Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



Euro Zone IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Italy IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Markit/CIPS Construction PMI (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
France 10-Year OAT Auction Avg. YieldA:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Retail Sales MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Retail Sales YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Brazil GDP YoY (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Challenger Job Cuts YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Ivey PMI (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Ivey PMI (Not SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders Revised MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (SA) (Sept)A:--
F: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Transport) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
Saudi Arabia Crude Oil ProductionA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central BanksA:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
India Repo RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Benchmark Interest RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Reverse Repo RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Cash Reserve RatioA:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Leading Indicators Prelim (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Halifax House Price Index YoY (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Halifax House Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
France Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Italy Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final YoY (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final QoQ (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final QoQ (SA) (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final (SA) (Q3)--
F: --
Brazil PPI MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Consumer Confidence Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Income MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 5-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --


No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
Key takeaways:
Hyperliquid processed around $330 billion in trading volume in July 2025, briefly surpassing Robinhood.
A split-chain design enabled CEX-like speed while keeping custody and execution onchain.
The HLP vault and Assistance Fund buybacks aligned traders, market makers and token holders in a reinforcing loop.
A large airdrop, Phantom Wallet integration and self-funded operations helped attract users and sustain adoption.
A year after launching its own layer 1 (L1), Hyperliquid has become one of decentralized finance’s (DeFi) top perpetuals venues, logging about $319 billion in trading volume in July 2025. Remarkably, the core team behind it is believed to consist of only 11 people.
This guide looks at the technical design and operational choices that enabled such scale.
What is Hyperliquid?
Hyperliquid is a decentralized perpetuals exchange built on a custom layer 1.
Its chain is divided into two tightly connected components: HyperCore, which manages the onchain order book, margining, liquidations and clearing; and HyperEVM, a general-purpose smart contract layer that interacts directly with exchange state.
Both are secured by HyperBFT, a HotStuff-style proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus that enforces a single transaction order without relying on offchain systems. HyperEVM launched on mainnet on Feb. 18, 2025, adding programmability around the exchange core.
Did you know? Hyperliquid achieves a median trade latency of just 0.2 seconds (with even 99th‑percentile delays under 0.9 seconds) and can handle up to 200,000 transactions per second, rivaling centralized exchanges on speed.
The $330-billion month: What the data shows
July was Hyperliquid’s strongest month yet. Data from DefiLlama shows the platform processed about $319 billion in perpetuals trading volume. That pushed DeFi-wide perpetuals to a record $487 billion — a 34% jump from June.
At the same time, industry trackers highlighted a combined $330.8 billion figure, which included spot trading as well. Headlines noted this meant Hyperliquid briefly surpassed Robinhood.
Robinhood’s July metrics provide the basis for comparison: $209.1 billion in equities notional plus $16.8 billion in crypto trading, along with $11.9 billion at Bitstamp (a Robinhood subsidiary), totaling around $237.8 billion.
Several outlets noted that July marked the third straight month Hyperliquid’s volumes topped Robinhood’s, which is a striking outcome for a team of only 11. And these are monthly figures, not cumulative totals. That means the platform is showing sustained high-frequency activity rather than a one-off spike.
Engineering for throughput
Hyperliquid’s scale comes from a carefully split state machine operating under one consensus.
HyperCore acts as the exchange engine, with central-limit order books, margin accounting, matching and liquidations all kept fully onchain. The documentation stresses that it avoids offchain order books. Each asset’s book exists onchain as part of the chain state, with price-time priority matching.
HyperEVM is an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible environment on the same blockchain. Because it shares consensus and data availability with HyperCore, applications can build around the exchange without leaving the L1.
Both components rely on HyperBFT, a HotStuff-inspired PoS consensus that delivers a consistent transaction order across the entire system. The design aims for low-latency finality while keeping custody and execution onchain.
This structure differs from typical decentralized exchange (DEX) models: automated market makers (AMMs) that rely on liquidity pools or hybrid order-book DEXs that keep orders onchain but match them offchain.
Hyperliquid instead runs its core exchange logic (order books, matching, margin and liquidations) entirely onchain while still enabling EVM-based apps to integrate natively.
The operating model: How 11 people attained CEX speed
Hyperliquid’s organizational design is deliberately lean.
Founder Jeff Yan has said the core team consists of about 11 people, with hiring intentionally selective to maintain speed and cultural cohesion. The emphasis is on a small, coordinated group rather than rapid headcount expansion.
The project is entirely self-funded and has declined venture capital. Yan frames this as aligning ownership with users and keeping priorities independent of investor timelines. This approach also explains the absence of major centralized-exchange listings — the focus remains on technology and community adoption.
Execution follows a tight feedback loop. When an API outage on July 29 disrupted order execution for 37 minutes, the team reimbursed affected traders $1.99 million the next business day. For a DeFi venue, that speed of response stood out as an example of its “ship, fix, own it” mindset.
“Hiring the wrong person is worse than not hiring at all,” said Yan on staying lean.
Together, selective hiring, independence from venture capital and rapid incident management help explain how a small team can operate at a centralized-exchange cadence while keeping custody and execution fully onchain.
The HLP + Assistance Fund flywheel
Protocol mechanisms align trader activity with liquidity provisioning.
Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) vault
HLP is a protocol-managed vault that handles market-making and liquidations on HyperCore. Anyone can deposit capital, with contributors sharing in the vault’s profit and loss (PnL) and a portion of trading fees. By making market-making infrastructure open and rules-based, HLP reduces reliance on the bilateral market-maker deals common elsewhere.
Assistance Fund (fee buybacks)
According to DefiLlama dashboards, 93% of protocol fees flow to the Assistance Fund, which buys back and burns HYPE tokens, while 7% go to HLP. This creates a feedback loop: Higher organic volume funds larger buybacks, reducing token supply, while still allocating a portion to support the vault.
Funding mechanics
Perpetual funding on Hyperliquid is purely peer-to-peer, with no protocol take, paid hourly and capped at 4% per hour.
Rates combine a fixed interest (0.01% per eight hours, prorated hourly) with a variable premium derived from an oracle that aggregates centralized exchange spot prices.
This structure helps keep perpetual prices aligned with spot. Payments are made by both sides of the book, reinforcing risk sharing without embedding yield promises.
Distribution and community
Hyperliquid’s token distribution leaned heavily toward users.
On Nov. 29, 2024, the project launched the HYPE genesis airdrop, distributing about 310 million tokens to early participants. The event coincided with the token’s trading debut, reinforcing a community-first approach. Hyperliquid (HYPE) is used for staking in HyperBFT and for gas payments onchain.
Momentum accelerated in mid-2025 when Phantom Wallet integrated Hyperliquid perpetuals directly in-app. Analysts and media noted a clear boost in flow and adoption.
VanEck’s July report attributed $2.66 billion in trading volume, $1.3 million in fees and roughly 20,900 new users to the Phantom rollout. Separate reporting tracked $1.8 billion in routed volume within the first 16 days.
On the product side, HyperEVM went live on Feb. 18, 2025, enabling general-purpose smart contracts and creating pathways for wallets, vaults and listing processes to integrate around the exchange. That flexibility encouraged outside developers to plug into the ecosystem and supported a steady pipeline of new markets.
Did you know? Hyperliquid’s genesis airdrop distributed around $1.6 billion worth of HYPE across 90,000 users, equal to 31% of the total supply. At peak prices, the average airdrop value exceeded $100,000 per user.
Critiques and risk factors
Decentralization and validator set
In early 2025, researchers and validators raised concerns over validator transparency and centralization. The team acknowledged the issue and said it would make the code open-source after strengthening its security. The team also outlined plans to expand validator participation.
Concentration risk
Hyperliquid’s market share (often estimated at 75%-80% of decentralized perpetuals trading) poses concentration challenges. Commentators highlighted the benefits of network effects but also noted the systemic risks if liquidity shifts or shocks occur at a single venue.
Operational incidents
A 37-minute API outage on July 29 temporarily halted trading. Hyperliquid reimbursed roughly $2 million to users the next day. While the swift refund reinforced its reputation for responsiveness, the event also highlighted the exposure leveraged traders face during outages.
Governance and treasury execution
Observers sometimes scrutinize how protocol-managed vaults allocate capital offchain or across chains, as well as the design of buyback mechanisms. These remain areas of operational risk to watch as Hyperliquid scales.
Did you know? Hyperliquid depends on validator-maintained price oracles. If these oracles are manipulated, it may trigger premature or inaccurate liquidations. To counter this, Hyperliquid limits open interest levels and blocks orders more than 1% away from the oracle price, though the HLP vault is exempt from those restrictions.
Final thoughts: Why Hyperliquid scaled when others stalled
Four factors help explain Hyperliquid’s outsized growth.
First, its execution-first chain design: HyperCore handles onchain matching and margin, while HyperEVM provides composability, both ordered under HyperBFT. Together, this setup delivers near CEX-level latency while keeping custody and state fully onchain.
Second, incentive alignment through fee-funded buybacks (via the Assistance Fund) and the open HLP vault created a reflexive liquidity loop as trading volumes expanded.
Third, maintaining a lean core team of about 11 contributors minimized managerial overhead and kept product cycles fast.
Fourth, distribution advantages (most notably Phantom Wallet’s integration) reduced onboarding friction and expanded reach during a favorable cycle for onchain derivatives.
For those evaluating long-term durability, several watchpoints stand out:
Whether validator decentralization and code open-sourcing progress as promised
How quickly spot markets, central limit order book activity and third-party apps build around HyperEVM
Whether revenue and volume remain resilient as competitors begin adopting similar models.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
The trend of exposure reduction by major Bitcoin network players continues to deepen even as Bitcoin awaits its next major move.
According to Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards, Bitcoin miners are "puking" Bitcoin at a rate not seen since the cryptocurrency traded at $19,000. This trend of Bitcoin liquidation typically happens for one of two reasons, which include a margin squeeze whenever they need cash, but this might not be the case at present. The second reason stated by Edwards could be that they are bearish despite being in profit.
Charles Edwards@caprioleioSep 09, 2025Bitcoin miners are puking Bitcoin, at a rate not seen since $19K.
This typically happens for 1 of 2 reasons:
1) Margin squeeze, they need cash (not so today)
2) They are in profit and bearish
In all cases, price was higher a month later. pic.twitter.com/6fNvINpPNJ
Bitcoin’s mining difficulty, a measure of how difficult it is for miners to solve cryptographic puzzles in Bitcoin mining, has recently hit a new all-time high, coinciding with an increase in the hash rate.
This strength alleviates fears about miners’ net outflows or the lack of profitability gains across the sector.
Silver lining
Despite the concerns, there is no evidence that miners are under immediate pressure to liquidate positions.
In his tweet, Capriole Investments Founder Charles Edwards posted a Bitcoin price chart alongside his tweet, which also showed Bitcoin miner inflows.
A trend is deduced when Bitcoin miner netflows dip into the red, and the price reverses direction, often climbing, hinting at a bullish divergence.
Edwards added that in cases where Bitcoin miners' outflows soared, the price was often higher a month later, indicating a hidden bullish signal.
This shows that when Bitcoin flows out from miners, it is being taken up by corporate reserves, which often counter the negative effects. At press time, Bitcoin was up 1% in the last 24 hours to $112,931.
Hyperliquid is shaking up the crypto world with a bold move: it’s launching its own stablecoin, USDH, and letting the community vote on who will issue it. With $5.6 billion in deposits and potential annual revenue of $220 million, the announcement has drawn top stablecoin issuers into a high-stakes scramble.
Things are getting interesting. Not familiar with what’s happening? Here’s the scoop.
$220M on the Table
Hyperliquid currently relies on USDC, but all the interest earned on these deposits goes to the external issuer. By launching USDH, the exchange could capture the returns itself.
At a short-term Treasury yield of around 4%, the $5.6 billion in reserves could generate roughly $220 million a year – almost three times the revenue of Hyperliquid’s HLP vault.
Lower trading fees on spot pairs and improved liquidity are part of the plan. Hyperliquid hopes this will boost its spot trading volume, strengthen order books, and make the platform more competitive.
Who’s in the Race?
Hyperliquid’s public bidding process is unusual. Normally, stablecoin issuers are pre-selected or in-house. Here, Paxos, Frax Finance, Agora, Native Markets, and Sky (formerly MakerDAO) are competing through a validator vote.
Each brings something different to the table:
Rune@RuneKekSep 08, 2025USDH powered by Sky
The best stablecoin offers so much more than just a stable medium of exchange – it should also deliver highly efficient returns, generated by actively developing, building and growing the ecosystem it lives in.
By using Sky to power USDH, the Hyperliquid…
Governance or Preselection?
Not everyone is convinced the vote is fair. Some community members call it “governance theater,” pointing out that Native Markets submitted its proposal within an hour of the announcement, and Frax followed just ten hours later.
The short, five-day review window leaves questions about how detailed the evaluation can be.
What This Means for Hyperliquid
USDH could bring a major revenue boost and strengthen Hyperliquid’s ecosystem. It could reduce reliance on USDC and improve spot market liquidity.
But replacing USDC won’t be easy. Its long track record and deep liquidity make it the stablecoin of choice for many traders. For now, this remains a high-stakes experiment!
Recently, the MYX price has taken the spotlight in the crypto market. After a strong pump in early September, it again recorded a remarkable surge of nearly 190% in a single day and 1700% on the weekly scale.
At the time of writing, it is trading now above $17.38, MYX crypto has rapidly climbed into the top 100 altcoins, which no expert imagined such a parabolic move would be a rare sight. The growth was directly linked with its bullish momentum fueled by listings, demand, and speculation.
MYX Price Today: Rally Extends With Fresh Listings Today
The MYX price today reflects an extraordinary run, amplified by major listings and increased liquidity.
Similarly, this parabolic rally is possible from a series of bullish factors. These includes the early September WLFI token listing on the MYX exchange and debate around the unlocking of nearly 39 million MYX tokens.
However, the earlier sparked debate over a potential correction when the token traded below $10 has now been delayed, with strong demand observed on the daily chart.
Sep 09, 2025Gate繁體華語@Gate_zw
However, the persistent buying momentum and FOMO defied expectations, driving MYX price toward the $20 level, and, most recently, the addition of MYX to the GATE exchange on September 9 elevated the bullish sentiment. These developments have attracted strong speculative inflows, as the MYX price chart continues to trend steeply upward.
Leveraged Traders Amplify MYX Price Momentum
In parallel with its spot gains, the derivatives market for MYX crypto has exploded. Open interest has surged to record highs, and liquidation data reveal that a massive wave of short positions was wiped out, further accelerating the MYX price USD breakout.
Derivatives volumes show aggressive participation from leveraged traders, intensifying the bullish narrative even as technicals signal caution.
While bullish narratives dominate, indicators like the RSI suggest overheated conditions, raising questions about the sustainability of such rapid gains and shaping short-term MYX price forecast discussions.
Amid the parabolic advance, MYX crypto has established key technical support zones, which may serve as potential resting points if momentum fades. The liquidation heatmap highlights $7.74, $11.85, $14.14, and $16.08 as crucial levels to watch. These supports could help stabilize the MYX price should speculative demand temporarily cool.
A recent Node Package Manager (NPM) attack stole just $50 worth of crypto, but industry experts say the incident highlights ongoing vulnerabilities for exchanges and software wallets.
Charles Guillemet, the chief technology officer of hardware wallet company Ledger, said in a Tuesday X post that the attempted exploit was a “clear reminder” that software wallets and exchanges remain exposed to risks.
If your funds sit in a software wallet or on an exchange, you’re one code execution away from losing everything,” he said, adding that supply-chain compromises remain a powerful malware delivery vector.
Guillemet took the opportunity to advocate for hardware wallets, saying that features like clear signing and transaction checks would help users withstand such threats. “The immediate danger may have passed, but the threat hasn’t. Stay safe,” he added.
Largest NPM attack stole only $50 in crypto
The attack unfolded after hackers acquired credentials using a phishing email sent from a fake NPM support domain.
Using their newly acquired access to developer accounts, the attackers pushed malicious updates to popular libraries. This included chalk, debug strip-ansi and more.
The code they injected attempted to hijack transactions by intercepting wallet addresses and replacing them in network responses across several blockchains, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Tron and Litecoin.
TON CTO breaks down NPM attack
Anatoly Makosov, the chief technology officer of The Open Network (TON), said that only specific versions of 18 packages were compromised and that rollbacks were already published.
Breaking down the mechanics of the attack, Makosov said compromised packages functioned as crypto clippers, which silently spoofed wallet addresses in products that relied on the infected versions.
This means web apps interacting with the aforementioned chains risked having their transactions intercepted and redirected without the knowledge of the users.
He said that developers who pushed their builds within hours of the malicious updates and apps that auto-update their code libraries instead of freezing them to a safe version were the most exposed.
Makosov shared a checklist on how developers can check if their apps were compromised. The main sign is whether the code is using one of 18 versions of popular libraries like ansi-styles, chalk or debug. He said if a project relies on these versions, it’s likely compromised.
He said the fix is to switch back to safe versions, reinstall clean code and rebuild applications. He added that new and updated releases are already available and urged developers to act quickly to clear out the malware before it can affect their users.
On-chain data shared by the @XRPwallets analytics account on the X platform shows that there is now one fewer cold XRP wallet at the largest U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase.
According to the tweet, the number of cold XRP wallets at Coinbase has been falling quickly, along with the XRP stash held in those wallets.
Minus 16.5 million XRP at Coinbase
The XRP-focused analytics account @XRPwallets shared that over the past 24 hours, Coinbase has seen another 16.5 million XRP leave it into the ether from a cold wallet.
Instead of the eight cold wallets remaining today, Sept. 9, there are only seven wallets with 16.5 million XRP in each of them.
XRP_Liquidity (Larsen/Britto/Escrow/ODL/RLUSD)@XRPwalletsSep 09, 20257 Cold Wallets Remaining at 16.5M XRP each https://t.co/02lO6GOPaO pic.twitter.com/GHfm5w9wn8
Three months ago, on June 9, the same account had tracked 52 cold wallets in total at Coinbase. Ten wallets among them contained 26.8 million XRP each, and 42 wallets held 16.5 million XRP each. Now, instead of 42 wallets with this amount of XRP, there are only seven remaining at Coinbase.
BlackRock uses XRP but does not launch ETF
As reported by U.Today earlier, this summer, the world’s largest wealth management company, BlackRock, inked a collaboration with the aforementioned crypto exchange, Coinbase. This platform is not only a custodian for its spot Bitcoin ETF. As of this summer, Coinbase began providing XRP to institutional customers of BlackRock’s investment firm, Aladdin.
The firm started offering Bitcoin services only, but now it has expanded its range of products. While BlackRock is using XRP in this way, it does not have plans so far to launch a spot XRP ETF, even though it has already rolled out ETFs based on Bitcoin and Ethereum.
But some experts believe that BlackRock’s rejection of this ETF might not last long.
Bitcoin and Ethereum are holding steady as optimism over potential U.S. rate cuts drives a cautiously bullish mood in the crypto market. Bitcoin has managed to sustain levels above $112K, reflecting resilience despite recent macro headwinds, while Ethereum trades around $4,300, showing relative stability amid mixed altcoin performance. Investors are increasingly pricing in Federal Reserve easing this month, with expectations ranging from a 25 bps to a 50 bps cut. This growing rate-cut optimism is fueling liquidity-driven bets, though caution remains ahead of the Fed’s September decision.
Bitcoin Breaks the Resistance
The BTC price has broken an important resistance zone, which validates a revival of a bullish trend. The token is consolidating above $112,000, a zone that has emerged as near-term support. In the times when the price was expected to test the support of the descending parallel channel, the potential rate cut has turned into a huge bullish catalyst. Now the question arises whether the current upswing is short-lived.
The Bollinger bands are going parallel, while the OBV continues to descend, which suggests the bears are holding a notable dominance. However, a resistance has formed around $115K to $117K, where profit-taking could intensify. A confirmed breakout above this region may open the door for a rally toward $120K, while a failure could drag the levels close to $110K. The market is showing signs of accumulation, but the traders remain cautious given the potential for volatility around FED announcements.
Ethereum Price Remains Stable
Ethereum is holding around $4,300, supported by steady institutional interest and ongoing ecosystem growth. Meanwhile, the price has been consolidating within a very narrow range since the start of the month and failing to rise above $4500. Now that the short-term resistance lies near $4,450, there is strong support around $4,200. Now the question arises whether the tight consolidation will lead towards a macro trigger.
The ETH price seems to be consolidating within a predefined resistance and support, as it did before. A massive upswing followed that elevated the levels to a new ATH. Currently, the price is consolidating within a similar pattern, while the bulls are trying for a trend reversal. As the MACD suggests a potential bullish crossover, the ETH price is expected to undergo a parabolic recovery and rise by another 10% to 12% to mark a new ATH.
Besides, altcoins such as XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin have shown sharper gains compared to BTC and ETH, reflecting higher beta behavior in response to rate-cut speculation. However, these moves remain largely range-bound, signalling that investors are not yet in full risk-on mode.
The crypto market’s trajectory in September hinges heavily on the Fed’s rate decision. While Bitcoin and Ethereum are showing stability, volatility is expected to rise as investors react to policy signals. A dovish Fed could reinforce bullish momentum, pushing BTC toward $120K and ETH closer to $4,600. On the other hand, a smaller-than-expected cut—or cautious Fed guidance—may trigger short-term pullbacks.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up