FCA Sounding the Alarm: CFD Providers Still Failing Consumers Despite New Duty

CFDs were meant to offer investors a level playing field， but the FCA now confirms the field is tilted. Hidden costs, inconsistent charges, and ignored complaints form a pattern of structural advantage, revealing how far some firms are willing to stretch the boundaries of compliance.

The FCA found firms continuing to ignore the very metrics designed to measure fairness. Complaints and satisfaction data are often sidelined, product adjustments are minimal or nonexistent, and overnight funding charges are applied inconsistently, sometimes on hedged positions, creating invisible drains with no apparent benefit. These are not isolated oversights; they are systemic gaps in governance and culture. The very architecture of CFD distribution allows discretion over pricing and risk disclosure, leaving regulators to piece together whether the balance ever truly favors the customer.

Mark Francis, director of sell-side markets, framed the issue plainly: regulatory expectations are no longer aspirational. CFDs are inherently high-risk, and firms cannot cloak revenue extraction in complexity while claiming compliance. The Duty demands evidence, not intention. It requires that every charge, every pricing decision, and every structural feature of a product be defensible, auditable, and aligned with the purported value delivered.

This review also illuminates the tension between regulatory ambition and industry inertia. Two years of heightened standards have not been sufficient to overhaul practices deeply embedded in the sector. Oversight now enters the stage not as a gentle nudge but as a potential fulcrum for enforcement, compensation orders, or more severe measures. Firms that continue to obscure cost structures or disregard fair-value principles are operating in regulatory limbo, where every oversight can become a liability.

The FCA’s findings underscore a larger truth: the shift from compliance boxes to outcome-focused supervision is more than procedural. It is a confrontation with entrenched behaviors, a test of whether financial services can align the mechanics of profit with the principles of consumer protection. CFDs remain a domain where theoretical gains collide with practical risk, and the Duty now casts a spotlight over every transaction, forcing the industry to reconcile profit models with ethical obligation.

BrokersView reminds you

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is the UK's financial regulator, responsible for overseeing financial markets, ensuring consumer protection, and maintaining fair competition within the industry.

Click to find more brokers regulated by the FCA.