Applied Materials Warns of $600 Million Revenue Loss in 2026 Amid U.S. Export Curbs

Economic

Summary:

Applied Materials projects a $600 million revenue hit in fiscal 2026 due to expanded U.S. export restrictions, highlighting ongoing tensions in the semiconductor supply chain and challenges for companies serving China-based customers....

Impact of Export Restrictions on Revenue

Applied Materials, a leading chip equipment manufacturer, announced that the expansion of the U.S. export blacklist could reduce its fiscal 2026 revenue by approximately $600 million. The move, which affects semiconductors, aircraft, and medical equipment sectors, complicates exports and the provision of certain parts and services to select Chinese clients without obtaining a license. The company also anticipates a $110 million impact on its fourth-quarter revenue, signaling near-term pressures.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has widened the export blacklist to include majority-owned subsidiaries of listed companies. This targets Chinese and other international firms that may use affiliates to bypass export controls. Applied Materials and peers like ASML Holding already face headwinds from a slowdown in China and U.S.-imposed tariffs, and the new rules are expected to further disrupt global semiconductor supply chains, increasing compliance requirements and limiting access for certain customers.

Broader Context in the Semiconductor Sector

The company’s revenue rose 8% year-over-year to $7.30 billion in the third quarter, surpassing estimates of $7.22 billion, and its fiscal 2024 revenue reached $27.18 billion, reflecting resilient demand despite geopolitical pressures. U.S. policymakers, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, have also suggested incentives for domestic production, proposing a 50-50 manufacturing split with Taiwan to reduce dependency on foreign chip production.

Applied Materials’ forecast underscores the direct economic impact of U.S. export policy on the semiconductor industry. Companies navigating complex regulations and geopolitical trade tensions may face significant revenue volatility, emphasizing the strategic importance of supply chain diversification and compliance in global technology markets.

Source: The Guardian

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Hedge Funds Eye Election-Driven Market Opportunities

As Japan prepares for a decisive leadership vote between reformist Shinjiro Koizumi and conservative Sanae Takaichi, hedge funds are implementing a range of strategies to capitalize on potential market reactions. Some funds plan to sell into rallies following the announcement of the winner, while others are betting on yen appreciation or trimming exposure to risk assets.

The race’s outcome is expected to influence Japan’s economic direction, including interest rate policy and stimulus measures, which has prompted investors to adjust positions ahead of the election.

Candidate Policy Differences and Market Implications

Takaichi is widely viewed as favoring monetary easing, which could slow the pace of Bank of Japan rate hikes, whereas Koizumi advocates for incremental economic reforms, including boosting wages and productivity. Both candidates have moderated their positions to appeal to centrist voters, complicating market predictions. The outcome will determine not only Japan’s fiscal trajectory but also investor sentiment across equity and currency markets.

Hedge funds such as Epic Partners Investments plan to sell into stock rallies post-election, while K2 Asset Management has positioned for potential yen appreciation through unhedged currency exposures in Japanese equities. Orbis Investment Management is monitoring possible market dislocations for opportunities, particularly if the yen reacts sharply to a Takaichi victory. Current positioning data shows a wide divergence between yen longs and shorts, the largest since 2007, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the political event.

Risk Management and Hedging

Some investors are reducing risk exposure entirely by shifting into traditional hedges such as gold, preparing for volatility triggered by either political outcomes or interest rate developments. Others, like Atsuko Tsuchiya of Atom Capital, are focusing on the Bank of Japan’s next policy move rather than the election itself, balancing long positions with strategic hedges to manage potential corrections already priced into bank stocks.

Japan’s leadership contest is creating significant trading opportunities and uncertainty, prompting hedge funds and asset managers to adopt a variety of strategies. While candidate policies influence investor sentiment, the broader concern remains the trajectory of Bank of Japan interest rates, which will likely dictate market volatility and returns in the near term. This election exemplifies the intricate interplay between political events and financial markets in Asia.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tariffs Hit Halloween Businesses Hard

The U.S. trade war with China has had an unexpected consequence for the Halloween industry. Chris Zephro, founder of Trick or Treat Studios in Santa Cruz, California, has already paid over $800,000 in tariffs this year for imported products, including latex masks, movie props, and novelty games. About 90% of Halloween products rely on at least one foreign component, most commonly from China. The surge in costs has forced Zephro to lay off 15 employees for the first time in 15 years, highlighting the strain on small and medium-sized enterprises that lack the scale to absorb such financial shocks.

President Trump raised tariffs to 145% in April before lowering them to 30% in May, prompting importers to delay orders. As a result, this year’s Halloween inventory is limited, and the National Retail Federation (NRF) projects consumers will spend a record $114.45 per person, $11 higher than last year.

Impact on Prices and Consumer Choices

Retailers like Phantom Halloween in Northridge, California, are attempting to shield customers from the full impact of higher import costs. Ryan Goldman, the store’s manager, noted that while adult costume prices may rise $5-10, efforts are being made to keep children’s costume prices stable. Some products, such as large animatronic props and specialized action figures, were excluded from this year’s inventory due to prohibitive costs, demonstrating the tangible effects of tariffs on both variety and affordability.

Shoppers like Reyna Hernandez are feeling the pinch, piecing together costumes piece by piece to manage expenses. Even when some products are produced outside of China, in countries such as Mexico, Vietnam, India, or the U.K., cost pressures persist due to global supply chain constraints and regulatory challenges.

Struggles of Small Businesses and Supply Chains

The Halloween and Costume Association noted that smaller manufacturers are especially vulnerable, as they lack the scale to offset tariffs or relocate production domestically. Zephro emphasized that simply penalizing businesses for using overseas factories is not a viable solution; meaningful incentives are needed to rebuild domestic manufacturing capabilities, which have eroded over decades due to infrastructure, regulatory hurdles, and material availability.

Goldman added that Halloween businesses continue to face multiple pressures, including inflation, wildfires, and lingering pandemic effects, with tariffs compounding existing financial strains. Maintaining price stability for consumers has become a balancing act, but it remains difficult in the current trade environment.

The Trump administration’s tariffs have placed unprecedented pressure on the Halloween industry, increasing costs for import-dependent businesses and driving higher prices for consumers. Small and medium-sized manufacturers face particularly acute challenges, revealing the broader consequences of trade policies on niche sectors and emphasizing the need for thoughtful strategies to support domestic production while maintaining affordability and product diversity.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Soybeans as a Trade Lever

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signaled optimism for the next round of trade negotiations with China, highlighting an informal pull-aside meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping at a regional summit in South Korea scheduled for late October. The negotiations follow ongoing disputes over Chinese purchases of U.S. soybeans, which have become a key point of contention between the world’s two largest economies.

China has not purchased any soybean cargo from the current U.S. harvest, a sharp contrast to last year when it sourced approximately one-fifth of its imports from the United States. Analysts note that this gives Beijing leverage in trade discussions, similar to its previous use of rare earth exports to extract concessions on export controls. Lu Ting, chief China economist at Nomura Holdings, observed that U.S. soybeans are now less critical to China, allowing Beijing to withhold purchases strategically.

U.S. Response and Farmer Support

The Trump administration has taken steps to protect domestic farmers, with Bessent and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins planning announcements to support the agricultural sector, particularly soybean growers. The administration has also floated using tariff revenue to subsidize affected farmers, reflecting the high political stakes for representatives from key agricultural states such as North Dakota.

Senator John Hoeven emphasized the economic and political implications, warning that China’s shift to South American suppliers threatens U.S. farmers while serving as a bargaining tool in broader tariff negotiations. Trump reinforced this position on social media, asserting that China’s lack of purchases is purely a negotiating tactic and pledging to maintain support for American soybean producers.

Trade Talks and Broader Implications

The upcoming talks occur before the November 10 expiration of the tariff truce established earlier this year. Previous rounds of negotiations, including a June meeting in the U.K., produced agreements easing certain U.S. export controls and accelerating China’s rare earth shipments critical for U.S. industrial sectors.

Bessent described the situation as a delicate balancing act: advancing bilateral trade objectives while mitigating the economic impact on domestic agriculture. The ongoing use of soybeans as leverage highlights the strategic role of agricultural exports in U.S.-China trade dynamics and underscores the political urgency to resolve these disputes ahead of key market and harvest cycles.

China’s temporary halt on U.S. soybean purchases mirrors earlier rare-earth disputes, serving as leverage in high-stakes trade negotiations. With upcoming meetings between Trump and Xi and planned U.S. government support for farmers, the resolution of this issue will be closely watched by policymakers, farmers, and markets, reflecting the intersection of trade strategy, agriculture, and geopolitics.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Hiring Plans Plunge to Historic Lows

According to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, U.S. employers planned to add only 204,939 jobs through September 2025, the lowest year-to-date total since 2009, when hiring totaled 169,385 amid post-recession recovery. This represents a sharp decline from 483,590 planned hires at the same point in 2024. The drop was particularly pronounced in seasonal hiring, with only 100,800 planned seasonal jobs last month, compared to 401,850 during the same period last year.

The steep reduction in hiring signals a slowdown in labor demand and underscores the ongoing stagnation in the U.S. job market, as companies remain cautious amid economic uncertainty.

Rising Job Cuts Amplify Concerns

At the same time, planned job cuts have surged. Year-to-date, employers announced 946,426 planned layoffs, the highest total since 2020, although this figure fell 37% from August. Challenger senior vice president Andy Challenger noted that if current trends continue, job cuts could surpass one million for the first time since 2020. He highlighted that such levels of workforce reductions historically coincide with recessions or periods of technological automation impacting manufacturing and technology sectors.

The recent layoffs were influenced by several factors, including federal government staff reductions due to the shutdown, business responses to tariff- and inflation-driven economic uncertainty, and store closures. AI has contributed modestly, with 17,375 layoffs explicitly attributed to automation and artificial intelligence.

Market Implications and Data Gaps

The U.S. government shutdown is expected to delay the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ official September jobs report, originally scheduled for release in early October. In the absence of this government data, market participants are increasingly relying on private sources such as Challenger and payroll processor ADP to gauge labor market conditions. The weakened hiring outlook, combined with elevated layoffs, raises concerns about broader economic growth and the potential for recessionary pressures in 2026.

The U.S. labor market is exhibiting signs of significant weakness, with hiring plans at their lowest levels in over 15 years and job cuts approaching record highs. Federal layoffs, economic uncertainty, and shifts in business investment strategies are combining to slow labor demand, leaving both policymakers and investors watching closely for signals of broader economic impacts.

Source: Yahoo Finance

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Reaffirming the Call to Eat Less Meat

The EAT-Lancet Commission has released its second iteration of the planetary health diet, emphasizing once again that reducing meat consumption and increasing plant-based foods is critical for both human health and environmental sustainability. The report estimates that following its guidelines could prevent approximately 15 million premature deaths annually and cut farm-related emissions by 15%. While targeting high-income nations, it recognizes that parts of the Global South may need to increase animal protein intake to combat malnutrition.

Food systems contribute roughly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, largely due to livestock farming, which is also a significant source of methane and strains land and water resources. Even with a global transition away from fossil fuels, food production alone could push global temperatures past the 1.5°C threshold. The EAT-Lancet report notes that the wealthiest 30% of the global population drive more than 70% of food-related environmental pressures.

Dietary Recommendations and Flexibility

The “planetary health diet” is designed to resemble traditional diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, providing ranges rather than rigid rules. It does not mandate veganism but encourages moderation in animal-sourced foods, following a “1+1” principle: one serving of dairy and one serving of another animal protein daily. This approach aims to respect cultural diversity and personal preferences while promoting healthier and more sustainable consumption patterns.

The report recommends reducing production of beef, goat, and lamb by one-third from 2020 levels by 2050, with global herds of ruminants reduced by about 25%. While diet change is central, the report stresses that complementary measures such as reducing food waste and improving agricultural productivity are necessary to achieve sustainability goals.

Policy, Politics, and Public Reception

Since its first release in 2019, the EAT-Lancet report has faced backlash from the meat industry, right-wing populist movements, and social media campaigns. Critics labeled it elitist and “anti-meat,” leading to threats and public criticism against the report’s authors. The updated version seeks to address earlier concerns, highlighting accessibility, affordability, and the need for policy interventions including subsidies, taxes, and broader engagement with farmers, chefs, and consumers to implement change effectively.

The commission plans a global roadshow to promote the report, aiming to engage stakeholders across regions and cultures in dialogue about sustainable diets. According to co-founder Gunhild Stordalen, the goal is to foster “brave conversations” to shift mindsets and encourage practical steps toward healthier, more sustainable food systems worldwide.

EAT-Lancet 2.0 reinforces the message that reduced meat consumption in wealthy nations is vital for planetary health and human longevity. By combining dietary recommendations with targeted policies and cross-sector dialogue, the report seeks to transform global food systems while accommodating cultural diversity and economic realities, aiming for both environmental and public health gains.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Michelle Reid

The U.S. government shut down Wednesday, putting hundreds of thousands of federal workers at risk of losing pay.

About 750,000 federal employees are expected to be furloughed each day, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Hundreds of thousands more are required to keep working without pay until funding resumes, based on federal agency estimates, including essential staff like air traffic controllers and border patrol agents.

The shutdown was triggered early Wednesday after the Senate failed to pass a short-term funding bill. The measure, which would have kept the government open through Nov. 20, fell short in a 55-45 vote, below the 60 needed.

All but two Democratic senators opposed the bill. Led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Democrats have been pushing for an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies and the reversal of about $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts included in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill.

In turn, Trump and Vice President J.D Vance have threatened permanent job cuts. Last week, the Office of Management and Budget sent a memo directing federal agencies to prepare layoff plans for programs "not consistent with the president's priorities" if funding lapses, according to the memo published by PBS.

Labor unions have already sued over the move, arguing it violates federal law.

What a shutdown means and who is affected

Each year, Congress must approve funding for the government's new fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. A shutdown occurs when lawmakers miss that deadline. The last time it happened was a 34-day shutdown in 2018, during Trump's first term.

In a shutdown, agencies pause many operations and split workers into two categories:

● Excepted employees who must keep working without pay, commonly in roles tied to safety and national security.

● Non-excepted employees who are placed on unpaid leave and told not to report to work.

Federal employees are guaranteed back pay once the shutdown ends, but contractors are not.

The shutdown's effects will be most visible in the government's largest agencies. At the Department of Homeland Security, more than 250,000 employees are required to keep working without pay, including border patrol officers and TSA agents, according to its contingency plan.

The Department of Health and Human Services expects to furlough about 32,460 workers, or 41% of its staff, Reuters reports. And at the FAA, more than 11,000 employees are being sent home while about 13,000 air traffic controllers continue working without pay.

Most social programs will continue because they're funded outside the annual budget process. Social Security and Medicare benefits will still go out, the Postal Service will keep running and veterans' health care and disability payments will continue. SNAP food assistance is not expected to be affected immediately, though a prolonged shutdown could strain USDA's reserves, AARP reports.

Guidance for federal workers

Shutdowns are a considerable disruption, especially for federal employees whose pay status can be unclear. To help them, the Office of Personnel Management maintains the government-wide shutdown guidance that applies to all federal employees.

Federal agencies have also posted contingency plans that outline who is furloughed, who must keep working without pay and the procedures employees are expected to follow while operations are scaled back. Below is guidance from some of the agencies with the most employees affected:

● Department of Defense contingency plan

● Department of Veterans Affairs contingency plan

● Department of Homeland Security shutdown procedures

● Department of Justice contingency plan

● Health and Human Services contingency staffing plan

● Department of Transportation shutdown guidance

● State Department guidance

For contract workers wondering if they'll get paid, the National Law Review offers advice on confirming contract status and possible recourse on compensation.

Beyond that, out-of-work federal workers and contractors might qualify for state unemployment insurance. Furloughed federal employees access it through the Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees program.

Unfortunately, excepted employees have fewer options and often need to rely on personal savings until the shutdown ends.