Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev
All Contests
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
This column will continuously track developments in the China–U.S. trade war, interpret policy changes, and assess their far-reaching impact on global markets, supply chains, and investment patterns—providing readers with insightful and forward-looking perspectives.
To quickly learn market dynamics and follow market focuses in 15 min.
In the world of mankind, there will not be a statement without any position, nor a remark without any purpose.
Inflation, exchange rates, and the economy shape the policy decisions of central banks; the attitudes and words of central bank officials also influence the actions of market traders.
Top Columnists
Enjoy exciting activities, right here at FastBull.
The latest breaking news and the global financial events.
I have 5 years of experience in financial analysis, especially in aspects of macro developments and medium and long-term trend judgment. My focus is maily on the developments of the Middle East, emerging markets, coal, wheat and other agricultural products.
BeingTrader chief Trading Coach & Speaker, 8+ years of experience in the forex market trading mainly XAUUSD, EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, and Crude Oil. A confident trader and analyst who aims to explore various opportunities and guide investors in the market. As an analyst I am looking to enhance the trader’s experience by supporting them with sufficient data and signals.
Latest Update
Risk Warning on Trading HK Stocks
Despite Hong Kong's robust legal and regulatory framework, its stock market still faces unique risks and challenges, such as currency fluctuations due to the Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar and the impact of mainland China's policy changes and economic conditions on Hong Kong stocks.
HK Stock Trading Fees and Taxation
Trading costs in the Hong Kong stock market include transaction fees, stamp duty, settlement charges, and currency conversion fees for foreign investors. Additionally, taxes may apply based on local regulations.
HK Non-Essential Consumer Goods Industry
The Hong Kong stock market encompasses non-essential consumption sectors like automotive, education, tourism, catering, and apparel. Of the 643 listed companies, 35% are mainland Chinese, making up 65% of the total market capitalization. Thus, it's heavily influenced by the Chinese economy.
HK Real Estate Industry
In recent years, the real estate and construction sector's share in the Hong Kong stock index has notably decreased. Nevertheless, as of 2022, it retains around 10% market share, covering real estate development, construction engineering, investment, and property management.
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All
No data
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
LONDON (April 15): The International Energy Agency (IEA) on Tuesday sharply cut its forecast for the growth in global oil demand this year due to escalating trade tensions, a day after a similar move by producer group Opec.
LONDON (April 15): The International Energy Agency (IEA) on Tuesday sharply cut its forecast for the growth in global oil demand this year due to escalating trade tensions, a day after a similar move by producer group Opec.
"The deteriorating outlook for the global economy amid the sudden sharp escalation in trade tensions in early April has prompted a downgrade to our forecast for oil demand growth this year," the IEA, which advises industrialised countries, said in a monthly report.
"Growth is expected to slow further in 2026, to 690,000 bpd, as lower oil prices only partly offset the weaker economic environment."
Global investment banks are lowering their projections for China's economic growth this year as U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressivetariffsare expected to take a toll on the world's second-largest economy.
Global investment banks are lowering their projections for China's economic growth this year as U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressivetariffsare expected to take a toll on the world's second-largest economy.
Some of the banks had upgraded their forecasts for China just a month ago, encouraged by signs of improvement in the sputtering economy in the first two months of the year.
Sino-U.S. trade tensions have intensified after Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on April 2, leading to tit-for-tat duties on each other's goods. By April 11, China was all but under a U.S. trade embargo as tariffs rose to 145%.
Gross domestic product growth in the first quarter is forecast at 5.1% year-on-year, while full-year expansion is predicted to hit 4.5% in 2025, compared with last year's 5.0% pace, according to a Reuters poll, falling short of the official target of around 5.0%.
China is due to release its first-quarter GDP data and activity indicators on Wednesday.
Here is a summary of some forecasts for the China's GDP.
NEW (PREVIOUS) | ||
INVESTMENT HOUSE | 2025 | 2026 |
CITI | 4.2% (4.7%) | |
GOLDMAN SACHS | 4% (4.5%) | 3.5% (4%) |
UBS | 3.4% (4%) | 3% (3%) |
** In the previous factbox, some of the institutions raised their GDP forecast for this year following some early signs of economic recovery.
KEY QUOTES:
** UBS
"Under our current new baseline assumptions, we estimate tariff hikes this year to pose a more than two-percentage-point drag on China's GDP growth. We expect China's exports to the U.S. to fall by 2/3 in the coming quarters and its overall exports to fall by 10% in USD terms in 2025, the latter also takes into account slower U.S. and global growth.
While tariff exemptions will likely reduce the inflationary pressure somewhat in the U.S., we expect they are unlikely to affect importers' desire to find alternatives to imports from China. Therefore, we expect continued negative impact of the tariff hikes on China's exports in 2026."
** CITI
"We see little scope for a deal between the U.S. and China after recent escalations.
Domestic policies could focus more on demand expansion. We expect additional funding of 1 to 1.5 trillion yuan ($205 billion) while policy implementation accelerates. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) could cut policy rates by 40 basis points and reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 100 basis points. Policy constraints such as the exchange rate and debt management could stay, however. With prolonged elevated uncertainties, policymakers could choose to keep more powder dry."
** GOLDMAN SACHS
"Recent events have underscored the speed with which President Trump can alter tariff rates, while also highlighting the likelihood that high tariffs on Chinese goods will persist.
We estimate that 10 to 20 million workers in China may be exposed to U.S.-bound exports. The combination of extremely high U.S. tariffs, sharply declining exports to the U.S., and a slowing global economy is expected to generate substantial pressures on the Chinese economy and labor market."
Unemployment held steady at 4.4%, where it has been since last November, while employment rose by a better-than-expected 206k on a rolling 3-month basis.
Unemployment held steady at 4.4%, where it has been since last November, while employment rose by a better-than-expected 206k on a rolling 3-month basis.
Meanwhile, earnings continued to increase at a rapid clip, albeit somewhat softer than consensus. Overall pay rose 5.6% YoY, and regular pay by 5.9% YoY over the same period. While one old hope that earnings pressures fade somewhat as the year progresses, this is by no means guaranteed, even if risks to the labour market are biased towards weakness, as the impacts of the National Insurance changes are felt from Q2 onwards. Right now, though, the current clip of pay growth is clearly incompatible with a sustainable return to the BoE's 2% inflation target over the medium-term.
In any case, though, policymakers on Threadneedle Street are unlikely to place much weight on this morning's figures. While well-documented issues continue to plague the unemployment data, the earnings series is now also subject to question marks, and potential revisions, given late pay data submissions. At the present rate, the ONS seem unlikely to have got their house ‘in order' until the tail end of next year at the earliest.
Taking that into account, it's tough to imagine today's data materially changing the policy outlook for the ‘Old Lady'. A 25bp cut at the next meeting in early-May remains nailed on, with further such cuts likely to be delivered on a quarterly basis over the remainder of the year, as headline CPI remains on a path towards 4% over the summer.
That said, risks to the outlook do now tilt in a distinctly more dovish direction, as downside growth risks continue to mount, chiefly as a result of President Trump's numerous tariff announcements. Were policymakers to become confident that the risks of inflation persistence had sufficiently abated, a more rapid pace of normalisation could be delivered. Tomorrow's March CPI data will, hence, be considerably more impactful in moving the needle for the BoE.
Trump considers 25% tariff exemptions for auto imports; Bostic: "It is unwise to push the policy too boldly in any direction."; Hamas Officials: "We refuse disarmament as part of negotiations"…
Only 1 Day to Go! FastBull Finance Summit Dubai 2025 Is Tomorrow
China halts rare earth exports; impact on U.S. industries.Increased costs for manufacturers reliant on rare earth.Potential long-term global supply chain disruptions reported.
Experts emphasize the move highlights China's strategic use of its dominance in rare earth production, potentially complicating global supply chain protocols.
The Chinese government halted exports of rare earth minerals, citing retaliation for U.S. tariff hikes on tech products. This action affects companies like Tesla, Apple, and military firms relying on critical resources.
President Donald Trump has imposed significant tariffs on Chinese goods, while a new Chinese licensing system is expected to cause further supply delays. Analysts worry global entities will be scrambling for alternatives as disruptions are anticipated.
American manufacturers and defense firms face increased costs due to limited U.S. rare earth reserves. Industrial disruptions may increase volatility in ETFs tied to rare earth materials.
The suspension affects multiple industries globally and could lead to immediate price increases. Historically, such actions have caused major fluctuations in related markets.
Companies worldwide may seek alternative sources, which could lead to increased demand for rare earth resources outside China. Past precedents indicate slow development of new supply chains and potential long-term shortages.
Analysts note a potential uptick in resource-driven inflation impacting broader markets and investor actions. The U.S. may enhance its strategic stockpiles or diversify through partnerships with other nations.
Repeated failures at key resistance could keep bearish pressure intact. Key level at the 100 day MA for the AUDUSD.
The AUDUSD is once again flirting with its 100-day moving average, currently near 0.62917, and the risk is that history repeats. The last two breaks above this key technical level failed to hold, both stalling at 0.6390 before rotating back lower. Today’s attempt showed even less momentum, with the high reaching just 0.6340 before sellers leaned in and the pair reversed.
If the pair can't hold above the 100-day MA, attention will shift back toward downside support targets. The first is the 200-hour moving average at 0.6259, followed by the 100-hour moving average at 0.6220. A move below both would confirm that the recent break was another false start—and place sellers firmly back in control.
The technical picture remains precarious. Buyers need to not just break the 100-day MA, but sustain momentum above it. Without that, the bias stays bearish and the AUDUSD may just be “doing it again.”
Key levels:
Resistance: 0.62917 (100-day MA), 0.6340, 0.6390
Support: 0.6259 (200-hour MA), 0.6220 (100-hour MA)
AUDUSD technicals.
Global investment banks are lowering their projections for China's economic growth this year as U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressivetariffsare expected to take a toll on the world's second-largest economy.
Some of the banks had upgraded their forecasts for China just a month ago, encouraged by signs of improvement in the sputtering economy in the first two months of the year.
Sino-U.S. trade tensions have intensified after Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on April 2, leading to tit-for-tat duties on each other's goods. By April 11, China was all but under a U.S. trade embargo as tariffs rose to 145%.
Gross domestic product growth in the first quarter is forecast at 5.1% year-on-year, while full-year expansion is predicted to hit 4.5% in 2025, compared with last year's 5.0% pace, according to a Reuters poll, falling short of the official target of around 5.0%.
China is due to release its first-quarter GDP data and activity indicators on Wednesday.
Here is a summary of some forecasts for the China's GDP.
NEW (PREVIOUS) | ||
INVESTMENT HOUSE | 2025 | 2026 |
CITI | 4.2% (4.7%) | |
GOLDMAN SACHS | 4% (4.5%) | 3.5% (4%) |
UBS | 3.4% (4%) | 3% (3%) |
** In the previous factbox, some of the institutions raised their GDP forecast for this year following some early signs of economic recovery.
KEY QUOTES:
** UBS
"Under our current new baseline assumptions, we estimate tariff hikes this year to pose a more than two-percentage-point drag on China's GDP growth. We expect China's exports to the U.S. to fall by 2/3 in the coming quarters and its overall exports to fall by 10% in USD terms in 2025, the latter also takes into account slower U.S. and global growth.
While tariff exemptions will likely reduce the inflationary pressure somewhat in the U.S., we expect they are unlikely to affect importers' desire to find alternatives to imports from China. Therefore, we expect continued negative impact of the tariff hikes on China's exports in 2026."
** CITI
"We see little scope for a deal between the U.S. and China after recent escalations.
Domestic policies could focus more on demand expansion. We expect additional funding of 1 to 1.5 trillion yuan ($205 billion) while policy implementation accelerates. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) could cut policy rates by 40 basis points and reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 100 basis points. Policy constraints such as the exchange rate and debt management could stay, however. With prolonged elevated uncertainties, policymakers could choose to keep more powder dry."
** GOLDMAN SACHS
"Recent events have underscored the speed with which President Trump can alter tariff rates, while also highlighting the likelihood that high tariffs on Chinese goods will persist.
We estimate that 10 to 20 million workers in China may be exposed to U.S.-bound exports. The combination of extremely high U.S. tariffs, sharply declining exports to the U.S., and a slowing global economy is expected to generate substantial pressures on the Chinese economy and labor market."
Unemployment held steady at 4.4%, where it has been since last November, while employment rose by a better-than-expected 206k on a rolling 3-month basis.
Meanwhile, earnings continued to increase at a rapid clip, albeit somewhat softer than consensus. Overall pay rose 5.6% YoY, and regular pay by 5.9% YoY over the same period. While one old hope that earnings pressures fade somewhat as the year progresses, this is by no means guaranteed, even if risks to the labour market are biased towards weakness, as the impacts of the National Insurance changes are felt from Q2 onwards. Right now, though, the current clip of pay growth is clearly incompatible with a sustainable return to the BoE's 2% inflation target over the medium-term.
In any case, though, policymakers on Threadneedle Street are unlikely to place much weight on this morning's figures. While well-documented issues continue to plague the unemployment data, the earnings series is now also subject to question marks, and potential revisions, given late pay data submissions. At the present rate, the ONS seem unlikely to have got their house ‘in order' until the tail end of next year at the earliest.
Taking that into account, it's tough to imagine today's data materially changing the policy outlook for the ‘Old Lady'. A 25bp cut at the next meeting in early-May remains nailed on, with further such cuts likely to be delivered on a quarterly basis over the remainder of the year, as headline CPI remains on a path towards 4% over the summer.
That said, risks to the outlook do now tilt in a distinctly more dovish direction, as downside growth risks continue to mount, chiefly as a result of President Trump's numerous tariff announcements. Were policymakers to become confident that the risks of inflation persistence had sufficiently abated, a more rapid pace of normalisation could be delivered. Tomorrow's March CPI data will, hence, be considerably more impactful in moving the needle for the BoE.
Experts emphasize the move highlights China's strategic use of its dominance in rare earth production, potentially complicating global supply chain protocols.
The Chinese government halted exports of rare earth minerals, citing retaliation for U.S. tariff hikes on tech products. This action affects companies like Tesla, Apple, and military firms relying on critical resources.
President Donald Trump has imposed significant tariffs on Chinese goods, while a new Chinese licensing system is expected to cause further supply delays. Analysts worry global entities will be scrambling for alternatives as disruptions are anticipated.
American manufacturers and defense firms face increased costs due to limited U.S. rare earth reserves. Industrial disruptions may increase volatility in ETFs tied to rare earth materials.
The suspension affects multiple industries globally and could lead to immediate price increases. Historically, such actions have caused major fluctuations in related markets.
Companies worldwide may seek alternative sources, which could lead to increased demand for rare earth resources outside China. Past precedents indicate slow development of new supply chains and potential long-term shortages.
Analysts note a potential uptick in resource-driven inflation impacting broader markets and investor actions. The U.S. may enhance its strategic stockpiles or diversify through partnerships with other nations.
The AUDUSD is once again flirting with its 100-day moving average, currently near 0.62917, and the risk is that history repeats. The last two breaks above this key technical level failed to hold, both stalling at 0.6390 before rotating back lower. Today’s attempt showed even less momentum, with the high reaching just 0.6340 before sellers leaned in and the pair reversed.
If the pair can't hold above the 100-day MA, attention will shift back toward downside support targets. The first is the 200-hour moving average at 0.6259, followed by the 100-hour moving average at 0.6220. A move below both would confirm that the recent break was another false start—and place sellers firmly back in control.
The technical picture remains precarious. Buyers need to not just break the 100-day MA, but sustain momentum above it. Without that, the bias stays bearish and the AUDUSD may just be “doing it again.”
Key levels:
Resistance: 0.62917 (100-day MA), 0.6340, 0.6390
Support: 0.6259 (200-hour MA), 0.6220 (100-hour MA)
AUDUSD technicals.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up