- GBPUSD
- XAUUSD
- XAGUSD
- WTI
- USDX
行情
分析
使用者
快訊
財經日曆
學習
數據
- 名稱
- 最新值
- 前值












VIP跟單
所有跟單
所有比賽



英國服務業PMI初值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
英國綜合PMI初值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
俄羅斯關鍵利率公:--
預: --
前: --
印度存款增長年增率公:--
預: --
前: --
墨西哥經濟活動指數年增率 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大零售銷售月增率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
加拿大核心零售銷售月增率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
美國IHS Markit 服務業PMI初值 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國IHS Markit 綜合PMI初值 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國IHS Markit 製造業PMI初值 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國密西根大學消費者預期指數終值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國密西根大學消費者信心指數終值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國密歇根大學一年期通膨率預期終值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國密西根大學現況指數終值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當周石油鑽井總數公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當週鑽井總數公:--
預: --
前: --
美國總統川普發表演說
德國IFO商業景氣指數 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
德國IFO商業現況指數 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
德國IFO商業預期指數 (季調後) (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
英國CBI零售銷售預期指數 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
英國CBI零售銷售差值 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
巴西貿易經常帳 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大全國經濟信心指數公:--
預: --
前: --
美國芝加哥聯邦儲備銀行全國活動指數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國達拉斯聯邦儲備銀行新訂單指數 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國達拉斯聯邦儲備銀行商業活動指數 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國2年期公債拍賣平均殖利率公:--
預: --
前: --
韓國GDP季增率初值 (季調後) (第三季度)公:--
預: --
前: --
英國BRC商店物價指數年增率 (10月)公:--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸工業利潤年增率 (年初至今) (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
歐元區M3貨幣供應量年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區三個月M3貨幣供應量年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區私營部門信貸年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
德國2年期Schatz公債拍賣平均殖利率--
預: --
前: --
巴西貿易經常帳 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
墨西哥貿易帳 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
巴西PPI月增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國耐用品訂單月增率 (不含國防 ) (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國非國防資本耐用品訂單月增率 (不含飛機) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國耐用品訂單月增率 (不含運輸) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國耐用品訂單月增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國當周紅皮書同店零售銷售指數年增率--
預: --
前: --
美國S&P/CS20座大城市房價指數 (未季調) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國標普/CS10座大城市房價指數月增率 (未季調) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國聯邦住房金融局 (FHFA) 房價指數 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國FHFA房價指數年增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國標普/CS10座大城市房價指數年增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國標普/CS20座大城市房價指數月增率 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國標普/CS20座大城市房價指數年增率 (未季調) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國FHFA房價指數月增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國標普/CS20座大城市房價指數月增率 (未季調) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國諮商會消費者信心指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國年度新屋銷售總數 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國里奇蒙聯邦儲備銀行服務業收入指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國里奇蒙聯邦儲備銀行製造業裝船指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國諮商會消費者預期指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國諮商會消費者現況指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國新屋銷售年化月率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國里奇蒙聯邦儲備銀行製造業綜合指數 (10月)--
預: --
前: --
美國5年期公債拍賣平均殖利率--
預: --
前: --




















































無匹配數據
A Hyperliquid user operating wallet address 0x0cdC…E955 has lost $21 million worth of crypto to hackers, following a private key breach.
Blockchain security specialists at of stolen assets through on-chain analysis, revealing that the attackers quickly moved to transfer the compromised funds to the Ethereum network.
The stolen haul included approximately 17.75 million DAI tokens and 3.11 million MSYRUPUSDP tokens.
PeckShield’s investigation included visual evidence in the form of screenshots that map out various wallet addresses implicated in the theft.
A victim 0x0cdC…E955 lost ~$21M worth of cryptos on due to a private key leak. The hacker has bridged the stolen funds to , including 17.75M & 3.11M . — PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert)
The data shows a clear trail of stolen tokens being systematically transferred and redistributed . This methodology closely mirrors the tactics employed by cybercriminals in previous high-profile cryptocurrency thefts.$16M Long Trade Close Links to the Hyperliquid Private Key Breach
A mysterious aspect of the hacking incident involves the timing of certain trading activities.
Precisely when PeckShield issued its initial alert about the breach, show that a Hyperliquid account executed a closure of a HYPE long position valued at $16 million. Source:
This same account also liquidated 100,000 HYPE coins, converting them into $4.4 million.
Researchers at MLM of transaction records from Hypurrscan and have put forward the theory that this trading account likely belongs to the compromised user.
Their reasoning centers on the observation that these newly acquired assets were converted into the stablecoins USDC and DAI, then spanning both the Ethereum and Arbitrum blockchain networks.
This transaction pattern correlates closely with the movement data that PeckShield .
The scope of the attack wasn’t limited to assets held directly on the Hyperliquid platform.
Investigation findings reveal that the attacker also successfully extracted $3.1 million from the Plasma Syrup Vault liquidity pool. Source:
These funds, denominated in MSYRUPUSDP tokens, were immediately relocated to a freshly created wallet address.
Luke Cannon, a prominent voice on X (formerly Twitter), has suggested that the victim’s losses may be even more extensive.
According to , an additional $300,000 may have been drained from associated wallet addresses that the hacker managed to compromise.Similar Hacking Incidents On Hyperliquid Paint a Troubling Picture
Another Hyperliquid user that he lost $700k in HYPE in a similar incident last month.
According to him, he’s not sure how he was hacked, “No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download,” he added.
Lost 700k in hype in a similar incident last month. Not sure how they hacked. No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download.— BRVX (@TradeThreads)
He the hack was most likely achieved through Windows malware, as he hadn’t touched crypto wallets in a week prior to the hack and had gotten a new MacBook, too, but the wallet wasn’t set up on it.
Unlike smart contract bugs or exchange exploits, this attack happened because of a private key leak.
That means the attacker gained direct access to the wallet’s login credentials. Such leaks often occur due to phishing links, malware, or unsafe key storage.
Security experts have long warned that high-value accounts should always use cold wallets or multi-signature protection to prevent such incidents.
🥸 Blockstream issued an urgent security alert warning users about a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting Jade hardware wallet owners through fake firmware update emails. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews)
But it seems users continue to fall victim to these exploits.A Pattern of Private Key Breaches
Just a few weeks ago, SFUND, the official token of Seedify, plummeted by 99% after North Korean hackers extracted $1.2 million from the DAO launchpad by gaining access to a Seedify developer’s private keys.
Similarly, in September, a user of the Venus lending protocol on BNB Chain lost assets worth about $27 million due to a private key breach.
According to a report by blockchain security firm CertiK, last year alone saw a loss of $2.36 billion in total across 760 on-chain security incidents.
A whopping $1.05 billion was lost to private key breaches through over 296 incidents, accounting for 39% of the total number of attacks suffered in crypto.Source:
Private key breach through phishing is popular due to its simplicity and effectiveness, the report says.
It is less about technological defenses and more about human vulnerability.
Blockchain transactions make phishing “particularly devastating” as they are irreversible.
It’s also observed that Ethereum saw the most security incidents overall, with , scams, and exploits, followed by Binance Smart Chain (BSC), the second-most targeted chain when it comes to phishing scams.Source: Certik
But now it seems Hyperliquid, as a result of its decentralized nature, is also getting into the mix for hackers and bad actors.
交易股票、貨幣、商品、期貨、債券、基金等金融工具或加密貨幣屬高風險行為,這些風險包括損失您的部分或全部投資金額,所以交易並非適合所有投資者。
做出任何財務決定時,應該進行自己的盡職調查,運用自己的判斷力,並諮詢合格的顧問。本網站的內容並非直接針對您,我們也未考慮您的財務狀況或需求。本網站所含資訊不一定是即時提供的,也不一定是準確的。本站提供的價格可能由造市商而非交易所提供。您做出的任何交易或其他財務決定均應完全由您負責,並且您不得依賴通過網站提供的任何資訊。我們不對網站中的任何資訊提供任何保證,並且對因使用網站中的任何資訊而可能造成的任何交易損失不承擔任何責任。
未經本站書面許可,禁止使用、儲存、複製、展現、修改、傳播或分發本網站所含數據。提供本網站所含數據的供應商及交易所保留其所有知識產權。