Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
To quickly learn market dynamics and follow market focuses in 15 min.
In the world of mankind, there will not be a statement without any position, nor a remark without any purpose.
Inflation, exchange rates, and the economy shape the policy decisions of central banks; the attitudes and words of central bank officials also influence the actions of market traders.
Money makes the world go round and currency is a permanent commodity. The forex market is full of surprises and expectations.
Top Columnists
Enjoy exciting activities, right here at FastBull.
The latest breaking news and the global financial events.
I have 5 years of experience in financial analysis, especially in aspects of macro developments and medium and long-term trend judgment. My focus is maily on the developments of the Middle East, emerging markets, coal, wheat and other agricultural products.
BeingTrader chief Trading Coach & Speaker, 8+ years of experience in the forex market trading mainly XAUUSD, EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, and Crude Oil. A confident trader and analyst who aims to explore various opportunities and guide investors in the market. As an analyst I am looking to enhance the trader’s experience by supporting them with sufficient data and signals.
Latest Update
Risk Warning on Trading HK Stocks
Despite Hong Kong's robust legal and regulatory framework, its stock market still faces unique risks and challenges, such as currency fluctuations due to the Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar and the impact of mainland China's policy changes and economic conditions on Hong Kong stocks.
HK Stock Trading Fees and Taxation
Trading costs in the Hong Kong stock market include transaction fees, stamp duty, settlement charges, and currency conversion fees for foreign investors. Additionally, taxes may apply based on local regulations.
HK Non-Essential Consumer Goods Industry
The Hong Kong stock market encompasses non-essential consumption sectors like automotive, education, tourism, catering, and apparel. Of the 643 listed companies, 35% are mainland Chinese, making up 65% of the total market capitalization. Thus, it's heavily influenced by the Chinese economy.
HK Real Estate Industry
In recent years, the real estate and construction sector's share in the Hong Kong stock index has notably decreased. Nevertheless, as of 2022, it retains around 10% market share, covering real estate development, construction engineering, investment, and property management.
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All
No data
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
Government debts resulting from excessive public spending damage growth. The cure – a period of austerity – seems politically suicidal. This is a perfect trap.
Earlier in 2024, global government debt hit a record $91.4 trillion, according to the Institute of International Finance, the global association of the financial industry. The world’s combined gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024 is projected to be approximately $109.5 trillion.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF), which promotes global monetary cooperation, financial stability and economic growth, has been increasingly vocal in its warnings about the ballooning public debt. Kristalina Georgieva, the IMF’s managing director, in April shared her fears that the current decade could be remembered as “the turbulent 20s” of this century due to the sobering reality of weak global economic activity by historical standards, along with the debt.
Economic growth prospects have been steadily declining since the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, with inflation remaining a persistent issue, fiscal buffers exhausted and rising debt levels posing significant challenges to public finances in numerous countries.
The IMF has focused its concerns on the United States in particular, labeling it one of the worst offenders and urging immediate action to address its spiraling deficit. Halfway into 2024, the nation’s government debt hit a new $35 trillion landmark, equal to the combined GDP of China, Japan, Germany, India and the United Kingdom. It is projected that by 2032, the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio will surpass 140 percent under current policies.
Despite frequent warnings from institutional leaders, politicians and conservative commentators about the dangers of rising public debt levels, next to nothing is being done to actually address the problem. Alarmingly, no meaningful cuts in public spending are even on the horizon. There appears to be no immediate incentive for change, as voters and taxpayers vastly underestimate the direct threat that government debt poses to their lives.
Too many people mistakenly assume that high levels of public debt do not impact their personal interests, financial situations or overall quality of life. Excessive government borrowing to finance spending programs fails to ignite public alarm or mobilize protests. Actually, historical trends show that the opposite policy – cutting government spending – most often provokes angry citizen reactions. In the U.S., concerns about public debt are not among the top priorities for voters in the current presidential election campaign. In late July 2024, a Statista report revealed that only 4 percent of the U.S. electorate considered it a vital issue in this election cycle.
Given that only a tiny fraction of U.S. voters pay attention to government debt, politicians have scarce incentive to address the runaway problem. Reining in debt of this magnitude would necessitate short-term but drastic sacrifices on the part of the public, who primarily perceive the problem as someone else’s concern. Government officials tend to view debt as a hot potato issue that future administrations will handle. At the same time, citizens discount it as a burden that will be foisted on to the next generation. This lack of urgency and accountability perpetuates the cycle of rising indebtedness, leaving little political room for meaningful fiscal reform.
Dramatically reducing government spending is an effective remedy, but wildly unpopular – and for good reason.
This apparent consensus between the government and the public is based on a misunderstanding of the facts. On a fundamental level, higher government debt, and therefore higher servicing costs, translate into less money for public services. That alone directly impacts citizens’ quality of life. Dramatically reducing government spending in areas like public healthcare, education and military budgets or scrapping social welfare schemes are clear and effective remedies, but they are also wildly unpopular – and for good reason.
Implementing such cuts at the necessary scale would exacerbate inequality and inflict financial hardship on many households reliant on state support, at least in the short to medium term. A policy U-turn of this magnitude would destabilize the political landscape, given that most advanced economies are by now addicted to higher public spending.
Implementing austerity measures in today’s inflationary climate, as people are increasingly struggling to make ends meet, could be extremely risky politically. During the European debt crisis in the late 2000s, several EU member states were pressured to implement radical austerity measures as a condition for bailout loans. The reaction in southern European nations like Greece was highly adverse, with widespread protests and social unrest. There were real concerns at the time that the austerity policies could fracture the European Union project. Those memories are still fresh, it appears, as any mention of fiscal responsibility these days meets with alarm and extreme resistance, barring a few countries that are trying to mitigate past overspending.
Under such circumstances, in April 2024, the European Parliament ratified a new set of fiscal rules that the European Council agreed upon last December. This decision followed significant public protests in Brussels at the time. The new regulations mandate that EU governments maintain budget deficits below 3 percent of GDP and public debt below 60 percent of GDP. This is a return to the bloc’s fiscal guidelines set out in 1992 that reappeared in the “fiscal compact” of 2011, enacted after the financial crisis. The targets, however, were ignored and subsequently forgotten by almost all member states.
As a Euronews article highlighted, the updated framework introduces a risk-based categorization of member states into high-, medium- and low-risk groups. Specifically, countries with a public debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 90 percent are required to reduce their debt by 1 percentage point of GDP each year. Meanwhile, those with ratios between 60 percent and 90 percent must cut their debt by 0.5 percentage points annually.
The article, written by Lucie Studnicna, president of the Workers’ Group at the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), highlighted the results of a recent Eurobarometer poll. When asked about their top priorities, citizens point to combating poverty and social exclusion, improving healthcare and creating jobs, she wrote. She also argued that the revised fiscal rules could hinder Europe’s ability to invest in social programs, hospitals and climate action – precisely the areas citizens are demanding more support for.
However, nations cannot indefinitely continue providing what the people are asking for with borrowed money. Denying or dodging the debt bullet is not a viable long-term strategy. The problem will need to be directly acknowledged and addressed sustainably sooner rather than later.
With wars raging in Gaza, in Ukraine and elsewhere, with forced displacement and civilian casualties on the rise across the globe, with the gap between the richest and the poorest widening rapidly, it seems as though we are witnessing nothing less than humanity itself in a state of crisis. We must urgently direct all our efforts, all our expertise and skills, towards making our global community kinder and more humane.
We now turn our attention to what may be deemed the root of these crises — the lack of humanity in the world’s financial systems — and to the role of finance, and of Islamic finance in particular, in restoring it.
We all, I suspect, have some sense of what it means that humanity is lacking within the world’s financial systems; and, likewise, we all have some sense of the necessary steps to restore it.
Equally, I suspect that we also all understand the dire consequences of a failure to take those necessary steps. To speak of an absence of humanity in finance is, perhaps, to use language which is more evocative than economic. However, what we evoke with that phrase can be understood in starkly economic terms. The financial implications of environmental degradation and the climate crisis are increasingly apparent. By considering global challenges in terms of finance, moreover, we are not, as some might claim, elevating economics above the well-being of humanity and our finite planetary home. For the study of economics is, I believe, at its root, nothing other than the study of human well-being.
The accelerating environmental crisis, the pandemic and the subsequent upsurge in social distress, and geopolitical tensions are among the many elements of what has come to be termed the contemporary “polycrisis”. In exploring how to restore humanity in finance, then, we are, in effect, seeking a reformed conception of finance which can speak to this polycrisis.
At its heart, restoring humanity in finance means that the previously paramount goal of economic growth must now be balanced far more carefully with the goals of environmental stewardship and social inclusion. It means that the pursuit of profits must be tempered by a recognition of our collective responsibility to protect our environment, and better serve society at large. Businesses must become part of the solution to our various global challenges. They must take responsibility for their broader impacts on the world around them, on their stakeholders as well as shareholders — no longer able to dismiss these as being outside their primary profit-making functions.
And the good news, I think, is that there is now widespread recognition that the time for unfettered capitalism is over. Businesses are no longer able to disregard their broader impacts. Instead, they are expected to avoid and minimise harm, and also, increasingly, to compensate for any harm they have caused. Mining companies must clean up when they leave a site. Agricultural companies must allocate land for protective buffers around waterways. The chemicals they use are now carefully monitored, and the workers applying these must have protective gear.
Ever more detailed and stringent regulations are being put in place to ensure that these external consequences are taken on board, and that stakeholders are better served. Rather than being voluntary or “nice to have”, as they have been in the past, environmental and social responsibilities are increasingly being integrated into regulatory frameworks, at national, regional and even international levels. They now exist alongside other corporate governance requirements, as expressions of a business sector that is beginning to comprehend its responsibility towards humanity. Hence the birth of ESG, short for Environmental, Social and Governance — which is a set of standards measuring a business’ impact on society, the environment, and how transparent and accountable it is.
Nevertheless, there is continued pushback from the business and financial worlds in this regard — and quite naturally so, given the costs involved in adjusting to the burgeoning regulations. Claims that the ESG approach is ultimately good for shareholders as well as stakeholders have been called into question by these realities, as well as by the recent disappointing performance of ESG funds. Scepticism of the so-called business case for a more responsible approach may well be warranted, as there are undeniably higher costs involved.
Yet despite this expected resistance, the “ecosystem” of ESG requirements and regulations continues to evolve. ESG norms are now spreading across multiple jurisdictions and sectors of the real economy. Hiring patterns attest to this trend, with ESG expertise increasingly required on company boards. There has also been a rapid proliferation of all kinds of ESG-related education and training. With companies increasingly seeking these skills, a wave of upskilling in the area has begun, with an ever-growing provision of these services in response.
This emphasis on ESG is really another way of framing or articulating the need to restore humanity in finance. ESG compliance is helping to strengthen accountability, not only to shareholders but to stakeholders more broadly. This includes improving transparency through disclosure and data requirements. I truly believe the need to demonstrate compliance with ESG frameworks is a catalyst for change. At the same time, it is also helping to reign in some of the more damaging consequences of unfettered profit-seeking. In Southeast Asia, for example, deforestation rates have been brought under much better control by certification schemes, while textile and other workers’ employment conditions have improved due to the greater attention being paid to labour issues. In both cases, improvements have taken place incrementally, with commitments first, followed by the development of implementation “ecosystems”, and finally, today, a movement towards regulation.
We are, then, seeing real progress towards environmental and social goals, as ESG gradually rolls out. To this extent, we can perhaps speak of the first glimmerings of a re-humanisation of our financial systems. But for the business and financial worlds to play their full role in addressing our multifaceted global crisis, we must move beyond compliance and the fulfilment of negative obligations, towards making a positive contribution. In fact, the single overarching principle of Islamic law enshrined in a famous legal maxim (dar’ al-mafasid wa-jalb al-manafi’) is to “avert harm and to promote benefit”. And it is here, with its unwavering faith-based commitment to avoiding harmful activities and striving towards social good, that Islamic finance can set an example for the conventional finance and business worlds.
Efforts in the sphere of Islamic finance are increasingly focused on moving beyond shariah compliance alone, towards the fulfilment of the higher social and humane objectives captured by the concept of Maqasid al-Shariah. This refers to the spirit, rather than the letter, of Islamic law and ethics. The approach of taking account of broader impacts, and avoiding those deemed negative, is thus intrinsic to Islamic finance.
I do not wish to overstate the ethical credentials of Islamic finance as opposed to conventional finance. In both spheres, we are seeing efforts to progress from avoiding harm towards actively seeking to do good. In both spheres, socially responsible investment is growing. There has, for example, been steady growth in issuances of both conventional green bonds and green sukuk — asset classes with explicit environmental goals. These goals may include the restoration of areas that have suffered harm, and investment into carbon sinks and offsets, as well as into the vital areas of green technology and innovation. Malaysia and her region have been at the forefront of this growth. But despite its very welcome expansion, this market segment remains a tiny proportion of overall capital investment. The amounts being raised fall woefully short of what is estimated as necessary to give humanity a fighting chance of addressing some of the severe environmental challenges we face.
And then we have impact investment with positive social goals — often formulated in relation to the 15 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — as well as Islamic finance waqf and other instruments, with similar social equity and inclusion objectives. But, as with financing with environmental goals, financing with explicit social goals remains a tiny proportion of total investment. And, again, it falls far short of what is required, with ever higher calculations being made of the funding gap for meeting the SDGs, even as needs rise in direct proportion to environmental and other crises.
While it is by no means the case that efforts to humanise finance are confined to the Islamic sphere, I do believe that global players in the economy can look to Islamic finance as a thought leader in a number of specific areas. One of these is the area of risk-sharing and equity-based financing. Islamic finance has always espoused risk-sharing instead of risk-transfer, because it promotes fairness through proportionate gains and liability. Increasingly, financial theorists are arguing that risk-sharing is a better fit for the economy as a whole, and when we look at recent economic history, we can understand why. During the global financial crash at the end of the first decade of the new millennium, Islamic financial institutions fared better than mainstream institutions, according to the International Monetary Fund, proving themselves more stable and less susceptible to shocks. Large, unpayable debts lie behind these kinds of crises, and Islamic finance offers an alternative model: one that is not only more humane, but makes more fiscal sense as well.
I also want to highlight the role that large-scale multilateral Islamic financial institutions play in generating and coordinating social finance. Over the past five decades since its establishment, for example, the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) has approved an accumulated US$182 billion in financing, with US$12 billion approved in 2023 alone. The IDB is at the forefront of ethical finance, funding projects, businesses and communities in a responsible, sustainable way. It is a model for long-term, holistic value creation for all, as opposed to profit for the institution only.
The iTEKAD programme, established by Bank Negara Malaysia, is another example of financial institutions playing an active role in social finance. Multiple Islamic banks participate in this programme, which uses social finance instruments including zakat and waqf to fund business assets, and also to provide structured financial and business training. As at 2023, the iTEKAD programme had disbursed around
US$16 million in social finance funding, financing and investment, benefiting 6,019 micro-entrepreneurs from various marginalised groups, including people on lower incomes, people with disabilities, army veterans and eligible zakat recipients — the asnaf.
Islamic finance has grown remarkably, at around 10% year on year between 2013 and 2023. That growth is expected to continue, with the industry projected to be worth a staggering US$6.67 trillion by 2027.
And yet, in spite of that impressive growth, and its increasing presence in mainstream global finance, I believe that Islamic finance has a still larger role to play on the world stage. What it offers is moral leadership: an approach to finance which is guided by principles of care for humanity and care for the planet.
Global finance could learn much from Islamic finance, because values like responsibility, sustainability and generosity transcend the boundaries of religion. While I hope that Islamic financial institutions themselves continue to grow and thrive, my greater hope is that all financial institutions will absorb something of the spirit of Islamic finance, on the path to restoring humanity in the sector.
At the present moment, the richest 1% on the planet own almost half of global wealth; while close to one in 10 people in our world are living in extreme poverty. Let us seek ways to address that imbalance, restoring humanity in finance, for a fairer and more prosperous future for all.
Wall Street’s biggest banks are divided over how fast and deep the US Federal Reserve will cut interest rates over the next year, setting the stage for jittery financial markets until the outlook clears.
Hours after the US central bank surprised most Fed watchers on Wednesday by cutting its benchmark by half a percentage point, economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc revised their forecast to show quarter-point reductions at every meeting from November through next June. Peers at JPMorgan Chase & Co, who’d correctly predicted this week’s shift, still see another half-point in November, but say that will depend on the state of the labour market.
In the market, traders are pricing in about 70 basis points (bps) worth of easing by the end of the year — and nearly two percentage points of rate cuts by next September. That’s more aggressive than the half point of cuts forecast by Fed officials in their latest dot plot by year’s end.
Bank of America
The Fed “will get pushed into deeper cuts” with another 75bps coming in the fourth quarter and 125bps next year, economists and strategists including including Aditya Bhave, Mark Cabana and Alex Cohen wrote.
Citigroup
Citi kept its forecast for another 75bps of reductions this year, with 50 basis points coming November and 25bps in December. “Risks remain balanced to an even faster pace of cuts,” the bank wrote in a note. The bank expects more 25 basis point shifts in 2025, taking the terminal rate to a range of 3% to 3.25%.
Goldman Sachs
The Fed will opt for a “longer string” of consecutive quarter-point cuts from November through next June, taking the terminal rate to a range of 3.25% to 3.5%, economists including Jan Hatzius wrote in a note. The bank previously expected consecutive cuts at the last two meetings of 2024 and then quarterly moves in 2024. Whether the Fed cuts by 50bps again in November is a “close call” and will be determined by the next two employment reports.
JPMorgan
Michael Feroli, the bank’s chief US economist, correctly predicted this week’s half-point cut and is sticking with his view for another one in November. However, he said such a move would be contingent on further softening in the labor market.
Morgan Stanley
Officials will likely opt for a “string” of quarter-point cuts through the middle of 2025, with two this year and four in the first half of next, according to a team including economist Seth Carpenter and strategist Matthew Hornbach.
Wells Fargo
“The 2024 easing cycle starts with historic levels of market uncertainty,” wrote Wells Fargo strategists including Michael Schumacher and Angelo Manolatos. The bank expects that the Fed could ultimately cut by as many as 350bps in a hard-landing scenario — or 150bps in a soft-landing outcome — in this first year of its cutting cycle. Either way, the bank said that “the Fed has a lot of room to ease.”
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.