- EURUSD
- XAUUSD
- XAGUSD
- WTI
- USDX
行情
分析
使用者
快訊
財經日曆
學習
數據
- 名稱
- 最新值
- 前值












VIP跟單
所有跟單
所有比賽


川普:上一次激進左翼民主黨人掌權時,他們為你們帶來了美國歷史上最嚴重通膨、美國歷史上最高能源價格、美國歷史上最嚴重的貿易逆差,他們讓2500萬人湧入我們的邊境……如果他們在中期選舉中獲勝,他們會再次把這一切重演。

歐元區失業率 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國企業雇主宣告裁員月增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國企業雇主宣告裁員人數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國企業雇主宣告裁員年增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國當周初請失業金人數 (季調後)公:--
預: --
美國當周初請失業金人數四週均值 (季調後)公:--
預: --
美國當周續請失業金人數 (季調後)公:--
預: --
巴西IHS Markit 製造業PMI (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
里奇蒙聯儲主席巴爾金、波士頓聯邦儲備銀行主席柯林斯、堪薩斯聯邦儲備銀行主席施密德發表演說
加拿大製造業PMI (季調後) (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
歐洲央行行長拉加德發表演說
美國IHS Markit 製造業PMI終值 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM製造業PMI (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM製造業就業指數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM製造業新訂單指數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM庫存指數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國ISM產出指數 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國建築支出月增率 (8月)公:--
預: --
聯準會理事沃勒發表講話
美國當週EIA天然氣庫存變動公:--
預: --
前: --
墨西哥製造業PMI (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
美國紐約聯邦儲備銀行主席威廉斯發表講話
美國當週外國央行持有美國公債公:--
預: --
前: --
韓國CPI年增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本求職者比率 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本東京核心CPI年增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本東京CPI年增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本失業率 (8月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本東京CPI月增率 (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本東京CPI月增率 (不含食品與能源) (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
日本基礎貨幣年增率 (季調後) (9月)公:--
預: --
前: --
意大利零售銷售月增率 (季調後) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區HICP年增率初值 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區核心消費者物價指數 (CPI) 年增率初值 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
歐元區核心消費者物價指數 (CPI) 月增率初值 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
印度存款增長年增率--
預: --
前: --
美國政府就業人數 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國失業率 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國非農就業人數 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國每小時平均工資年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國每小時平均工資月增率 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國U6失業率 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國製造業就業人數 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國就業參與率 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國每周平均工時 (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國非農就業人數 (私營部門 ) (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --
美國工廠訂單月增率 (不含國防) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國工廠訂單月增率 (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國工廠訂單月增率 (不含運輸) (8月)--
預: --
前: --
美國當周石油鑽井總數--
預: --
前: --
美國當週鑽井總數--
預: --
前: --
當澳洲開始進入夏令時,其金融市場交易時間及經濟數據公佈時間將較冬令時提早一小時
澳洲服務業PMI初值 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
日本IHS Markit 綜合PMI (9月)--
預: --
前: --
日本IHS Markit 服務業PMI (9月)--
預: --
前: --
沙地阿拉伯IHS Markit 綜合PMI (9月)--
預: --
前: --
日本家庭消費者信心指數 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
俄羅斯IHS Markit 服務業PMI (9月)--
預: --
前: --
土耳其CPI年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
土耳其PPI年增率 (9月)--
預: --
前: --
南非IHS Markit 制綜合PMI (季調後) (9月)--
預: --
前: --





















































無匹配數據
By Elsa Ohlen
Bitcoin has finally broken into the mainstream after years as the noisy rebel of the financial system. Now, the Trump administration's crypto push could do the same for altcoins — at least some of them.
For years, the world of cryptocurrencies operated as a financial Wild West, characterized by unchecked speculation, regulatory ambiguity, and occasionally spectacular downfalls. Now, just about three years after the collapse of exchange FTX shattered confidence in the sector, lawmakers are actively engaging in shaping rules to govern cryptos, classifying them as either commodities or securities. That, in turn, will remove the ambiguity and overlap over regulation, making investing less of a risk.
"It adds more certainty that [cryptocurrency] is here to stay," Jamie Hopkins, CEO of Bryn Mawr Trust Advisors told Barron's.
For years, it has been unclear just where crypto fits in to the world of financial assets. Despite their name, cryptocurrencies aren't regulated as currencies and there have been legal cases over whether certain tokens should be considered commodities or securities. That ambiguity has had impact on their supervision and regulatory overlap between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission. The lack of a regulatory framework left investors in limbo, while the many attempted cases of litigation and government enforcement have discouraged people wanting to enter the industry.
"It creates a cautionary principle where you don't go to the edge of the cliff," Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan tells Barron's. "You have to stop a hundred yards from the edge of the cliff because you don't know where the cliff is."
A multiyear legal battle between Ripple Labs and the SEC served as a cautionary tale. The regulator charged Ripple in 2020 for selling XRP, which it considered an unregistered security. Ripple denied the accusations, arguing that XRP didn't act like a security and therefore shouldn't be subject to securities control.
A district judge issued a split ruling in 2023 stating that retail XRP sales on public exchanges didn't qualify as securities transactions, however, some institutional sales did. After over four years, Ripple and the SEC finally settled and Ripple agreed to pay a fine of $125 million. In August this year, they jointly filed for dismissal of the case.
The Clarity Act could be key to finally giving the industry the rules and predictability it has craved. It lays out a framework to distinguish whether digital assets are classified as commodities, overseen by the CFTC, or securities, under the jurisdiction of the SEC. Stablecoins, or coins typically pegged to the dollar that act like a crypto version of a money-market fund, have their own category and would fall under joint oversight of the SEC and the CFTC.
The Act's backers say it gives the sector just that, while critics argue it doesn't do enough to ensure effective ways to enforce its rules and provide enough protection.
The act still needs to pass through the Senate, which has published its own discussion draft market structure bill that would likely put most cryptos under SEC jurisdiction, although with exemptions from many aspects of securities laws.
The House bill, would define a commodity as an asset with its value intrinsically linked to the use of a blockchain — that has a decentralized record of transactions maintained across computers. Furthermore that blockchain must be one that isn't controlled by any one person or group. Coins with a central issuer or controlling entity would fall under the SEC as a security. Most will want to avoid the latter, Hougan says. True value, he suggests, lies in the trust and characteristics of a truly decentralized ownership and governance structure. If a coin is too centralized to be classified as a commodity, it's little more than a "a bad database."
Law firm McMillan suggests a reconciliation process is expected that will converge both bills into a final text for passage.
So far Bitcoin and Ether have typically been considered commodities by regulators due to their distinct decentralized nature of a broad ownership and governance structure, but most other coins remain largely undefined. Comparing them to Bitcoin or Ether would be like comparing the world's most valuable company, Nvidia, to a penny stock, Hougan says.
For Bitcoin and Ether, regulatory advancements will be "strictly positive," he adds. It could reduce their notorious volatility as well as remove the reputational risk that surrounds cryptos. Other coins, however, face a potential divide.
The total cryptocurrency market has a value of nearly $4 trillion — around the same as Microsoft — with Bitcoin accounting for about two thirds of that. The rest is altcoins, or alternative coins, of which there are thousands. About 80 tokens have a market capitalization of more than $1 billion, according to CoinDesk data.
The new law could give cryptos tied to a blockchain a leg up on their competitors, according to Professor Sarit Markovich at Kellogg School of Management. She sees cryptos tied to a blockchain like Ether, Solana, and Ripple's XRP as "two-sided markets" — operating systems with app developers on one side and users on the other. Regulatory clarity and legitimacy would bring more users to these ecosystems, increasing their value and the price of the tokens tied to them, she says.
In contrast, the long-term prospects for meme coins such as Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, or $TRUMP, despite potential short-term price bumps, appear more challenging. Meme coins don't typically have their own blockchain but are built on top of other blockchains.
While financial advisors are coming round to making a place for cryptos in portfolios, they are divided on coins besides Bitcoin. Hopkins says he recommends clients interested in cryptos invest between 1% and 3% in via spot ETFs such as those by Fidelity, BlackRock, and Bitwise, leaning toward the lower end of that range, as opposed to investing in the coins themselves.
BlackRock offers the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF. Similarly, investors can buy the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund or the Fidelity Ethereum Fund.
Bitwise also offers funds tracking the price of a basket of coins like the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund, which is heavily overweight on Bitcoin but also includes 1% or more of Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, as well as minor holdings of Chainlink, Sui, Avalanche, Litecoin, and Polkadot.
If passed, the legislation would remove a key impediment to investing in crypto by providing much-needed regulatory clarity. The Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund may be a good place to start.
While many still oppose cryptos altogether, that battle appears to have been fought and lost. Digital assets are here to stay — maybe it's time to embrace them.
Write to Elsa Ohlen at elsa.ohlen@barrons.com
This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
交易股票、貨幣、商品、期貨、債券、基金等金融工具或加密貨幣屬高風險行為,這些風險包括損失您的部分或全部投資金額,所以交易並非適合所有投資者。
做出任何財務決定時,應該進行自己的盡職調查,運用自己的判斷力,並諮詢合格的顧問。本網站的內容並非直接針對您,我們也未考慮您的財務狀況或需求。本網站所含資訊不一定是即時提供的,也不一定是準確的。本站提供的價格可能由造市商而非交易所提供。您做出的任何交易或其他財務決定均應完全由您負責,並且您不得依賴通過網站提供的任何資訊。我們不對網站中的任何資訊提供任何保證,並且對因使用網站中的任何資訊而可能造成的任何交易損失不承擔任何責任。
未經本站書面許可,禁止使用、儲存、複製、展現、修改、傳播或分發本網站所含數據。提供本網站所含數據的供應商及交易所保留其所有知識產權。