far, as investigations into many cases have only recently begun.

          Even government-held crypto assets came under scrutiny, as the US Marshals Service it is investigating a possible hack of federal digital-asset accounts.

          Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, acknowledged that the government seizure addresses were among the wallets from which hackers stole more than $60 million in late 2025.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Here’s Why Bitcoin Fall Below $80,000 Could Be A Deep Pit – Analyst

          NewsBTC
          Brevis / Tether
          +5.91%
          HumidiFi / Tether
          +0.46%
          Midnight / USD Coin
          +3.57%
          HumidiFi / USD Coin
          -10.57%
          Midnight / Tether
          +3.43%

          In the past few hours, Bitcoin has dropped below $80,000 amid another wave of liquidations as January comes to a rather volatile close. Analysts at Kobeissi note there have been three notable liquidation events in the past 12 hours, resulting in a combined loss of $1.3 billion.

          Such developments, coupled with a very fearful market after last week’s price slump, have pushed Bitcoin below a key price level. According to the renowned market expert Burak Kesmeci, Bitcoin’s behavior towards this $80,000 price zone holds significant consequences for the market trajectory.

          Bitcoin Slips Under ETF Realized Price As Downside Risk Grows

          In a recent X post, Burak Kesmeci outlines the technical and on-chain importance of the $80,000 price level to the Bitcoin market. Before Bitcoin’s recent breakdown below $80,000, the asset had twice retested this zone following the correction phase that began in early October 2025.

          Each successful rebound from these retests reinforced $80,000 as a critical support level, with certain chart formations even hinting at potential trend reversal. This underscored the market’s technical sensitivity to this level before the recent loss. However, Kesmeci highlights an on-chain importance of the $80,000 price point in that it also functions as the cost basis of the Bitcoin Spot ETFs. Therefore, the recent price fall below $80,000 places a large cohort of institutional investors at risk of entering unrealized losses.

          In January 2026 alone, the Bitcoin ETFs already witnessed massive levels of withdrawals, resulting in a total net outflow of $1.61 billion. However, these figures are likely to surge higher as sustained price decline below the ETF cost basis is expected to trigger a wide-scale, panic-driven redemption among investors. In addition to its on-chain and technical importance, Kesmeci also notes that $80,000 presently functions as the True Market Mean.

          What Next For Bitcoin? 

          According to Burak Kesmeci, a bearish scenario would require a weekly close below the $80,000 support level. If confirmed, the analyst warns that bearish momentum could intensify, potentially driving Bitcoin lower toward $72,000, $68,000, and eventually $62,000 in sequence. This is because these levels align with notable volume profile clusters, representing potential areas where liquidity could accumulate, and the price may temporarily stabilize.

          Conversely, in a bullish scenario, Kesmeci notes that a sustained rebound from current levels could shift momentum back in favor of the bulls. The first major upside hurdle lies at $90,000, followed by the 111-period Simple Moving Average (SMA111) near $95,000, which is described as a critical level for confirming a medium-term trend reversal.

          A decisive break above the psychological $100,000 resistance would further strengthen the bullish case and signal a potential resumption of the broader uptrend. At press time, Bitcoin trades at $77,832, reflecting a 7.1% loss in the past day.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com