- USDX
- XAUUSD
- XAGUSD
- WTI
行情
分析
用户
快讯
财经日历
学习
数据
- 名称
- 最新值
- 前值












VIP跟单
所有跟单
所有比赛



美国ISM非制造业库存指数 (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国ISM非制造业新订单指数 (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国ISM非制造业物价指数 (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国当周EIA天然气库存变动公:--
预: --
前: --
美国克利夫兰联储主席哈马克发表讲话
美国当周外国央行持有美国国债公:--
预: --
前: --
德国建筑业PMI (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
意大利零售销售月率 (季调后) (7月)公:--
预: --
英国Markit/CIPS建筑业PMI (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
英国央行行长贝利发表讲话
欧元区零售销售月率 (7月)公:--
预: --
欧元区零售销售年率 (7月)公:--
预: --
欧洲央行首席经济学家连恩发表讲话
加拿大就业人数 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国政府就业人数 (8月)公:--
预: --
美国每周平均工时 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国非农就业人数 (私营部门) (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
加拿大兼职就业人数 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
加拿大失业率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
加拿大就业参与率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
加拿大全职就业人数 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国失业率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国非农就业人数 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
美国每小时平均工资年率 (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国每小时平均工资月率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
美国U6失业率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国制造业就业人数 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
美国就业参与率 (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
加拿大Ivey PMI (未季调) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
加拿大Ivey PMI (季调后) (8月)公:--
预: --
前: --
美国当周钻井总数公:--
预: --
前: --
美国当周石油钻井总数公:--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆外汇储备 (8月)--
预: --
前: --
日本外汇储备 (8月)--
预: --
前: --
日本领先指标初值 (7月)--
预: --
前: --
英国Halifax房价指数年率 (季调后) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
英国Halifax房价指数月率 (季调后) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
德国工业产出月率 (季调后) (7月)--
预: --
前: --
欧元区Sentix投资者信心指数 (9月)--
预: --
前: --
欧元区GDP年率修正值 (第二季度)--
预: --
前: --
欧元区就业人数季率初值 (季调后) (第二季度)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆进口额年率 (人民币) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆出口额年率 (美元) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆进口额年率 (美元) (8月)--
预: --
中国大陆贸易账 (人民币) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆进口额 (人民币) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆贸易账 (美元) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
中国大陆出口额 (8月)--
预: --
前: --
英国BRC总体零售销售年率 (8月)--
预: --
前: --
英国BRC同店零售销售年率 (8月)--
预: --
前: --
日本工资月率 (7月)--
预: --
前: --
日本贸易账 (7月)--
预: --
前: --
日本名义GDP季率修正值 (第二季度)--
预: --
前: --
德国出口月率 (季调后) (7月)--
预: --
前: --
法国贸易账 (季调后) (7月)--
预: --
前: --
南非GDP年率 (第二季度)--
预: --
前: --
美国NFIB小型企业信心指数 (季调后) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
加拿大全国经济信心指数--
预: --
前: --
美国谘商会就业趋势指数 (季调后) (8月)--
预: --
前: --
美国3年期国债拍卖收益率--
预: --
前: --
美国消费信贷 (季调后) (7月)--
预: --
前: --














































无匹配数据
A Hyperliquid user operating wallet address 0x0cdC…E955 has lost $21 million worth of crypto to hackers, following a private key breach.
Blockchain security specialists at of stolen assets through on-chain analysis, revealing that the attackers quickly moved to transfer the compromised funds to the Ethereum network.
The stolen haul included approximately 17.75 million DAI tokens and 3.11 million MSYRUPUSDP tokens.
PeckShield’s investigation included visual evidence in the form of screenshots that map out various wallet addresses implicated in the theft.
A victim 0x0cdC…E955 lost ~$21M worth of cryptos on due to a private key leak. The hacker has bridged the stolen funds to , including 17.75M & 3.11M . — PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert)
The data shows a clear trail of stolen tokens being systematically transferred and redistributed . This methodology closely mirrors the tactics employed by cybercriminals in previous high-profile cryptocurrency thefts.$16M Long Trade Close Links to the Hyperliquid Private Key Breach
A mysterious aspect of the hacking incident involves the timing of certain trading activities.
Precisely when PeckShield issued its initial alert about the breach, show that a Hyperliquid account executed a closure of a HYPE long position valued at $16 million. Source:
This same account also liquidated 100,000 HYPE coins, converting them into $4.4 million.
Researchers at MLM of transaction records from Hypurrscan and have put forward the theory that this trading account likely belongs to the compromised user.
Their reasoning centers on the observation that these newly acquired assets were converted into the stablecoins USDC and DAI, then spanning both the Ethereum and Arbitrum blockchain networks.
This transaction pattern correlates closely with the movement data that PeckShield .
The scope of the attack wasn’t limited to assets held directly on the Hyperliquid platform.
Investigation findings reveal that the attacker also successfully extracted $3.1 million from the Plasma Syrup Vault liquidity pool. Source:
These funds, denominated in MSYRUPUSDP tokens, were immediately relocated to a freshly created wallet address.
Luke Cannon, a prominent voice on X (formerly Twitter), has suggested that the victim’s losses may be even more extensive.
According to , an additional $300,000 may have been drained from associated wallet addresses that the hacker managed to compromise.Similar Hacking Incidents On Hyperliquid Paint a Troubling Picture
Another Hyperliquid user that he lost $700k in HYPE in a similar incident last month.
According to him, he’s not sure how he was hacked, “No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download,” he added.
Lost 700k in hype in a similar incident last month. Not sure how they hacked. No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download.— BRVX (@TradeThreads)
He the hack was most likely achieved through Windows malware, as he hadn’t touched crypto wallets in a week prior to the hack and had gotten a new MacBook, too, but the wallet wasn’t set up on it.
Unlike smart contract bugs or exchange exploits, this attack happened because of a private key leak.
That means the attacker gained direct access to the wallet’s login credentials. Such leaks often occur due to phishing links, malware, or unsafe key storage.
Security experts have long warned that high-value accounts should always use cold wallets or multi-signature protection to prevent such incidents.
🥸 Blockstream issued an urgent security alert warning users about a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting Jade hardware wallet owners through fake firmware update emails. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews)
But it seems users continue to fall victim to these exploits.A Pattern of Private Key Breaches
Just a few weeks ago, SFUND, the official token of Seedify, plummeted by 99% after North Korean hackers extracted $1.2 million from the DAO launchpad by gaining access to a Seedify developer’s private keys.
Similarly, in September, a user of the Venus lending protocol on BNB Chain lost assets worth about $27 million due to a private key breach.
According to a report by blockchain security firm CertiK, last year alone saw a loss of $2.36 billion in total across 760 on-chain security incidents.
A whopping $1.05 billion was lost to private key breaches through over 296 incidents, accounting for 39% of the total number of attacks suffered in crypto.Source:
Private key breach through phishing is popular due to its simplicity and effectiveness, the report says.
It is less about technological defenses and more about human vulnerability.
Blockchain transactions make phishing “particularly devastating” as they are irreversible.
It’s also observed that Ethereum saw the most security incidents overall, with , scams, and exploits, followed by Binance Smart Chain (BSC), the second-most targeted chain when it comes to phishing scams.Source: Certik
But now it seems Hyperliquid, as a result of its decentralized nature, is also getting into the mix for hackers and bad actors.
交易股票、货币、商品、期货、债券、基金等金融工具或加密货币属高风险行为,这些风险包括损失您的部分或全部投资金额,所以交易并非适合所有投资者。
做出任何财务决定时,应该进行自己的尽职调查,运用自己的判断力,并咨询合格的顾问。本网站的内容并非直接针对您,我们也未考虑您的财务状况或需求。本网站所含信息不一定是实时提供的,也不一定是准确的。本站提供的价格可能由做市商而非交易所提供。您做出的任何交易或其他财务决定均应完全由您负责,并且您不得依赖通过网站提供的任何信息。我们不对网站中的任何信息提供任何保证,并且对因使用网站中的任何信息而可能造成的任何交易损失不承担任何责任。
未经本站书面许可,禁止使用、存储、复制、展现、修改、传播或分发本网站所含数据。提供本网站所含数据的供应商及交易所保留其所有知识产权。