Britain's Economic Crisis Offers an Opportunity for New Ideas – Labour Must Be Ready

Summary:

Just as the neoliberals took advantage of the mess of the 70s, so the left can offer its own radical solutions for today's turmoil.

When Liz Truss and her chancellor drew up the policies that crashed the pound and threatened pension funds, they were working to a blueprint devised in the Hotel du Parc of Mont-Pèlerin in 1947.

Among those gathered were the economists Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman and the philosopher Karl Popper, and they were profoundly depressed. "The central values of civilisation are in danger," they declared, caused by a "decline of belief in private property and the competitive market" after the Great Depression and world wars. They fleshed out a belief that the state and collectivism were mortal threats to the individual's ability to succeed: Margaret Thatcher and her would-be torchbearer Truss would come to follow it with zeal.

The neoliberals, as they became known, used their political exile wisely, going on to found thinktanks such as the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Adam Smith Institute to lay the intellectual foundations and find funders. But what these ideologues really needed was turmoil. "Only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change," Friedman observed. "When the crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas laying around."

In a foreshadowing of today, the surging inflation of the 1970s – back then, spurred on by a massive oil shock – offered that opportunity. As unions went on strike to defend falling real wages, Thatcher cleverly wove a story of individual effort stifled by the state. "We believe that everyone has the right to be unequal," she declared, arguing that while ordinary workers were crucial to society, there were "others with special gifts who should also have their chance". That meant slashing taxes for the rich, flogging off state assets and hobbling trade unions in the name of liberty.

In the eyes of Truss, Thatcher's prescriptions freed Britain from the corset of socialism and ushered in a new age of prosperity – and so a return to her vision will end the same way. The problem is, it was all a myth. Despite the lifeline offered by the discovery of North Sea oil, economic growth in the 1980s was no greater than the crisis-ridden 1970s, just less equitably distributed.

One rare defender of our current prime minister – from the Institute of Economic Affairs, obviously – beseeched her to stay the course, arguing that early Thatcherism was savaged just as Trussonomics is now, but that it paved the way for the growth of the following decade. A nonsense: the average annual economic expansion in the 90s was the lowest of any postwar decade up to that point, and the next two decades were weaker still. The best performing decade was the 1960s – the heyday of statism. The legacy of Thatcherism was an economy too dependent on the City of London, with communities stripped of secure work, creaking infrastructure and public services, and an explosion of inequality.

When the chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, talks of Britain's "cycle of stagnation", and Truss damns the "business-as-usual economic management" that has delivered low growth for decades, both are right. But it is the ideas of the Mont Pelerin Society to blame. Slashing corporation tax will punch a £18.7bn-size hole in the nation's revenues, but trickle-down theory says it will pay for itself with investment. But as the former chancellor Rishi Sunak has said, "that low corporation tax rate we had has done absolutely zilch for investment in our economy, it has not increased, it is still one of the lowest in the developed world: it accounts for over half our productivity difference."

Just as the winter of discontent became a salutary fable about the dangers of collectivism, "that time the Tories crashed the economy by slashing taxes on the rich" should become an eternal warning hung around the neck of rightwing dogmas. Any attempt to repeat this failed experiment should conjure up images of economic ruin.

Here's an opportunity for Labour. Unlike Thatcher, Truss has no electoral mandate, limited support from MPs, no North Sea oil or Falklands war, and the communication skills of an unprepared supply teacher. But Friedman was right – in a crisis, radical change depends on the ideas lying around. Labour has made some good tentative steps in the right direction, from nationalisation of rail to a sovereign wealth fund to a public energy generation company. But now's the time to go further.

Instead of old-style top-down nationalisation, Labour could argue for democratic public ownership, where workers and communities own public utilities. Taxes on wealth and income could fund devastated public services, and fix inequalities that even the International Monetary Fund now recognises destabilise the economy. A new charter of rights for trade unions and higher wages could stop the wealth generated by workers being hoovered up by a tiny few, stashed away in tax havens. A Swiss dream became our nightmare – but their hubris will only truly meet its nemesis if Labour has the same courage and determination as the true believers of Mont Pelerin.

Source: The Guardain

Risk Warnings and Investment Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading with strategies. Following any strategies or investment methodologies is the potential for loss. The content on the site is being provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, or securities, or signal, or any other product is suitable for you based on your investment objectives and financial situation.

Quick Access to 7x24

Quick Access to More Editor-selected Real-time News

Full Access to Pro Video Channel

FastBull project team is dedicated to create exclusive videos

Real-Time Quotes

View more faster market quotes

More comprehensive macro data and economic indicators

Members have access to entire historical data, guests can only view the last 4 years

Member-only Database

Comprehensive forex, commodity, and equity market data

7x24

Real Time Quotes

Economic Calendar

Economic Calendar
Events
Holiday

Policy Rates

BANKS ACT (%) PREV (%) CPI (%)

English

简体中文

繁體中文

العربية

Home News Columns AI News Economic Calendar Quotes Videos Data Warehouse Analysis AI Signals Pro User Agreement Privacy Policy About Us

Risk Disclosure

The risk of loss in trading financial assets such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs or crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

No consideration to invest should be made without thoroughly conduct your own due diligence, or consult with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you, since we have not known your financial condition and investment needs. It is possible that our financial information might have latency or contains inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your transactions and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital lost.

Without getting the permission from the website, you are not allow to copy the website graphics, texts, or trade marks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belongs to its providers and exchange merchants.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Situation in Taiwan Strait

The Fed

China-U.S. Relations

FastBull Featured

FastBull

Devin Wang

Winkelmann

Recent Searches

Trending Searches

Quotes

7x24

Britain's Economic Crisis Offers an Opportunity for New Ideas – Labour Must Be Ready

Source: The Guardain

Risk Disclosure