FastBull BrokersView

登錄
Deriv unlawfully withheld USD 26,455 for 13 months, refunded only after regulatory pressure — compensation still unresolved
查看翻譯
Mahammad Monjurul Islam
印度 2025-09-15
相關交易商:
Deriv
監管機構: VFSC,SVG FSA,MFSA,Labuan FSA
維權: 交易損失賠償,資金回收,其他
維權金額: $26,455
進度: 已回复
評論1
Mahammad Monjurul Islam 補充投訴
2025-09-18

Account verified on 11th August 2025 by deriv contradiction with July 2024 false fraud & document temper aligation

查看翻譯
Mahammad Monjurul Islam 補充投訴
2025-09-18

Regulatory escalation & compensation filed 30th August 2025

查看翻譯
Mahammad Monjurul Islam 補充投訴
2025-09-18

here 1) account disabled on 29th July 2024 2) Full disabled and fraud allegation.16th aug 2024 3) Unauthorised withdrawal $20022. 14th aug 2024 4) Unauthorised withdrawal Usdt $6426. 14th aug 2024 5) first formal complaint to deriv. 5th aug 2025 6) Final refusal to release fund . 27th aug 2025 7) Regulatory escalation & compensation filed 30th aug 2025. 8) Refund Acceptance. 1st Sep 2025 9) Compensation declined & Regulatory contradiction to me (SVG) 8th sep 2025. 10) To MFSA/LFSA (BVI)

查看翻譯
BrokersView BrokersView回复
2025-09-18
Dear Mahammad Monjurul Islam,
We have received your complaint and conveyed to Deriv, if any response, we will immediately inform you.
Could you please provide some screenshots of proof to support your complaint? 
You may add proofs in your complaint.
We are looking forward to hearing from you.
Best regards
BrokersView Team
service@brokersview.com
查看翻譯
Mahammad Monjurul Islam 補充投訴
2025-09-15
On 14 Sept 2025, I wrote to Holiston Media (Global Forex Awards) asking them to review Deriv’s award status for breaching transparency and ethics. I explained my funds were withheld 13 months, I was coerced into filing ITR, deadlines were missed, and compensation denied. Deriv replied with a generic template, thanking me, apologizing, and saying the “team is looking into it,” without addressing any of my points.
查看翻譯
Mahammad Monjurul Islam 發起投訴
2025-09-15
Complaint Content: In my experience, Deriv uses its Terms & Conditions mainly as a tool to defend itself when challenged, rather than as a fair framework to safeguard its clients. My case shows how Deriv withheld funds, made false allegations, and shifted jurisdictions until regulators intervened. --- Case Timeline 1. 29 July 2024 – Account Disabled & Funds Withheld My account (CR5427736) was suddenly disabled with false fraud allegations, trapping USD 26,455. 2. 14 August 2024 – Unauthorized Withdrawal Deriv unilaterally withdrew the entire balance of USD 26,455 without my consent, later shifting it into an SVG wallet structure. 3. 5 August 2025 – Formal Complaint Filed After one year of waiting, I lodged a formal complaint demanding refund. 4. 11 August 2025 – Account Verified Deriv confirmed my account was fully verified and authenticated, promising refund within 1–3 working days (as also confirmed in live chats with Lorick and Romeo). 5. 11–16 August 2025 – Missed Deadline Despite repeated assurances from multiple agents (Lorick, Romeo, Boon) that my refund was in process, Deriv missed its own deadline of 16 August 2025, forcing me to issue a Final Warning. 6. 22–27 August 2025 – ITR Coercion, Health Disclosure & Final Refusal On 22 August 2025, during a Zoom call, I explicitly informed SVP Gemma Doyle about my health conditions and the stress this prolonged dispute was causing. Despite this, Deriv continued to pressure me to provide unnecessary documents beyond its Terms. Under this pressure, on 23 August 2025, I submitted my Income Tax Return (ITR) — even though filing was not mandatory in my jurisdiction and not required under Deriv’s Terms. Still, on 27 August 2025, Deriv issued a final refusal to release the refund. 7. 27 August 2025 – Regulatory Escalation & Compensation Claim I escalated to LFSA, MFSA, BVIFSC, FSC Mauritius, SVGFSA, and SCA Dubai and filed a formal compensation claim citing emotional distress, lost investment opportunity, and pu
查看翻譯

評論1