Futures edge lower, Trump on trade talks, PPI ahead - what’s moving markets

Stocks

China–U.S. Trade War

Summary:

U.S. futures dipped as investors eyed U.S.-China trade talks, inflation data, and geopolitical tensions. Trump hinted at extending tariff delays. Oracle surged on strong AI demand. Oil fell amid Iran concerns.

U.S. stock futures suggest a lackluster start to trading on Wall Street on Thursday, as investors eye recent U.S.-China trade talks and a bevy of fresh inflation data. President Donald Trump has suggested that he is open to possibly extending a 90-day delay to his punishing "reciprocal" tariffs beyond a deadline early next month. Elsewhere, markets are awaiting May producer price figures, while Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) raises its full-year revenue target, sending shares in the cloud-computing group spiking in extended hours trading.

Futures drop

U.S. stock futures pointed lower, with traders gauging a relatively benign consumer price reading and signs of détente in recent trade tensions between the United States and China.

By 03:37 ET (07:37 GMT), the Dow futures contract had slipped by 106 points, or 0.3%, S&P 500 futures had fallen by 13 points, or 0.2%, and Nasdaq 100 futures had declined by 48 points, or 0.2%.

The benchmark S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite both retreated on Wednesday, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average was unchanged. Investors seemed to greet a slower-than-anticipated measure of consumer price growth in May in muted fashion, as worries persisted over the potential impact of Trump’s tariff agenda.

Markets seemed to also be cautiously assessing a framework agreement between Washington and Beijing to resume their fragile trade truce. Trump called the deal "great," although analysts flagged that the announcement was short of many concrete details and possibly left the door open for a future flare-up in the spat between the world’s two largest economies.

Sentiment was dented as well after media reports suggested that the U.S. is preparing for a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iran. An official from Tehran previously said that strikes on U.S. bases in the region would be carried out if ongoing nuclear talks collapse and a conflict emerges with the U.S.

Trump on trade talks

Meanwhile, Trump has hinted at a willingness to possibly extend a delay to his elevated "reciprocal" levies on most countries, saying that negotiations on bespoke trade deals were ongoing with 15 countries.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump claimed that the White House was "rocking in terms of deals," adding that "quite a few countries [...] want to make a deal with us."

But he stressed that an extension to a postponement of his heightened duties beyond the current deadline in early July is likely not a "necessity."

Trump added that the U.S. plans to send out letters to dozens of nations in the coming weeks that will set out the terms of trade deals, flagging that these countries will then have to choose whether to "take it, or [...] leave it."

The president paused the implementation of his broadest tariffs in April, in a bid to give negotiators time to hammer out a series of agreements. However, with the 90-day halt set to end on July 8, the U.S. has just one trade deal agreed with Britain and 17 others are being discussed.

PPI ahead

The focus is now turning to a data point due out later today which tracks growth in U.S. producer prices, as markets remain wary of any indications that Trump’s tariffs could be re-fueling inflationary pressures.

Economists anticipated that the producer price index for final demand edged up by 0.2% month-over-month in May, after it fell by 0.5% in the prior month. In the twelve months to May, the measure is seen speeding up to 2.6% from 2.4%.

In April, wholesale services prices slipped by 0.7% -- the biggest fall since the government first began to monitor the numbers in December 2009. Prices for hotel and motel rooms decreased in particular, reflecting a retreat in tourist travel which analysts noted was potentially sparked by a backlash to Trump’s policies since returning to office.

Crucially, accommodations, airline fares, and portfolio management fees make up some of the components that factor into an inflation gauge preferred by Federal Reserve interest-rate setters.

On Wednesday, a separate Labor Department data set showed that consumer prices increased at a cooler-than-projected pace in May, thanks in large part to cheaper gasoline prices counterbalancing an uptick in rent costs.

Oracle earnings

Shares in Oracle surged in extended hours trading after the cloud-computing group lifted its annual revenue growth target and highlighted solid demand from clients aiming to harness artificial intelligence.

Oracle CEO Safra Catz told investors in a post-earnings call on Wednesday that total revenue in its 2026 fiscal year is expected to be at least $67 billion, implying yearly growth of roughly 16.7%.

The company had previously guided for an increase of 15%.

Catz noted that its annual total cloud growth rate, which includes "applications plus infrastructure," will also rise to over 40% from 24% in the 2025 fiscal year, bolstered mostly by solid returns from its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure solution business and clients’ need to support AI workloads.

Analysts at Vital Knowledge called the prospects for Oracle’s growth "amazing," but flagged that "meeting that demand is eating up a lot of cash" and contributing to an elevated projection for annual capital expenditures.

Oil dips

Oil prices slipped, handing back some of the previous session’s sharp gains as the U.S. authorised voluntary departures for military dependents in the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran.

At 03:42 ET, Brent futures dropped 1.3% to $68.89 a barrel and U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures fell 1.2% to $67.33 a barrel.

Both contracts surged over 4% on Wednesday during a turbulent trading session, supported by the progress in U.S.-China trade talks, which has helped reduce demand concerns, with free-flowing trade expected to boost global economic activity and thus crude demand.

Wednesday’s spike reflects heightened geopolitical risk, as investors feared any conflict could disrupt shipping routes or oil infrastructure across the Gulf.

Source: Investing

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Economic

Forex

The euro hit its highest level in almost four years against the U.S. dollar as investors rushed into safe-haven assets on Thursday while remaining cautious about the impact of the U.S.-China trade deal.

Geopolitical risks were in focus after U.S. President Donald Trump said some U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because “it could be a dangerous place,” adding that Washington would not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.

A cocktail of rising Middle East tensions and concern over the fragility of the trade truce between the U.S. and China drew investors into safe-haven assets.

Analysts noted that the U.S. dollar serves as a key barometer of trade talks sentiment, while geopolitical instability prompted investors to buy safe-haven Swiss francs and yen.

The franc rose 0.8% to 0.8138 versus the greenback, its highest level since April 22, and the yen climbed 0.6% to 143.70.

The euro reached its highest since late 2021 at $1.1589 and was last up 0.70% at $1.1568.

Some analysts said the euro has also drawn support from a hawkish European Central Bank, which hinted at a pause in its year-long easing cycle after inflation finally returned to its 2% target.

However, ECB policymaker Isabel Schnabel said on Thursday the strong euro exchange rate is driven by a positive confidence shock in Europe - investors being drawn to the euro as a safe haven - and not by interest rate differentials.

Trade deal deadline

On the trade front, Trump said he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries. But he added that the U.S. would send out letters in coming weeks specifying the terms for trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could then embrace or reject.

Investors argued that such a move keeps the risk of a July 9 jump in U.S. import tariffs on the table, which is regarded as negative for the dollar. The greenback and U.S. Treasuries dropped sharply after Trump announced a blitz of reciprocal tariffs - which he dubbed “Liberation Day” - in early April.

Against a basket of currencies, the U.S. dollar fell to its weakest since April 22 at 98.072 and was last down 0.35% at 98.108. It hit 97.861, its lowest since April 2022.

U.S. Treasury yields dropped on Wednesday as the closely watched “core” consumer price index eased some pressure on the Federal Reserve to maintain higher interest rates for longer.

However, analysts remain cautious about the inflation outlook ahead of Thursday’s release of the producer price index.

“We suspect the core Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) reading will prove modestly firmer, although the result will also hinge on the inputs from core PPI,” said David Doyle, head of economics at Macquarie.

“Despite the subdued figures, through year-end, we expect year-on-year core inflation to remain elevated and potentially (to) rise as price pressures flow from recent tariff implementation.”

Markets priced two Fed rate cuts of 25 basis points by year-end, with an 80% chance of the first move in September and 100 bps by September 2026.

The onshore yuan rose 0.1% to 7.1818 per U.S. dollar, though gains were capped by the still-fragile truce in the U.S.-China trade war and the uncertainty surrounding the next moves of the two countries.

Barclays sees plenty of headwinds over the medium term that could push the currency back onto a depreciation path, even if it might gain a little further from below 7.20.

Source: BNN BIoomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Trade Setup Reflects Confidence in India's Macroeconomic Stability

Goldman Sachs’ trading desk has proposed a nine-month binary put option on the USD/INR pair, struck at 83 — a level that implies a nearly 3% appreciation of the rupee from its current level of around 85.50. Binary options are unique in that they offer an all-or-nothing payout if the rupee reaches or strengthens beyond that level by the contract’s expiry, in this case by March 2026. This timing aligns with seasonal rupee strength commonly observed toward India’s fiscal year-end.

The choice of a binary put signals Goldman’s conviction in a decisive break below the strike price rather than a gradual strengthening. It also minimizes exposure to volatility during the life of the trade, focusing only on the final settlement value, making it a cost-efficient expression of a directional view.

Improved Growth and Capital Flows Reinforce Bullish Sentiment

India's GDP growth of 7.4% in the March quarter — up from 6.4% in the previous period — suggests broad-based economic momentum. This uptick is supported by Goldman's internal activity tracker showing robust consumer spending into April. Such momentum is a key signal for foreign investors, who have already poured over $4 billion into Indian equities in the last two months. If this trend continues, the rupee will benefit from increased demand in the foreign exchange market.

Moreover, earnings growth among Indian corporates and rising investor confidence are aligning to create a pro-risk appetite that favors currency appreciation.

Geopolitics and Commodities Offer Additional Tailwinds

Another important factor in the trade setup is the expectation of easing trade tensions between India and the U.S. Goldman sees the prospect of a U.S.-India trade agreement as a possible catalyst for rupee strength. A de-escalation of reciprocal tariffs, particularly the paused 26% levy on Indian shipments, would boost both capital sentiment and trade flows, strengthening the rupee.

Lower oil prices are another pillar supporting this thesis. Brent crude is projected by Goldman to average $60 in H2 2025 and drop further to $56 in 2026. This would ease India’s import bill, improve the current account balance, and reduce the need for dollar purchases by oil companies, all of which point toward INR appreciation.

Currency Lag and Catch-Up Potential

Despite these improving fundamentals, the rupee has underperformed relative to other Asian currencies, even as the U.S. dollar index fell by over 9% in recent months. This divergence suggests potential catch-up gains for the INR, should market expectations realign with macroeconomic reality.

However, the binary nature of the option also implies that the trade could expire worthless if USD/INR fails to drop below 83, even marginally. Key risks include renewed global risk aversion, domestic political instability, or a surprise spike in oil prices — any of which could limit rupee gains or push the currency back into depreciation territory.

Goldman Sachs’ options bet on the rupee reflects a calculated optimism about India's economic trajectory and its currency’s underperformance in 2025. By targeting the 83 level with a binary put, the strategy expresses a high-conviction view with a defined risk-reward profile. Investors considering similar exposure must weigh macro tailwinds against potential shocks, but the broader case for rupee appreciation appears supported by solid fundamentals and improving capital market dynamics.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Michelle

Economic

Political

The Trump administration has launched a review into the Aukus defense pact that the US signed with Australia and the UK in 2021 to counter China’s military expansion in the Indo-Pacific region.

Central to the agreement is a controversial project — expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars — to help Australia develop a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines over a 30-year period.

If the US ends up abandoning the pact, it would deal a major blow to Australia and its defense capabilities. It would also raise questions for other Asia-Pacific allies about the US commitment to their security interests in the face of a rising China.

Aukus is the nickname given to the wide-reaching security partnership signed between the US, the UK and Australia in September 2021. The most eye-catching part of the pact was the agreement to help Australia acquire a fleet of eight nuclear-powered submarines.

At the moment, only six nations — the US, the UK, France, China, Russia and India — have the technology to deploy and operate nuclear-powered subs, which are faster than their diesel-electric counterparts, can stay submerged for several months and have space for more weapons, equipment and supplies.

The plan is for the US to sell Australia as many as five of its nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines by the early 2030s. Then Australia and the UK would together design and build a next-generation submarine partly using American technology, due to be completed in the 2040s.

Under the deal, the UK would also expand its own nuclear-powered submarine fleet, from seven to as many as 12. The Aukus deal represented the first time that the US agreed to share its highly sensitive sub technology since 1965. The agreement was important enough to the US that it was willing to risk a diplomatic crisis with France, which saw a $66 billion contract to provide conventional submarines to Australia abruptly canceled because of Aukus.

But the partnership isn’t limited to submarines: The second pillar of the deal, for instance, revolves around strategic technology sharing in areas such as quantum computing, artificial intelligence and advanced weaponry.

The possibilities of the Aukus agreement have already led Japan, South Korea and New Zealand to all publicly express interest in joining the second pillar of the pact.

The Trump administration has been looking to shift the burden of collective defense to its allies and to make sure the US has enough naval vessels of its own in case of a military clash over the coming decades.

The review will study whether the deal, signed while Joe Biden was president, is “aligned with the President’s America First agenda,” the Pentagon said in a statement.

More generally, the Trump administration has been ramping up pressure on allies around the world — including NATO countries and regional partners in Asia — to increase their military budgets. And the US wants to narrow its own gap in total ships with China’s Navy, the world’s largest.

In a face-to-face meeting with Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth specifically asked for Canberra to raise its defense spending to 3.5% of GDP. Currently, Australia is on track to boost its military spending to about 2.4% of GDP by the mid 2030s.

US shipbuilding and submarine production has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Last year, a top US lawmaker revealed that the Navy’s Virginia-class submarine program is at least two years behind schedule and is projected to run $17 billion over its planned budget through 2030.

Skeptics of Aukus include US Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby. Last year, he posted to social media that “it would be crazy to have fewer SSNs in the right place and time,” using the shorthand for nuclear-powered attack submarine.

The pact has also attracted criticism in Australia. Former Australian Prime Ministers Paul Keating and Malcolm Turnbull have disapproved of the agreement, saying it undermines the nation’s defense sovereignty at a time of growing strategic uncertainty in the Indo-Pacific.

Following the announcement of the review, Keating described the Aukus program as the “most poorly conceived defense procurement program ever adopted by an Australian government.” Critics of the pact said the review would present Australia with an opportunity to leave the deal.

Any major revisions or even scrapping of the Aukus pact would deal a major blow to Australia’s defense sector, which had begun to reshape itself to accommodate the anticipated submarines. Marles, who is also Australia’s deputy prime minister, earlier this year delivered a A$500 million ($325 million) downpayment to the US as part of Aukus.

The Australian government has also been moving away from conventional military forces and toward longer-range capabilities, including missiles and drones, to support the nuclear fleet.

A failure to acquire the submarines would blow a hole through the center of Australia’s defense capabilities at a crucial moment in regional geopolitics, with tensions high over China’s ambitions in the Indo-Pacific and South China Sea.

Any move by the US or Australia to end Aukus would be viewed as a major win for China, which has been highly critical of the security pact since it was signed.

At a Ministry of Foreign Affairs briefing in Beijing on June 12, spokesman Lin Jian said China opposed “anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates an arms race.”

China has repeatedly petitioned the International Atomic Energy Agency to consider the Aukus pact a breach of non-proliferation treaties. China’s state-run media has also repeatedly accused Australia of trying to become a nuclear threat.

The initial announcement in 2021 was greeted with some concern from Southeast Asian nations including Indonesia and Malaysia, which worried about a regional arms race. Others, including Japan and the Philippines, fellow US treaty allies, were positive about the partnership.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

A Surprise Contraction Signals Fragility Beneath Quarterly Growth

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that UK GDP fell by 0.3% in April, a sharper decline than the 0.1% contraction expected by economists. This comes after a modest 0.2% growth in March. While the three-month rolling GDP figure shows a 0.7% expansion — buoyed by services sector performance earlier in the year — the sudden monthly drop suggests that recent growth may have been front-loaded and is not firmly rooted.

ONS director Liz McKeown noted that activity in sectors like legal and real estate services slumped after a March spike in house purchases ahead of stamp duty changes. Similarly, car manufacturing, which had contributed to Q1 momentum, underperformed. These reversals underscore how temporary policy incentives or one-off factors distorted the true trajectory of economic output.

Sectoral Imbalances Complicate Recovery Outlook

While construction, retail, and R&D posted gains in April, they were insufficient to offset declines elsewhere. The imbalance highlights an ongoing lack of broad-based economic strength. For instance, the contraction in manufacturing — especially automotive production — is worrying given its multiplier effect on supply chains and employment. It also reflects persistent structural weaknesses, such as stagnant investment and weak export competitiveness.

The service sector, traditionally the UK’s economic engine, remains volatile. April's drop, driven by reduced activity in professional and property-related services, suggests consumer and business confidence is still fragile. This dynamic could persist amid ongoing cost-of-living pressures and global macroeconomic headwinds, including uncertainty from U.S. tariffs and geopolitical instability.

Government Growth Agenda Faces Early Test

In response to the data, Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged the disappointing figures but reaffirmed her commitment to “delivering growth” via the government’s Plan for Change. Her recently announced spending review outlined ambitious public investment: £29 billion annually for the NHS, a defence budget increase to 2.6% of GDP by 2027, £39 billion for affordable housing, and £15.6 billion for city-region transport upgrades.

However, these capital allocations — while promising in the long term — are unlikely to produce immediate GDP uplift. Moreover, with tax revenues constrained and debt levels elevated, the government may face pressure to introduce tax rises or borrowing to finance these initiatives, potentially dampening household spending or business investment in the short run.

Market and Policy Implications

The pound remained relatively steady after the data release, suggesting markets may be taking a wait-and-see approach. However, continued weak monthly data could trigger volatility, especially if inflation stays sticky or external shocks intensify. Policymakers at the Bank of England may also reassess the timing of future rate decisions, especially if growth and inflation begin to diverge.

The UK’s economic contraction in April serves as a cautionary reminder that recovery remains uneven and vulnerable. While headline quarterly growth remains intact, the April figures question its durability. Chancellor Reeves' growth agenda is comprehensive in scope but will need careful execution, fiscal discipline, and sustained confidence to translate into real economic momentum.

Unless private sector activity picks up and structural productivity issues are addressed, government investment alone may not be enough to anchor long-term growth — especially in the face of rising geopolitical and trade uncertainties across global markets.

Source: Yahoo Finance

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

US Tariffs Trigger Global Shockwaves, Threatening Japan’s Fragile Recovery

The resurgence of U.S. protectionist policies, especially automobile tariffs, has injected new uncertainty into global trade, with Japan expected to bear a disproportionate burden. According to former BOJ policymaker Takako Masai, these tariffs are likely to depress Japanese exports and industrial output, weakening both wage growth and consumer spending. This would delay the BOJ's already cautious normalization of interest rates.

Masai predicts that the real economic impact will manifest by 2026, as the lagged effects of trade disruption ripple through the supply chain and external demand. Notably, Japan's auto industry—an anchor of its export economy—is directly in the crosshairs of the new tariffs, magnifying the potential hit to GDP.

Monetary Policy Path Reverses as External Conditions Deteriorate

Earlier optimism over Japan achieving stable 2% inflation led BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda to begin exiting ultra-loose policy, with the first rate hike to 0.5% in January 2025. However, the current trade turbulence appears to be altering the monetary policy trajectory. While core inflation has remained above target for over three years, much of it stems from supply-side pressures like energy and commodity costs, not from robust domestic demand.

Masai emphasizes that in such an environment, further rate hikes could be premature. She advocates for low real interest rates to help bolster domestic restructuring, including diversification of exports and stimulating internal consumption. This reflects a strategic shift in Japan’s economic playbook—adapting to deglobalization trends and reducing external vulnerabilities.

Delays in BOJ Hikes Reflect Structural Trade Dependence

Market consensus already points to a delay in further BOJ action. A recent Reuters poll indicates that most analysts foresee the next rate hike not until early 2026, reinforcing Masai’s assertion that the rate hike cycle may have peaked.

The BOJ’s decision to downgrade growth projections on May 1 amid trade concerns underscores this outlook. Even though inflation exceeds 2%, the composition of that inflation matters. If it’s not driven by wage-push or demand-pull forces, the risk of stagflation rises. Hence, hiking rates in the face of weakening demand may do more harm than good.

Policy Flexibility Over Dogma

Masai’s comments also signal the BOJ’s willingness to re-expand its balance sheet if necessary—a return to quantitative easing should the economy take a sharper downturn. This reaffirms Japan’s adaptive, rather than doctrinaire, monetary approach. Under Ueda, while the goal remains to anchor inflation expectations and normalize policy, global shocks may demand pragmatic backpedaling.

Japan’s economic restructuring—long dependent on exports and a weak yen—is now challenged by trade fragmentation. Tariff uncertainty makes that dependence risky. Unless Japan accelerates domestic consumption, digital productivity, and demographic reforms, it risks prolonged stagnation under persistent external constraints.

Navigating an Era of Weaponized Trade

The intersection of global trade politics and domestic monetary policy is once again in focus. Japan, caught in the crossfire of U.S. tariff strategy, finds itself needing to balance inflation control with growth stabilization. The BOJ, aware of these vulnerabilities, appears set to maintain policy flexibility rather than push ahead with hikes that may aggravate downturn risks.

In the broader context, Japan’s experience underscores a key insight: in an era of trade weaponization, central banks must not only fight inflation but shield economies from external geopolitical tremors. Whether the BOJ will act decisively or remain in wait-and-see mode depends heavily on how aggressively U.S. trade policy continues to evolve.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

The Expanding “Silver Economy” and Its Double-Edged Nature

The aging population is rapidly redefining the structure of economies and social welfare systems. In China, the so-called “silver economy” — encompassing services and industries tailored for the elderly — reached 7 trillion yuan in 2024, about 6% of GDP. The government has responded with a 26-point development plan, focusing on senior-oriented industrial parks, smart healthcare, and retirement financial planning.

While these efforts create promising pathways for innovation and job creation (potentially 100 million jobs by 2050), analysts caution that they are only part of the solution. Rapid aging without synchronized government intervention can worsen fiscal stress and exacerbate economic slowdowns, particularly in emerging markets.

Global Echoes: Aging Stress from Africa to South Asia

Aging is no longer confined to high-income economies. In the past week, countries across Asia and Africa — including Morocco, India, and Iran — have flagged aging as a major policy concern. Morocco anticipates its over-60 population to double by 2050, with lower fertility rates creating a labor shortage and placing enormous strain on social welfare systems.

In Iran, nearly one-third of the population will be elderly in 25 years. Stark income disparities are already evident, with 62% of elderly women and 39% of elderly men living below the absolute poverty line. This is pushing the national pension and public healthcare systems to a breaking point.

India, the world’s fifth-largest economy, is racing against time. By 2050, the elderly population is projected to reach 350 million. However, only 29% currently receive pensions, and the country has a glaring shortage of geriatric healthcare capacity—with only 270 specialists serving more than 140 million older adults.

These examples reveal a common pattern: most developing nations are aging before they can fully industrialize or establish robust safety nets, making them vulnerable to productivity stagnation and deepening social inequalities.

South Korea: A Warning from a “Super-Aged” Society

Perhaps no country offers a clearer cautionary tale than South Korea, which officially entered the “super-aged” society stage in late 2024, with over 20% of the population aged above 65. Recent data show that for the first time, hospitalizations due to age-related cataracts outnumbered births—marking a demographic inflection point.

The economic effects are profound. Remote villages are becoming ghost towns. Local populations are shrinking, and the elderly face growing isolation. One resident of a now-quiet town lamented: “In a few years, even this cultural center will be empty. No children, no future.”

South Korea’s central bank has quantified the risks: a 1% increase in the old-age dependency ratio could reduce banks’ capital adequacy (BIS) ratio by 0.64 percentage points and weaken their risk-absorbing capacity (Z-score) by nearly 2 points.

Moreover, aging reduces consumption and investment in innovation. Elderly individuals tend to save more and spend less, dampening domestic demand. The Bank of Korea projects potential GDP growth could fall to as low as 0.5–1.2% by 2040—an alarmingly low level for a developed economy.

Structural Reforms as an Economic Imperative

Countries like Japan, Sweden, and South Korea have pioneered various reforms to cope with aging, including robot-assisted elderly care, workplace inclusion for older adults, and increased fertility incentives. But the consensus among experts is clear: without aggressive structural changes—including enhancing labor productivity, boosting retirement savings, and incentivizing elderly workforce participation—many emerging economies risk entering a "demographic trap."

South Korea’s government, for instance, is expanding welfare programs and childcare subsidies, but economists such as Kang Min Joo from ING caution that this will remain a formidable challenge for any future administration.

Aging as a Global Economic Reckoning

The rise of the aging population is no longer a looming concern; it is a present and intensifying economic phenomenon. From demographic shifts to pension pressures, from consumption slowdowns to productivity losses, the effects are being felt across every sector.

Without urgent, coordinated policy action, especially in developing economies, aging will not only reshape societal structures but also erode the foundation of long-term growth. The future lies in a balanced approach—embracing the economic opportunities of the silver economy while fortifying institutional resilience against its fiscal and labor market strains.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites