- USDX
- XAUUSD
- XAGUSD
- WTI
行情
分析
使用者
快訊
財經日曆
學習
數據
- 名稱
- 最新值
- 前值












VIP跟單
所有跟單
所有比賽



美國ISM非製造業庫存指數 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM非製造業新訂單指數 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM非製造業物價指數 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當週EIA天然氣庫存變動公:--
預: --
前: --
美國克里夫蘭聯邦儲備銀行主席哈馬克發表講話
美國當週外國央行持有美國公債公:--
預: --
前: --
德國建築業PMI (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
意大利零售銷售月增率 (季調後) (7月)公:--
預: --
英國Markit/CIPS建築業PMI (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
英國央行行長貝利發表演說
歐元區零售銷售月增率 (7月)公:--
預: --
歐元區零售銷售年增率 (7月)公:--
預: --
歐洲央行首席經濟學家連恩發表講話
加拿大就業人數 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國政府就業人數 (8月)公:--
預: --
美國每周平均工時 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國非農就業人數 (私營部門 ) (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
加拿大兼職就業人數 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大失業率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大就業參與率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大全職就業人數 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國失業率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國非農就業人數 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
美國每小時平均工資年增率 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國每小時平均工資月增率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
美國U6失業率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國製造業就業人數 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
美國就業參與率 (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大Ivey PMI (未季調) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
加拿大Ivey PMI (季調後) (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當週鑽井總數公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當周石油鑽井總數公:--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸外匯存底 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
日本外匯存底 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
日本領先指標初值 (7月)--
預: --
前: --
英國Halifax房價指數年增率 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
英國Halifax房價指數月增率 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
德國工業產出月增率 (季調後) (7月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區Sentix投資者信心指數 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區GDP年增率修正值 (第二季度)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區就業人數季增率初值 (季調後) (第二季度)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸進口額年增率 (人民幣) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸出口額年增率 (美元) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸進口額年增率 (美元) (8月)--
預: --
中國大陸貿易帳 (人民幣) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸進口額 (人民幣) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸貿易帳 (美元) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
中國大陸出口額 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
英國BRC總體零售銷售年增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
英國BRC同店零售銷售年增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
日本工資月增率 (7月)--
預: --
前: --
日本貿易帳 (7月)--
預: --
前: --
日本名義GDP季增率修正值 (第二季度)--
預: --
前: --
德國出口月率 (季調後) (7月)--
預: --
前: --
法國貿易帳 (季調後) (7月)--
預: --
前: --
南非GDP年增率 (第二季度)--
預: --
前: --
美國NFIB小型企業信心指數 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
加拿大全國經濟信心指數--
預: --
前: --
美國諮商會就業趨勢指數 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國3年期公債拍賣殖利率--
預: --
前: --
美國消費信貸 (季調後) (7月)--
預: --
前: --














































無匹配數據
A Hyperliquid user operating wallet address 0x0cdC…E955 has lost $21 million worth of crypto to hackers, following a private key breach.
Blockchain security specialists at of stolen assets through on-chain analysis, revealing that the attackers quickly moved to transfer the compromised funds to the Ethereum network.
The stolen haul included approximately 17.75 million DAI tokens and 3.11 million MSYRUPUSDP tokens.
PeckShield’s investigation included visual evidence in the form of screenshots that map out various wallet addresses implicated in the theft.
A victim 0x0cdC…E955 lost ~$21M worth of cryptos on due to a private key leak. The hacker has bridged the stolen funds to , including 17.75M & 3.11M . — PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert)
The data shows a clear trail of stolen tokens being systematically transferred and redistributed . This methodology closely mirrors the tactics employed by cybercriminals in previous high-profile cryptocurrency thefts.$16M Long Trade Close Links to the Hyperliquid Private Key Breach
A mysterious aspect of the hacking incident involves the timing of certain trading activities.
Precisely when PeckShield issued its initial alert about the breach, show that a Hyperliquid account executed a closure of a HYPE long position valued at $16 million. Source:
This same account also liquidated 100,000 HYPE coins, converting them into $4.4 million.
Researchers at MLM of transaction records from Hypurrscan and have put forward the theory that this trading account likely belongs to the compromised user.
Their reasoning centers on the observation that these newly acquired assets were converted into the stablecoins USDC and DAI, then spanning both the Ethereum and Arbitrum blockchain networks.
This transaction pattern correlates closely with the movement data that PeckShield .
The scope of the attack wasn’t limited to assets held directly on the Hyperliquid platform.
Investigation findings reveal that the attacker also successfully extracted $3.1 million from the Plasma Syrup Vault liquidity pool. Source:
These funds, denominated in MSYRUPUSDP tokens, were immediately relocated to a freshly created wallet address.
Luke Cannon, a prominent voice on X (formerly Twitter), has suggested that the victim’s losses may be even more extensive.
According to , an additional $300,000 may have been drained from associated wallet addresses that the hacker managed to compromise.Similar Hacking Incidents On Hyperliquid Paint a Troubling Picture
Another Hyperliquid user that he lost $700k in HYPE in a similar incident last month.
According to him, he’s not sure how he was hacked, “No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download,” he added.
Lost 700k in hype in a similar incident last month. Not sure how they hacked. No malware, no discord chats, no TG calls, no email download.— BRVX (@TradeThreads)
He the hack was most likely achieved through Windows malware, as he hadn’t touched crypto wallets in a week prior to the hack and had gotten a new MacBook, too, but the wallet wasn’t set up on it.
Unlike smart contract bugs or exchange exploits, this attack happened because of a private key leak.
That means the attacker gained direct access to the wallet’s login credentials. Such leaks often occur due to phishing links, malware, or unsafe key storage.
Security experts have long warned that high-value accounts should always use cold wallets or multi-signature protection to prevent such incidents.
🥸 Blockstream issued an urgent security alert warning users about a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting Jade hardware wallet owners through fake firmware update emails. — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews)
But it seems users continue to fall victim to these exploits.A Pattern of Private Key Breaches
Just a few weeks ago, SFUND, the official token of Seedify, plummeted by 99% after North Korean hackers extracted $1.2 million from the DAO launchpad by gaining access to a Seedify developer’s private keys.
Similarly, in September, a user of the Venus lending protocol on BNB Chain lost assets worth about $27 million due to a private key breach.
According to a report by blockchain security firm CertiK, last year alone saw a loss of $2.36 billion in total across 760 on-chain security incidents.
A whopping $1.05 billion was lost to private key breaches through over 296 incidents, accounting for 39% of the total number of attacks suffered in crypto.Source:
Private key breach through phishing is popular due to its simplicity and effectiveness, the report says.
It is less about technological defenses and more about human vulnerability.
Blockchain transactions make phishing “particularly devastating” as they are irreversible.
It’s also observed that Ethereum saw the most security incidents overall, with , scams, and exploits, followed by Binance Smart Chain (BSC), the second-most targeted chain when it comes to phishing scams.Source: Certik
But now it seems Hyperliquid, as a result of its decentralized nature, is also getting into the mix for hackers and bad actors.
交易股票、貨幣、商品、期貨、債券、基金等金融工具或加密貨幣屬高風險行為,這些風險包括損失您的部分或全部投資金額,所以交易並非適合所有投資者。
做出任何財務決定時,應該進行自己的盡職調查,運用自己的判斷力,並諮詢合格的顧問。本網站的內容並非直接針對您,我們也未考慮您的財務狀況或需求。本網站所含資訊不一定是即時提供的,也不一定是準確的。本站提供的價格可能由造市商而非交易所提供。您做出的任何交易或其他財務決定均應完全由您負責,並且您不得依賴通過網站提供的任何資訊。我們不對網站中的任何資訊提供任何保證,並且對因使用網站中的任何資訊而可能造成的任何交易損失不承擔任何責任。
未經本站書面許可,禁止使用、儲存、複製、展現、修改、傳播或分發本網站所含數據。提供本網站所含數據的供應商及交易所保留其所有知識產權。