
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has identified significant gaps in Meta’s ability to block illegal financial promotions, raising fresh concerns over scam exposure on social media platforms.
According to findings reviewed by Reuters, more than 1,050 unauthorised ads promoting high-risk financial products—including forex trading and contracts for difference (CFDs)—were published across platforms operated by Meta Platforms within a single week in November. Notably, 56% of these ads originated from advertisers already flagged to the company.
The regulator has repeatedly warned that social media remains a primary distribution channel for online investment scams, particularly those involving leveraged trading products. CFDs, in particular, are considered high-risk due to their complexity and the potential for losses exceeding initial deposits.
Despite a 2022 voluntary commitment by Meta Platforms to restrict financial advertising in the UK to authorised firms only, the FCA said it has seen no material improvement in enforcement outcomes. A follow-up review conducted in December reportedly produced similar results, with repeat offenders continuing to dominate illegal ad activity.
The issue is compounded by a regulatory gap. While the UK’s Online Safety Act allows for substantial fines on platforms hosting illegal user-generated content, enforcement powers over paid scam advertisements have been delayed until at least 2027. This has left regulators with limited authority to directly sanction platforms.
Market participants have raised concerns over the scale of exposure. Data suggests that over half of sampled financial ads referencing major banks may contain scam indicators, pointing to systemic weaknesses in ad screening mechanisms.
BrokersView calls on authorities and industry stakeholders to strengthen platform accountability, as financial scams increasingly exploit paid advertising channels to reach retail investors at scale.